It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:05 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
ZephMarshack wrote:
Garnett vs Dirk is a far closer and more interesting debate than Garnett vs Duncan.


Garnett was a better all around player and Dirk was a great scorer. I would take Garnett first. He always had TWTW.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Garnett vs Dirk is a far closer and more interesting debate than Garnett vs Duncan.


Garnett was a better all around player and Dirk was a great scorer. I would take Garnett first. He always had TWTW.

No he had the TWTOTAWBUFAHPBLOTWRIGF


The will to try and win but ultimately fail and have people blame lack of talent when really it's Garnett's failure


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Shaq needed Kobe to win though. If Shaq was like Duncan or Robinson the Lakers win 8 titles. All Kobe wanted was for Shaq to consider him an equal and Shaq kept calling him his little brother when Kobe was clearly better.

From players to coaches and management Duncan has been fortunate. It doesn't take away from his greatness but it is a fact. Still never won back to back.

Kobe never wanted to be equals. He wants to win and he wants to be the man when winning. It's why he's chucking up 20 shots a game still instead of teaching Russell and Randle how to win, while Duncan has graciously been adapting his game while teaching Kawhi how to be the superstar now. They are both all time great talents, but Duncan's personality and approach to the game separates him from Kobe. It's why luck doesn't matter. If they played their careers in 10 different scenarios, Duncan would always come out with the more notable career. He makes his teammates better and has fostered a team first, winning environment for 20 years. Kobe has tried to leave and demanded a trade on more than one occasion. He was so narcissistic he thought Phil and Shaq were holding him back from true greatness. Duncan is and always has been the better player in a team sport. Maybe Kobe should have taken up tennis or golf.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Garnett vs Dirk is a far closer and more interesting debate than Garnett vs Duncan.


Garnett was a better all around player and Dirk was a great scorer. I would take Garnett first. He always had TWTW.

No he had the TWTOTAWBUFAHPBLOTWRIGF


The will to try and win but ultimately fail and have people blame lack of talent when really it's Garnett's failure


He was a Marshmelo that cared about winning. Both were miscast as #1's. Garnett was a lot closer to being a #1 though.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Shaq needed Kobe to win though. If Shaq was like Duncan or Robinson the Lakers win 8 titles. All Kobe wanted was for Shaq to consider him an equal and Shaq kept calling him his little brother when Kobe was clearly better.

From players to coaches and management Duncan has been fortunate. It doesn't take away from his greatness but it is a fact. Still never won back to back.

Kobe never wanted to be equals. He wants to win and he wants to be the man when winning. It's why he's chucking up 20 shots a game still instead of teaching Russell and Randle how to win, while Duncan has graciously been adapting his game while teaching Kawhi how to be the superstar now. They are both all time great talents, but Duncan's personality and approach to the game separates him from Kobe. It's why luck doesn't matter. If they played their careers in 10 different scenarios, Duncan would always come out with the more notable career. He makes his teammates better and has fostered a team first, winning environment for 20 years. Kobe has tried to leave and demanded a trade on more than one occasion. He was so narcissistic he thought Phil and Shaq were holding him back from true greatness. Duncan is and always has been the better player in a team sport. Maybe Kobe should have taken up tennis or golf.


Duncan almost went to Orlando. Kobe's issue was talent. Smush Parker can't be the 2nd best player on your team. The Spurs have never forced Duncan to deal with that. Having Robinson/Ginobili/Parker/Popivich/Great GM/Owner doesn’t hurt either.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
ZephMarshack wrote:
Garnett vs Dirk is a far closer and more interesting debate than Garnett vs Duncan.


Agreed.. Very close on this one..Im not even sure Who gets the nod.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Bottom line is Kobe has had a more successful career despite all the chaos in LA and KG wouldn't have been Duncan in San Antonio.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Shaq needed Kobe to win though. If Shaq was like Duncan or Robinson the Lakers win 8 titles. All Kobe wanted was for Shaq to consider him an equal and Shaq kept calling him his little brother when Kobe was clearly better.

From players to coaches and management Duncan has been fortunate. It doesn't take away from his greatness but it is a fact. Still never won back to back.

