It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 490 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 17  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Why is it so important to Cubs fans to perpetuate the half truth that he took less money to be a cub?

It's a whole truth, and it's not important.

I don't care if he plays here for free.....he's here!


I don't believe it's anything close to the truth. These are complicated contracts and we have no idea what the actual offers were. One thing is for certain- it's a rare, rare guy who takes a lower offer. I doubt Heyward is that rarity.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23759
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Yeah, the took less money thing seems like useless speculation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
spanky wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Why is it so important to Cubs fans to perpetuate the half truth that he took less money to be a cub?

It's a whole truth, and it's not important.

I don't care if he plays here for free.....he's here!


I don't believe it's anything close to the truth. These are complicated contracts and we have no idea what the actual offers were. One thing is for certain- it's a rare, rare guy who takes a lower offer. I doubt Heyward is that rarity.


I thought he has a right to walk after 3 years with the Cub contract. That's why the contract was front loaded.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The opt out clause worked out pretty well for Zack Grienke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One thing is for certain- it's a rare, rare guy who takes a lower offer.

I don't agree. Many people would take 5%-7% less money if the other factors that they're looking for are in place. Especially when the 7% less still is $185M, and they're already a multi-millionaire.

For instance, who among wouldn't prefer to live........hell, anywhere.......except St. Louis. :eye:

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
good dolphin wrote:
Why is it so important to Cubs fans to perpetuate the half truth that he took less money to be a cub?

Even if it is correct in a very unsophisticated manner of analysis, what does it matter?


that's an easy one. because that concept validates this current cubs team as "something special going on" and it validates cubs fans' thoughts that they're the sexiest thing going on in baseball so people are literally going to give up millions of dollars JUST... to be a part of this "cub thing" going out and having parties of the century every year for a 5-10 year span [because of various 100yr anniversaries]

see right now cubs fans really wanna believe that they're something special that transcends merely being a really/good team that has a boatload of $$$ to throw around to complement their core of high draft picks. they wanna have some sort of "it"-team status that makes them the most amazingly awesome once-in-a-lifetime-HELLYEAH team/org in professional sports (not just baseball) --- so if you can perpetuate some myth that these 2015+ cubs are so amazing that all of baseball is literally fighting amongst themselves to give up $$$millions$$$ just to come here and be a part of the magic that is this cubs team, well then that's a whole lot better than saying they're basically good-major-market-team-X that's simply splashing the cash after hitting on a few high draft picks.

in cricket there's a saying that goes "it's more than just cricket" and i'd say that cubs fans want that to be the case with these 2015+ cubs. they dont wanna be just another good looking chick.... they wanna be the fucking prom queen!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One thing is for certain- it's a rare, rare guy who takes a lower offer. I doubt Heyward is that rarity.


i can almost guarantee that the cubs were the only team to offer the guy *TWO* opt-outs after 3/4 years in order to set up a win/win/win/WIN situation for heyward. not only did the cubs likely give him the highest AAV in the contract, but by being willing to let him walk after 3/4 years and thus essentially give him a 4/5 year ~85/110mil insurance policy after those first 3/4 years, they likely gave jay-hey everything he could have wanted and thensome.... plus he gets to be the highly marketable african american star on an Elmhurst-Steve-Approved "white" team who can go sell lots of jerseys in chiraq to ppl down there who wanna come out of the closet as cubs fans over the next few years.

there's no way in hell he doesn't opt out twice and end up doing 8yrs here, as he'd legitimately have to be broken and/or so horrible he can't swing a deal worth over 110mil in order to stay with the cubs. now if we find out that he doesnt opt out after 3 years when he has another 8yr/250mil deal on the table THEN we can talk about taking less money to stay here in chicago because who in their right mind would leave the back-to-back(-to-back?) world champions to go take more $$$ to lose to the cubs?

