It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:32 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
I can easily understand any fan preferring Wrigley Field (The Shrine) and the ambiance of Wrigleyville, to U.S. cellular and the awful neighborhood it sits it.


Wrigley Field sucks. Getting to Wrigley Field sucks. Their beer selection sucks. The food sucks. The only redeeming quality of going to a game at Wrigley is pre-game beers and Buffalo Wing pizza at Yak-zies.

If I were a Cubs fan, I'd make multiple pilgrimages to Milwaukee to see them play. Parking is great, plus, tailgating.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
It would never really work out similarly anyway, as the Sox have gotten greatly discounted rent at the ballpark the state built at taxpayer expense, due to having attendance at a level low enough to qualify for a greatly discounted rate in several seasons. The Cubs attendance would never be low enough these days to get such a deal. Also, the state doesn't have liquid funds sufficient to build a ballpark now, as it did then. If that same situation rose today, Rahm would probably tell jerry to enjoy the Florida weather.
You just explained why the Cubs benefit from not having the same deal as the White Sox. Thanks!


I think in the long run, if a person or group has the money to construct their own ballpark, they are better off in the long run. But if the person or group lacks the funds to finance the construction of a new park, they have to accept that while they will save hundreds of millions perhaps in construction costs, they will also make less money in the long run. But the initial cost of building a ballpark today is so great, that the city should really be giving the Cubs a few breaks. Chicago is raking in huge amounts, based on not only tickets, but taxes from all the establishments around Wrigley that would not be raking in the dollars if the Cubs had moved to Rosemont.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
It would never really work out similarly anyway, as the Sox have gotten greatly discounted rent at the ballpark the state built at taxpayer expense, due to having attendance at a level low enough to qualify for a greatly discounted rate in several seasons. The Cubs attendance would never be low enough these days to get such a deal. Also, the state doesn't have liquid funds sufficient to build a ballpark now, as it did then. If that same situation rose today, Rahm would probably tell jerry to enjoy the Florida weather.
You just explained why the Cubs benefit from not having the same deal as the White Sox. Thanks!


I think in the long run, if a person or group has the money to construct their own ballpark, they are better off in the long run. But if the person or group lacks the funds to finance the construction of a new park, they have to accept that while they will save hundreds of millions perhaps in construction costs, they will also make less money in the long run. But the initial cost of building a ballpark today is so great, that the city should really be giving the Cubs a few breaks. Chicago is raking in huge amounts, based on not only tickets, but taxes from all the establishments around Wrigley that would not be raking in the dollars if the Cubs had moved to Rosemont.
Thank you for continuing to explain it!

Saving me a lot of time.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
The Wrigley experience just gets better and better...actually!



Going up to a game in Milwaukee is also a treat. Really nice stadium up there. Though it still can be a pain in the ass to get in and out of with traffic and road construction. Once you think you're in...then you have to deal with the stupid parking lot situation. If you could get up there early enough to get set up for tailgating and could wait until the lot was empty to leave, then you'd have a pretty good experience.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
America wrote:

I dont like Lakeview, I dont like the people who live in Lakview


The pure essence of a Sox fan

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
If Steve posts "in the long run" again, he is going to have to start paying the estate of Glenn Frey.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
I can easily understand any fan preferring Wrigley Field (The Shrine) and the ambiance of Wrigleyville, to U.S. cellular and the awful neighborhood it sits it.


Wrigley Field sucks. Getting to Wrigley Field sucks. Their beer selection sucks. The food sucks. The only redeeming quality of going to a game at Wrigley is pre-game beers and Buffalo Wing pizza at Yak-zies.

If I were a Cubs fan, I'd make multiple pilgrimages to Milwaukee to see them play. Parking is great, plus, tailgating.


I agree about Milwaukee. I like miller Park a lot. Especially in April, May and September, when it's likely to be cool and might rain. That roof is pretty nice to have on rainy cool nights. The tailgating is cool and people are usually real friendly. the food is good and the concourses are nice and wide. I have gone to dozens of games there.

But Wrigley Field is better than ever and will get better still over the next year and a half-2 years, when it's done. The food is better these days and I get to the park way early to watch batting practice, so getting there is not a real problem, as I am there well before traffic gets bad. it's beautiful ballpark, where fans are closer to the field than is the case in most parks. Can't understand why teams want wide areas between the foul lines and the seats, when they could have more good seats there instead?

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
It would never really work out similarly anyway, as the Sox have gotten greatly discounted rent at the ballpark the state built at taxpayer expense, due to having attendance at a level low enough to qualify for a greatly discounted rate in several seasons. The Cubs attendance would never be low enough these days to get such a deal. Also, the state doesn't have liquid funds sufficient to build a ballpark now, as it did then. If that same situation rose today, Rahm would probably tell jerry to enjoy the Florida weather.
You just explained why the Cubs benefit from not having the same deal as the White Sox. Thanks!