Kobe never wanted to be equals. He wants to win and he wants to be the man when winning. It's why he's chucking up 20 shots a game still instead of teaching Russell and Randle how to win, while Duncan has graciously been adapting his game while teaching Kawhi how to be the superstar now. They are both all time great talents, but Duncan's personality and approach to the game separates him from Kobe. It's why luck doesn't matter. If they played their careers in 10 different scenarios, Duncan would always come out with the more notable career. He makes his teammates better and has fostered a team first, winning environment for 20 years. Kobe has tried to leave and demanded a trade on more than one occasion. He was so narcissistic he thought Phil and Shaq were holding him back from true greatness. Duncan is and always has been the better player in a team sport. Maybe Kobe should have taken up tennis or golf.

Duncan almost went to Orlando. Kobe's issue was talent. Smush Parker can't be the 2nd best player on your team. The Spurs have never forced Duncan to deal with that. Having Robinson/Ginobili/Parker/Popivich/Great GM/Owner doesn’t hurt either.

Duncan never seriously considered leaving. He only even hit free agency one time, in '03 after Parker almost cost them the Finals. Smush was the 2nd best player on Kobe's team at one point solely because of Kobe. Kobe literally has nobody else to blame for that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Bottom line is Kobe has had a more successful career despite all the chaos in LA and KG wouldn't have been Duncan in San Antonio.

Kobe was the sole reason for the chaos in LA, and in no objective way has his career been better than Duncan's. Duncan has more awards and accolades, and isn't finished yet.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Bottom line is Kobe has had a more successful career despite all the chaos in LA and KG wouldn't have been Duncan in San Antonio.

Kobe was the sole reason for the chaos in LA, and in no objective way has his career been better than Duncan's. Duncan has more awards and accolades, and isn't finished yet.


He's been to the Finals more and was a star on all those teams. He was a far better scorer and he was a more clutch player. Winning multiple titles in a row is tough and despite having great teams Duncan never accomplished that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Shaq needed Kobe to win though. If Shaq was like Duncan or Robinson the Lakers win 8 titles. All Kobe wanted was for Shaq to consider him an equal and Shaq kept calling him his little brother when Kobe was clearly better.

From players to coaches and management Duncan has been fortunate. It doesn't take away from his greatness but it is a fact. Still never won back to back.

Kobe never wanted to be equals. He wants to win and he wants to be the man when winning. It's why he's chucking up 20 shots a game still instead of teaching Russell and Randle how to win, while Duncan has graciously been adapting his game while teaching Kawhi how to be the superstar now. They are both all time great talents, but Duncan's personality and approach to the game separates him from Kobe. It's why luck doesn't matter. If they played their careers in 10 different scenarios, Duncan would always come out with the more notable career. He makes his teammates better and has fostered a team first, winning environment for 20 years. Kobe has tried to leave and demanded a trade on more than one occasion. He was so narcissistic he thought Phil and Shaq were holding him back from true greatness. Duncan is and always has been the better player in a team sport. Maybe Kobe should have taken up tennis or golf.



The mere fact that Kobe Bryant strongarmed his way into L.A. says a lot about him as a person. He has never been called on it the way he should have but who the hell was he to demand a trade before ever playing a minute of NBA ball.

He always wanted to win on his own terms. He made a power play to get Shaq off the team because he was tired of playing second fiddle.

He demanded a trade once he felt the team wasn't going anywhere.

He routinely shows teammates up on the court and in the locker room.

He was and is a competitive guy but his me first attitude detracted from his greatness.

As a player he has some of the worst shot selection that I have ever seen in a "great" player. That is what separated he and Jordan the most and it is the primary reason that i could never put him Jordan's class. There is about a 5 or 6 percent shooting difference between the two and the main reason is that Kobe took shots that Jordan would never dream of taking.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57250
If you were starting a team from scratch and could have Kobe at his best or Duncan at his best, who would you choose?

Initially I want to say Kobe, but looking at everything I think you have to go Duncan.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Bottom line is Kobe has had a more successful career despite all the chaos in LA and KG wouldn't have been Duncan in San Antonio.

Kobe was the sole reason for the chaos in LA, and in no objective way has his career been better than Duncan's. Duncan has more awards and accolades, and isn't finished yet.


He's been to the Finals more and was a star on all those teams. He was a far better scorer and he was a more clutch player. Winning multiple titles in a row is tough and despite having great teams Duncan never accomplished that.

