It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:02 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 197 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38701
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's not the DA's job to promote a social agenda. I think it's pretty clear she is a liar. And her (family) planting evidence should show you to what degree. In spite of all of that, Kane is never going to get his reputation back.
You want the district attorney, who is in charge of trying crimes on behalf of accusers, to be virtually calling an accuser a liar in the biggest case that he probably will ever be part of?

Imagine there is a rape tomorrow in Buffalo, and the person who is in charge of getting justice for your family member is the guy that shamed this girl for no useful reason. How confident are you that you won't get the same fate if not all of the dna evidence comes out in your favor?


The DA is there to get a conviction. If there was the slightest possibility that he could have gotten one against Patrick Kane, he would have. That's the kind of high profile shit these guys live for. As it is, he's telling you all of the evidence is so flimsy he was disgusted with the accuser. There are witnesses- plural- contradicting her story. Some of them may be her own friends. That's in addition to the non-existent DNA, the non-existent evidence of penetration, the bed evidence, and on and on and on. You're acting as if she's still the injured party. If anything, people should be angry with her for making it more difficult for other women to make a legitimate rape accusation, not Kane or the DA.

Bingo.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So if someone still thinks Kane is a rapist you think that would be fair?


That's not what I said. I said that if there was enough evidence for the DA to believe that Kane was a rapist but not enough to charge him or some problem with charging him and the DA made a statement suggesting such, I think that would be fair.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The correct answer here is that there is not enough evidence to believe that Kane is a rapist but also not enough to know if she was lying.


I believe you are mistaken about that and I think that's precisely why the DA worded his statement the way he did.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:29 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
I just find it odd that now he is St. Kane.


:lol: Who believes that? That kid is a goof.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38701
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
The DA wants to make sure his ass is covered because he has higher political aspirations. That plays into this as well.

Look, she could be a liar. Kane could have put a condom on too. Kane fucking bit her.

No one knows for sure what happened. I just find it odd that now he is St. Kane. They could have just gone quietly into the night, issued a one sentence statement that they weren't going further and left it at that.

:roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The DA is there to get a conviction. If there was the slightest possibility that he could have gotten one against Patrick Kane, he would have. That's the kind of high profile shit these guys live for. As it is, he's telling you all of the evidence is so flimsy he was disgusted with the accuser. There are witnesses- plural- contradicting her story. Some of them may be her own friends. That's in addition to the non-existent DNA, the non-existent evidence of penetration, the bed evidence, and on and on and on. You're acting as if she's still the injured party. If anything, people should be angry with her for making it more difficult for other women to make a legitimate rape accusation, not Kane or the DA.
There was not enough evidence to charge Kane. I don't know why you keep mentioning it. He wasn't charged.

If the DA wants to charge her with making false statements then do that. Don't go out and basically call her a liar when we really don't know.

The bottom line is that Kane still bit her, and his dna was under her fingernails. She may have been lying. She may not have.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The bottom line is that Kane still bit her, and his dna was under her fingernails.


I don't know if we're sure about that. I've read various things about that.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
That's not what I said. I said that if there was enough evidence for the DA to believe that Kane was a rapist but not enough to charge him or some problem with charging him and the DA made a statement suggesting such, I think that would be fair.
To some people the dna evidence may be enough though. That is why the DA should not have done what he did. The fact in this case is that there was NOT ENOUGH evidence to charge him with a crime.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I believe you are mistaken about that and I think that's precisely why the DA worded his statement the way he did.
The DA thinks she is a liar. However, his job was to determine if there was enough evidence to charge Kane.

If she gets charged with a crime, then his job is to determine that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38701
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Must've put his dick under her nails and not in her vagina too

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The bottom line is that Kane still bit her, and his dna was under her fingernails.


I don't know if we're sure about that. I've read various things about that.
Those two things were confirmed with the report that his dna was not found in the rape kit.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The DA is there to get a conviction. If there was the slightest possibility that he could have gotten one against Patrick Kane, he would have. That's the kind of high profile shit these guys live for. As it is, he's telling you all of the evidence is so flimsy he was disgusted with the accuser. There are witnesses- plural- contradicting her story. Some of them may be her own friends. That's in addition to the non-existent DNA, the non-existent evidence of penetration, the bed evidence, and on and on and on. You're acting as if she's still the injured party. If anything, people should be angry with her for making it more difficult for other women to make a legitimate rape accusation, not Kane or the DA.
There was not enough evidence to charge Kane. I don't know why you keep mentioning it. He wasn't charged.

If the DA wants to charge her with making false statements then do that. Don't go out and basically call her a liar when we really don't know.

The bottom line is that Kane still bit her, and his dna was under her fingernails. She may have been lying. She may not have.



Is it so hard to grasp that the DA said what he said because HE thinks she is a liar? Nothing more to it really.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The DA thinks she is a liar.


Obviously. And he knows way, way more about the case than we do.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:58 am
Posts: 209
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kane has won in every way imaginable in this thing.


Except for the whole "lots of people think he's a rapist" thing.

_________________
My pistols represent me
Bust until my rounds empty
Back for the street fame


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The DA thinks she is a liar.


Obviously. And he knows way, way more about the case than we do.
I'm not going to restate what I said before, but it isn't his job to call her a liar, even if he believes it.

