It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2025 5:01 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Are you saying no number exists that would allow a majority of the working poor to be able to provide themselves with shelter, food, and clothing?

Pretty much. What is that number?
$15.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Are you saying no number exists that would allow a majority of the working poor to be able to provide themselves with shelter, food, and clothing?

Pretty much. What is that number?
$15.

OK. You might be right. I honestly don't know. I don't believe that is a viable number in the poorer parts of our country. There are not enough businesses in very small towns who can afford to pay that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
OK. You might be right. I honestly don't know. I don't believe that is a viable number in the poorer parts of our country. There are not enough businesses in very small towns who can afford to pay that.
Well, I obviously don't know the exact number but it would be a lot better than what we have now and much more in line with what it should be based on past levels.

As I've said before though, do we really care about jobs that are so low paying that they can't afford to pay more than $7.25 an hour?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
OK. You might be right. I honestly don't know. I don't believe that is a viable number in the poorer parts of our country. There are not enough businesses in very small towns who can afford to pay that.
Well, I obviously don't know the exact number but it would be a lot better than what we have now and much more in line with what it should be based on past levels.

As I've said before though, do we really care about jobs that are so low paying that they can't afford to pay more than $7.25 an hour?

Seems to me that is just $7.25 an hour(x however many people make it) that you are now going to task the government with paying, in order to take care of folks who are unable to find work.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Seems to me that is just $7.25 an hour(x however many people make it) that you are now going to task the government with paying, in order to take care of folks who are unable to find work.
That's ok though.

I mean, my other solution is to have there be no minimum wage, but make it so any company with more than 300 employees can't have a single employee on government assistance, but my guess is that people wouldn't like that because Wal-Mart would have to charge a lot more.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Seems to me that is just $7.25 an hour(x however many people make it) that you are now going to task the government with paying, in order to take care of folks who are unable to find work.
That's ok though.

I mean, my other solution is to have there be no minimum wage, but make it so any company with more than 300 employees can't have a single employee on government assistance, but my guess is that people wouldn't like that because Wal-Mart would have to charge a lot more.

Your alternative suggestion seems to make more sense from a practical application standpoint. Nobody is going to feel bad for McDonalds or Walmart if they have to adjust their business plan to meet the minimum wage. People will rightfully be irked if that same law puts mom and pop stores in small towns out of business.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Your alternative suggestion seems to make more sense from a practical application standpoint. Nobody is going to feel bad for McDonalds or Walmart if they have to adjust their business plan to meet the minimum wage. People will rightfully be irked if that same law puts mom and pop stores in small towns out of business.
People don't really care. There is a reason Wal-Mart is so massive.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Your alternative suggestion seems to make more sense from a practical application standpoint. Nobody is going to feel bad for McDonalds or Walmart if they have to adjust their business plan to meet the minimum wage. People will rightfully be irked if that same law puts mom and pop stores in small towns out of business.
People don't really care. There is a reason Wal-Mart is so massive.

If Walmart comes into town and puts a small business owner out of business, it would most likely be because Walmart is selling similar products at a lower price. It would be easier to appease people in that situation. If a dramatically increased minimum wage put that small business owner out of business, there would not necessarily be a different business in line to take it's place. That seems like a significant difference.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

What is your particular skill that can't be replicated?


I have many long term relationships with key strategic customers and distributors who are loyal to me and our relationship, and my boss and colleagues recognize this and value me for it.


You are describing cronies, not skills.



That's not a fair thing to say.

There are still businesses that relationships mean something to. You undercut your argument about corporate welfare when you refuse to acknowledge the skills of others in a smaller setting.


:lol: Don't take it personally, Seacrest. I suspect that you, Scorehead, and I all have the same basic "skill" which isn't really much of a skill at all, but rather just an ability to connect with people and a list of contacts that we have built over time. I suppose that has value, but it depends on the people. If we're talking big picture, skills, ability, merit, I don't think having a lot of friends is something that should put a man in the upper tier of a "fair" society.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
If Walmart comes into town and puts a small business owner out of business, it would most likely be because Walmart is selling similar products at a lower price. It would be easier to appease people in that situation. If a dramatically increased minimum wage put that small business owner out of business, there would not necessarily be a different business in line to take it's place. That seems like a significant difference.
Someone will find a way to provide needed goods and services.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Just means you have what they refer to as social capital. It's a good thing to have but it doesn't make a person extraordinary.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38787
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

What is your particular skill that can't be replicated?


I have many long term relationships with key strategic customers and distributors who are loyal to me and our relationship, and my boss and colleagues recognize this and value me for it.


You are describing cronies, not skills.



That's not a fair thing to say.

There are still businesses that relationships mean something to. You undercut your argument about corporate welfare when you refuse to acknowledge the skills of others in a smaller setting.


Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
:lol: Don't take it personally, Seacrest. I suspect that you, Scorehead, and I all have the same basic "skill" which isn't really much of a skill at all, but rather just an ability to connect with people and a list of contacts that we have built over time. I suppose that has value, but it depends on the people. If we're talking big picture, skills, ability, merit, I don't think having a lot of friends is something that should put a man in the upper tier of a "fair" society.




Why would I take a shot you directed at Scorehead personally?

Connecting with people is a skill. And should be recognized more often as such.

And a list of contacts built up over time is also something of great merit. And often times something that most people don't want to invest their time doing. My guess is, that Scorehead has reaped the rewards of having done so in his industry while many other bailed earlier for "greener" pastures so to speak.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38787
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Just means you have what they refer to as social capital. It's a good thing to have but it doesn't make a person extraordinary.



It can, and often does, make a person wealthier.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Seacrest wrote:
Why would I take a shot you directed at Scorehead personally?

Connecting with people is a skill. And should be recognized more often as such.

And a list of contacts built up over time is also something of great merit. And often times something that most people don't want to invest their time doing. My guess is, that Scorehead has reaped the rewards of having done so in his industry while many other bailed earlier for "greener" pastures so to speak.


Well, I know you're a middleman. You've got a catalogue and a Cadillac. Seriously though, it's not a skill. It's a club and it's one that's much easier to belong to if you're a white male. I'm not saying Scorehead (or you or anyone) shouldn't trade on that, but we should be able to recognize it and call it what it is. As long time guy said, it's "social capital". And our social capital is dwarfed by real power players, guys that attend Andover and Exeter, then Harvard and Yale, and then go on to run the country.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38787
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Why would I take a shot you directed at Scorehead personally?

Connecting with people is a skill. And should be recognized more often as such.

And a list of contacts built up over time is also something of great merit. And often times something that most people don't want to invest their time doing. My guess is, that Scorehead has reaped the rewards of having done so in his industry while many other bailed earlier for "greener" pastures so to speak.


Well, I know you're a middleman. You've got a catalogue and a Cadillac. Seriously though, it's not a skill. It's a club and it's one that's much easier to belong to if you're a white male. I'm not saying Scorehead (or you or anyone) shouldn't trade on that, but we should be able to recognize it and call it what it is. As long time guy said, it's "social capital". And our social capital is dwarfed by real power players, guys that attend Andover and Exeter, then Harvard and Yale, and then go on to run the country.


Your entire premise about me is wrong. And from what I know, the same can be said about your feelings on Scorehead.

My business is not based at all on a catalogue. I have one client in IL. The rest are all over the country. My knowledge culled over years in the same industry is how I can be a middleman and get paid for it. I started at the very bottom and worked hard to get where I am at.

And social capital has nothing to do with my business either.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:15 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Why would I take a shot you directed at Scorehead personally?

Connecting with people is a skill. And should be recognized more often as such.

And a list of contacts built up over time is also something of great merit. And often times something that most people don't want to invest their time doing. My guess is, that Scorehead has reaped the rewards of having done so in his industry while many other bailed earlier for "greener" pastures so to speak.


Well, I know you're a middleman. You've got a catalogue and a Cadillac. Seriously though, it's not a skill. It's a club and it's one that's much easier to belong to if you're a white male. I'm not saying Scorehead (or you or anyone) shouldn't trade on that, but we should be able to recognize it and call it what it is. As long time guy said, it's "social capital". And our social capital is dwarfed by real power players, guys that attend Andover and Exeter, then Harvard and Yale, and then go on to run the country.


Your entire premise about me is wrong. And from what I know, the same can be said about your feelings on Scorehead.

My business is not based at all on a catalogue. I have one client in IL. The rest are all over the country. My knowledge culled over years in the same industry is how I can be a middleman and get paid for it. I started at the very bottom and worked hard to get where I am at.

And social capital has nothing to do with my business either.


First, I didn't really think you had a catalogue. Second, have you been following this conversation at all? It's not about how "hard" anyone works. The guy standing in front of a fryer at McDonald's works hard. It's about how we value what jobs are worth. Also, are you saying that we could have spmack or IMU or whoever make whatever calls you make with the same products and pricing and do the same business as you do? If the answer is no, then of course you're trading on social capital.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Why would I take a shot you directed at Scorehead personally?

Connecting with people is a skill. And should be recognized more often as such.

And a list of contacts built up over time is also something of great merit. And often times something that most people don't want to invest their time doing. My guess is, that Scorehead has reaped the rewards of having done so in his industry while many other bailed earlier for "greener" pastures so to speak.