we're talking something like 10 championships in 15 years here so i mean, yeah, we're going to find out who wants to WIN and who wants to GET PAID over the next ~10+ years because it's going to be patently obvious that players who truly want to WIN have only one destination: your 2015+ chicago cubs!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
I like your doom avatar.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/159439600/cubs-sign-jason-heyward-cardinals-rivalry?partnerId=ed-9936862-858448453

Will Leitch
December 11, 2015
It's the Cubs' World Now

After my St. Louis Cardinals lost to the Chicago Cubs in the NLDS last season, the worst part about it was not the loss itself. The worst part about it, as I wrote at the time, was that the Cubs were so obviously the better team. "The Cubs beat the Cardinals, fair and square, because they're a superior baseball team constructed in a more intelligent, comprehensive manner," I wrote, still a little shell-shocked from all the Cubs' towering homers. I wondered what the Cards' counterstrike to the looming tower that was the Cubs would be. I wondered how they would fight back.

Turns out, the obviously superior team took the best position player and the best pitcher from the inferior team it just walloped for the whole world to see … and it put those guys on its team.

First it was John Lackey, who notched the only Cardinals victory that NLDS, signing an under-market-value deal with the Cubs. But the real dagger came Friday, when Jason Heyward -- a player the Cardinals just traded for last offseason and prioritized signing above all others -- reportedly took less money to sign with the Cubs. That's right: Heyward supposedly had better offers on the table from both the Nationals and the Cardinals, but he agreed to sign with Chicago.

Cubs are believed to have gotten heyward for less than $200M. Apparently taking less to be at addison and clark. @GDubCub 1st
- Jon Heyman (@JonHeymanCBS) December 11, 2015


Think about that for a moment. The whole premise of the Cardinals trading for Heyward with one year left on his contract was that they could pull that St. Louis veteran voodoo that they do, the way they did with Matt Holliday and Mark McGwire. But even allotting for that, Cardinals general manager John Mozeliak made what early reports indicated was the highest dollar offer for Heyward -- a player who appeared to love his time in St. Louis -- just to make sure he got his guy. St. Louis did all that, and not only did it still lose Heyward to their division rival, it lost him for less money. Because Heyward thought it would be his best chance at a ring.

In retrospect, this turn of events should have been obvious.


Cubs are close enough to World Series contention now that it seems crazy that any free agent they pursue seriously would pick anywhere else
- Cespedes Family BBQ (@CespedesBBQ) December 11, 2015


Winning the World Series with the Cubs is just about the coolest thing you could do in a team sport right now. Why wouldn't Heyward want to be a part of that? And this isn't just a team that could do it, it's one that, with Heyward, has to be considered the overwhelming favorite to do so. Look at this team right now:

Image

Only two of the men in that lineup are older than 26, by the way.

Chicago is also apparently in on trade talks with Carlos Carrasco, because when you're trying to win a World Series, and you have a ton of young talent already, why not go all the way? Why think the Cubs are done now? Whether you think Heyward is overpaid or not, whether you think his WAR value is overstated (and if it's not, remember, he's one of the 10 best players in baseball), he's a massive upgrade at the Cubs' only real weak position. It is a dominant move. It is checkmate. The Cubs have officially reached the If They Don't Win A World Series In The Next Five Years, Something Horrible Has Happened point of their existence. Considering they haven't even been to the World Series in 70 years … well, Theo Epstein may already have his Hall of Fame bust ready, and he's still a month younger than Ichiro.

Meanwhile: The Cardinals. This team came into this offseason crowing about how much money it had to spend -- "flexing some payroll muscle," St. Louis Post-Dispatch Derrick Goold called it -- but for what appears to be the third time, it has come in second place on a free agent. (The Cardinals' offers for both David Price and Jeff Samardzija were also reportedly the second-best, behind the Red Sox and Giants, respectively.) This money is now apparently still in the Cards' pocket. Ken Rosenthal had reported just two weeks ago that St. Louis was theoretically "in a flexible enough position to add a pitcher such as Price and a hitter such as free-agent right fielder Jason Heyward or first baseman Chris Davis."

