What was it that you said Mulli? That it was madness to go on the street and get a QB and not play Clausen. How did that work out for you??

SHUTOUT

Just because you have a radio show and a column doesn't mean you know anything about football.

Cowboys didnt even suit up Cassell today and that guy has been around since 1963, so if that guys isnt picking up an offense in a week, who is?

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”

Jesus, not this again.

_________________

Cassell didn't have to be ready, because Weedon is not Clausen. How many points did the Cowboys and Weedon put up?

Tebow with five plays could have done better than Clausen today.

Even if true (it's not), they still lose bad. That's the point. Unless you think God might have stepped in.

_________________

Wrong. Had we had another guy, we could have upset Seattle today. They were ripe for the taking.

Clausen couldn't make a play today to save his life--63 yards passing. It wasn't until 10:00 in the 2nd quarter that we even passed mid-field.

Had we scored 28 points today like Dallas did with Weedon, we would have won today. Instead, we got the worst production of any offense in whole league. It's a misnomer to call it production at all, with every drive ending in a punt.

And I had to listen to the announcers talk about how Clausen was the most highly recruited QB coming out of high school, as if he lived up to that recognition today.

The Bears have a duty to the fans to try to win every game. That didn't happen on offense in this game, because the GM and coach were too much cowards in refusing to bring in a guy that could help the team.

Well, Mulli agrees with me that the Bears didn't try, but his answer is shoot the coach.

Maybe, but you still had a guy who couldn't throw. It was a mistake to start him to begin with or even have him on your team.