It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2053 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 ... 69  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
shakes wrote:
Julie at it again.....

JulieDiCaro@JulieDiCaro 7 minutes ago
Accuser tried to leave Kane's house many times prior to rape, but was unable to do since Kane's house is enchanted and the rooms are constantly rearranging themselves so that all doors just lead to more doors.


What does that even mean? Too much ecstasy?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
pittmike wrote:
shakes wrote:
Julie at it again.....

JulieDiCaro@JulieDiCaro 7 minutes ago
Accuser tried to leave Kane's house many times prior to rape, but was unable to do since Kane's house is enchanted and the rooms are constantly rearranging themselves so that all doors just lead to more doors.


What does that even mean?

You think that tweet is fiction too?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:52 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
spanky wrote:
Score is doomed wrote:
More made up bullshit b the stupid c**t. Haven't heard her rip on DRose for the gang rape suit.

You think that tweet was made up? Really?

LOL got me there.
Unfortunately, it does sound like the crap she puts out. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:56 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
pittmike wrote:
shakes wrote:
Julie at it again.....

JulieDiCaro@JulieDiCaro 7 minutes ago
Accuser tried to leave Kane's house many times prior to rape, but was unable to do since Kane's house is enchanted and the rooms are constantly rearranging themselves so that all doors just lead to more doors.


What does that even mean? Too much ecstasy?



I think you've had too much ecstasy :drunken:

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Maybe she was raped at the Winchester House.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65768
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Maybe she was raped at the Winchester House.

Is that part of the admission price?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:13 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Da Region
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Score is doomed wrote:
More made up bullshit b the stupid c**t. Haven't heard her rip on DRose for the gang rape suit.

Bernstein hasn't given them permission to rip Rose yet. He loves his basketball too much to do that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
Image


She seems to be one of those Instagram "models" who develop followers by posting pics of themselves in various states of undress. Now, before anyone classifies my observation as victim blaming, I want to point out that she is no longer a victim, but rather a perpetrator. Victims don't fake evidence.

And just as we judge Kane based his loutish frat boy behavior and it's completely fair to do so, I also believe it's fair to make judgments about modern Instagram "models".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Now, before anyone classifies my observation as victim blaming, I want to point out that she is no longer a victim, but rather a perpetrator. Victims don't fake evidence.
I don't know if this changes your beliefs but I believe it is her mom that is the one who faked the evidence according to what the DA said.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Now, before anyone classifies my observation as victim blaming, I want to point out that she is no longer a victim, but rather a perpetrator. Victims don't fake evidence.
I don't know if this changes your beliefs but I believe it is her mom that is the one who faked the evidence according to what the DA said.


Okay. If Kane's mom had faked evidence I would consider it the same as Kane doing so. Her mother doing it is no different. She faked evidence on her daughter's behalf. I find it preposterous to believe that it occurred without the daughter's knowledge unless the mother is behind the entire accusation from the beginning, which makes the daughter a perpetrator anyway. The accuser is no longer credible. Why is there a need to fake evidence if you're telling the truth?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I believe there are two people on the internet that have that same name. First name spelled with a "y" is a swimsuit model in Hawaii.

The other spelled with an "i" is a student in NY.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Now, before anyone classifies my observation as victim blaming, I want to point out that she is no longer a victim, but rather a perpetrator. Victims don't fake evidence.
I don't know if this changes your beliefs but I believe it is her mom that is the one who faked the evidence according to what the DA said.


Okay. If Kane's mom had faked evidence I would consider it the same as Kane doing so. Her mother doing it is no different. She faked evidence on her daughter's behalf. I find it preposterous to believe that it occurred without the daughter's knowledge unless the mother is behind the entire accusation from the beginning, which makes the daughter a perpetrator anyway. The accuser is no longer credible. Why is there a need to fake evidence if you're telling the truth?
I agree that the whole case is done because of it. I just tend to believe this was an irrational mother trying to help her daughter in the most illogical way possible. Didn't the lawyer who quit basically say "Mom is a liar?".

If I'm the accuser, and I believe I have truth on my side, I'm not letting something like this happen which had a 0% chance of success.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
That's about as ridiculous as believing if Kane's shady cop driver were caught tampering with evidence ( like a lot of people believed before last week anyway) 2 days after DNA tests were leaked implicating Kane that he was just acting on his own and not ordered by Kane to do it or that Kane had no knowledge he was doing so. Had that happened everyone one of these Kane is guilty no matter what crowd would have been screaming SEE, HE'S GUILTY!!!!!

