denisdman wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
But the leftist idea of "you don't need to make more than $X a year" is laughable. I want people out there who will do stuff like invest in chemo medication research because they want to make bazzilions of dollars if they hit on the right drug. I don't want them going "fuck it, I'm not going to take those risks and on the 1% chance I'm going to hit it, I'm going to give 94% of that to a bunch of people who are too stupid to hold a decent job."
Essentially, what you are alluding to is the hurdle rate required to make a business project profitable. Most people will set a hurdle rate of around 12%. Meaning your internal rate of return is 12% or higher. Others will use a net present value calculation with a 12% discount rate to get at the same concept. Since income tax directly impacts cash flow, any increase in the income tax rate makes that hurdle much harder to overcome. As such, higher taxes reduces return on investment and means less projects will be undertaken.
Now, we all know that taxes are a necessary evil of living in a society where the government provides us with benefits. Those benefits include a court system, military protection, schools, firemen, police, roads, and then your various social programs. I'd say most folks agree that we need to pay taxes. The question is where to strike a balance. Where our society has gone wrong is that we have de-linked the benefits of government from the costs. This shows up in the massive debts that have been accumulated. such that we are receiving those benefits without paying the full cost. It is estimated that the Federal Government alone has $75 trillion in total debt outstanding - $18T or in actual debt and another 50T+ in unfunded pension, social securitys, and Medicare/Medicaid benefits. The Federal Government is running a pay as you go retirement and health care system.
Oh well. You already have economists talking about helicopter money.
Good points. We are too insulated from cost but we see the same "benefits." That goes for state, local and federal. It's loaded up at all points. No real room to maneuver, even at the margins.
As for "helicopter " money...it seems the psychopaths I'm central banking are running out of road to drive their failed idea caravan on. Theyve totally failed, thus the recycled ideas are repackaged and get more extreme. Almost a decade later and still at near zero rates and still living and dying by Fed policy, of course at this point it's fed policy that has our economy stagnant in a ditch. Still no velocity of money and they catch their heads and trudge along.
Next steps are further forms of capital controls, money printing, government intrusion into private retirement funds, travel controls, war and then collapse.