It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:53 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
She Blinded Me With Rape might have actually been a better music video.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Miss Sakamoto, you're problematic!

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
How could anyone possibly know how many rapes (or crimes of any kind) are unreported if they're unreported?

Anyway, here are a couple interesting articles on the subject:

http://www.aei.org/publication/before-d ... y-not/#mbl

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2 ... /16007089/

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Baffoe acts like these types of questionable (at best) accusations are far more rare than they actually are.

http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/show ... tback.html

But I don't believe that in most cases the women are really lying. I think the issue is that the very definition of "rape" is in flux. Especially on the American college campus. Thirty years ago if a woman went home with a guy and woke up the next morning thinking, "Man, I would have never fucked that dude had I been sober!", she chalked it up as a mistake she made, life experience. If that same scenario occurs today, there's a fair chance she might call it rape. Hell, I don't know. Maybe it is. But I'll say again, I think such a standard is a societal choice to treat a woman as a child. I'm just glad I don't have to deal with those sexual politics.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
Miss Sakamoto, you're problematic!

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82233
leashyourkids wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Tim Baffoe wrote:
The “wait for all the facts before declaring a verdict” is a legal protection that on paper is afforded to all. Asking for the same standards in the court of public opinion serves only to get people to stop talking about something that makes you uncomfortable (or threatens a power structure or hero worship).


Good Lord.

Not even bothering to disguise it any longer. Seems to be a credo.

By the way, these writers sure like taking the long way around the barn. Do they get paid by the syllable?


:lol: What. The. Fuck.

Do they realize what a slippery-slope that is? Nevermind, that's rhetorical.


It's beyond a slippery slope. That statement is over the cliff.

An underlying principal of our legal system is to let 10 guilty walk free to avoid 1 innocent being jailed (I know this may not be true in practice). Bafoe proudly advocates the exact opposite.

However, we should not be surprised. The post Rolling Stone response detailed that there are certain people who are very comfortable throwing the innocent into the fire in order to achieve something they consider a greater good

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 8:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
The post Rolling Stone response detailed that there are certain people who are very comfortable throwing the innocent into the fire in order to achieve something they consider a greater good


There's no doubt about that. Even in light of the fact that the Rolling Stone article was an outright fabrication- not some misunderstanding or quibbling over details- you can still find assholes using an #IbelieveJackie hashtag. It seems the truth doesn't matter if that truth fails to support one's agenda.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 8:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
The post Rolling Stone response detailed that there are certain people who are very comfortable throwing the innocent into the fire in order to achieve something they consider a greater good


What you're discussing here is actually a popular school of feminist thought. This stuff just didn't come out of nowhere. I'm not even sure if it's fringe thought at this point. It appears to be pretty mainstream in modern American academia. Accusers are seen as a collective and a core principle of such "feminism" is that accusers must be believed.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
good dolphin wrote:
An underlying principal of our legal system is to let 10 guilty walk free to avoid 1 innocent being jailed


I use this "phrase" often when arguing about the death penalty or right to a fair trial. I don't think many are aware of this philosophy or what the statement itself represents... but it's probably hard to think about this when listening to people like Nancy Grace or Julie DiCaro.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 12:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Baffoe acts like these types of questionable (at best) accusations are far more rare than they actually are.

http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/show ... tback.html

But I don't believe that in most cases the women are really lying. I think the issue is that the very definition of "rape" is in flux. Especially on the American college campus. Thirty years ago if a woman went home with a guy and woke up the next morning thinking, "Man, I would have never fucked that dude had I been sober!", she chalked it up as a mistake she made, life experience. If that same scenario occurs today, there's a fair chance she might call it rape. Hell, I don't know. Maybe it is. But I'll say again, I think such a standard is a societal choice to treat a woman as a child. I'm just glad I don't have to deal with those sexual politics.


It seems that describes Julie's story of her rape.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Quote:
Tom Priestley‏@ThomasPriestley
@TimBaffoe I come away from this article with the impression you'd rather somebody was raped because it would better fit your narrative

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
:lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
spmack wrote:
Quote:
Tom Priestley‏@ThomasPriestley
@TimBaffoe I come away from this article with the impression you'd rather somebody was raped because it would better fit your narrative


Exactly!

You could Tweet that at the people who still say "We really don't know what happened with Patrick Kane..."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 2:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tad Queasy wrote:
spmack wrote:
Quote:
Tom Priestley‏@ThomasPriestley
@TimBaffoe I come away from this article with the impression you'd rather somebody was raped because it would better fit your narrative


Exactly!

You could Tweet that at the people who still say "We really don't know what happened with Patrick Kane..."


Well, we really don't. But that's a two way street. We never really know what happened when only two people were present. The popular viewpoint is that believing a woman should be the default. Maybe that's true. But the idea that a man who appears innocent based upon overwhelming evidence should be sacrificed in the name of feminism is immoral and frankly, should be abhorrent to any human being.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22539
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Baffoe has a conversation with...well, pretty likely himself:

Quote:
Frankie Presto ‏@TimBaffoe Mar 14
After watching Fantastic Lies, I wrote about the worst prevailing aspect of the Duke lacrosse case. http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/03/14/ ... osse-case/

Ramblin Grimace ‏@RamblinGrimace Mar 14
@TimBaffoe Seriously, this was really great. I wish the right people would read it, but I won't hold my breath.

