It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 7:58 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:15 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
bigfan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So just like I said then. Good talk.

Not really. I dont think anyone alleged that it was super hilarious.

It's gonna be a long year of pretending to not be rooting against the Cubs if you're this upset already.
Don't be defensive. I just think most players secretly thought this was kind of dumb.

Oh, and how is this rooting against the Cubs? :lol:


Guessing you and a few others will think that anything Maddon does will be seen as dumb...and I think you are quite mistaken. Now, maybe his next stunt will backfire and be seen as a pain in the ass, but for the most part, I think his BS is more than welcomed by a bunch of players who probably get bored pretty quick...and a change of pace is usually welcome.

If you ever see the stupid crap players do, because they have so much downtime, its easy to see how Maddons little acts can be more than welcomed.

Image
Image
Image


You don't see the difference between 25 year olds acting like 25 year olds and 65 year olds acting like 25 year olds?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Does it affect his managing?

Who cares? I doubt Maddon cares that people think he's goofy. In fact he probably plans it that way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
America wrote:
bigfan wrote:
when people start worrying about what Anthony Rizzo will think about this stuff at age 31....really just dont care. We will deal with it then.

Anthony Rizzo and I are the same age, and if he thinks this shit is funny you should be worried about his faculties. Weird, old drunks driving around in a van is something you laugh at when you're 13 and beer makes you look cool.

It's just cringe, like everything else about the Cubs.

A gay man who hates the Cubs and has anger issues. Who'd of thunk it?


The guy who posts as "America" is gay? Must have missed the thread where he came out of the closet.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
rogers park bryan wrote:
Does it affect his managing?

Who cares? I doubt Maddon cares that people think he's goofy. In fact he probably plans it that way.


I agree with your last sentence. I think he cares A LOT that people think he is goofy.

I don't care that he does the goofy stuff. The players are probably mildly amused so why not? I do, however, get a little irritated that the media will portray this as instrumental to the team's success.

It's the equivalent of jeans and Hawaiian shirt day at the office. It's enjoyable but has zero affect on production.

Image

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Last edited by good dolphin on Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
I'm 50-50 on the schtick. Doesn't bother me per se....but sometimes seems a little bit too contrived.

I did see the Cubs facebook posting of the van driving up & the clowns or whatever.....Then I read some of the comments & much of it was puke-worthy slurping of all things Maddon.

Just killing time until the regular season starts!

Go Cubs!

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
TurdFerguson wrote:
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
America wrote:
bigfan wrote:
when people start worrying about what Anthony Rizzo will think about this stuff at age 31....really just dont care. We will deal with it then.

Anthony Rizzo and I are the same age, and if he thinks this shit is funny you should be worried about his faculties. Weird, old drunks driving around in a van is something you laugh at when you're 13 and beer makes you look cool.

It's just cringe, like everything else about the Cubs.

A gay man who hates the Cubs and has anger issues. Who'd of thunk it?


The guy who posts as "America" is gay? Must have missed the thread where he came out of the closet.

I'm not actually gay Steve, but your interest sure seems piqued.

What do you want Steve? Don't tell me about what your "friends" in Elmhurst want you to be, tell me about your paradise. Surrounded by men? Young, talented men destined for greatness? Festooned in blue and white (emphasis WHITE)? Maybe a little grab ass in the locker room with one of the darker, Latin ones and one thing leads to another. It doesn't have to be a dream, Steve.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Does it affect his managing?

Who cares? I doubt Maddon cares that people think he's goofy. In fact he probably plans it that way.


I agree with your last sentence. I think he cares A LOT that people think he is goofy.

I don't care that he does the goofy stuff. The players are probably mildly amused so why not? I do, however, get a little irritated that the media will portray this as instrumental to the team's success.

It's the equivalent of jeans and Hawaiian shirt day at the office. It's enjoyable but has zero affect on production.

Image

yea the media sucks. whatya gonna do?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Does it affect his managing?

Who cares? I doubt Maddon cares that people think he's goofy. In fact he probably plans it that way.


I agree with your last sentence. I think he cares A LOT that people think he is goofy.

I don't care that he does the goofy stuff. The players are probably mildly amused so why not? I do, however, get a little irritated that the media will portray this as instrumental to the team's success.

It's the equivalent of jeans and Hawaiian shirt day at the office.


Being relaxed helps players perform better. For generations it has been something players acknowledged as they will tell people how valuable a guy like Bob Uecker or Jay Johnstone was, because they kept guys loose and relaxed. That a Manager (who many times is the reason for increased tension) is the guy keeping guys loose, may be even more valuable. In any case, his record speaks for itself.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

I think Fowler took less. Heyward was a push. Took less overall but more per year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:40 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

I think Fowler took less. Heyward was a push. Took less overall but more per year.


I don't think Fowler took less unless you mean less from the Cubs by failing to accept the QO. That opt-out that no one else was willing to give has a lot of value, especially with next season's weak group of outfield free agents. But we can go with the narrative that guys just want to put on Cubbie blue so much they don't care about getting paid.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Does it affect his managing?

