It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
So I hear they're sitting in some protest here... cool.
What are the proposed reforms? I'm not hearing specifics on the news.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
So I hear they're sitting in some protest here... cool.
What are the proposed reforms? I'm not hearing specifics on the news.


Virtually the same as Republicans. Another useless political stunt.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
So I hear they're sitting in some protest here... cool.
What are the proposed reforms? I'm not hearing specifics on the news.


Virtually the same as Republicans. Another useless political stunt.

Well what are we trying to get done? It's all quite vague.
Tell ya what... I'd like to see...

Tighter background checks.
Background checks at shows.
Mandatory training.

Things that are useless...

Magazine size restrictions.
Serial numbers on ammunition.
Leashyourkids

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
That's not what your mother said, Trebeck.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
leashyourkids wrote:
That's not what your mother said, Trebeck.

You are a sick man.
I hate my job.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
So I hear they're sitting in some protest here... cool.
What are the proposed reforms? I'm not hearing specifics on the news.


Virtually the same as Republicans. Another useless political stunt.

Well what are we trying to get done? It's all quite vague.
Tell ya what... I'd like to see...

Tighter background checks.
Background checks at shows.
Mandatory training.

Things that are useless...

Magazine size restrictions.
Serial numbers on ammunition.
Leashyourkids


Preventing people on the terrorist watch list from buying guns right away. Dems want the wait to be a couple of months and Republicans say 3 days. Both are full of shit as usual.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/20/politics/senate-gun-votes-congress/

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
So I hear they're sitting in some protest here... cool.
What are the proposed reforms? I'm not hearing specifics on the news.


Virtually the same as Republicans. Another useless political stunt.

Well what are we trying to get done? It's all quite vague.
Tell ya what... I'd like to see...

Tighter background checks.
Background checks at shows.
Mandatory training.

Things that are useless...

Magazine size restrictions.
Serial numbers on ammunition.
Leashyourkids


Preventing people on the terrorist watch list from buying guns right away. Dems want the wait to be a couple of months and Republicans say 3 days. Both are full of shit as usual.


Ah yes, the "Watch List" being used to prevent the buying of guns. A list that no one can seem to explain, can't explain the criteria for being put on it and certainly can't explain what the "petitioning" of the federal govt actually entails. From what I've read the list is filled with people who shouldn't be on it either.

So, why are we going to eliminate due process for people via the "Watch List?" Seems like a stupid and short sighted idea pushed by big govt fascists.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
It is interesting that the Dems are sitting in exclusively for the terror watchlist amendment. Hatred of Middle Eastern looking people is usually the one thing that can bring both sides of the aisle together but evidently not in this instance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
So I hear they're sitting in some protest here... cool.
What are the proposed reforms? I'm not hearing specifics on the news.


Virtually the same as Republicans. Another useless political stunt.

Well what are we trying to get done? It's all quite vague.
Tell ya what... I'd like to see...

Tighter background checks.
Background checks at shows.
Mandatory training.

Things that are useless...

Magazine size restrictions.
Serial numbers on ammunition.
Leashyourkids


Preventing people on the terrorist watch list from buying guns right away. Dems want the wait to be a couple of months and Republicans say 3 days. Both are full of shit as usual.


Ah yes, the "Watch List" being used to prevent the buying of guns. A list that no one can seem to explain, can't explain the criteria for being put on it and certainly can't explain what the "petitioning" of the federal govt actually entails. From what I've read the list is filled with people who shouldn't be on it either.

So, why are we going to eliminate due process for people via the "Watch List?" Seems like a stupid and short sighted idea pushed by big govt fascists.


I see it both ways. If you can't fly on a plane you shouldn't be able to buy a gun. That being said the government needs to be able to provide evidence to a judge. People have the ability to get off the no fly list now.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Why can't someone fly on a plane? How do you get off the list? That hasn't been explained, DHS looked lost at the recent hearings.

This is a terrible idea. Let's not move in the direction of tying the elimination of due process to some esoteric list that, apparently, anyone can be put on. In fact, let's not move in the direction of eliminating due process at all.

Treat it like getting licensed for a car or something.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
I see it both ways. If you can't fly on a plane you shouldn't be able to buy a gun. That being said the government needs to be able to provide evidence to a judge. People have the ability to get off the no fly list now.

Hold on here, slick.
One is a constitutional right, one is not. Not the same thing. Kinda sad in a way, but true. You can take someone's driver's license but not their right to own a weapon. Weird laws, huh?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:50 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
I see it both ways. If you can't fly on a plane you shouldn't be able to buy a gun. That being said the government needs to be able to provide evidence to a judge. People have the ability to get off the no fly list now.

Hold on here, slick.
One is a constitutional right, one is not. Not the same thing. Kinda sad in a way, but true. You can take someone's driver's license but not their right to own a weapon. Weird laws, huh?


Restrictions can be put on that right and they are.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Why can't someone fly on a plane? How do you get off the list? That hasn't been explained, DHS looked lost at the recent hearings.

