It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Eh, the Sox have only played (and dominated) the first place Oakland A's, the Indians (average team probably) and one game against the lowly Twins.

Cubs have played two last place teams and a team that is obviously tanking in a bullshit league with free strikeouts.


The Sox have played 7 games and have a +7 run differential, they haven't dominated shit. You'd going a good job as JORR's lapdog in that your definition of "dominated" in this context is as laughable as JORR's bullshit definition of "pitching problem" as it pertained to the Cubs.

Sox took 3 out 4 against a first place team. Cant deny it, the A's may be a real-ass ballclub this year and the Sox went into their house (traditionally a nightmare building for the Sox) and took 3 out of 4.

The Cubs meanwhile have been bumslaying teams with no chance this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
America wrote:
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Eh, the Sox have only played (and dominated) the first place Oakland A's, the Indians (average team probably) and one game against the lowly Twins.

Cubs have played two last place teams and a team that is obviously tanking in a bullshit league with free strikeouts.


The Sox have played 7 games and have a +7 run differential, they haven't dominated shit. You'd going a good job as JORR's lapdog in that your definition of "dominated" in this context is as laughable as JORR's bullshit definition of "pitching problem" as it pertained to the Cubs.

Sox took 3 out 4 against a first place team. Cant deny it, the A's may be a real-ass ballclub this year and the Sox went into their house (traditionally a nightmare building for the Sox) and took 3 out of 4.

The Cubs meanwhile have been bumslaying teams with no chance this year.


When did it morph from "Dominated" to "took from"?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
:lol: You are a fucking idiot if you are going to give the Sox so much credit for beating the A's and will not give the Cubs any credit for the Angels and the Dbacks.

The Dbacks are a team many expect to contend in the West and for a wild card.

Hardly anyone has the As doing anything this year.

But you keep believing your pathetic trolling shit.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
America wrote:
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Eh, the Sox have only played (and dominated) the first place Oakland A's, the Indians (average team probably) and one game against the lowly Twins.

Cubs have played two last place teams and a team that is obviously tanking in a bullshit league with free strikeouts.


The Sox have played 7 games and have a +7 run differential, they haven't dominated shit. You'd going a good job as JORR's lapdog in that your definition of "dominated" in this context is as laughable as JORR's bullshit definition of "pitching problem" as it pertained to the Cubs.

Sox took 3 out 4 against a first place team. Cant deny it, the A's may be a real-ass ballclub this year and the Sox went into their house (traditionally a nightmare building for the Sox) and took 3 out of 4.

The Cubs meanwhile have been bumslaying teams with no chance this year.


I think the Sox have looked solid thus far. It doesn't bother me. See how easy that is?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
America wrote:
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Eh, the Sox have only played (and dominated) the first place Oakland A's, the Indians (average team probably) and one game against the lowly Twins.

Cubs have played two last place teams and a team that is obviously tanking in a bullshit league with free strikeouts.


The Sox have played 7 games and have a +7 run differential, they haven't dominated shit. You'd going a good job as JORR's lapdog in that your definition of "dominated" in this context is as laughable as JORR's bullshit definition of "pitching problem" as it pertained to the Cubs.

Sox took 3 out 4 against a first place team. Cant deny it, the A's may be a real-ass ballclub this year and the Sox went into their house (traditionally a nightmare building for the Sox) and took 3 out of 4.

The Cubs meanwhile have been bumslaying teams with no chance this year.


The Sox are 5-2 against teams with an aggregate record of 6-12, the Cubs are 6-1 against teams with an aggregate record of 9-11. I know you are shitty at math, but what is better winning 6 of 18 or winning 9 of 20?

Can't deny it.

Maybe you should let JORR take over for you at this point. He's better at shoveling bullshit around these threads.

Keep it up though, I see promise in you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
America wrote:
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Eh, the Sox have only played (and dominated) the first place Oakland A's, the Indians (average team probably) and one game against the lowly Twins.

Cubs have played two last place teams and a team that is obviously tanking in a bullshit league with free strikeouts.


The Sox have played 7 games and have a +7 run differential, they haven't dominated shit. You'd going a good job as JORR's lapdog in that your definition of "dominated" in this context is as laughable as JORR's bullshit definition of "pitching problem" as it pertained to the Cubs.