Back to back vs total titles is doesn't matter. The fact that you're using that makes my case for me. Duncan has been a star on every Finals team he's ever been on, and has been as clutch or more clutch than Kobe in his career. Duncan has also never quit on his team in a Game 7 like Kobe did in the Suns series in '06. No matter which way you try to go with this, Duncan always comes out as the superior player.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:56 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
If you were starting a team from scratch and could Kobe at his best or Duncan at his best, who would you choose?

Initially I want to say Kobe, but looking at everything I think you have to go Duncan.


I take the guard every time. Someone has to give the big man the ball with the game on the line. Kobe can create on his own. Kobe also had the scoring ability to carry a team like MJ and Iverson. He wasn't the same defender as Duncan but he was great for a long period of time.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
If you were starting a team from scratch and could have Kobe at his best or Duncan at his best, who would you choose?

Initially I want to say Kobe, but looking at everything I think you have to go Duncan.

I don't see how you can make a case for Kobe over Duncan. Keep in mind that Duncan will try to improve your team, and Kobe will threaten to leave if you can't get him a transcendent big man to play with.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
RFDC wrote:
If you were starting a team from scratch and could Kobe at his best or Duncan at his best, who would you choose?

Initially I want to say Kobe, but looking at everything I think you have to go Duncan.


I would take Duncan. Duncan bested Shaq and Kobe when they were in their primes and he had virtually nothing around him. He won a Championship with Bruce Bowen and Avery Johnson in his starting lineup.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Bottom line is Kobe has had a more successful career despite all the chaos in LA and KG wouldn't have been Duncan in San Antonio.

Kobe was the sole reason for the chaos in LA, and in no objective way has his career been better than Duncan's. Duncan has more awards and accolades, and isn't finished yet.


He's been to the Finals more and was a star on all those teams. He was a far better scorer and he was a more clutch player. Winning multiple titles in a row is tough and despite having great teams Duncan never accomplished that.

Back to back vs total titles is doesn't matter. The fact that you're using that makes my case for me. Duncan has been a star on every Finals team he's ever been on, and has been as clutch or more clutch than Kobe in his career. Duncan has also never quit on his team in a Game 7 like Kobe did in the Suns series in '06. No matter which way you try to go with this, Duncan always comes out as the superior player.


Duncan was a role player 2 years ago and he is one now. He hasn't been a star for years now.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
If you were starting a team from scratch and could Kobe at his best or Duncan at his best, who would you choose?

Initially I want to say Kobe, but looking at everything I think you have to go Duncan.


I take the guard every time. Someone has to give the big man the ball with the game on the line. Kobe can create on his own. Kobe also had the scoring ability to carry a team like MJ and Iverson. He wasn't the same defender as Duncan but he was great for a long period of time.

Duncan can create on his own, and had no problem carrying teams offensively by himself in the postseason many times.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Duncan was a role player 2 years ago and he is one now. He hasn't been a star for years now.

Duncan is still one of the 5 or 6 best defensive big men in the game, and was two years ago. He also still carries the team on nights when other guys don't have it. He was putting up 26 and 18 games just last postseason. You're wrong again here.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Kobe Bryant rarely separated himself from other good or great players either. Rip Hamilton outplayed during the Detroit series. Reggie Miller more than held his own during the Indiana series. Kobe shot terribly from the field. Paul Pierce checked him during the Boston series and I don't really recall Kobe getting the best of that matchup either.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Duncan was a role player 2 years ago and he is one now. He hasn't been a star for years now.

Duncan is still one of the 5 or 6 best defensive big men in the game, and was two years ago. He also still carries the team on nights when other guys don't have it. He was putting up 26 and 18 games just last postseason. You're wrong again here.


If you were 6 inches taller you would probably be one of the best big men defensively in the game. That's not a compliment today. Duncan was great and can still show flashes of greatness but he's just a role player now.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
Kobe Bryant rarely separated himself from other good or great players either. Rip Hamilton outplayed during the Detroit series. Reggie Miller more than held his own during the Indiana series. Kobe shot terribly from the field. Paul Pierce checked him during the Boston series and I don't really recall Kobe getting the best of that matchup either.

Kobe definitely didn't get the best of that matchup with Boston. He's lucky Artest saved him in Game 7 of the rematch too.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Duncan was a role player 2 years ago and he is one now. He hasn't been a star for years now.