It's irresponsible, especially since everyone loves to throw out the "innocent until proven guilty" thing. But hey, let's throw that all out now because Julie DiCaro is an idiot!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
hatersgonhate wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kane has won in every way imaginable in this thing.


Except for the whole "lots of people think he's a rapist" thing.
I don't think a lot of people think that. At best, they can say "We don't know what happens" but not even being charged is a huge win for him.

Considering that some dna evidence does exist, that is a huge win for him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65791
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
If you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich it's pretty telling that this didn't even go to indictment.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38701
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darkside wrote:
If you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich it's pretty telling that this didn't even go to indictment.

That doesn't mean nothing happened. Except rape. Which is what the allegation was.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
The DA wants to make sure his ass is covered because he has higher political aspirations.


He's running unopposed for a seat on the State Supreme Court ... no real need to cover his ass.



Frank Sedita wrote:
... The totality of credible evidence - the proof - does not sufficiently substantiate the complainant's allegation that she was raped by Patrick Kane and this so-called 'case' is rife with reasonable doubt ...

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
prosecutors prosecute. They frequently even prosecute shit cases because of public pressure. They are not prosecuting this case. Pretty telling, especially when Kane has no connection to the Daley family

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
prosecutors prosecute. They frequently even prosecute shit cases because of public pressure. They are not prosecuting this case. Pretty telling, especially when Kane has no connection to the Daley family
The public pressure was not to prosecute, at least after the debacle with the evidence bag.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
She is clearly a liar, since she did not object to the whole tampered evidence bag press conference. Are we to believe that she did not recognize the bag and that it was the result of a scheme by her mother that the "so-called" victim had no part of?

With no DNA evidence, conflicting witness testimony and family's planted evidence lie, it is not a stretch to call the victim a liar.

Also, where has it been confirmed that Kane bit her?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Also, where has it been confirmed that Kane bit her?
http://wgntv.com/2015/09/21/kane-investigation-still-looms-over-hawks-training-camp-festival/

Quote:
Last week in South Bend, Ind., Kane said he'd be vindicated. This weekend the Buffalo News reported the rape kit done on the alleged victim came back negative for Kane's DNA, though it was found under her fingernails and in a bite mark.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:51 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
interesting interview with DA last night. It is in 3 parts.

http://www.wgrz.com/story/news/local/20 ... /75203792/


Last edited by Score is doomed on Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8011
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Also, where has it been confirmed that Kane bit her?
http://wgntv.com/2015/09/21/kane-investigation-still-looms-over-hawks-training-camp-festival/

Quote:
Last week in South Bend, Ind., Kane said he'd be vindicated. This weekend the Buffalo News reported the rape kit done on the alleged victim came back negative for Kane's DNA, though it was found under her fingernails and in a bite mark.


Kane's attorney said publicly that any reports of Kane's DNA being found in the rape kit, or his DNA found in a (nonexistant?) bite mark were false.

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Kane's attorney said publicly that any reports of Kane's DNA being found in the rape kit, or his DNA found in a (nonexistant?) bite mark were false.
I don't think he said that about the bite marks. He said some of the reports were completely inaccurate. This was in August.

He wouldn't say what was innaccurate though. I believe it was the leg scratch that was inaccurate.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:09 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
from the Buffalo News today

"While no criminal charges will be filed against Kane, there were indications from Sedita that there was some physical contact between him and the woman.

When asked by The Buffalo News if it was true that bite were marks found on the alleged victim’s shoulders, Sedita answered:

“There were bite marks or so-called ‘hickeys’ on her shoulders. Kane likely caused them.”

When asked if there was consensual sex between the two, Cambria said, “It didn’t happen. It did not happen, and all the evidence supports that.”

Sedita, meanwhile, stressed that there was no preferential treatment given to this case because it involved a celebrity.

And despite the doubts cast on the woman’s allegations, a law enforcement source familiar with the DA’s investigation said there are no plans to pursue criminal charges against her."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Thanks sid!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
So the bite marks are hickies. It would still put her into the liar category based on everything else. She cooperated with the press conference presenting the evidence bag.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:56 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the bite marks are hickies. It would still put her into the liar category based on everything else. She cooperated with the press conference presenting the evidence bag.


It's funny how different a choice of words can make the same thing seem, isn't it?

bite marks = vicious attack
hickeys = makeout session

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Don't forget, there is dna evidence of more than casual physical contact between them. Clearly not enough to charge him with a crime, but it isn't like she walked past him in a bar and then cried rape.


That's not true. DNA on her shoulder and under her fingernails in and of themselves does not prove that there was anything more than casual contact. You hang out at a loud bar with a person you're bound to exchange DNA just from interacting and especially if its in a flirtatious way.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:41 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
shakes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Don't forget, there is dna evidence of more than casual physical contact between them. Clearly not enough to charge him with a crime, but it isn't like she walked past him in a bar and then cried rape.


That's not true. DNA on her shoulder and under her fingernails in and of themselves does not prove that there was anything more than casual contact. You hang out at a loud bar with a person you're bound to exchange DNA just from interacting and especially if its in a flirtatious way.


The bar owner said she was hanging all over Kane most of the evening.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 197 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group