It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2025 2:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19620
Lets hypothetically pretend every single person in America wok up tomorrow and had the exact same amount of money in their bank accounts, how long would it take most of the money to get back in the hands of almost the exact same people? What percentage of people would improve their life and not piss it all away. What percentage of trust fund babies would be completely screwed and end up poor for life?

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I'm not sure if by redistribution most politicians mean it in the same simplistic way you're presenting it here. Of course you could mean you want to talk about the government actually withdrawing money from accounts in order to deposit it in other accounts which, in that case, go ahead and discuss...I guess?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
veganfan21 wrote:
I'm not sure if by redistribution most politicians mean it in the same simplistic way you're presenting it here. Of course you could mean you want to talk about the government actually withdrawing money from accounts in order to deposit it in other accounts which, in that case, go ahead and discuss...I guess?

The IRS essentially does just that.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Mr. Reason wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I'm not sure if by redistribution most politicians mean it in the same simplistic way you're presenting it here. Of course you could mean you want to talk about the government actually withdrawing money from accounts in order to deposit it in other accounts which, in that case, go ahead and discuss...I guess?

The IRS essentially does just that.


Okay but this isn't then what I think conns' scenario is. This is basically leading into a discussion about systems of taxation.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:51 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
veganfan21 wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I'm not sure if by redistribution most politicians mean it in the same simplistic way you're presenting it here. Of course you could mean you want to talk about the government actually withdrawing money from accounts in order to deposit it in other accounts which, in that case, go ahead and discuss...I guess?

The IRS essentially does just that.


Okay but this isn't then what I think conns' scenario is. This is basically leading into a discussion about systems of taxation.

Our nation has the most progressive personal income taxation in the western world. What more do you want?

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Mr. Reason wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I'm not sure if by redistribution most politicians mean it in the same simplistic way you're presenting it here. Of course you could mean you want to talk about the government actually withdrawing money from accounts in order to deposit it in other accounts which, in that case, go ahead and discuss...I guess?

The IRS essentially does just that.


Okay but this isn't then what I think conns' scenario is. This is basically leading into a discussion about systems of taxation.

Our nation has the most progressive personal income taxation in the western world. What more do you want?


I'm not sure why you're imputing to me a position I assume you've deduced from what was essentially my attempt to clarify things. I don't really have much to say at this point other than i think/thought the scenario presented here is extra-taxation in that the focus is on coercively leveling the socioeconomic playing field as opposed to (no less coercively) funding the government, which is what I correctly or incorrectly understand the main purpose of taxes to be, at least here.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:29 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
veganfan21 wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
The IRS essentially does just that.


Okay but this isn't then what I think conns' scenario is. This is basically leading into a discussion about systems of taxation.

Our nation has the most progressive personal income taxation in the western world. What more do you want?


I'm not sure why you're imputing to me a position I assume you've deduced from what was essentially my attempt to clarify things. I don't really have much to say at this point other than i think/thought the scenario presented here is extra-taxation in that the focus is on coercively leveling the socioeconomic playing field as opposed to (no less coercively) funding the government, which is what I correctly or incorrectly understand the main purpose of taxes to be, at least here.


We have redistributed countless trillions of dollars over the last 50+ years and yet, we are still still arguing over the same problems. All of those funds have been funneled through the same coffers and nothing has improved.

Do you sense a problem here?

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Yes, I realize the government is a problem argument has a long history and makes sense from time to time. On the other hand, how do you feel about recent revelations we've come across via the Panama papers and an oxfam report?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
conns7901 wrote:
, how long would it take most of the money to get back in the hands of almost the exact same people?


50 years


conns7901 wrote:
, What percentage of people would improve their life and not piss it all away.


80%

conns7901 wrote:
, . What percentage of trust fund babies would be completely screwed and end up poor for life?


The same percentage that have shitty lives right now, despite the money, would end up poor for life 2%

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:42 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
veganfan21 wrote:
Yes, I realize the government is a problem argument has a long history and makes sense from time to time. On the other hand, how do you feel about recent revelations we've come across via the Panama papers and an oxfam report?