I think in the long run, if a person or group has the money to construct their own ballpark, they are better off in the long run. But if the person or group lacks the funds to finance the construction of a new park, they have to accept that while they will save hundreds of millions perhaps in construction costs, they will also make less money in the long run. But the initial cost of building a ballpark today is so great, that the city should really be giving the Cubs a few breaks. Chicago is raking in huge amounts, based on not only tickets, but taxes from all the establishments around Wrigley that would not be raking in the dollars if the Cubs had moved to Rosemont.
Thank you for continuing to explain it!

Saving me a lot of time.


Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.
The Cubs benefit from owning Wrigley Field rather than playing in a city/state owned facility.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.
The Cubs benefit from owning Wrigley Field rather than playing in a city/state owned facility.


AND??????????

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.
The Cubs benefit from owning Wrigley Field rather than playing in a city/state owned facility.


AND??????????
Read the thread. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.
The Cubs benefit from owning Wrigley Field rather than playing in a city/state owned facility.

That isn't true. When the State must bear all costs while all revenues are funneled to the tenant that's a fantastic deal.

Under the White Sox model all the renovations currently underway at Wrigley would be paid for by the State with nearly all revenue deposited in the Ricketts pocket. Pretty sweet deal if you ask me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Wrigley Field sucks. It's like an NFL game, looks great on TV but is terrible going in person. The last game I went to at Wrigley, Soriano was still on the Nationals and hit a couple of homers off Kerry Wood.

You are wrong, as usual, about Bridgeport, and the Cubs closing thier beer garden at 9pm.



Their.....not thier beer garden. So tell me how (besides the bar owners) closing the beer garden at 11pm rather than 9pm, will negatively impact the Wrigleyville neighborhood. Also, I have been to U.S. Cellular a couple dozen times, including the 2nd game in the Boston series in the ALDS series in 2005 where Iguchi hit the 3 run homer after the Graffanino error. I am not speaking as someone who has never been in that neighborhood. I always worry whether or not my car will be broken into when I have gone there, especially during night games. it's a shitty area. If you don't think so, it's because your standards are low, not because it's not lousy.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.
The Cubs benefit from owning Wrigley Field rather than playing in a city/state owned facility.

That isn't true. When the State must bear all costs while all revenues are funneled to the tenant that's a fantastic deal.

Under the White Sox model all the renovations currently underway at Wrigley would be paid for by the State with nearly all revenue deposited in the Ricketts pocket. Pretty sweet deal if you ask me.
I would personally buy Wrigley Field for $1 right now, take on all outstanding debt on it, and give them the EXACT same deal the White Sox have. Would the Ricketts accept my proposal?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
If you think your car had a better chance of being broken into while it's parked at US Cellular field than it does near Wrigley or at a Metra station, it has nothing to do with standards. It very simply has to do with you being a complete dumbass.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
I find it curious how concerned Sox fans are, about anything the Ricketts family wants to do around Wrigley Field.


And I find it curious that suburbanites think their shitty opinions on City of Chicago zoning issues matter even a little bit.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.
The Cubs benefit from owning Wrigley Field rather than playing in a city/state owned facility.


AND??????????
Read the thread. :lol:


:roll: :roll: :roll:

Besides the fact that your mastery of the obvious is not exclusive to the Cubs in the world of Pro Sports, but it has nothing to do with the Molotov cocktail of a shitpost that America threw up to start it off.

_________________
Not a mult.


Last edited by Minooka Meatball on Tue May 17, 2016 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.
The Cubs benefit from owning Wrigley Field rather than playing in a city/state owned facility.

That isn't true. When the State must bear all costs while all revenues are funneled to the tenant that's a fantastic deal.

Under the White Sox model all the renovations currently underway at Wrigley would be paid for by the State with nearly all revenue deposited in the Ricketts pocket. Pretty sweet deal if you ask me.



You're both right in different ways. Yes, the Sox got a great deal from the state and saved hundreds of millions on building a new ballpark and yes, they have paid very little of the profits back to the state, due to a ridiculous attendance clause that allows them to have substantially reduced rent, based on poor attendance. BUT the Cubs would not get such a break, because they get nearly twice the fans at their games. because their attendance is so much better, having their own park and keeping all the money, is better for them in the long run (just for you Frank).

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Let's not kid ourselves. This issue breaks down with Cub fans wanting Ricketts to be the richest man in the world because they believe that will help this hapless franchise win the World Series they fantasize about. There are no other considerations in their minds.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Once you explain to us what point you are trying to make instead of posting in ltg-style circles of nonsense, then maybe we can finally end this horseshit.
The Cubs benefit from owning Wrigley Field rather than playing in a city/state owned facility.

That isn't true. When the State must bear all costs while all revenues are funneled to the tenant that's a fantastic deal.

Under the White Sox model all the renovations currently underway at Wrigley would be paid for by the State with nearly all revenue deposited in the Ricketts pocket. Pretty sweet deal if you ask me.
I would personally buy Wrigley Field for $1 right now, take on all outstanding debt on it, and give them the EXACT same deal the White Sox have. Would the Ricketts accept my proposal?