Well, the Cardinals didn't end up with either. Davis is still on the market, and the Cards could go after him, considering how much money is apparently burning a hole in their pocket, or they could potentially trade for Carlos Gonzalez. Or they could just not spend it all: This St. Louis fan confesses to have grown a bit tired of hearing about how the Cards -- who just signed a television deal that could eventually bring in as much as $55 million in extra revenue a year -- claim they're about to spend money, only to not do so.

The Cardinals aren't doomed. They still have a solid lineup, a solid rotation and a solid bullpen, and you'd have to think they'll add somebody. But for years, some fans have claimed, wrongly, that Cardinals-Cubs isn't a real rivalry because the Cards have always been so much better than the Cubs. This, not coincidentally, is the same thing Yankees fans used to say about the Red Sox, before Epstein took over there as well. Now, some have said, in the wake of the Cubs' signing of Heyward, that this ratchets up the rivalry.

But if anything, I believe it dampens it. Even before Friday, the Cubs were a better team than the Cardinals in just about every way. Now that the Cubs took the Cardinals' best player, the gap between these teams have widened. If anyone needs to prove this is a rivalry, it's the fading Cardinals. Because here is what has happened in the last two months:

• The Cubs have bashed the Cardinals out of the playoffs.
• They have taken the Cardinals' best postseason pitcher.
• They have taken the Cardinals' best position player.
• Those two players -- both of whom the Cardinals wanted back -- took below-market deals so that they could play for the Cubs.

That doesn't look like a rivalry to me. That looks like an uprising. That looks like the unleashing of furious vengeance and righteous anger.

That looks the end of one era, and the beginning of something new entirely. The Cubs have completely owned the Cardinals. They're about to do so to the rest of baseball. The world has you know it -- as this Cards fan has always understood it -- has changed, forever. The Cubs, they are the captain now.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55851
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Why should I believe that all these players are champing at the bit to win the World Series with the Cubs? Winning the Stanley Cup with the Toronto Maple Leafs would be just as immortalizing -- if not more, given the Maple Leafs' place in Canada relative to the Cubs' in the United States -- and yet we've seen year after year after year that valuable free agents would rather be injected with the Ebola virus than sign with Toronto because they don't want to be held accountable for their performance. (They also don't want to pay that high Ontario income tax and hear the wives they cheat on bitch about the snow.)

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Curious Hair wrote:
Why should I believe that all these players are champing at the bit to win the World Series with the Cubs? Winning the Stanley Cup with the Toronto Maple Leafs would be just as immortalizing -- if not more, given the Maple Leafs' place in Canada relative to the Cubs' in the United States

There is a gigantic flaw in your logic here.


It's called "Canada".

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
So the Cards/Cubs was a rivalry when the Cards were winning making the playoffs these last five years or so while I Cubs have been tanking, but now that both teams are clearly going to be playoff contenders it's one sided?

Dolt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
lipidquadcab wrote:
So the Cards/Cubs was a rivalry when the Cards were winning making the playoffs these last five years or so while I Cubs have been tanking, but now that both teams are clearly going to be playoff contenders it's one sided?

Dolt.

Whoah. First, it goes way farther back than 5 years.

This past season......if we were talking about "playoff contenders", then I guess the Cubs > Cards, right?

Now, look what has happened since then. I get it, the Cards, more than any other team seem to produce guys that just fill in for injuries and succeed, but.......I mean, man, just look what has happened the last 12 months

The scales have tipped this past year or two, no?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
spanky wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
So the Cards/Cubs was a rivalry when the Cards were winning making the playoffs these last five years or so while I Cubs have been tanking, but now that both teams are clearly going to be playoff contenders it's one sided?

Dolt.

Whoah. First, it goes way farther back than 5 years.

This past season......if we were talking about "playoff contenders", then I guess the Cubs > Cards, right?

Now, look what has happened since then. I get it, the Cards, more than any other team seem to produce guys that just fill in for injuries and succeed, but.......I mean, man, just look what has happened the last 12 months

The scales have tipped this past year or two, no?

