Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I could keep the idiotic pf/c debate going but I won't because it's stupid. Tim Duncan from about 97 til about 07 was the best player in the league.
I will say that your advanced stat stuff is dumb, since they have Duncan playing a 100% of the time at center. They also have Splitter playing a vast majority of time at Center too. How is that possible if both are starting. It's not really about being right, but watch the games sometimes. It helps with the "analysis".
Brick you couldn't probably tell who any of the PFs were doing Duncan's Era at Center. You would have to go back and start crunching numbers. Watch the games and that will tell you what you need to know. You would be able to cite specifics. Never can.
No he wasn't
Which players prior to 05 did he play with that were top 05 at their position? Which players prior to 05 were top 10 at their position? On the Spurs. I believed that they'd amassed 3 rings by that point.
David Robinson was still a great player when Duncan came into the league. Duncan wasn't even the best big man. Hakeem was still playing and Shaq was dominating. Jordan was in the league than too. I could argue that Duncan was never the best player in the league. His consistency is what makes him great.
David Robinson wasn't great when Duncan came into the league. David Robinson also had never been to a conf. Finals prior to Duncan's arrival. Maybe the year Houston beat them. Im not sure on that one but I think it was a second round knockout. Jordan was in his final year with the Bull when Duncan was a rookie. Where was Kobe at that stage of the game? Hakeem was also on his last legs that year. Lot of revisionism here.
Shaq was the only player during the early millennium period that was in Duncan's class. Garnett was somewhere in the conversation but he never could dominate games offensively. Duncan could.
_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.