It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Curious Hair wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
It's not about rewarding people at the top. It's about shaming people at the bottom.


Can we talk more about this? Even Spiegel found this gross.

What was this in reference to?


Someone made a joke about a collection plate being passed around for a third time. Dan bragged that his synagogue publishes how much its members donate for everyone to see and lists them by tier. Spiegel said that's a terrible thing to do, as if it's to reward the wealthy for being better Jews than their fellow congregants. Dan responded that it's not about rewarding people at the top, it's about shaming people at the bottom. He tied it into his work with the cancer charity and said something about how this is how you do effective fundraising.

Without getting too rabbinical, I believe that anonymous giving is considered the highest form of charity.


Pharisees gonna Pharisee.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55974
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
You can contextualize observing traditions of the Jewish people however you'd like, but I found it interesting that a guy who's always railing against the nebulous concept of "organized religion" was arguing for an instance of a religion being quite organized indeed -- organized into brackets by donation level, I guess.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
It's not about rewarding people at the top. It's about shaming people at the bottom.


Can we talk more about this? Even Spiegel found this gross.

What was this in reference to?


Someone made a joke about a collection plate being passed around for a third time. Dan bragged that his synagogue publishes how much its members donate for everyone to see and lists them by tier. Spiegel said that's a terrible thing to do, as if it's to reward the wealthy for being better Jews than their fellow congregants. Dan responded that it's not about rewarding people at the top, it's about shaming people at the bottom. He tied it into his work with the cancer charity and said something about how this is how you do effective fundraising.

Without getting too rabbinical, I believe that anonymous giving is considered the highest form of charity.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Dan really is in the self-parody stage of his career.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 3287
pizza_Place: Olde Silver Tavern, Manalapan, NJ [R.I.P.?]
Curious Hair wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
It's not about rewarding people at the top. It's about shaming people at the bottom.


Can we talk more about this? Even Spiegel found this gross.

What was this in reference to?


Someone made a joke about a collection plate being passed around for a third time. Dan bragged that his synagogue publishes how much its members donate for everyone to see and lists them by tier. Spiegel said that's a terrible thing to do, as if it's to reward the wealthy for being better Jews than their fellow congregants. Dan responded that it's not about rewarding people at the top, it's about shaming people at the bottom. He tied it into his work with the cancer charity and said something about how this is how you do effective fundraising.

Without getting too rabbinical, I believe that anonymous giving is considered the highest form of charity.


I've never been able to explain exactly why I find Dan's on-air shilling for One Step to be so unseemly, and here the man himself sums it up pretty well.

_________________
The Bulls haven't done anything wrong, and they're not going to do anything wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
Curious Hair wrote:
Without getting too rabbinical, I believe that anonymous giving is considered the highest form of charity.


Is rabbinical an adjective or verb or both?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
That's weird. I can't believe people like him but this is the side he takes in his social causes. It's shame and blame the shitty person, then he tries to shame his listeners into agreeing with him. He never really gives a shit about the victims, he doesn't show much compassion for them. He's an angry, weird guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
You finally have to realize that little danny is the real piece of human garbage.
Just useless, self important trash.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:35 pm
Posts: 1905
Location: Up Where We Belong
What a day, what a show!

If anybody can ruin Scotch its DB. Instead of going with his cliff notes as a Scotch drinker (note: no personal preference could he express), he should have asked Jason whether Terry should get him some Dewars or the Chivas Regal?

The man apparently likes to keep his religion tightly tucked, by denomination, in his wallet. To be pulled out whenever his "Jesus" cracks won't fly (or when Goff is in the room). Pretty cool to be a better Jew than those at the bottom of the list.

Speaking of scared, I found the exchange with caller Frank hilarious. He's right in that DB is a hypocrite, he just couldn't nail him down because Dan got argumentatively slimy and Frank could only tell him not to get that way. Whatever kind of threat Dan perceived when he needed armed secruity guards, the bottom line was that he was scared. Should it really matter where a person lives as a determinant of the degree one should be scared? I forget how he characterized the threat (he used more than one type of terminology) but the bottom line is that he was scared.

Add in the fetishization of LeBron's intelligence (because he's comically funny) and Derrick not being so smart (apparently T-shirts don't count, even though LBJ put the same one on the next day). And don't forget the call to the secret source that explained why Robin Ventura will be back the next day.

Leery came on at the end and he tore to shreds (first time ever?) what Bernstein was saying in support of Ventura. Maybe Leery scared him with some sound, cold, straight-forward logic. Bottom line: Bernstein's reasoning/explanation to keep Ventura is reason for a fan to not attend/support the team.