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
badrogue17 wrote:
That's about as ridiculous as believing if Kane's shady cop driver were caught tampering with evidence ( like a lot of people believed before last week anyway) 2 days after DNA tests were leaked implicating Kane that he was just acting on his own and not ordered by Kane to do it or that Kane had no knowledge he was doing so. Had that happened everyone one of these Kane is guilty no matter what crowd would have been screaming SEE, HE'S GUILTY!!!!!
Huh?

Kane isn't even going to get charged because of this. Keep on fighting the good fight though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
That's about as ridiculous as believing if Kane's shady cop driver were caught tampering with evidence ( like a lot of people believed before last week anyway) 2 days after DNA tests were leaked implicating Kane that he was just acting on his own and not ordered by Kane to do it or that Kane had no knowledge he was doing so. Had that happened everyone one of these Kane is guilty no matter what crowd would have been screaming SEE, HE'S GUILTY!!!!!
Huh?

Kane isn't even going to get charged because of this. Keep on fighting the good fight though.


What he's saying is that you can imagine what DiCaro, Graham, et al would be saying if someone from Kane's camp had faked evidence. But it's the other way and they're doing everything they can to downplay it.

The accuser has no credibility, but people like DiCaro and Graham are dug in so deep they just can't back off. They remind me of when a prosecutor gets a conviction and then DNA evidence discredits that conviction and then the guy actually confesses. Instead of releasing the innocent guy from jail, the prosecutor says, "They must have been in it together!"

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
What he's saying is that you can imagine what DiCaro, Graham, et al would be saying if someone from Kane's camp had faked evidence. But it's the other way and they're doing everything they can to downplay it.
I don't think that is what he said. He called my thoughts ridiculous.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
What he's saying is that you can imagine what DiCaro, Graham, et al would be saying if someone from Kane's camp had faked evidence. But it's the other way and they're doing everything they can to downplay it.
I don't think that is what he said. He called my thoughts ridiculous.

Believing mom acted independently without daughters knowledge is ridiculous .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
badrogue17 wrote:
Believing mom acted independently without daughters knowledge is ridiculous .
Ok then. I disagree, and so does the lawyer who quit on them.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:49 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Believing mom acted independently without daughters knowledge is ridiculous .
Ok then. I disagree, and so does the lawyer who quit on them.


Well, I'm not so sure about the lawyer. Who did he represent, the mother or the daughter? You say he quit on "them". You see why this is so problematic for their side. My guess would be that if you got the lawyer alone and off the record, he'd say something like, "These fucking people are crazy."

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, I'm not so sure about the lawyer. Who did he represent, the mother or the daughter? You say he quit on "them". You see why this is so problematic for their side. My guess would be that if you got the lawyer alone and off the record, he'd say something like, "These fucking people are crazy."
The lawyer represented the accuser and he specifically blamed the mother as did the DA the next day. From what I understand, the mother was supposedly in possession of the bag the whole time. I think she just had a breakdown while the case was slowly slipping away and did something really stupid. If badrogue wants to think that this was a grand conspiracy by the whole family then he has that right.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol: Last week that lawyer believed he had a rape kit he went thru great lengths to verify . Not sure if he's the best judge of character for that family

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:00 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, I'm not so sure about the lawyer. Who did he represent, the mother or the daughter? You say he quit on "them". You see why this is so problematic for their side. My guess would be that if you got the lawyer alone and off the record, he'd say something like, "These fucking people are crazy."
The lawyer represented the accuser and he specifically blamed the mother as did the DA the next day. From what I understand, the mother was supposedly in possession of the bag the whole time. I think she just had a breakdown while the case was slowly slipping away and did something really stupid. If badrogue wants to think that this was a grand conspiracy by the whole family then he has that right.


I don't think it was a "grand conspiracy", but I tend to believe the daughter knew what the mother (or whoever) was doing. Frankly, I'm not sure the accuser remembers what happened on the night in question. When the facts about the DNA evidence leaked, I think she knew her case was getting shaky.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Spaulding wrote:
So much wrong in this case and so much wrong with twitter. Everybody looks like an asshole.


The asshole category has risen with on air people who love to claim they are fair and dont care what you say.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't think it was a "grand conspiracy", but I tend to believe the daughter knew what the mother (or whoever) was doing. Frankly, I'm not sure the accuser remembers what happened on the night in question. When the facts about the DNA evidence leaked, I think she knew her case was getting shaky.
Yeah, but you at least seem to acknowledge that it may have just been an irrational mother doing something irrational and destroying the whole case.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, I'm not so sure about the lawyer. Who did he represent, the mother or the daughter? You say he quit on "them". You see why this is so problematic for their side. My guess would be that if you got the lawyer alone and off the record, he'd say something like, "These fucking people are crazy."
The lawyer represented the accuser and he specifically blamed the mother as did the DA the next day. From what I understand, the mother was supposedly in possession of the bag the whole time. I think she just had a breakdown while the case was slowly slipping away and did something really stupid. If badrogue wants to think that this was a grand conspiracy by the whole family then he has that right.