I think you're missing the point I'm trying to make.

I'm not saying the Cubs aren't in a better position to win now than the Cards are, because they absolutely are and anyone who thinks otherwise is either an idiot or is really banking on that whole "Cards just find a way to win" logic. Lackey and Heyward moving make Chicago better and make St. Louis worse. No question.

The problem is this guy is saying the rivalry has "ratcheted down" after these moves, which is hilarious considering we just experienced an extended period where one team was perennially making the playoffs while the other was finishing at the bottom of the division.

If he honestly thinks the Cards/Cubs rivalry is going to be less intense over the next five years than it was the previous five years he must know something the rest of us don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
lipidquadcab wrote:
The problem is this guy is saying the rivalry has "ratcheted down" after these moves, which is hilarious considering we just experienced an extended period where one team was perennially making the playoffs while the other was finishing at the bottom of the division.

If he honestly thinks the Cards/Cubs rivalry is going to be less intense over the next five years than it was the previous five years he must know something the rest of us don't.

Ah, gotcha. Yeah I misunderstood.

If anything...this sucker is gonna get ramped up the next couple years. I can't wait!
We aren't the cuddly, friendly "rivals" up north anymore.
Shit is about to get real. :wink:

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
spanky wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
The problem is this guy is saying the rivalry has "ratcheted down" after these moves, which is hilarious considering we just experienced an extended period where one team was perennially making the playoffs while the other was finishing at the bottom of the division.

If he honestly thinks the Cards/Cubs rivalry is going to be less intense over the next five years than it was the previous five years he must know something the rest of us don't.

Ah, gotcha. Yeah I misunderstood.

If anything...this sucker is gonna get ramped up the next couple years. I can't wait!
We aren't the cuddly, friendly "rivals" up north anymore.
Shit is about to get real. :wink:

Right on.

The playoff series this year was fun and all (obviously a hell of a lot more fun for you) but I'm more excited about the next couple seasons, having every single one of those games in the regular season matter that much more.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
lipidquadcab wrote:
The playoff series this year was fun and all (obviously a hell of a lot more fun for you) but I'm more excited about the next couple seasons, having every single one of those games in the regular season matter that much more.

Yeah buddy. I can't wait.
The Cards can't be happy with how this offseason has gone so far.....I think they have a move or two left in them.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Curious Hair wrote:
Why should I believe that all these players are champing at the bit to win the World Series with the Cubs? Winning the Stanley Cup with the Toronto Maple Leafs would be just as immortalizing -- if not more, given the Maple Leafs' place in Canada relative to the Cubs' in the United States -- and yet we've seen year after year after year that valuable free agents would rather be injected with the Ebola virus than sign with Toronto because they don't want to be held accountable for their performance. (They also don't want to pay that high Ontario income tax and hear the wives they cheat on bitch about the snow.)


This is even worse than your Hawks thoughts. Wow.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 3:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
spanky wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Why should I believe that all these players are champing at the bit to win the World Series with the Cubs? Winning the Stanley Cup with the Toronto Maple Leafs would be just as immortalizing -- if not more, given the Maple Leafs' place in Canada relative to the Cubs' in the United States

There is a gigantic flaw in your logic here.


It's called "Canada".


something something "big fish in a small pond"

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 8:08 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Will Leitch wrote:
Whether you think Heyward is overpaid or not, whether you think his WAR value is overstated (and if it's not, remember, he's one of the 10 best players in baseball), he's a massive upgrade at the Cubs' only real weak position.


The problem with this spin- and that's exactly what it is- is that Fowler was anything but a "weakness". He was on base constantly when the Cubs got really good in the second half.

And if Jason Heyward is really one of the ten best players in baseball, it's no wonder why watching television has become the more popular sport.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Curious Hair wrote:
Why should I believe that all these players are champing at the bit to win the World Series with the Cubs? Winning the Stanley Cup with the Toronto Maple Leafs would be just as immortalizing -- if not more, given the Maple Leafs' place in Canada relative to the Cubs' in the United States -- and yet we've seen year after year after year that valuable free agents would rather be injected with the Ebola virus than sign with Toronto because they don't want to be held accountable for their performance. (They also don't want to pay that high Ontario income tax and hear the wives they cheat on bitch about the snow.)