Duncan is still one of the 5 or 6 best defensive big men in the game, and was two years ago. He also still carries the team on nights when other guys don't have it. He was putting up 26 and 18 games just last postseason. You're wrong again here.


If you were 6 inches taller you would probably be one of the best big men defensively in the game. That's not a compliment today. Duncan was great and can still show flashes of greatness but he's just a role player now.

He's the second most important player on a team that will win 60 games. Kobe is the 5th most important player on a team that won't win half that many. Duncan wins again. We can do this all day.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
long time guy wrote:
Kobe Bryant rarely separated himself from other good or great players either. Rip Hamilton outplayed during the Detroit series. Reggie Miller more than held his own during the Indiana series. Kobe shot terribly from the field. Paul Pierce checked him during the Boston series and I don't really recall Kobe getting the best of that matchup either.



Yep, If Perkins doesn't get hurt..that series is over quickly.. I think Kobe shot like 5-24 in final game and Gasol carried the team that series

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:04 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
long time guy wrote:
Kobe Bryant rarely separated himself from other good or great players either. Rip Hamilton outplayed during the Detroit series. Reggie Miller more than held his own during the Indiana series. Kobe shot terribly from the field. Paul Pierce checked him during the Boston series and I don't really recall Kobe getting the best of that matchup either.


You post something like this but say you aren't a Kobe hater just like FF and others.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Kobe Bryant rarely separated himself from other good or great players either. Rip Hamilton outplayed during the Detroit series. Reggie Miller more than held his own during the Indiana series. Kobe shot terribly from the field. Paul Pierce checked him during the Boston series and I don't really recall Kobe getting the best of that matchup either.


You post something like this but say you aren't a Kobe hater just like FF and others.

Don't blame us that you are bothered by #facts. I haven't hated on Kobe at all. If saying Duncan is better makes me a hater it means I hate everyone who's ever played in the NBA except for like 3-4 guys.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Kobe Bryant rarely separated himself from other good or great players either. Rip Hamilton outplayed during the Detroit series. Reggie Miller more than held his own during the Indiana series. Kobe shot terribly from the field. Paul Pierce checked him during the Boston series and I don't really recall Kobe getting the best of that matchup either.


You post something like this but say you aren't a Kobe hater just like FF and others.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Kobe Bryant rarely separated himself from other good or great players either. Rip Hamilton outplayed during the Detroit series. Reggie Miller more than held his own during the Indiana series. Kobe shot terribly from the field. Paul Pierce checked him during the Boston series and I don't really recall Kobe getting the best of that matchup either.

Kobe definitely didn't get the best of that matchup with Boston. He's lucky Artest saved him in Game 7 of the rematch too.


The one team I think he owned was Portland. Probably Sac. also. I remember Ruben Patterson talking about he was the Kobe stopper but consistently was torched come playoff time. Journeyman swingman though. Bonzi Wells gave Kobe the flux however but he wasn't really that good either. Elite matchups rarely were dominated by Kobe and he didn't really outplay his counterpart if they were any good.

Ray Allen used to get the best of him during his Seattle days also.

Duncan's teams have won better than 50 games for something like 16 yrs running (If you exclude strikes or lockouts).

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
RFDC wrote:
If you were starting a team from scratch and could have Kobe at his best or Duncan at his best, who would you choose?

Initially I want to say Kobe, but looking at everything I think you have to go Duncan.



They both need 3 or 4 other pieces...I'd go with Duncan he could make his teammates better...where Kobe only looked to make his stats better

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Kobe Bryant rarely separated himself from other good or great players either. Rip Hamilton outplayed during the Detroit series. Reggie Miller more than held his own during the Indiana series. Kobe shot terribly from the field. Paul Pierce checked him during the Boston series and I don't really recall Kobe getting the best of that matchup either.


You post something like this but say you aren't a Kobe hater just like FF and others.


I gave him second best of his era. I place him ahead of Lebron. I don't count Shaq as a guy from his era. Shaq is from another era in my NBA world.

The guy is a career 45% shooter. He was the best player on two of his five championships. He only wins championships when his teams have vastly superior talent. I can name a few guys that win when they weren't supposed to. He isn't one of them. His teams have also had some remarkable flameouts during his tenure. Duncan's never have.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group