This is a terrible idea. Let's not move in the direction of tying the elimination of due process to some esoteric list that, apparently, anyone can be put on. In fact, let's not move in the direction of eliminating due process at all.

Treat it like getting licensed for a car or something.


I'm fine with that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6592
pizza_Place: Giordano's
JMO


I own multiple firearms, but there is no reason to own these AR15s or anything like them. Home defense should be a shotgun or a handgun. Someone on a no-fly list or a watch list should not be able to purchase a fire arm. These gun shows need to be regulated as well as private sales of guns. I have a friend who sells privately and he really doesn't check anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Being on a terror watch list, or a no fly list is just a little bit more serious than having a suspended license... Also, those two lists are not necessarily permanent.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Cashman wrote:
JMO


I own multiple firearms, but there is no reason to own these AR15s or anything like them. Home defense should be a shotgun or a handgun. Someone on a no-fly list or a watch list should not be able to purchase a fire arm. These gun shows need to be regulated as well as private sales of guns. I have a friend who sells privately and he really doesn't check anything.

I agree with the AR15 thing. I agree with your home defense points. Excellent points.
I would disagree with the no fly list as there is no due process that would result in you losing a constitutional right.
Right now in Illinois, you lose your FOID if you are simply accused of a domestic violence incident. Two things, no due process and also I believe that results in people not reporting domestic violence in fear of losing an important right.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
I see it both ways. If you can't fly on a plane you shouldn't be able to buy a gun. That being said the government needs to be able to provide evidence to a judge. People have the ability to get off the no fly list now.

Hold on here, slick.
One is a constitutional right, one is not. Not the same thing. Kinda sad in a way, but true. You can take someone's driver's license but not their right to own a weapon. Weird laws, huh?

Interstate travel is recognized by the courts as a constitutional right and the no-fly list process itself was ruled unconstitutional in 2014. That's why the Republicans are just as full of shit on this as the Democrats since they had no problem at all with the arbitrary and opaque no-fly lists up until this point.


Last edited by ZephMarshack on Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:03 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Cashman wrote:
JMO


I own multiple firearms, but there is no reason to own these AR15s or anything like them. Home defense should be a shotgun or a handgun. Someone on a no-fly list or a watch list should not be able to purchase a fire arm. These gun shows need to be regulated as well as private sales of guns. I have a friend who sells privately and he really doesn't check anything.

I agree with the AR15 thing. I agree with your home defense points. Excellent points.
I would disagree with the no fly list as there is no due process that would result in you losing a constitutional right.
Right now in Illinois, you lose your FOID if you are simply accused of a domestic violence incident. Two things, no due process and also I believe that results in people not reporting domestic violence in fear of losing an important right.


Being told to wait isn't taking away that right.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6592
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Darkside wrote:
Cashman wrote:
JMO


I own multiple firearms, but there is no reason to own these AR15s or anything like them. Home defense should be a shotgun or a handgun. Someone on a no-fly list or a watch list should not be able to purchase a fire arm. These gun shows need to be regulated as well as private sales of guns. I have a friend who sells privately and he really doesn't check anything.

I agree with the AR15 thing. I agree with your home defense points. Excellent points.
I would disagree with the no fly list as there is no due process that would result in you losing a constitutional right.
Right now in Illinois, you lose your FOID if you are simply accused of a domestic violence incident. Two things, no due process and also I believe that results in people not reporting domestic violence in fear of losing an important right.



I think I would agree. I figured if you were on the no fly, there was some evidence. I would NEVER give up my firearms under any circumstance. You have the right to have fire arms per the constitution.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Cashman wrote:
JMO


I own multiple firearms, but there is no reason to own these AR15s or anything like them. Home defense should be a shotgun or a handgun. Someone on a no-fly list or a watch list should not be able to purchase a fire arm. These gun shows need to be regulated as well as private sales of guns. I have a friend who sells privately and he really doesn't check anything.

I agree with the AR15 thing. I agree with your home defense points. Excellent points.
I would disagree with the no fly list as there is no due process that would result in you losing a constitutional right.
Right now in Illinois, you lose your FOID if you are simply accused of a domestic violence incident. Two things, no due process and also I believe that results in people not reporting domestic violence in fear of losing an important right.


Being told to wait isn't taking away that right.

Im not talking about being told to wait at all. I'm referring to the point made that "Someone on a no flly or watch list should not be able to purchase a firearm"

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
ZephMarshack wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
I see it both ways. If you can't fly on a plane you shouldn't be able to buy a gun. That being said the government needs to be able to provide evidence to a judge. People have the ability to get off the no fly list now.

Hold on here, slick.
One is a constitutional right, one is not. Not the same thing. Kinda sad in a way, but true. You can take someone's driver's license but not their right to own a weapon. Weird laws, huh?

Interstate travel is recognized by the courts as a constitutional right and the no-fly list process itself was ruled unconstitutional in 2014. That's why the Republicans are just as full of shit on this as the Democrats since they had no problem at all with the arbitrary and opaque no-fly lists up until this point.


Especially when it can be used as a weapon itself. If this anti-American lunacy goes through it will set a hell of a bad precedent.