That's nothing more than a smokescreen to take the heat off our failing ruling class. Capitalism is so demonized and essentially it's nothing more than the trading of goods and services between individuals. That is, until a government gets involved and money gets involved in order to influence the outcomes of said transactions. Then you have crony-capitalism. Which is nothing more than a pay to play system which only benefits the rich and powerful. It's a system that can only be sustained by corrupt government officials that so many want to give more and more power over our lives. It all makes no damn sense to me.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33244
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I love Reason, and I have many reasons to love him so.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Mr. Reason wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Yes, I realize the government is a problem argument has a long history and makes sense from time to time. On the other hand, how do you feel about recent revelations we've come across via the Panama papers and an oxfam report?

That's nothing more than a smokescreen to take the heat off our failing ruling class. Capitalism is so demonized and essentially it's nothing more than the trading of goods and services between individuals. That is, until a government gets involved and money gets involved in order to influence the outcomes of said transactions. Then you have crony-capitalism. Which is nothing more than a pay to play system which only benefits the rich and powerful. It's a system that can only be sustained by corrupt government officials that so many want to give more and more power over our lives. It all makes no damn sense to me.


Pay your alderman early and often, or your state reps and congresspeople...then if you need 50k in funding, no problem

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
It's a lot deeper than just having the money in a bank account. The wealthy know how to use governmental power in a way the poor do not. And why wouldn't they? They are the ones who created the governmental power and did so in a way to benefit themselves.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Last edited by JORR on Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
If we all had the same jobs, it would go back pretty quickly


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Mr. Reason wrote:
That's nothing more than a smokescreen to take the heat off our failing ruling class. Capitalism is so demonized and essentially it's nothing more than the trading of goods and services between individuals. That is, until a government gets involved and money gets involved in order to influence the outcomes of said transactions. Then you have crony-capitalism. Which is nothing more than a pay to play system which only benefits the rich and powerful. It's a system that can only be sustained by corrupt government officials that so many want to give more and more power over our lives. It all makes no damn sense to me.


It is not the trading of goods and services. That's the barter system. It's placing of economic value on every aspect of your life.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
Yeah, Capitalism has really sucked for America. Let's try something completely different because a guy who supported and aided Communist regimes for years says that everything here sucks now.

Or you know, we could keep it, and things would pretty much stay pretty good for the next few decades.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yeah, Capitalism has really sucked for America. Let's try something completely different because a guy who supported and aided Communist regimes for years says that everything here sucks now.

Or you know, we could keep it, and things would pretty much stay pretty good for the next few decades.


Good for who?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yeah, Capitalism has really sucked for America. Let's try something completely different because a guy who supported and aided Communist regimes for years says that everything here sucks now.

Or you know, we could keep it, and things would pretty much stay pretty good for the next few decades.


I would not get sucked into the idea that Sanders is going to end capitalism. He is mostly proposing a return to New Deal era regulations. This idea that if we stay the course with what has "worked" in the past will mean that things will stay good is a fairly terrible assumption. Capitalism already collapsed in the country in the 1930s. It took total war to bring the country out of it.

Is capitalism that rewards only the top one percent sustainable? Is it even environmentally sustainable to continue push monetary profits above all else?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yeah, Capitalism has really sucked for America. Let's try something completely different because a guy who supported and aided Communist regimes for years says that everything here sucks now.

Or you know, we could keep it, and things would pretty much stay pretty good for the next few decades.


I would not get sucked into the idea that Sanders is going to end capitalism. He is mostly proposing a return to New Deal era regulations. This idea that if we stay the course with what has "worked" in the past will mean that things will stay good is a fairly terrible assumption. Capitalism already collapsed in the country in the 1930s. It took total war to bring the country out of it.

Is capitalism that rewards only the top one percent sustainable? Is it even environmentally sustainable to continue push monetary profits above all else?
Yes. Capitalism will continue to work.

Let's say we elect Hillary. Can you describe what happens to America over the next 8 years?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19620
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yeah, Capitalism has really sucked for America. Let's try something completely different because a guy who supported and aided Communist regimes for years says that everything here sucks now.

Or you know, we could keep it, and things would pretty much stay pretty good for the next few decades.


I would not get sucked into the idea that Sanders is going to end capitalism. He is mostly proposing a return to New Deal era regulations. This idea that if we stay the course with what has "worked" in the past will mean that things will stay good is a fairly terrible assumption. Capitalism already collapsed in the country in the 1930s. It took total war to bring the country out of it.

Is capitalism that rewards only the top one percent sustainable? Is it even environmentally sustainable to continue push monetary profits above all else?
Yes. Capitalism will continue to work.