Who cares? I doubt Maddon cares that people think he's goofy. In fact he probably plans it that way.


I agree with your last sentence. I think he cares A LOT that people think he is goofy.

I don't care that he does the goofy stuff. The players are probably mildly amused so why not? I do, however, get a little irritated that the media will portray this as instrumental to the team's success.

It's the equivalent of jeans and Hawaiian shirt day at the office.


Being relaxed helps players perform better. For generations it has been something players acknowledged as they will tell people how valuable a guy like Bob Uecker or Jay Johnstone was, because they kept guys loose and relaxed. That a Manager (who many times is the reason for increased tension) is the guy keeping guys loose, may be even more valuable. In any case, his record speaks for itself.


Does it?

RPB, I agree that the media sucks, but their reporting leads to beliefs like the one above. Their belief in the antics is a self fulfilling prophecy. Meanwhile, they never acknowledge that players want to pound a guy like Swisher into the ground when he plays grab ass while they are not playing well.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

I think Fowler took less. Heyward was a push. Took less overall but more per year.


I don't think Fowler took less unless you mean less from the Cubs by failing to accept the QO. That opt-out that no one else was willing to give has a lot of value, especially with next season's weak group of outfield free agents. But we can go with the narrative that guys just want to put on Cubbie blue so much they don't care about getting paid.


The Cubs wanted him for 1-2 more years while Almora and Martinez are being developed to take over the CF position. They not only got him back for that 1-2 year stretch, they got him for less than the qualifying offer. I don't care if it was because teams didn't want to part with a draft pick and give him an out clause. All I care about is it worked out perfectly.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

I think Fowler took less. Heyward was a push. Took less overall but more per year.


If his intention was to take less to be a Cub, he would have accepted the QO from the start. Sure you can conjure up some number that he was offered $32 from the Orioles and $8 is less than $32 but that would display almost no sophistication with the subject matter.

Same with Heyward.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:50 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

I think Fowler took less. Heyward was a push. Took less overall but more per year.


If his intention was to take less to be a Cub, he would have accepted the QO from the start. Sure you can conjure up some number that he was offered $32 from the Orioles and $8 is less than $32 but that would display almost no sophistication with the subject matter.

Same with Heyward.


It's not really $8 million anyway. It works out to $13 million and him being a free agent after the season. He would have been better off with the QO, but he only took a $3 million haircut.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[The Cubs wanted him for 1-2 more years while Almora and Martinez are being developed to take over the CF position. They not only got him back for that 1-2 year stretch, they got him for less than the qualifying offer. I don't care if it was because teams didn't want to part with a draft pick and give him an out clause. All I care about is it worked out perfectly.


I think we all know that it is better for a business to pay less money than more money

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Does it affect his managing?

Who cares? I doubt Maddon cares that people think he's goofy. In fact he probably plans it that way.


I agree with your last sentence. I think he cares A LOT that people think he is goofy.

I don't care that he does the goofy stuff. The players are probably mildly amused so why not? I do, however, get a little irritated that the media will portray this as instrumental to the team's success.

It's the equivalent of jeans and Hawaiian shirt day at the office.


Being relaxed helps players perform better. For generations it has been something players acknowledged as they will tell people how valuable a guy like Bob Uecker or Jay Johnstone was, because they kept guys loose and relaxed. That a Manager (who many times is the reason for increased tension) is the guy keeping guys loose, may be even more valuable. In any case, his record speaks for itself.



Does it?

RPB, I agree that the media sucks, but their reporting leads to beliefs like the one above. Their belief in the antics is a self fulfilling prophecy. Meanwhile, they never acknowledge that players want to pound a guy like Swisher into the ground when he plays grab ass while they are not playing well.


Maybe Swisher was more obnoxious than funny? Maybe Maddon has a better sense of timing and recognizes when it's an appropriate time for some hijinks and when it is not? I don't know. But the players seem to respond positively. Let the dance parties, clowns, jugglers and petting zoo's continue, if it keeps guys loose and relaxed and it results in better performance.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

I think Fowler took less. Heyward was a push. Took less overall but more per year.


I don't think Fowler took less unless you mean less from the Cubs by failing to accept the QO. That opt-out that no one else was willing to give has a lot of value, especially with next season's weak group of outfield free agents. But we can go with the narrative that guys just want to put on Cubbie blue so much they don't care about getting paid.

So he took less money but overall the same value. That's fine.

And lets get go nuts in the other direction. Players like to play for good teams and in big cities. That doesnt mean they will lose significant money over it but its not like the idea that a guy would want to play for the Cubs is crazy.


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
If the Maddon act was as old as described above, I find it hard to beleive we'd be signing free agent. Much less consistently signing free agents for sub-optimal dollars.

So far Fowler, Zobrist, and Hayward all spurned higher dollar contracts to come here.


Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

I think Fowler took less. Heyward was a push. Took less overall but more per year.


I believe it was a lot more per year in the first three years with an opt out likely to be invoked.