_________________
DRINK BƎTTƎR. @theRIPH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:12 am
Posts: 1362
pizza_Place: J.B. Alberto's
Zizou wrote:
No need to ever go outdoors when you can make up sources and use deductive reasoning to program an entire show. When Terry retires this show will become nothing but a solipsistic exercise for Dan. Or, in other words, he will truly have become Mike Francesa.


Eratosthenes determined the circumference of the earth without needing to leave the Library of Alexandria. Maybe Danny can solve the problem of gun violence without needing to leave the studio.

_________________
"Now comes good sailing. Moose. Indian."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9979
pizza_Place: world famous
Curious Hair wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
It's not about rewarding people at the top. It's about shaming people at the bottom.


Can we talk more about this? Even Spiegel found this gross.

What was this in reference to?


Someone made a joke about a collection plate being passed around for a third time. Dan bragged that his synagogue publishes how much its members donate for everyone to see and lists them by tier. Spiegel said that's a terrible thing to do, as if it's to reward the wealthy for being better Jews than their fellow congregants. Dan responded that it's not about rewarding people at the top, it's about shaming people at the bottom. He tied it into his work with the cancer charity and said something about how this is how you do effective fundraising.

Without getting too rabbinical, I believe that anonymous giving is considered the highest form of charity.


I tried to listen to this, but I don't see that today's tranny in on the podcast.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9979
pizza_Place: world famous
Danny was trying to explain why he doesn't think Mike Matheny is a good manager. He said that he is a meatball who clings to antiquated notions of unwritten baseball rules and eschews modern statistical analysis. He said that good teams can win despite having a bad manager. Nevermind that the Cardinals organization does embrace statistical analysis, and Matheny's shortcomings as an in-game manager do exist, but to call him a "bad manager" is simply wrong. Dan thinks that managers should simply push buttons based on the statistics. He completely ignores the aspect of managing egos, the clubhouse, and pulling a team together despite the enormous amount of injuries that that particular team has endured. (unless it is the current Cubs skipper, then all that stuff is REAL). Go ahead and call him a bad in-game manager...fine. But to say he is a bad manager of a team is completely wrong.

One thing I realized today is that, on top of his general douchbaggery, his sports thoughts are usually bad. Like, real bad. The asshole doesn't know shit about anything.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
There's a lot of shit the average dope doesn't understand about protocols and clubhouse standards. I just read a good article about the downfall of the Nationals and learned that if a manager gets a reliever up a second time he has to go in the game. If he doesn't it's a breach of protocol.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's a lot of shit the average dope doesn't understand about protocols and clubhouse standards. I just read a good article about the downfall of the Nationals and learned that if a manager gets a reliever up a second time he has to go in the game. If he doesn't it's a breach of protocol.


I thought you could get him up twice but not three times, ie he would be in the game or done for the night.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Franky T wrote:
Danny was trying to explain why he doesn't think Mike Matheny is a good manager. He said that he is a meatball who clings to antiquated notions of unwritten baseball rules and eschews modern statistical analysis. He said that good teams can win despite having a bad manager. Nevermind that the Cardinals organization does embrace statistical analysis, and Matheny's shortcomings as an in-game manager do exist, but to call him a "bad manager" is simply wrong. Dan thinks that managers should simply push buttons based on the statistics. He completely ignores the aspect of managing egos, the clubhouse, and pulling a team together despite the enormous amount of injuries that that particular team has endured. (unless it is the current Cubs skipper, then all that stuff is REAL). Go ahead and call him a bad in-game manager...fine. But to say he is a bad manager of a team is completely wrong.

One thing I realized today is that, on top of his general douchbaggery, his sports thoughts are usually bad. Like, real bad. The asshole doesn't know shit about anything.


Agreed, but Matheny is still likely a serial killer.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's a lot of shit the average dope doesn't understand about protocols and clubhouse standards. I just read a good article about the downfall of the Nationals and learned that if a manager gets a reliever up a second time he has to go in the game. If he doesn't it's a breach of protocol.


Wasn't the issue with Williams that he got Thornton up five times and never brought him into the game?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's a lot of shit the average dope doesn't understand about protocols and clubhouse standards. I just read a good article about the downfall of the Nationals and learned that if a manager gets a reliever up a second time he has to go in the game. If he doesn't it's a breach of protocol.


I thought you could get him up twice but not three times, ie he would be in the game or done for the night.


Well, Williams got Thornton up five times without putting him in the game and the bullpen revolted.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
what kind of fucking moron would do that? who's the pitching coach?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
what kind of fucking moron would do that? who's the pitching coach?


