It is currently Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:42 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Apparently someone feels like putting the phrase 'better late than never' to the test ...

http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-36022876

Led Zeppelin founders Robert Plant and Jimmy Page must face trial in a copyright row over the song Stairway to Heaven, a US court has ruled.

A Los Angeles district judge said there were enough similarities between the song and an instrumental by the band Spirit to let a jury decide.

The trial has been scheduled for 10 May.

Stairway to Heaven, released in 1971, is widely seen as one of the greatest rock compositions of all time.

The copyright infringement action has been brought by Michael Skidmore, a trustee for the late Spirit guitarist Randy Wolfe, who played on the same bill as Led Zeppelin in the 1960s, and claims he should be given a writing credit on the track.

Led Zeppelin guitarist Page and lead singer Plant are reputed to have written Stairway to Heaven in a remote cottage in Wales.

However, Mr Skidmore has suggested the song came about after the band heard Spirit perform the instrumental Taurus while the bands toured together in 1968 and 1969.


US district judge Gary Klausner said a jury could find "substantial" similarity between the first two minutes of Stairway and Taurus. (judge for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFHLO_2_THg ... personally I've heard far more eggregious lifting of riffs but it's not 100% baseless, but I wouldn't rule against Zeppelin personally)

"While it is true that a descending chromatic four-chord progression is a common convention that abounds in the music industry, the similarities here transcend this core structure," Judge Klausner ruled.

"What remains is a subjective assessment of the 'concept and feel' of two works... a task no more suitable for a judge than for a jury."

He also said the trustee can get only 50% of any damages awarded, citing a 1967 contract Wolfe signed.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Love these stories and then little blurb..."Contract Signed"

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33565
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-1_9-z9rbY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 7:01 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102625
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I'm not sure why Zeppelin would wait until 1971 to record and release that song if they were copying it.

The music is different 99% of the time, its Plant's lyrics that have gotten the band in trouble before.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'm not sure why Zeppelin would wait until 1971 to record and release that song if they were copying it.

The music is different 99% of the time, its Plant's lyrics that have gotten the band in trouble before.


I'm made to understand it's considerably more than just lyrics they've lifted without proper credit over the years.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Can you even copyright a chord progression? I'm not sure it is the exact same chord progression as Stairway either...it is kinda close though. I dont know, this seems a little silly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 78907
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Don Tiny wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'm not sure why Zeppelin would wait until 1971 to record and release that song if they were copying it.

The music is different 99% of the time, its Plant's lyrics that have gotten the band in trouble before.


I'm made to understand it's considerably more than just lyrics they've lifted without proper credit over the years.



Clearly. And it was far more egregious when they did it to poor old brothers from Chicago than when they did it to fellow rock star Randy California.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
Then they went after Pearl Jam for "Given to Fly." Have to laugh, since Zeppelin has been caught blatantly stealing from so many bands.

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4724
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
I've listened to Zeppelin since high school, first being amazed with them when I heard a friend of mine on the football team playing "Stairway" on the bus to an away game. I was hooked from then on, going on to collect every bootleg recording I could get my hands on. I've listened to them all, except for a few '69 and '77 shows. I'm also a student of Zep history, having read all the biographies from Richard Cole, etc.

While I believe it's true that Page took the beginning sequence of Stairway from Spirit's Taurus, I would call it more being inspired rather than a blatant rip off. The other 95% of the song Page came up on his own, first working on it in his house and then developing it with his band mates. There's early recordings that exist of Stairway being practiced, with Plant using different lyrics and Jones working out the accompaniment. Those tapes alone prove that Page didn't rip the song off, because they developed the song to a large degree through improvisation. And if you listen to the live performance of the song, particularly from '73 onwards, Page's arrangement is so masterfully intricate and soloing so lyrical, he couldn't possibly have copied the song from any one else.

If Zeppelin should be sued for copyright infringement, it should be by Bert Jansch. Page truly did rip off his songs, including Black Mountain Side, Going to California, Bron-y-aur Stomp and one or two others. Dazed and Confused, How Many More Times, I Can't Quit You and Babe I'm Gonna Leave you from the first album were all stolen from other artists, who should have been credited. Same thing with the Lemon Song and part of the lyrics to Thank You off the second album. Plant's phrase, "And if sun refuse to shine, I'll still be loving you", came from a Hendrix Song, I believe.