Let's say we elect Hillary. Can you describe what happens to America over the next 8 years?


Bigger divide between Rich and poor. Kind of like with Obama.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19620
bigfan wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
, how long would it take most of the money to get back in the hands of almost the exact same people?


50 years


conns7901 wrote:
, What percentage of people would improve their life and not piss it all away.


80%

conns7901 wrote:
, . What percentage of trust fund babies would be completely screwed and end up poor for life?


The same percentage that have shitty lives right now, despite the money, would end up poor for life 2%


I was thinking less than 5 years.

Maybe 35-40% would actually permanently improve in life.

Around 5-10%

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yes. Capitalism will continue to work.

Let's say we elect Hillary. Can you describe what happens to America over the next 8 years?


Define continue to work. That's vague, open for interpretation and almost certainly an assumption. Would you say that capitalism was "working" in 2007-08? What if the student loan bubble bursts in the next few years.

The next eight years are going to be a transition phase. There are vast changes being brought on by technology. Who knows what will occur. I don't think many societies have collapsed because the people were too equal or that they shared too much.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Define continue to work. That's vague, open for interpretation and almost certainly an assumption. Would you say that capitalism was "working" in 2007-08? What if the student loan bubble bursts in the next few years.
Yes. Nothing is perfect. There are going to be good times and bad times.
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
The next eight years are going to be a transition phase. There are vast changes being brought on by technology. Who knows what will occur. I don't think many societies have collapsed because the people were too equal or that they shared too much.
Technology is going to happen one way or another. With or without Bernie those things are going to happen.

But, are you saying that society has a good chance of collapsing in the next 8 years?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Since the wealthy tend to be better educated, so chances are they would still ascend to a higher socio-economic status in a short period of time and reclaim the loftier status they enjoyed previously. The uneducated (formerly poor) people who have no experience handling larger sums of money would soon be relieved of it.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Define continue to work. That's vague, open for interpretation and almost certainly an assumption. Would you say that capitalism was "working" in 2007-08? What if the student loan bubble bursts in the next few years.
Yes. Nothing is perfect. There are going to be good times and bad times.
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
The next eight years are going to be a transition phase. There are vast changes being brought on by technology. Who knows what will occur. I don't think many societies have collapsed because the people were too equal or that they shared too much.
Technology is going to happen one way or another. With or without Bernie those things are going to happen.

But, are you saying that society has a good chance of collapsing in the next 8 years?


It would not call 2007 bad times. A recession is a bad time. The entire economy collapsed, and there are still no protections on this not happening again. The banks are still too big to fail, and debt is still being packaged and sold in deceptive ways.

Do you find this situation acceptable?

Not sure what "a good chance" means. I believe the odds are much better of systemic economic collapse if we stay on our current course.
But I do not know when this will occur. I also don't claim to be an expert on future predictions.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
It would not call 2007 bad times. A recession is a bad time. The entire economy collapsed, and there are still no protections on this not happening again. The banks are still too big to fail, and debt is still being packaged and sold in deceptive ways.
And then after that the economy recovered in a big way.
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Not sure what "a good chance" means. I believe the odds are much better of systemic economic collapse if we stay on our current course.
But I do not know when this will occur. I also don't claim to be an expert on future predictions.
But you are making a case that the current situation is dire. Is the future not dire too? I just want to know what you expect.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Who do you believe the economy has gotten better for since 2007-08? You can draw a direct link to the collapse and this: http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archi ... ly/433863/

There have been no real protections put in place since the crash. This leads me to believe that it could occur again with the next setback or bubble to burst.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Who do you believe the economy has gotten better for since 2007-08? You can draw a direct link to the collapse and this: http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archi ... ly/433863/
Our economy is undoubtedly doing better now than it was in 07-08.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Who do you believe the economy has gotten better for since 2007-08? You can draw a direct link to the collapse and this: http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archi ... ly/433863/
Our economy is undoubtedly doing better now than it was in 07-08.


For whom? And because it is better now does it excuse the crash? Does it mean that it's continued improvement is assured?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
For whom?
The country. :lol:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
And because it is better now does it excuse the crash?
No, but crashes happen. We had one at the end of the 90s too. We'll have one again at some point.
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Does it mean that it's continued improvement is assured?
It's never assured. However, over the next couple decades, I think it will continue to improve. That is if we make America Great Again and elect my girl Hillary.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group