Steve McCatty that shitter who pitched for Oakland.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9979
pizza_Place: world famous
leashyourkids wrote:
Franky T wrote:
Danny was trying to explain why he doesn't think Mike Matheny is a good manager. He said that he is a meatball who clings to antiquated notions of unwritten baseball rules and eschews modern statistical analysis. He said that good teams can win despite having a bad manager. Nevermind that the Cardinals organization does embrace statistical analysis, and Matheny's shortcomings as an in-game manager do exist, but to call him a "bad manager" is simply wrong. Dan thinks that managers should simply push buttons based on the statistics. He completely ignores the aspect of managing egos, the clubhouse, and pulling a team together despite the enormous amount of injuries that that particular team has endured. (unless it is the current Cubs skipper, then all that stuff is REAL). Go ahead and call him a bad in-game manager...fine. But to say he is a bad manager of a team is completely wrong.

One thing I realized today is that, on top of his general douchbaggery, his sports thoughts are usually bad. Like, real bad. The asshole doesn't know shit about anything.


Agreed, but Matheny is still likely a serial killer.


And a Christian. I assume that's where Danny's dislike of him begins.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
leashyourkids wrote:
Franky T wrote:
Danny was trying to explain why he doesn't think Mike Matheny is a good manager. He said that he is a meatball who clings to antiquated notions of unwritten baseball rules and eschews modern statistical analysis. He said that good teams can win despite having a bad manager. Nevermind that the Cardinals organization does embrace statistical analysis, and Matheny's shortcomings as an in-game manager do exist, but to call him a "bad manager" is simply wrong. Dan thinks that managers should simply push buttons based on the statistics. He completely ignores the aspect of managing egos, the clubhouse, and pulling a team together despite the enormous amount of injuries that that particular team has endured. (unless it is the current Cubs skipper, then all that stuff is REAL). Go ahead and call him a bad in-game manager...fine. But to say he is a bad manager of a team is completely wrong.

One thing I realized today is that, on top of his general douchbaggery, his sports thoughts are usually bad. Like, real bad. The asshole doesn't know shit about anything.


Agreed, but Matheny is still likely a serial killer.


Stellar point Leash.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Franky T wrote:
Danny was trying to explain why he doesn't think Mike Matheny is a good manager. He said that he is a meatball who clings to antiquated notions of unwritten baseball rules and eschews modern statistical analysis. He said that good teams can win despite having a bad manager. Nevermind that the Cardinals organization does embrace statistical analysis, and Matheny's shortcomings as an in-game manager do exist, but to call him a "bad manager" is simply wrong. Dan thinks that managers should simply push buttons based on the statistics. He completely ignores the aspect of managing egos, the clubhouse, and pulling a team together despite the enormous amount of injuries that that particular team has endured. (unless it is the current Cubs skipper, then all that stuff is REAL). Go ahead and call him a bad in-game manager...fine. But to say he is a bad manager of a team is completely wrong.

One thing I realized today is that, on top of his general douchbaggery, his sports thoughts are usually bad. Like, real bad. The asshole doesn't know shit about anything.


Agreed, but Matheny is still likely a serial killer.


Stellar point Leash.


Thanks Mike!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
Only manager to make the playoffs in each of his first four seasons. Granted he has a little help from the expanded postseason pool. But yeah, what a terrible manager. Best record in baseball with their ace gone for 97% of the season, not to mention their LF, 1B, and C missing significant time. Can't wait for him to be fired! Guess he should bring a god damn magician or zoo animals into the clubhouse to be a Really Smart Manager. I bet Matheny isn't even in the top 5% of donators at his church either.

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 5:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:22 pm
Posts: 593
pizza_Place: Phil's
redskingreg wrote:
Only manager to make the playoffs in each of his first four seasons. Granted he has a little help from the expanded postseason pool. But yeah, what a terrible manager. Best record in baseball with their ace gone for 97% of the season, not to mention their LF, 1B, and C missing significant time. Can't wait for him to be fired! Guess he should bring a god damn magician or zoo animals into the clubhouse to be a Really Smart Manager. I bet Matheny isn't even in the top 5% of donators at his church either.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 9:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
MelMarkon wrote:
...And the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard on the radio is.... Dan asking a caller "who is going to break into your house" during a back and forth about protecting your family with a firearm.

Too bad the caller was an idiot because Dan is completely clueless.


these women are glad they had a gun


http://www.news4jax.com/sports/gbi-inve ... a/35568592


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:27 pm
Posts: 79
Location: St. Bede's
pizza_Place: Roseangelas
Quote:
these women are glad they had a gun


OK! That's one . . .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:12 pm
Posts: 9
pizza_Place: Arenellos
MMA guy from Menomonee Falls Wi had a burgler invade his home recently. It might not be a cornfield but its pretty close.

I stick by my opinion that "Who? is going to break into YOUR house?" as completely ridiculous point/argument when it comes to the gun debate.

BTW, I hate guns, don't own one, and never shot one. I am, however, in favor qualified US citizens owning guns and in favor of reasonable gun laws. Back round checks and waiting periods....etc


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group