Yes, Zeppelin took a lot of material from other artists, but what they did with it was totally original. But in this case with Stairway, I don't think Zep is liable and it will probably play out that way in court, once the jury here's Page's story, if he testifies. How would you like to be a juror on that case?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65556
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
It's pretty clear it's ripped off.
How many hundreds or thousands of songs have been ripped off from the Beatles?
There are a finite number of chords and combinations that they work within. Most rock is based on 12 bar blues anyway so that further reduces the number of combinations.

Whatever. This happened over 40 years ago. If you were gonna be salty be salty in 71

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:25 pm
Posts: 4232
pizza_Place: pizza and subs
there are so many hit song artists that could sue each other into oblivion since they all use the C–G–Am–F progression in some sort of way. many nearly identical.

the problem with this claim is that the only part of it that is the same is the bassline progression of the first 4 notes and that it starts in A minor the other progressions on stairway and that it after a few notes drops out of A minor completely. there is only so much music sounds you can make on a guitar and there is tons of overlap in music (many construe it as theft) but they are going to have to prove that it is so since much of the song is so entirely different. Its so different they are going to have to prove i think that he was familiar with the song at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
I can't remember if Ray Parker Jr. sued Huey Lewis and the News for "I Want a New Drug"'s similarity to the "Ghostbusters" theme, or vice versa, but the larger point is it made me imagine a Led Zeppelin version of the "Ghostbusters" theme, and it was pretty good.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
I'm too lazy to look, but I'm left wondering how in the world any party can bring a copyright infringement case 45 years after the song hit number one on the charts. I can't envision how there is an exception to federal statutes of limitations in this case.

I'd have guessed that sanctions should have been imposed against whoever filed this late action.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4724
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Regular Reader wrote:
I'm too lazy to look, but I'm left wondering how in the world any party can bring a copyright infringement case 45 years after the song hit number one on the charts. I can't envision how there is an exception to federal statutes of limitations in this case.

I'd have guessed that sanctions should have been imposed against whoever filed this late action.


Statutes of Limitations can be "tolled" (meaning the time at which the clock begins ticking for the S of L is pushed back) by a number of equitable factors, but I have no idea what equitable factors would be relevant or involved here, if there are any.

The judge already denied defendant's motion to dismiss, so no sanctions are forthcoming against plaintiff attorney. They pretty much amount to nothing anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 78907
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
hnd wrote:
there are so many hit song artists that could sue each other into oblivion since they all use the C–G–Am–F progression in some sort of way. many nearly identical.

the problem with this claim is that the only part of it that is the same is the bassline progression of the first 4 notes and that it starts in A minor the other progressions on stairway and that it after a few notes drops out of A minor completely. there is only so much music sounds you can make on a guitar and there is tons of overlap in music (many construe it as theft) but they are going to have to prove that it is so since much of the song is so entirely different. Its so different they are going to have to prove i think that he was familiar with the song at all.


How about this one?:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTsvs-pAGDc

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4724
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


I mentioned it in my post. Blatant rip off. Most of the songs off Zeppelin I were ripped off.

But of course, Page inserted his bow solo into his version and the lyrics were changed by Plant.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
Vanilla Ice wrote:
They're not the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Dignified Rube wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I'm too lazy to look, but I'm left wondering how in the world any party can bring a copyright infringement case 45 years after the song hit number one on the charts. I can't envision how there is an exception to federal statutes of limitations in this case.

I'd have guessed that sanctions should have been imposed against whoever filed this late action.


Statutes of Limitations can be "tolled" (meaning the time at which the clock begins ticking for the S of L is pushed back) by a number of equitable factors, but I have no idea what equitable factors would be relevant or involved here, if there are any.

The judge already denied defendant's motion to dismiss, so no sanctions are forthcoming against plaintiff attorney. They pretty much amount to nothing anyway.