Well, I know you're a middleman. You've got a catalogue and a Cadillac. Seriously though, it's not a skill. It's a club and it's one that's much easier to belong to if you're a white male. I'm not saying Scorehead (or you or anyone) shouldn't trade on that, but we should be able to recognize it and call it what it is. As long time guy said, it's "social capital". And our social capital is dwarfed by real power players, guys that attend Andover and Exeter, then Harvard and Yale, and then go on to run the country.


Your entire premise about me is wrong. And from what I know, the same can be said about your feelings on Scorehead.

My business is not based at all on a catalogue. I have one client in IL. The rest are all over the country. My knowledge culled over years in the same industry is how I can be a middleman and get paid for it. I started at the very bottom and worked hard to get where I am at.

And social capital has nothing to do with my business either.



What you initially described is defined as social capital. I'm not knocking it, just trying to clarify it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38787
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Why would I take a shot you directed at Scorehead personally?

Connecting with people is a skill. And should be recognized more often as such.

And a list of contacts built up over time is also something of great merit. And often times something that most people don't want to invest their time doing. My guess is, that Scorehead has reaped the rewards of having done so in his industry while many other bailed earlier for "greener" pastures so to speak.


Well, I know you're a middleman. You've got a catalogue and a Cadillac. Seriously though, it's not a skill. It's a club and it's one that's much easier to belong to if you're a white male. I'm not saying Scorehead (or you or anyone) shouldn't trade on that, but we should be able to recognize it and call it what it is. As long time guy said, it's "social capital". And our social capital is dwarfed by real power players, guys that attend Andover and Exeter, then Harvard and Yale, and then go on to run the country.


Your entire premise about me is wrong. And from what I know, the same can be said about your feelings on Scorehead.

My business is not based at all on a catalogue. I have one client in IL. The rest are all over the country. My knowledge culled over years in the same industry is how I can be a middleman and get paid for it. I started at the very bottom and worked hard to get where I am at.

And social capital has nothing to do with my business either.


First, I didn't really think you had a catalogue. Second, have you been following this conversation at all? It's not about how "hard" anyone works. The guy standing in front of a fryer at McDonald's works hard. It's about how we value what jobs are worth. Also, are you saying that we could have spmack or IMU or whoever make whatever calls you make with the same products and pricing and do the same business as you do? If the answer is no, then of course you're trading on social capital.



Camps could certainly do what I am doing today. It wouldn't take long to learn it, but it would take time for him, or anyone else to feel confident doing it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38787
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Why would I take a shot you directed at Scorehead personally?

Connecting with people is a skill. And should be recognized more often as such.

And a list of contacts built up over time is also something of great merit. And often times something that most people don't want to invest their time doing. My guess is, that Scorehead has reaped the rewards of having done so in his industry while many other bailed earlier for "greener" pastures so to speak.


Well, I know you're a middleman. You've got a catalogue and a Cadillac. Seriously though, it's not a skill. It's a club and it's one that's much easier to belong to if you're a white male. I'm not saying Scorehead (or you or anyone) shouldn't trade on that, but we should be able to recognize it and call it what it is. As long time guy said, it's "social capital". And our social capital is dwarfed by real power players, guys that attend Andover and Exeter, then Harvard and Yale, and then go on to run the country.


Your entire premise about me is wrong. And from what I know, the same can be said about your feelings on Scorehead.

My business is not based at all on a catalogue. I have one client in IL. The rest are all over the country. My knowledge culled over years in the same industry is how I can be a middleman and get paid for it. I started at the very bottom and worked hard to get where I am at.

And social capital has nothing to do with my business either.



First, I didn't really think you had a catalogue. Second, have you been following this conversation at all? It's not about how "hard" anyone works. The guy standing in front of a fryer at McDonald's works hard. It's about how we value what jobs are worth. Also, are you saying that we could have spmack or IMU or whoever make whatever calls you make with the same products and pricing and do the same business as you do? If the answer is no, then of course you're trading on social capital.


And i don't think that anyone here values my industry very much either. :lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Glad it's been pointed out most of the article was hyperbole, but one big scam in this country is disability income. Billions are being wasted on people who frankly need to get their asses out there and work. As to state health care programs, I know for a fact that people are out there working cash jobs and then getting medical procedures for free, costing taxpayers millions.

During the depression, people would get "relief". Nowadays, in a percentage of cases, frankly it's nothing more than a handout. Yes some (probably a majority) of people need and deserve them, but many are just abusing the hell out of the system and are to lazy to work and expect the government to pay for their booze and cigarettes.

The only way anything will change is to implement term limits so people will go into government for a finite period of time to make a difference, not just to focus on re-election and special interests.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38787
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
What you initially described is defined as social capital. I'm not knocking it, just trying to clarify it.



My social capital comes from a large family and having attended good schools growing up.

Neither one of these things are currently at play with what I am doing. As a matter of fact, they have altered where and how I do business.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group