Sox took 3 out 4 against a first place team. Cant deny it, the A's may be a real-ass ballclub this year and the Sox went into their house (traditionally a nightmare building for the Sox) and took 3 out of 4.

The Cubs meanwhile have been bumslaying teams with no chance this year.


The Angels and Diamondbacks are both better teams than Oakland.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Eh, the Sox have only played (and dominated) the first place Oakland A's, the Indians (average team probably) and one game against the lowly Twins.

Cubs have played two last place teams and a team that is obviously tanking in a bullshit league with free strikeouts.


The Sox have played 7 games and have a +7 run differential, they haven't dominated shit. You'd going a good job as JORR's lapdog in that your definition of "dominated" in this context is as laughable as JORR's bullshit definition of "pitching problem" as it pertained to the Cubs.

Sox took 3 out 4 against a first place team. Cant deny it, the A's may be a real-ass ballclub this year and the Sox went into their house (traditionally a nightmare building for the Sox) and took 3 out of 4.

The Cubs meanwhile have been bumslaying teams with no chance this year.


The Sox are 5-2 against teams with an aggregate record of 6-12, the Cubs are 6-1 against teams with an aggregate record of 9-11. I know you are shitty at math, but what is better winning 6 of 18 or winning 9 of 20?

Can't deny it.

Maybe you should let JORR take over for you at this point. He's better at shoveling bullshit around these threads.

Keep it up though, I see promise in you.

Yes the Sox won one game against the worst team in baseball, aside from that they've played the 4-3 A's and the 2-2 Tribe. Cubs have played one team even close to .500, and its the fucking Reds who are probably panicking about winning too many games early in the season (fucking National League... can it be called baseball)?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Angels and Diamondbacks are both better teams than Oakland.

not according to the standings, but that's just what I go by. too many blacks in Oakland CA for you, Steve?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
America wrote:
Yes the Sox won one game against the worst team in baseball, aside from that they've played the 4-3 A's and the 2-2 Tribe. Cubs have played one team even close to .500, and its the fucking Reds who are probably panicking about winning too many games early in the season (fucking National League... can it be called baseball)?


The only person I see panicking about a team winning too many games is you as it relates to the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
America wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Angels and Diamondbacks are both better teams than Oakland.

not according to the standings, but that's just what I go by. too many blacks in Oakland CA for you, Steve?


So I guess the Sox are not better than the Reds? You know that shit-ass team that is tanking?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Angels and Diamondbacks are both better teams than Oakland.

not according to the standings, but that's just what I go by. too many blacks in Oakland CA for you, Steve?


So I guess the Sox are not better than the Reds? You know that shit-ass team that is tanking?

Sox and Reds have the same record, sure. BUT the Sox play in the AL, tie goes to the team that plays in a major league and not some AAA-knockoff with bigger stadiums.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
America just has his head spinning now!

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
You know America is panicking when he is already going to the worn out line that the AL plays such superior baseball to the NL :lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
America wrote:
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Angels and Diamondbacks are both better teams than Oakland.

not according to the standings, but that's just what I go by. too many blacks in Oakland CA for you, Steve?


So I guess the Sox are not better than the Reds? You know that shit-ass team that is tanking?

Sox and Reds have the same record, sure. BUT the Sox play in the AL, tie goes to the team that plays in a major league and not some AAA-knockoff with bigger stadiums.



Must be embarrassing for the AL that they are currently losing to the NL in interleague play..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
One Post wrote:
America wrote:
Not like the Sox have played more games than the Cubs or anything.


No, at the time of the post both teams played 6 games.

Uhhh JORR made that post at 8:30 PM today.... Sox/Twins first pitch was at 3:00 today...


I subtracted the one run the Sox gave up today to get them to their total of 20. Trust me it was an apples to apples comparison.

After 7 games, Sox 21 runs, Cubs 18.

Now run along little boy back to the Sox forum where you and JORR can discuss the meltdown that is the Sox pitching.


