It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2025 2:06 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 652 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 22  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
No, Im not kidding you. You're not being truthful. If you were, you would say public colleges because that is the truth.

And that is a difference. Your statements make it sound like he's proposing all college everywhere to be free. That is not the case.
That is just dumb.

I'm talking about people. You are just arguing to argue on this.

Its not dumb. It's you spinning. Is it that difficult to say he's proposing free tuition at public universities?

And that he's proposing affordable child care and not FREE child care for all?

As I said before, if the ideas are as crazy as you say they are, you shouldnt have to spin or exaggerate at all.
He is offering ALL eligible people free college tuition. I don't really understand your point that it would only be to public schools. Who cares?

Everyone but you seems to understand that I was referring to people when saying "ALL".

Oh, I understand what you're doing. It's obvious. There is a difference between making free college possible for all and making all college everywhere free.

No one is misunderstanding you. You're just not stating the complete truth.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
As for the child care stuff, I posted his actual words earlier and asked a very simple question

I think it's great that you've stopped misrepresenting his ideas after many posts speaking of massive govt takeovers and all encompassing free services.


Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What if I decide that I don't want to pay anything for my 7 week old?

You would have an option like that. Kinda like public schools I would think.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
You would have an option like that. Kinda like public schools I would think.
:lol: How is that not free child care?

If I offer you a free burrito, and instead you choose to go buy a taco, it is still a free burrito. It doesn't become less free because you can choose to not accept it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
He is attempting to portray himself as the candidate of change because he has correctly ascertained that it would benefit him politically. Historically he has never been that guy. He has positioned himself as the choice for the anyone but Hillary crowd. In this regard he is an opportunist.
True Socialist types such Chris Hedges have blasted him for his tendency to always fall in line. He even provided a quote where Sanders stated his reason for not running as an independent. Sanders stated that the reason that he didn't run as an independent is because he didn't want to end up like Ralph Nader.


Running as an alternative makes him a sell-out? That doesn't make him an opportunist. It means he has different ideas. And he has not fallen into line on several issues including the Iraq war. He is the only one talking about money in politics. It has been that way for years, and really as the Panama Papers are showing this is the issue of today, because everything is affected by it.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
He is attempting to portray himself as the candidate of change because he has correctly ascertained that it would benefit him politically. Historically he has never been that guy. He has positioned himself as the choice for the anyone but Hillary crowd. In this regard he is an opportunist.
True Socialist types such Chris Hedges have blasted him for his tendency to always fall in line. He even provided a quote where Sanders stated his reason for not running as an independent. Sanders stated that the reason that he didn't run as an independent is because he didn't want to end up like Ralph Nader.


Running as an alternative makes him a sell-out? That doesn't make him an opportunist. It means he has different ideas. And he has not fallen into line on several issues including the Iraq war. He is the only one talking about money in politics. It has been that way for years, and really as the Panama Papers are showing this is the issue of today, because everything is affected by it.



He is running as a Democrat after yrs of claiming to be an independent. He votes with the Democrats 98% of the time. He continued to vote Democrat while being highly critical of them. He did this so that they wouldn't run a serious candidate against him in Vermont.

He had ample time to propose legislation that would curb the excesses of Wall Street and never did a thing.

He sold out the Socialist movement in order to win elections.

He also doesn't understand policy on the issue that he has used as the centerpiece of his campaign.

He also continues to use an anti Iraq vote taken years ago as a way to cover up his ignorance regarding foreign policy. It's the only card that he has to play.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
He is attempting to portray himself as the candidate of change because he has correctly ascertained that it would benefit him politically. Historically he has never been that guy. He has positioned himself as the choice for the anyone but Hillary crowd. In this regard he is an opportunist.
True Socialist types such Chris Hedges have blasted him for his tendency to always fall in line. He even provided a quote where Sanders stated his reason for not running as an independent. Sanders stated that the reason that he didn't run as an independent is because he didn't want to end up like Ralph Nader.


Running as an alternative makes him a sell-out? That doesn't make him an opportunist. It means he has different ideas. And he has not fallen into line on several issues including the Iraq war. He is the only one talking about money in politics. It has been that way for years, and really as the Panama Papers are showing this is the issue of today, because everything is affected by it.