Frankie Presto ‏@TimBaffoe Mar 14
@RamblinGrimace like those people who think I run your account?

Ramblin Grimace ‏@RamblinGrimace Mar 14
@TimBaffoe The Kane face on Jesus is definitely among those I had in mind. Also the guy trying to protect us all from the media.


That's a pretty intuitive understanding of a nebulous reference made by someone you've only conversed with on Twitter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Panther vibe

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tim Baffoe wrote:
Its message is that the world owes an apology to these resilient young athletes and their families — the real victims.
That, unfortunately, is an irksome underlying stance for the objective lens of any documentary to adopt.


Does he really believe the wrongly accused aren't owed an apology by someone?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tim Baffoe wrote:
The documentary mostly ignores that this was a wholly atypical situation.


Not quite as atypical as he'd like you to believe:

http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/14/here- ... ape-story/

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Does he really believe the wrongly accused aren't owed an apology by someone?


They should receive apologies in private while being condemned in public. It's about optics.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Does he really believe the wrongly accused aren't owed an apology by someone?


They should receive apologies in private while being condemned in public. It's about optics.


You know, I can accept the potential morality in a philosophy that favors society as a whole over particular individuals. And maybe the concept that rape survivors (or accusers, if you prefer) should simply be believed as a collective, as has been suggested by Jessica Valenti and some others, due to the greater good attained via the recognition of the prevalence of sexual assault is a good approach for our society. I have yet to be convinced of that, but I am at least open to the concept.

There are a couple obvious problems with such a philosophy. The first and most important being that it's very easy to sacrifice Patrick Kane or Dez Wells on the altar of modern feminism, but I don't think any of the "feminists" promoting such an idea would feel the same if the man in question were their father or brother.

Second, it seems that in the eyes of the modern feminist the "greater good of society" approach is only applicable to this single issue. When we discuss abortion and its effects on society, suddenly it becomes very personal and the rights of the individual must trump all.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't think any of the "feminists" promoting such an idea would feel the same if the man in question were their father or brother.

Depends on the flavor of their daddy issues.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:13 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Da Region
pizza_Place: Giordano's
So some person probably wanting attention created a fake account for Kane's accuser... Tim Baffoe then RT's it tell people to report it... Not a bad intent, but of course this just lets her name be known to all of his Twitter followers and anyone who RT's his post... Wow should have thought that out... :lol:

That is almost as bad as the lawyer not blacking out her name to begin with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
I would be livid if that guy was teaching one of my kids. The subject doesn't matter, I don't think he knows anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Spaulding wrote:
I would be livid if that guy was teaching one of my kids. The subject doesn't matter, I don't think he knows anything.

Doesn't he teach at an all-boys school? He's emboldening the patriarchy.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I didnt read the whole article. I will say that I understand being annoyed when people use an outlier to argue against the norm.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Score is doomed wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Baffoe acts like these types of questionable (at best) accusations are far more rare than they actually are.

http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/show ... tback.html

But I don't believe that in most cases the women are really lying. I think the issue is that the very definition of "rape" is in flux. Especially on the American college campus. Thirty years ago if a woman went home with a guy and woke up the next morning thinking, "Man, I would have never fucked that dude had I been sober!", she chalked it up as a mistake she made, life experience. If that same scenario occurs today, there's a fair chance she might call it rape. Hell, I don't know. Maybe it is. But I'll say again, I think such a standard is a societal choice to treat a woman as a child. I'm just glad I don't have to deal with those sexual politics.


It seems that describes Julie's story of her rape.

Psh, imagine how the rapist felt.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
I didnt read the whole article. I will say that I understand being annoyed when people use an outlier to argue against the norm.


The problem is, it's not the outlier he's claiming it is. He's accepting the third wave feminist party line that only 2% of claims are false with zero evidence to support such a claim.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I didnt read the whole article. I will say that I understand being annoyed when people use an outlier to argue against the norm.


The problem is, it's not the outlier he's claiming it is. He's accepting the third wave feminist party line that only 2% of claims are false with zero evidence to support such a claim.

I thought he was talking about the rarity of rich white people getting fucked by the court system.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I didnt read the whole article. I will say that I understand being annoyed when people use an outlier to argue against the norm.


The problem is, it's not the outlier he's claiming it is. He's accepting the third wave feminist party line that only 2% of claims are false with zero evidence to support such a claim.

I thought he was talking about the rarity of rich white people getting fucked by the court system.


That's an underlying theme as well, but he seems to be starting from the premise that 2% of rape accusations are false (this is a number accepted as fact in modern feminist thought and you will be shouted down for daring to question it) and the the philosophy that the 2% are collateral damage in the war against rape culture.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I didnt read the whole article. I will say that I understand being annoyed when people use an outlier to argue against the norm.


The problem is, it's not the outlier he's claiming it is. He's accepting the third wave feminist party line that only 2% of claims are false with zero evidence to support such a claim.

I thought he was talking about the rarity of rich white people getting fucked by the court system.


That's an underlying theme as well, but he seems to be starting from the premise that 2% of rape accusations are false (this is a number accepted as fact in modern feminist thought and you will be shouted down for daring to question it) and the the philosophy that the 2% are collateral damage in the war against rape culture.

Yea, that's pretty crazy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group