And why would anyone want to own an AR-15 for home defense? If you miss you'll risk hitting Ed from down the block! I would own one because I want to own one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Cashman wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Cashman wrote:
JMO


I own multiple firearms, but there is no reason to own these AR15s or anything like them. Home defense should be a shotgun or a handgun. Someone on a no-fly list or a watch list should not be able to purchase a fire arm. These gun shows need to be regulated as well as private sales of guns. I have a friend who sells privately and he really doesn't check anything.

I agree with the AR15 thing. I agree with your home defense points. Excellent points.
I would disagree with the no fly list as there is no due process that would result in you losing a constitutional right.
Right now in Illinois, you lose your FOID if you are simply accused of a domestic violence incident. Two things, no due process and also I believe that results in people not reporting domestic violence in fear of losing an important right.



I think I would agree. I figured if you were on the no fly, there was some evidence. I would NEVER give up my firearms under any circumstance. You have the right to have fire arms per the constitution.

I'm not sure how you get on the no fly list exactly. It's odd. I would say that if you have not been convicted of a crime you shouldn't lose your rights. Now... if you're on the no fly list and you need to wait an extra 14-90 days or more to be fully vetted by the Effa Bee Eye or whomever then I'm cool as a moose with that. I'd be against a straight up denial.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
SomeGuy wrote:
And why would anyone want to own an AR-15 for home defense? If you miss you'll risk hitting Ed from down the block! I would own one because I want to own one.

In my opinion the best weapon for home defense is a 12 gauge shotty.
Next is a 9mm or 45 cal handgun. If you are unable physically to use those weapons a .32 or .38. I think a .22 is fairly useless as a home defense weapon.
I do not believe that calling the police and waiting for a response is a valid home defense strategy.
My police friends tell me that their safety is actually considered before the citizens... meaning that in a bad moment, potentially lethal for a officer, they will not charge in to save you if it's too dangerous.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Cashman wrote:
JMO


I own multiple firearms, but there is no reason to own these AR15s or anything like them. Home defense should be a shotgun or a handgun. Someone on a no-fly list or a watch list should not be able to purchase a fire arm. These gun shows need to be regulated as well as private sales of guns. I have a friend who sells privately and he really doesn't check anything.

I agree with the AR15 thing. I agree with your home defense points. Excellent points.
I would disagree with the no fly list as there is no due process that would result in you losing a constitutional right.
Right now in Illinois, you lose your FOID if you are simply accused of a domestic violence incident. Two things, no due process and also I believe that results in people not reporting domestic violence in fear of losing an important right.


Being told to wait isn't taking away that right.

Im not talking about being told to wait at all. I'm referring to the point made that "Someone on a no flly or watch list should not be able to purchase a firearm"


They're telling them to wait longer. Republicans say 3 days and Democrats say 3 months. Either way this won't stop many attacks. It wouldn't have even stopped Orlando because he wasn't on a list.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Cashman wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Cashman wrote:
JMO


I own multiple firearms, but there is no reason to own these AR15s or anything like them. Home defense should be a shotgun or a handgun. Someone on a no-fly list or a watch list should not be able to purchase a fire arm. These gun shows need to be regulated as well as private sales of guns. I have a friend who sells privately and he really doesn't check anything.

I agree with the AR15 thing. I agree with your home defense points. Excellent points.
I would disagree with the no fly list as there is no due process that would result in you losing a constitutional right.
Right now in Illinois, you lose your FOID if you are simply accused of a domestic violence incident. Two things, no due process and also I believe that results in people not reporting domestic violence in fear of losing an important right.



I think I would agree. I figured if you were on the no fly, there was some evidence. I would NEVER give up my firearms under any circumstance. You have the right to have fire arms per the constitution.

I'm not sure how you get on the no fly list exactly. It's odd. I would say that if you have not been convicted of a crime you shouldn't lose your rights. Now... if you're on the no fly list and you need to wait an extra 14-90 days or more to be fully vetted by the Effa Bee Eye or whomever then I'm cool as a moose with that. I'd be against a straight up denial.


We're in agreement then.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:

They're telling them to wait longer. Republicans say 3 days and Democrats say 3 months. Either way this won't stop many attacks. It wouldn't have even stopped Orlando because he wasn't on a list.

Waiting lists prevent those weird crimes of passion...cooling off period ya know? That's about it.
If bad people want guns they're easy enough to get illegally anyhow.
But if a 30 day or 90 day waiting period makes some bozo feel safer... whatever.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:

We're in agreement then.

Well, shit. This is going way too smoothly. Tell ya what... say some nasty shit about Pink Floyd or something.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80568
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Did you see Neil Steinberg wanted to show how "easy" it is to get a gun and went to a gun shop in Des Plaines all smug and gun grabby. He filled out the paperwork and they denied him the gun because he has a record as a drunk and a wifebeater. :lol:

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Did you see Neil Steinberg wanted to show how "easy" it is to get a gun and went to a gun shop in Des Plaines all smug and gun grabby. He filled out the paperwork and they denied him the gun because he has a record as a drunk and a wifebeater. :lol:


:lol:

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group