He is running as a Democrat after yrs of claiming to be an independent. He votes with the Democrats 98% of the time. He continued to vote Democrat while being highly critical of them. He did this so that they wouldn't run a serious candidate against him in Vermont.

He had ample time to propose legislation that would curb the excesses of Wall Street and never did a thing.

He sold out the Socialist movement in order to win elections.

He also doesn't understand policy on the issue that he has used as the centerpiece of his campaign.

He also continues to use an anti Iraq vote taken years ago as a way to cover up his ignorance regarding foreign policy. It's the only card that he has to play.


This is why you're a walking contradiction, my friend. By the way, no one gives a shit about being registered as an independent and then joining the democrats. As for the contradiction, you acknowledge "excesses on Wall Street" but then support Wall Street's preferred candidate to a guy who doesn't take money from Wall Street while making its reform a central tenant of his campaign. As they say around here, Thursdays at 5.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
He is running as a Democrat after yrs of claiming to be an independent. He votes with the Democrats 98% of the time. He continued to vote Democrat while being highly critical of them. He did this so that they wouldn't run a serious candidate against him in Vermont.

He had ample time to propose legislation that would curb the excesses of Wall Street and never did a thing. False :http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-files-bill-to-break-up-big-banks

He sold out the Socialist movement in order to win elections. What votes do you have a problem with? How has he "sold-out" his movement?

He also doesn't understand policy on the issue that he has used as the centerpiece of his campaign. This is a lie. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-re ... 57184.html

He also continues to use an anti Iraq vote taken years ago as a way to cover up his ignorance regarding foreign policy. It's the only card that he has to play. So not wanting to go to war and pointing out tax havens not equals ignorance?


For the Dems, there is one candidate who is totally owned by Wall Street and willing to take blood money from everyone. Sanders is the other.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
What does that mean? It's really great to say that PACS aren't financing his campaign but the same is true for Trump. Why should I believe that Bernie will all of a sudden do things that he hasn't even tried to do after nearly 30 years in Washington?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
What does that mean? It's really great to say that PACS aren't financing his campaign but the same is true for Trump. Why should I believe that Bernie will all of a sudden do things that he hasn't even tried to do after nearly 30 years in Washington?


He doesn't have a Super PAC. She does. Not sure what else to say on that. What do you believe that he has not "tried to do" in Washington? He has tried to get the system to change. Here is a piece from ten years ago: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... s-20050825

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
He is attempting to portray himself as the candidate of change because he has correctly ascertained that it would benefit him politically. Historically he has never been that guy. He has positioned himself as the choice for the anyone but Hillary crowd. In this regard he is an opportunist.
True Socialist types such Chris Hedges have blasted him for his tendency to always fall in line. He even provided a quote where Sanders stated his reason for not running as an independent. Sanders stated that the reason that he didn't run as an independent is because he didn't want to end up like Ralph Nader.


Running as an alternative makes him a sell-out? That doesn't make him an opportunist. It means he has different ideas. And he has not fallen into line on several issues including the Iraq war. He is the only one talking about money in politics. It has been that way for years, and really as the Panama Papers are showing this is the issue of today, because everything is affected by it.



He is running as a Democrat after yrs of claiming to be an independent. He votes with the Democrats 98% of the time. He continued to vote Democrat while being highly critical of them. He did this so that they wouldn't run a serious candidate against him in Vermont.

He had ample time to propose legislation that would curb the excesses of Wall Street and never did a thing.

He sold out the Socialist movement in order to win elections.

He also doesn't understand policy on the issue that he has used as the centerpiece of his campaign.

He also continues to use an anti Iraq vote taken years ago as a way to cover up his ignorance regarding foreign policy. It's the only card that he has to play.


This is why you're a walking contradiction, my friend. By the way, no one gives a shit about being registered as an independent and then joining the democrats. As for the contradiction, you acknowledge "excesses on Wall Street" but then support Wall Street's preferred candidate to a guy who doesn't take money from Wall Street while making its reform a central tenant of his campaign. As they say around here, Thursdays at 5.



I try to respect your posts but you don't make sense on a lot of this stuff. When you say that "no one gives a shit" you are using generalities. Don't you think that the DNC "gives a shit"? Maybe that's the reason they havent jumped through hoops to support him? Maybe some look at the guys record instead of simply listening to the rhetoric.

