I like Hanley, but he isn't available all the time due to his Bulls beat. I certainly don't think Haugh is bad, and he is available five days a week, isn't he?

Is the show with Mulligan better with Haugh or Hanley? Simple question.

Personally I prefer Hanley because I think he's a little edgier, but I don't mind Haugh.

I have a hunch you're a younger guy Contempt - probably about college age (I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin') - so you may not remember the early days of The Score when Boers and Hanley alternated with Danny Mac based upon availability. Unless the show is expanded to 4 hours, I'm betting the Hanley/Haugh rotation continues.

Haugh is much better than Hanley because he isn't constantly interrupting Mully. Hanley talks over everyone. Mully can't give out the phone number. Haugh and Mully are much better together on football. Hanley doesn't sound like he's even seen the games, which maybe conflict with the Bulls or something. We need more Haugh and less Hanley.

Agree that after giving it more time to listen, I definately prefer Haugh or Hanley. Nothing against Brian, because I'd continue to listen, and enjoy the show if it were him and Mike. But I do like Haugh better. I just wish the show was official Haugh's with Mulli.

Hanley or not, this is the best show on the Score. And figures its only two hours. Any show without North, Jesse, Burnspee/Boresme and Murph has to be better. These guys have credibility and they are professionals. No other show has that!

I really didn't like it with Brian and Doug this week.