Stick with Hockey

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Heyward is not a top 10 in mlb, and I'm not even counting pitchers.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 11:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
He wouldn't be a top ten player if he didn't sign with the Cubs.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40615
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Frank Coztansa wrote:
He wouldn't be a top ten player if he didn't sign with the Cubs.



Right. He signed with the Cubs and they started making his HOF plaque.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Will Leitch wrote:
Whether you think Heyward is overpaid or not, whether you think his WAR value is overstated (and if it's not, remember, he's one of the 10 best players in baseball), he's a massive upgrade at the Cubs' only real weak position.


The problem with this spin- and that's exactly what it is- is that Fowler was anything but a "weakness". He was on base constantly when the Cubs got really good in the second half.

And if Jason Heyward is really one of the ten best players in baseball, it's no wonder why watching television has become the more popular sport.


I have no clue who Will Leitch is and yes Heyward's WAR is top 10 but he is not a top 10 player.

As to Fowler, yes he had a big 2nd half but he is not a difference maker in CF defensively and his OBP and runs scored should be met or exceeded by whomever bats lead off (Zobrist, Heyward or a new CF or a combo thereof).

I think the major benefit here with Heyward is he is a winning player who will upgrade the defense, is a high IQ player (like Zobrist), a good base runner, it hypothetically weakens STL etc.

The next major decision (which may not be resolved until mid season but probably by the start of the season) is Soler and CF.

Soler is a wildcard, could be a major stud or could be an oft injured, defensively challenged guy his whole career.

So let's see what happens next. Next year's FA class is weak so they are betting heavy on Heyward's defense, OBP and the fact that come October he is not a strikeout machine like a lot of their guys were against the Mets, so him and Zobrist are more apt to get on base as opposed to looking to bash balls over the scoreboard.

The goal now is to win it all and they pushed a lot of chips in with the Heyward signing but this is not their last move.

What I do like a lot of are the 2 opt outs. It gives Heyward incentive to produce in the first 3/4 years and then cash in again. Yes if he busts then they are stuck with a guy with an AAV of 23M for 8 years who is good/great on D but only worth half that.

Let's see what their next move is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Heyward is essentially an extension to Fowler with a lessened risk of Heyward falling apart due to age than Fowler. Not a bad thing because Fowler was pretty good for the Cubs in 15.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
America wrote:
Heyward is essentially an extension to Fowler with a lessened risk of Heyward falling apart due to age than Fowler. Not a bad thing because Fowler was pretty good for the Cubs in 15.


Fowler had a good/very good 2nd half but was not a difference maker defensively and K'd quite a bit.

I would have no problem if they traded Soler for a #3 cost controlled SP then got a superior defensive CF to augment the pitching staff.

They have plenty of boppers. I want lock down defense in CF at worst.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I don't know it you saw what the Dbacks gave up for Shelby Miller, but it costs a lot more than Soler to get a cost-controlled #3.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
America wrote:
I don't know it you saw what the Dbacks gave up for Shelby Miller, but it costs a lot more than Soler to get a cost-controlled #3.


That is not the market. That was LaRussa mortgaging the future.

That is why everything is in a holding pattern throughout baseball.

Cubs still engaged with TB, CLEV, SD, ATL and others.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jason Heyward
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Since it was asked ...

"William F. Leitch (born October 10, 1975 in Mattoon, Illinois) is a writer and the founding editor of the Gawker Media sports blog Deadspin. Leitch is a senior editor at Sports on Earth, a contributing editor at New York magazine, a contributor to The New York Times, GQ, Fast Company, and Slate, and has published four books ..."

Also, he's an avowed Cardinals fan, as one could tell from the opening words from his slightly overwrought but otherwise more or less fine screed.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 490 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group