Also how can a guy with no history of changing anything be viewed as a "reform" candidate? Isn't that what Obama was supposed to be and we see how that worked out.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
He is running as a Democrat after yrs of claiming to be an independent. He votes with the Democrats 98% of the time. He continued to vote Democrat while being highly critical of them. He did this so that they wouldn't run a serious candidate against him in Vermont.

He had ample time to propose legislation that would curb the excesses of Wall Street and never did a thing. False :http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-files-bill-to-break-up-big-banks

He sold out the Socialist movement in order to win elections. What votes do you have a problem with? How has he "sold-out" his movement?

He also doesn't understand policy on the issue that he has used as the centerpiece of his campaign. This is a lie. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-re ... 57184.html

He also continues to use an anti Iraq vote taken years ago as a way to cover up his ignorance regarding foreign policy. It's the only card that he has to play. So not wanting to go to war and pointing out tax havens not equals ignorance?


For the Dems, there is one candidate who is totally owned by Wall Street and willing to take blood money from everyone. Sanders is the other.


If Hillary is totally owned by Wall Street as is often suggested, then what piece of legislation has she pushed that directly benefits Wall Street?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
He is running as a Democrat after yrs of claiming to be an independent. He votes with the Democrats 98% of the time. He continued to vote Democrat while being highly critical of them. He did this so that they wouldn't run a serious candidate against him in Vermont.

He had ample time to propose legislation that would curb the excesses of Wall Street and never did a thing. False :http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-files-bill-to-break-up-big-banks

He sold out the Socialist movement in order to win elections. What votes do you have a problem with? How has he "sold-out" his movement?

He also doesn't understand policy on the issue that he has used as the centerpiece of his campaign. This is a lie. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-re ... 57184.html

He also continues to use an anti Iraq vote taken years ago as a way to cover up his ignorance regarding foreign policy. It's the only card that he has to play. So not wanting to go to war and pointing out tax havens not equals ignorance?


For the Dems, there is one candidate who is totally owned by Wall Street and willing to take blood money from everyone. Sanders is the other.


If Hillary is totally owned by Wall Street as is often suggested, then what piece of legislation has she pushed that directly benefits Wall Street?


She was not in Congress that long to have a vast legislative history, but who are we kidding? Look at all of the money going to the Clinton Foundation. Her husband singed all of the deregulation bills that led to the crash. You give Hilary credit for her healthcare efforts (which failed), so I am going to assume she gets some blame for the Clinton administration's efforts to strip Wall Street of oversight.

Also, she did have a key vote in voting for bankruptcy reform, which favored the banks of course.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/07/us/po ... .html?_r=0

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:

I try to respect your posts but you don't make sense on a lot of this stuff. When you say that "no one gives a shit" you are using generalities. Don't you think that the DNC "gives a shit"? Maybe that's the reason they havent jumped through hoops to support him? Maybe some look at the guys record instead of simply listening to the rhetoric.

Also how can a guy with no history of changing anything be viewed as a "reform" candidate? Isn't that what Obama was supposed to be and we see how that worked out.


Feel free to respond to your Wall Street contradiction. You've never coherently responded to any of the critiques thrown Clinton's way.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:

I try to respect your posts but you don't make sense on a lot of this stuff. When you say that "no one gives a shit" you are using generalities. Don't you think that the DNC "gives a shit"? Maybe that's the reason they havent jumped through hoops to support him? Maybe some look at the guys record instead of simply listening to the rhetoric.

Also how can a guy with no history of changing anything be viewed as a "reform" candidate? Isn't that what Obama was supposed to be and we see how that worked out.


Feel free to respond to your Wall Street contradiction. You've never coherently responded to any of the critiques thrown Clinton's way.



She is establishment. I will never deny that or attempt to deny it. She doesn't try and portray herself to be anything beyond that. Sanders has and that's why he is a bit of a fraud. True reformers know this.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The crash occurred on Bush's watch however.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:55 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
What does that mean? It's really great to say that PACS aren't financing his campaign but the same is true for Trump. Why should I believe that Bernie will all of a sudden do things that he hasn't even tried to do after nearly 30 years in Washington?