Heyward's Cubs contract is essentially a three year deal (with a very big insurance policy should disaster occur). His per year over those three years was significantly higher than that of the per year for other seven year contracts.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[The Cubs wanted him for 1-2 more years while Almora and Martinez are being developed to take over the CF position. They not only got him back for that 1-2 year stretch, they got him for less than the qualifying offer. I don't care if it was because teams didn't want to part with a draft pick and give him an out clause. All I care about is it worked out perfectly.


I think we all know that it is better for a business to pay less money than more money


I think that they actually intend to pay him more. I think they believe Almora will be ready for 2017 and intend for Fowler to only be here for 2016, then pay him the 5 million to opt out of the remainder of the deal and allow Fowler to sign elsewhere without teams having to lose a draft pick to sign him. But they also have the insurance of knowing if Almora is not ready, they can keep Fowler another year.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

Do we really need to break down the truth behind this belief?

I think Fowler took less. Heyward was a push. Took less overall but more per year.


I don't think Fowler took less unless you mean less from the Cubs by failing to accept the QO. That opt-out that no one else was willing to give has a lot of value, especially with next season's weak group of outfield free agents. But we can go with the narrative that guys just want to put on Cubbie blue so much they don't care about getting paid.

So he took less money but overall the same value. That's fine.

The point remains, if he didn't want to be in that environment, he had viable alternatives in STL or Washington.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I thought Fowler's supposed deal with the Orioles was more.


I dont really care why guys play here. Just win, baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:04 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
And lets get go nuts in the other direction. Players like to play for good teams and in big cities. That doesnt mean they will lose significant money over it but its not like the idea that a guy would want to play for the Cubs is crazy.


It's very rare for a player to flat out take less to play anywhere. The union frowns on it. And no agent wants to allow it. It's considered a slap at the other players and it just really isn't done. When it is, there's always an angle. Like Fowler with the opt-out that probably is worth more than $10 million (at least in theory) or Heyward at a higher annual average plus opt-outs.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[The Cubs wanted him for 1-2 more years while Almora and Martinez are being developed to take over the CF position. They not only got him back for that 1-2 year stretch, they got him for less than the qualifying offer. I don't care if it was because teams didn't want to part with a draft pick and give him an out clause. All I care about is it worked out perfectly.


I think we all know that it is better for a business to pay less money than more money


I think that they actually intend to pay him more. I think they believe Almora will be ready for 2017 and intend for Fowler to only be here for 2016, then pay him the 5 million to opt out of the remainder of the deal and allow Fowler to sign elsewhere without teams having to lose a draft pick to sign him. But they also have the insurance of knowing if Almora is not ready, they can keep Fowler another year.


Nope. There is a handshake agreement not to QO him next year. That was the reason the return was attractive. In practice, the Cubs are paying him 13 million (as Joe pointed out) for one year with no QO.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
rogers park bryan wrote:
I thought Fowler's supposed deal with the Orioles was more.


I dont really care why guys play here. Just win, baby


That is completely understandable.

I don't know why the myth is being perpetuated.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[
Maybe Swisher was more obnoxious than funny? Maybe Maddon has a better sense of timing and recognizes when it's an appropriate time for some hijinks and when it is not? I don't know. But the players seem to respond positively. Let the dance parties, clowns, jugglers and petting zoo's continue, if it keeps guys loose and relaxed and it results in better performance.


So it took Castro until August to understand the humor (language barrier and all) but once he got it, he really thought it was hysterical. Same with Fowler.

On the other hand, Hammel found the jokes hilarious in April, May and June but he lost his sense of humor during the All Star break.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[
Maybe Swisher was more obnoxious than funny? Maybe Maddon has a better sense of timing and recognizes when it's an appropriate time for some hijinks and when it is not? I don't know. But the players seem to respond positively. Let the dance parties, clowns, jugglers and petting zoo's continue, if it keeps guys loose and relaxed and it results in better performance.


So it took Castro until August to understand the humor (language barrier and all) but once he got it, he really thought it was hysterical. Same with Fowler.

On the other hand, Hammel found the jokes hilarious in April, May and June but he lost his sense of humor during the All Star break.

That part is actually true. Hammel was having the time of his life in the 1st half and turned cunty in the 2nd

But your point is taken


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
rogers park bryan wrote:
I thought Fowler's supposed deal with the Orioles was more.



Jon Heyman tweets that Fowler’s contract is worth $33MM over three years.

So let me explain the numbers to the "subbies"

$33 mil>$13 mil

and if gets hurt for the next 3 years

$33 mil > $0 + $13 mil

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
and as to Heyward taking less

this from Fangraohs:

On Friday, the Cubs won the bidding for Jason Heyward, convincing the outfielder to come to Chicago despite offers for more guaranteed money from the Nationals, the Cardinals, and reportedly one other team, perhaps the Angels. While Chicago’s offer of $184 million over eight years is certainly a substantial amount, he apparently could have taken $200 million guaranteed by going with one of the other offers. Instead he chose the Cubs, and along with putting him on baseball’s best team in 2016, the fascinating structure of the contract Chicago gave him may end up making this deal a big win for both sides.

here ya go "subbies" $200 million guaranteed > $184 million

Never let the facts get in the way of your opinion

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group