I don't think you understand the meaning of "apples to apples" when the Cubs are striking out Robbie Ray and the Sox are facing a DH.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:23 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Must be embarrassing for the AL that they are currently losing to the NL in interleague play..


Would you like to bet on which league finishes with the better record? Come on, take advantage of your lead. I'll take the AL.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I don't think you understand the meaning of "apples to apples" when the Cubs are striking out Robbie Ray and the Sox are facing a DH.

You can't play teams or players that aren't on your schedule

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
America wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Angels and Diamondbacks are both better teams than Oakland.

not according to the standings, but that's just what I go by. too many blacks in Oakland CA for you, Steve?


The sample size after just over a week of Baseball is not relevant. Baseball experts expect Oakland to be mediocre this season, The Angels should be good and perhaps contend for a playoff spot. The Diamondbacks were expected by many to be legit contenders for the World series, along with the Cubs. To suggest that current standings have any real importance at this early stage in the season is just stupid. I'm happy the Cubs are alone in first place in the Central right now, but it's too early to give much importance to it now.

As far as Oakland is concerned.....I have never been there, so I have no idea what it's like there.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Darkside wrote:
Sox new color seems to be green.


because of the cash saved on La Roche

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Must be embarrassing for the AL that they are currently losing to the NL in interleague play..


Would you like to bet on which league finishes with the better record? Come on, take advantage of your lead. I'll take the AL.



Sure, how about $250.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Please stop judging "America"
You would also have a fucked up Cubs obsession if you looked in the mirror one day wearing a Sox hat and said "Dear God I drive a Miata "

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Must be embarrassing for the AL that they are currently losing to the NL in interleague play..


Would you like to bet on which league finishes with the better record? Come on, take advantage of your lead. I'll take the AL.



Sure, how about $250.


I have no problem with that, but you'll have to verify who you are. I'm well known here. And if I lose, I'm gonna pay. I'm not taking the risk with some phantom who is just going to disappear after I win the bet.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Like Scorehead?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
Like Scorehead?



No, I'd make a $250 bet with Scorehead and expect that he would pay. The guy used his own real name here, for God's sake. I really don't think he ever intended the thing with Chus to be an actual bet. It was just some shit-talking that went bad between the two guys. Nobody has any idea who this One Post guy is. I have no idea if I'll get the money when I win. That being the case, I probably should not have offered the bet.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Like Scorehead?



No, I'd make a $250 bet with Scorehead and expect that he would pay. The guy used his own real name here, for God's sake. I really don't think he ever intended the thing with Chus to be an actual bet. It was just some shit-talking that went bad between the two guys. Nobody has any idea who this One Post guy is. I have no idea if I'll get the money when I win. That being the case, I probably should not have offered the bet.

Why don't you both PayPal me 250 each and I'll pay out to the winner at the end....
That's fair. Hell... you know where I live for God's sake.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Like Scorehead?



No, I'd make a $250 bet with Scorehead and expect that he would pay. The guy used his own real name here, for God's sake. I really don't think he ever intended the thing with Chus to be an actual bet. It was just some shit-talking that went bad between the two guys. Nobody has any idea who this One Post guy is. I have no idea if I'll get the money when I win. That being the case, I probably should not have offered the bet.

Why don't you both PayPal me 250 each and I'll pay out to the winner at the end....
That's fair. Hell... you know where I live for God's sake.


I'd have no problem with you holding the money. I don't use Paypal though. Fuck those guys! I'd get you the dough though if he wants to do it that way.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I'm available.

Image

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
And Goldschmidt and some guy named Burrito used Arrieta for batting practice last night.

:lol: oh for the love of god JORR.

He gave up 3 runs. THREE.

And he won the game, which is what good pitchers do, right? They find ways to win.

He pitched better than his opponent which is the most important criteria by which to judge pitchers.


He outpitched a 17 game loser. You should be very proud of him.

Mark Langston


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

He outpitched a 17 game loser. You should be very proud of him.

Mark Langston


:lol: I'm pretty sure you don't believe Shelby Miller is Mark Langston. Any pitcher can have a bad season. I feel pretty safe saying that Miller isn't Langston.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Darkside wrote:
Like Scorehead?


There are no redemptions at CSFMB

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group