He doesn't have a Super PAC. She does. Not sure what else to say on that. What do you believe that he has not "tried to do" in Washington? He has tried to get the system to change. Here is a piece from ten years ago: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... s-20050825


What does it mean? Should I support Trump because he isn't being financed by Wall Street? It's great that Bernie hasn't made a fortune like many other people in Washington, but that doesn't tell me anything about what his policies would be or if he can be an effective president.

I just read that article and it doesn't show him trying to change anything. He's giving a guy a tour and showing him how the sausage is made. Sanders proposes amendments that he and the Republicans who vote for them KNOW WILL EVENTUALLY DIE. I ask you again, why should I believe that Bernie will be able to propose legislation that he hasn't proposed in 3 decades in Washington? Why should I believe that he can get it passed considering he has never tried and doesn't have a lot of friends in Congress? Why hasn't he proposed any of these policies if he truly cares about them?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
What does it mean? Should I support Trump because he isn't being financed by Wall Street? It's great that Bernie hasn't made a fortune like many other people in Washington, but that doesn't tell me anything about what his policies would be or if he can be an effective president.

I just read that article and it doesn't show him trying to change anything. He's giving a guy a tour and showing him how the sausage is made. Sanders proposes amendments that he and the Republicans who vote for them KNOW WILL EVENTUALLY DIE. I ask you again, why should I believe that Bernie will be able to propose legislation that he hasn't proposed in 3 decades in Washington? Why should I believe that he can get it passed considering he has never tried and doesn't have a lot of friends in Congress? Why hasn't he proposed any of these policies if he truly cares about them?


Exposing how Congress works isn't trying to change it? He has proposed policies and legislation, numerous times including the amendments that you mention. If you look earlier in the thread you can find legislation to break up the banks that he proposed.

Sanders knows Congress and how it works. It's is lot different being a senator vs. being president. Not even LBJ could get Civil Rights passed until he was in the White House. Sanders is the only person talking about money in politics. Clinton is smiling and taking the checks. Yet, Sanders is the "hustler" in your mind.

What are Clinton's core beliefs? Other than shifting her positions to what is popular at the moment.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
You're really comparing Sanders to LBJ? Bernie Sanders hasn't proposed ANY of the policies he's running on in 3 decades in Washington. Bernie Sanders hasn't proposed a major piece of legislation EVER. Showing a reporter how the sausage is made means nothing. Lots of reporters know how the sausage is made. Proposing amendments that you know will die is as pointless as his rhetoric. #ActionMatters

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56758
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Why do we even have a thread for Bernie and a thread for Hillary when both threads are just Nas and long time guy thinking they're pulling the coup of the century by telling a guy eating a ham sandwich that he's eating a ham sandwich.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Curious Hair wrote:
Why do we even have a thread for Bernie and a thread for Hillary when both threads are just Nas and long time guy thinking they're pulling the coup of the century by telling a guy eating a ham sandwich that he's eating a ham sandwich.


Seems overly complimentary.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38787
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Curious Hair wrote:
Why do we even have a thread for Bernie and a thread for Hillary when both threads are just Nas and long time guy thinking they're pulling the coup of the century by telling a guy eating a ham sandwich that he's eating a ham sandwich.


So posters can see why the status quo is the status quo.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Why do we even have a thread for Bernie and a thread for Hillary when both threads are just Nas and long time guy thinking they're pulling the coup of the century by telling a guy eating a ham sandwich that he's eating a ham sandwich.


Seems overly complimentary.


Someone has to do it. Too much chiding of Hillary supporters taking place. Also Hillary supporters are customarily dismissed for failing to see the greatness that is Bernie Sanders. It's not merely about stating the obvious, because the obvious hasn't really been stated until now.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
You're really comparing Sanders to LBJ? Bernie Sanders hasn't proposed ANY of the policies he's running on in 3 decades in Washington. Bernie Sanders hasn't proposed a major piece of legislation EVER. Showing a reporter how the sausage is made means nothing. Lots of reporters know how the sausage is made. Proposing amendments that you know will die is as pointless as his rhetoric. #ActionMatters


LBJ was considered the King of the Senate. He had to become President to pass his signature piece of legislation. You keep referring to the article that was a snippet from years of service.