No question.

The Cubs will now occupy Wrigley without having to pay rent for the next 17 years. You are also liable for all future renovations, taxes, and maintenance with token revenue routed your way.

Plus all ticket revenue, concessions, merchandise, media rights and parking revenue is Cubs exclusive.

No brainer


Last edited by Kirkwood on Tue May 17, 2016 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Besides the fact that your mastery of the obvious is not exclusive to the Cubs in the world of Pro Sports, but is has nothing to do with the Molotov cocktail of a shitpost that America threw up to start it off.
Read the thread.

There are people currently arguing against my "mastery of the obvious".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Kirkwood wrote:
No question.

The Cubs will now occupy Wrigley without having to pay rent for the next 17 years. You are also liable for all future renovations, taxes, and maintenance with token revenue routed your way.
I'll pay for that with other events and concerts and the huge per ticket fees the Cubs would owe me for this year when they have massive attendance numbers.

So, just to be clear, you believe that Ricketts would have been smart to sell Wrigley Field and get a good deal on rent the day he bought the team?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
I find it curious how concerned Sox fans are, about anything the Ricketts family wants to do around Wrigley Field.


And I find it curious that suburbanites think their shitty opinions on City of Chicago zoning issues matter even a little bit.


I feel like I am a bit more qualified (I might have said entitled, but that would have just invited problems) than the average suburban fan, to broach this subject. My Great-Grandfather bought a 2 flat at 3833 N. Clark St. (across the street from where Nuts on Clark is now) and my Grandparents lived there after my Great- Grandparents passed as did my Mother, before she married my Father. I grew up going to lots of games there. Lived there myself for a bit over a year, while renovating the first floor flat at one point. I know the neighborhood. I still know many of the neighbors there and stop to say hello before or after a game. I played on softball team that were sponsored by the neighborhood bar (then Joe's Piano man) and went to the Metro to see musical acts. The neighborhood is like a 2nd home and I wish my Mother had not sold the building, or I would have maintained it and kept it in the family for as long as I lived. I love the effect the Ricketts are having on that neighborhood. Sure, it will ultimately just make them even richer and that is their motivation. But it's made the neighborhood better and they have made the team better. It's all good.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79465
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
I find it curious how concerned Sox fans are, about anything the Ricketts family wants to do around Wrigley Field.


And I find it curious that suburbanites think their shitty opinions on City of Chicago zoning issues matter even a little bit.


I feel like I am a bit more qualified (I might have said entitled, but that would have just invited problems) than the average suburban fan, to broach this subject. My Great-Grandfather bought a 2 flat at 3833 N. Clark St. (across the street from where Nuts on Clark is now) and my Grandparents lived there after my Great- Grandparents passed as did my Mother, before she married my Father. I grew up going to lots of games there. Lived there myself for a bit over a year, while renovating the first floor flat at one point. I know the neighborhood. I still know many of the neighbors there and stop to say hello before or after a game. I played on softball team that were sponsored by the neighborhood bar (then Joe's Piano man) and went to the Metro to see musical acts. The neighborhood is like a 2nd home and I wish my Mother had not sold the building, or I would have maintained it and kept it in the family for as long as I lived. I love the effect the Ricketts are having on that neighborhood. Sure, it will ultimately just make them even richer and that is their motivation. But it's made the neighborhood better and they have made the team better. It's all good.


You should have stayed if you wanted your opinion to matter. Your family sold their building but you still seem to think you should have the same or more input than the people you sold it to.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Besides the fact that your mastery of the obvious is not exclusive to the Cubs in the world of Pro Sports, but is has nothing to do with the Molotov cocktail of a shitpost that America threw up to start it off.
Read the thread.

There are people currently arguing against my "mastery of the obvious".


I read the thread just fine. Your original stance of "poor Wrigleyville souls are being infringed on by the big bad Cub OrganIZation, even though we should have seen this coming 35 years ago" somehow morphed into "Cubs benefit from owning their ballpark and surrounding property" as being the point, but your second point really has nothing to do with the first point in this instance.

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:39 pm
Posts: 379
Location: Florida
pizza_Place: Dickman's
Another fine post by Steve.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38674
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Edward Dickman wrote:
Another fine post by Steve.

:lol: The offshoot of the Cubs being good is more Steve Cubs posts which sort of makes me want them to be shitty again .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Minooka Meatball wrote:
I read the thread just fine. Your original stance of "poor Wrigleyville souls are being infringed on by the big bad Cub OrganIZation, even though we should have seen this coming 35 years ago" somehow morphed into "Cubs benefit from owning their ballpark and surrounding property" as being the point, but your second point really has nothing to do with the first point in this instance.
I wasn't the one who made the link to the White Sox.

Maybe read the thread again to see it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
badrogue17 wrote:
Edward Dickman wrote:
Another fine post by Steve.

:lol: The offshoot of the Cubs being good is more Steve Cubs posts which sort of makes me want them to be shitty again.


You're not alone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
I am a bit more qualified
Did.Not.Happen.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group