I don't think it was a "grand conspiracy", but I tend to believe the daughter knew what the mother (or whoever) was doing. Frankly, I'm not sure the accuser remembers what happened on the night in question. When the facts about the DNA evidence leaked, I think she knew her case was getting shaky.


Of course, we never know the relationship between the mother and daughter, but I cant imagine the mother and daughter not talking about every turn of this event.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
bigfan wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
So much wrong in this case and so much wrong with twitter. Everybody looks like an asshole.


The asshole category has risen with on air people who love to claim they are fair and dont care what you say.


One thing I'm sure about, Tim Graham and Julie DiCaro have both been far from fair and unbiased in covering this from the beginning.

I think Graham has a hard on for Kane because Kane is a well known douchebag in the Buffalo area. And I think DiCaro has a modern feminist view of male/female relations and simply believes that a woman accusing a man should be believed unless and until video surfaces that calls her story into question, and maybe she should still be believed even then.

On a somewhat related note, I just read an article in the Reader about "rape culture" at the University of Chicago. There were a bunch of stories in the article detailing "rapes" that I think a lot of reasonable people of both genders wouldn't classify as rapes. In one of the stories, a woman googled rape to find out if she had indeed been raped. I would just say this: If you have to use to Google to figure out if you've been raped, you haven't been.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
badrogue17 wrote:
:lol: Last week that lawyer believed he had a rape kit he went thru great lengths to verify . Not sure if he's the best judge of character for that family


In the lawyers defense, the mom and the accuser were in the room when the rape kit came out and was collected. If one of those people positively identify something don't you give them the benefit of the doubt. I would assume the nurse/doctor would explain what is in the rape kit to her and what they are collecting. I think the daughter should have had a pretty good idea what the rape kit was at this point.

Where was the accuser in this from the point the mom gave the kit to the lawyer and him going public with it. Wouldn't you think they let her have a look at it to confirm that's what it was? Or are they saying she was totally in the dark on this and the mother and lawyer were going public with this.

Its bullshit, she knew that wasn't police evidence when he presented. And that is why her lawyer pulled out (much like kane did)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
TurdFerguson wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
:lol: Last week that lawyer believed he had a rape kit he went thru great lengths to verify . Not sure if he's the best judge of character for that family


In the lawyers defense, the mom and the accuser were in the room when the rape kit came out and was collected. If one of those people positively identify something don't you give them the benefit of the doubt. I would assume the nurse/doctor would explain what is in the rape kit to her and what they are collecting. I think the daughter should have had a pretty good idea what the rape kit was at this point.

Where was the accuser in this from the point the mom gave the kit to the lawyer and him going public with it. Wouldn't you think they let her have a look at it to confirm that's what it was? Or are they saying she was totally in the dark on this and the mother and lawyer were going public with this.

Its bullshit, she knew that wasn't police evidence when he presented. And that is why her lawyer pulled out (much like kane did)
It was actually a rape kit bag for the rape kit, which isn't a thing that exists. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
bigfan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, I'm not so sure about the lawyer. Who did he represent, the mother or the daughter? You say he quit on "them". You see why this is so problematic for their side. My guess would be that if you got the lawyer alone and off the record, he'd say something like, "These fucking people are crazy."
The lawyer represented the accuser and he specifically blamed the mother as did the DA the next day. From what I understand, the mother was supposedly in possession of the bag the whole time. I think she just had a breakdown while the case was slowly slipping away and did something really stupid. If badrogue wants to think that this was a grand conspiracy by the whole family then he has that right.


I don't think it was a "grand conspiracy", but I tend to believe the daughter knew what the mother (or whoever) was doing. Frankly, I'm not sure the accuser remembers what happened on the night in question. When the facts about the DNA evidence leaked, I think she knew her case was getting shaky.


Of course, we never know the relationship between the mother and daughter, but I cant imagine the mother and daughter not talking about every turn of this event.


Relationship was good enough for her to be living at home still and for her to want mother in the room while getting checked out. If it was sour enough for the mom to intentionally derail, i don't think either one of those would happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
and nothing has changed...
Kane is an elite NHL player who is very bad person.
Some young lady from Buffalo is a moron who was drunk in a bar at 2:00 and foolishly went home with a man she doesn't know.
Maybe a rape happened. Maybe drunken sex happened.
At this point, I don't know and the story is now really old.

Young ladies....use your brain and don't go home with strange men.
Men....no means no.
Patrick Kane...your probably a lost cause at this point.
John McDonough....You need to hire a full-time babysitter to protect the investment you have in #88

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2053 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 ... 69  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group