What "action" has Hilary backed? What is she proposing that you find so convincing?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Why do we even have a thread for Bernie and a thread for Hillary when both threads are just Nas and long time guy thinking they're pulling the coup of the century by telling a guy eating a ham sandwich that he's eating a ham sandwich.


Seems overly complimentary.


Someone has to do it. Too much chiding of Hillary supporters taking place. Also Hillary supporters are customarily dismissed for failing to see the greatness that is Bernie Sanders. It's not merely about stating the obvious, because the obvious hasn't really been stated until now.


The media does this on a daily basis.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The media has given Sanders a pass. It's why it was so shocking to hear him fumble last week during that interview. He made it all the way to April without having to address how he would break up the banks. Why? Because they were focusing on his rallies, fundraising, ability to attract the youth vote, polling etc. They also were busy tearing down Hillary Clinton. There hasn't been any real vetting of Sanders.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Why do we even have a thread for Bernie and a thread for Hillary when both threads are just Nas and long time guy thinking they're pulling the coup of the century by telling a guy eating a ham sandwich that he's eating a ham sandwich.


Seems overly complimentary.


Someone has to do it. Too much chiding of Hillary supporters taking place. Also Hillary supporters are customarily dismissed for failing to see the greatness that is Bernie Sanders. It's not merely about stating the obvious, because the obvious hasn't really been stated until now.


:lol: The first post in the thread is some ridiculous article link with the OP calling Sanders a fraud. He has also been called Donald Trump in this thread. And beyond that, your candidate (who will be the most disliked presidential candidate in history aside from Trump) has a history of missteps and lies so long, they couldn't even be contained to a single thread.

And to top it all off, she's gonna win, anyway! The vitriol now is mainly focused around how Sanders has the gall to continue running! What an asshole!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
long time guy wrote:
The media has given Sanders a pass. It's why it was so shocking to hear him fumble last week during that interview. He made it all the way to April without having to address how he would break up the banks. Why? Because they were focusing on his rallies, fundraising, ability to attract the youth vote, polling etc. They also were busy tearing down Hillary Clinton. There hasn't been any real vetting of Sanders.


We know you feel this way. You've made the same post 20+ times in this thread.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The media has given Sanders a pass. It's why it was so shocking to hear him fumble last week during that interview. He made it all the way to April without having to address how he would break up the banks. Why? Because they were focusing on his rallies, fundraising, ability to attract the youth vote, polling etc. They also were busy tearing down Hillary Clinton. There hasn't been any real vetting of Sanders.


We know you feel this way. You've made the same post 20+ times in this thread.


I love the same post argument. How many times have we had to hear about Hillary's "honesty", "likability", or ties to corporate America. That dog has been hunting for a much longer period of time. My Sanders critique is a relatively newer and less popular byproduct of this.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Curious Hair wrote:
Why do we even have a thread for Bernie and a thread for Hillary when both threads are just Nas and long time guy thinking they're pulling the coup of the century by telling a guy eating a ham sandwich that he's eating a ham sandwich.


I don't think you all know that though. I'm confident that you all really believe that you are eating steak.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
You're really comparing Sanders to LBJ? Bernie Sanders hasn't proposed ANY of the policies he's running on in 3 decades in Washington. Bernie Sanders hasn't proposed a major piece of legislation EVER. Showing a reporter how the sausage is made means nothing. Lots of reporters know how the sausage is made. Proposing amendments that you know will die is as pointless as his rhetoric. #ActionMatters


LBJ was considered the King of the Senate. He had to become President to pass his signature piece of legislation. You keep referring to the article that was a snippet from years of service.

What "action" has Hilary backed? What is she proposing that you find so convincing?



LBJ knew how to get shit done. Bernie Sanders has NEVER gotten ANYTHING done. Please don't insult LBJ by comparing him to Bernie.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernie Sanders
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Seacrest wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Why do we even have a thread for Bernie and a thread for Hillary when both threads are just Nas and long time guy thinking they're pulling the coup of the century by telling a guy eating a ham sandwich that he's eating a ham sandwich.


So posters can see why the status quo is the status quo.


So you're voting for Trump?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 652 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 22  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group