Who wins and how does it play out? What's the most interesting matchup?

_________________

2005?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

I was almost ready to attack you until I realized it was a Cubs fan.

_________________

Bulls in 5. The 90's were better.

Pippen glues himself to Steph starting at the half court line.
Jordan scores 40 a game in the series
Rodman appears on The View during the series

'90's NBA rules or present day rules?

Warriors would not be able to run that offense in the 90's and the Bulls would not be able to run their defense today.

Warriors win with present NBA rules and Bulls win if they played in the 90's.

_________________

Warriors win the first one and Curry dances around. Jordan has a fire in his belly for the rest of the series and the Bulls dont lose another one.

Rodman would made Draymond cry.

_________________

Michael Jordan. So no.

I think the best Bulls team was 1991-92.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8

Agreed. Jordan might go off for 100 if Curry does his dance.

_________________

Jordan was in his prime, but Scottie wasn't as good yet and they didn't have nearly the depth, length, or Rodman.

The '96 team was fuckin' deep.

Harper, Kukoc, Kerr, Longley (welcome, BF), Buechler, even Randy Brown could play some hella D.

Didn't they have Bison Dele that year too?

_________________

The '92 team was deep too. Paxson, Armstrong, Levingston, Hopson, Williams, King, Hansen, Perdue. Just a bunch of solid back-up guys. I think they even had Chuck Nevitt for a minute.

True, Pippen hadn't reached his peak yet, but they were better at center with Cartwright. They were better on the offensive end with Grant. And yeah, Jordan was at his absolute best. And Jordan was the Bulls.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8

yes, Scottie would stick Steph....but who is going to stick Scottie?

My guy Luc does a 14 12 on them..and Kukoc just wouldnt get the ball passed to him enough to drop 30.

All the double teaming on MJ as well....Kerr drops 15 as well.

TRIANGLE works well when you have legends playing. Also makes for a great 3 point shooter when nobody guards you.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”

Agreed on Grant. Personally, I'd still take the 96ers with a slightly past prime Jordan.

Also, Kukoc doesn't often get remembered, but he was huge on that team. Think about what an advantage it was in '96 to have a guy that talented leading the 2nd team offense. He was also pretty unique back then since it was before stretch 4's became a dime a dozen.

_________________

Paxson - great floor and team leader, intangibles worth something, very players in any sport REALLY have that.
Armstrong - Average player at best, fact...UNTRADEABLE after his "All Star" year, should tell you something about how the league felt about him
Levingston - Great to have for the fourth quarter. A Jerry deal from the closeout section.
Hopson - Nothing
Williams - GREAT VALUE, busted his ass working in the paint, underrated time with Bulls.
King - Terrible. Shot from his chest, block city for a 6'10 guy
Hansen - Best 7:30 in Bulls history outside Jordan
Perdue - Made the best of what he had. No complaints.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”

I don't know about that. That was always the Achilles heel of those Bulls teams. Quick little guards gave them fits.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8

I fucking hated B.J., even as a kid, and partially because he went to Iowa. But he did redeem himself when he hit that 3 from the corner against the Knicks in '93.

_________________

Don't ruin this for us.

_________________

go to whatifsports.com and play a computer matchup for free.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."

I have NBA2K16 for that.

_________________

Yeah,but this is faster.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."

_________________

We gonna do this?

_________________
-- source

The game is virtually unrecognizable from 20 years ago. I don't even know how to compare them. My first inclination is that GS wouldn't be able to get a shot off.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest

the bulls in 4 because kerr knows all the warriors plays hes their fucking coach

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.

I think the game being different is overstated. It's changed a lot because most teams have at least 4 guys on the floor at one time who can shoot and shoot very well. Because of this, much of the offense is generated solely from the perimeter, so it looks different, but that's not to say that - with the correct personnel - another team couldn't be successful running a triple-post offense or an offense that begins down low. There just isn't that type of talent in today's game, and you would of course run the risk of not being able to defend these smaller, quicker teams with the matchup issues it would create.

I think both teams would struggle to defend the other in this matchup, even though both are excellent defensive teams.

_________________

This outside shooting business is crazy. Where do they grow these guys?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest

They selectively breed former players like Dell Curry. Can you imagine what Lebron's kids will be like? OMG, those bodies...

_________________

More or less this is correct. Although I suspect that the Bulls would thrive better out of their 'element' on the offensive end of the floor than the Warriors would thrive on the defensive end. And if worse came to worse, Rodman would just Rock Bottom Curry and that would be that.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George