rogers park bryan wrote:
You ended up being right. I stand behind the thought though. For every Mets, 90's Braves and 00s A's there are 10 young gun rotations that dont work out for one reason or another.
The Mets might be the 90's braves (probably not nearly as long)
welp right now it sure looks like i'm right, but this series isnt over and i've seen some ppl on here say if the cubs can win the hammel game tonight that the pressure is all on the mets.... and if the cubs get crazy hot and start whacking out timely 2-3R HRs they can beat the mets 4 in a row, as they did it at least once en route to 7-0.... and while the mets are having way more of that "team of destiny" stuff right now its not like they've got the 27 yankees offense alongside their pitching.
i cant even say that the cubs should have drafted a SP with their high draft picks cuz how can you hate on bryant and schwarber big picture? schwarber has "the clutch gene" or whatever (it didnt take him 21 games to hit a HR, and he only had his rizzoesque ~.149/1/9 in 150 ABs after he was like .350/10/30 or something) and bryant, despite his shortcomings/youth/inexperience being paramount this series, still looks like he's gonna be the main bat in the middle of the lineup for a decade.
but at the same time, the cubs were collecting position players almost exclusively and just kind of assumed they could do a patchwork pitching staff to supplant that until they bought spahn and sain and HAARP time to create some rain, and maybe for the short term that wasnt the best thing to do.... but right now the cubs have to assemble a pitching staff cuz as the ol adage goes "you're only as strong as your weakest", and even at 0-3 in a 7 game series yeah you can say it doesnt matter, but having to go with a god-awful hammel when your playoff lives are on the the line = "the plan" needs to hit on some top top pitching..... and since they're not going to tank to a top-5 pick, they gotta take some first/sandwich/2nd round pitchers and they gotta hit. theres plenty of top big league pitchers drafted 15-30 overall, and now the cubs gotta do a mad dash to get "THE PLAN: PITCHING EDITION" set in a year or two cuz as others on here have said, it's folly to assume you're penciled into the NLCS for the next 5-10yrs by default, so you cant just assume that you have 3-4 years to build up pitching while maybe you get lucky and duck the mets for a year or two and slug your way to a title.
if the situation was reversed the mets would be relying on steven matz to save their ass tonight, and i think he's up there in that harvey/degrom/syndergaard tier its just that he had injury problems once he made his MLB debut this year.... but check his stats this year and check his minor league stats too.... that 5IP 3ER game 4 against the dodgers was his worst game in the big league level. this is a guy who i think would be at least a #2 starter in any other playff rotation other than cubs/mets.... and the cubs need to get to a point where when they're in the playoffs they never end up with jason hammel having to save their ass. thats where they need to upgrade, even if it's 0-7 in the postseason david price with people going all hawk saying "he's due"
TLDR = the cubs have the harder part of THE PLAN here, unless pitching was never part of THE PLAN and just kind of assumed to be something they could piecemeal together cuz i think lester was the only homegrown SP on the 04/07 red sox, right?
_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?