I looked (thanks). Apparently there is a recent SCt. decision (Raging Bull case) that effectively restarts the statute of limitations each time a "work" is re-released. Best of/Special Re-issue/new format (i.e. CD, digital download, etc.) apparently fit the bill. The only thing more peculiar than the reasoning behind the decision is the majority opinion's author (Ginsburg) & the justices that joined in (Kagan, Sotomayor, Alito, Scalia & of course Thomas)

I'd be willing to bet that those six never concurred in total(alone) on any other opinion in history.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16282
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Regular Reader wrote:
Apparently there is a recent SCt. decision (Raging Bull case) that effectively restarts the statute of limitations each time a "work" is re-released. Best of/Special Re-issue/new format (i.e. CD, digital download, etc.) apparently fit the bill.


Sounds similar to how Disney is able to keep extending the copyright on Mickey Mouse.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:16 pm
Posts: 1706
pizza_Place: My moms grave
Yup Zeppelin ripped off a bunch of stuff. They did it so much better though!!! Theoretically everything is a cover song there are only 12 notes so it has all been played before. The zep stuff is more blatant. Still you don't hear the ghost of little wing all pissed off at yellow Ledbetter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 18, 2016 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4724
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
The more I read about this case, the more I think that Page and Plant are in danger of losing.

Are Zeppelin's rip-offs of other artists and subsequent settlements admissible as evidence in this case, to show a pattern? If so, they're in deep doo doo with a jury.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4724
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Some interesting details coming out of the courthouse in LA. The one I found most interesting is that Led Zeppelin played one of Spirit's songs of their debut album called "Fresh Garbage" during their ending medlies when they toured in '69. I have heard bootleg recordings of them doing it, so I know exactly what is being talked about. But then Page claims that he never heard the Spirit track until recently, when his son-in-law told him about the controversy a few years back.

What a bunch of crap. I believe Page is lying through his teeth, because he would have had to listen to "Fresh Garbage" on LP multiple times to get it down before he could perform it live. And if this is true, he undoubtedly heard Spirit off the same album. Preceding the guitar part on Taurus, people have missed that there's string synthesizers, which Page and Jones happened to mimic with a recorder sound on Stairway. The proof is in the pudding.

How ironic it is that Page has to lie now to protect his legacy after his great career. I suppose the "Wheels of Justice" grind slowly, though perfectly after all, and Page is now getting his. I do think less of him now, which is sad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Fool in the Courthouse
Misty Mountain Ripoff
Babe, I'm Gonna Sue You
Hey Hey, What Can I Steal
Whole Lotta Theft

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12558
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Apparently he testified that he owned the album but he hadn't heard the song. It seems close enough that if I were on the jury, I am going to side with Spirit.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13132
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
newper wrote:
Apparently he testified that he owned the album but he hadn't heard the song. It seems close enough that if I were on the jury, I am going to side with Spirit.

I thought they toured together. That would make it hard to deny having heard the song.

That said, supposedly the same riff can be found on songs from over 100 years ago which would effectively kill the lawsuit.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12558
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
newper wrote:
Apparently he testified that he owned the album but he hadn't heard the song. It seems close enough that if I were on the jury, I am going to side with Spirit.

I thought they toured together. That would make it hard to deny having heard the song.

That said, supposedly the same riff can be found on songs from over 100 years ago which would effectively kill the lawsuit.

Yes they did tour together, although Zeppelin says they don't remember hearing that song during the tour period.

I still say give them money.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
newper wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
newper wrote:
Apparently he testified that he owned the album but he hadn't heard the song. It seems close enough that if I were on the jury, I am going to side with Spirit.

I thought they toured together. That would make it hard to deny having heard the song.

That said, supposedly the same riff can be found on songs from over 100 years ago which would effectively kill the lawsuit.

Yes they did tour together, although Zeppelin says they don't remember hearing that song during the tour period.



It worked for Ronald Reagan.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40340
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
https://www.yahoo.com/music/led-zeppeli ... stone.html

They win.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
It appears as if that would've been an interesting trial to watch, if only for the lunacy & incompetency.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40340
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
From what I read Page and Plant made folks laugh and impressed with their British style. Simply listening to the beginning of each song I thought they were sunk. It must have been more complicated than that.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group