It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:53 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 1:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Maybe you don't know how to define "good". Is that possible?

By your definition everyone who makes the big leagues is good. If that's the route we're going, I'll agree.


Show me where I said that every pitcher that makes the big leagues constitutes a good pitcher.

Just use the quote function, it should be easy for you.

Christ, you have the reading comprehension of an aardvark.


By definition isn't every big league pitcher within the 99th percentile of anyone who ever picked up a baseball? Are you now going to make personal insults to let everyone know how you're winning this argument?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4047
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR is "respected"? By whom? You and a bunch of guys who read the Internet? If it's so "respected" why is there a need for different versions? Anyway, I'm not talking about the respect or value of WAR, I'm talking about blindly throwing it out there as some kind of argument ender instanter.

Image


Again, show me where I said WAR is the end all be all of stats.

This should be easy for you, just use the quote function. Shouldn't take you more than a second.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4047
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Maybe you don't know how to define "good". Is that possible?

By your definition everyone who makes the big leagues is good. If that's the route we're going, I'll agree.


Show me where I said that every pitcher that makes the big leagues constitutes a good pitcher.

Just use the quote function, it should be easy for you.

Christ, you have the reading comprehension of an aardvark.


By definition isn't every big league pitcher within the 99th percentile of anyone who ever picked up a baseball? Are you now going to make personal insults to let everyone know how you're winning this argument?



Absolutely, that is my point.

This isn't hard to figure out, we should judge whether Cain was good or not by comparing him to the other people who have pitched in the major leagues, that's the baseline.

Of all the people in the world, anyone who pitches an inning in the big leagues is in the 99th percentile. But of those we have Matt Cain, a guy who by one measure has created more value in throwing a baseball than all but 250 or so of those people in the 99th percentile. That's a guy who was a good pitcher.

And a guy with a losing record.

Trust me shitbag, if you're getting operated on and they tell you that your surgeon is in the top 1% of all the surgeons that have ever lived, you'd be smiling ear to ear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 1:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4047
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR is "respected"? By whom? You and a bunch of guys who read the Internet?


I like how JORR, a guy currently reading stuff and posting stuff on the internet, and a guy who from all appearances spends a tremendous amount of time on the internet (at least this internet site) is making shit out of other people who read the internet.

Irony is rich.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR is "respected"? By whom? You and a bunch of guys who read the Internet?


I like how JORR, a guy currently reading stuff and posting stuff on the internet, and a guy who from all appearances spends a tremendous amount of time on the internet (at least this internet site) is making shit out of other people who read the internet.

Irony is rich.


Okay. :lol: That's a good point.

The thing is though, I don't just read a newsletter from some little fat guy who declares something like "RBI are meaningless" and say, "Hey everyone says this, it must be right and I'll say it too." The "analytics community" is more dogmatic and arrogant than any group of hidebound tobacco chewing old scouts ever was. And if analytics leads people to somehow believe that Javy Vazquez had a better career than Mark Buerhle I think we need to question the analysis.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Maybe you don't know how to define "good". Is that possible?

By your definition everyone who makes the big leagues is good. If that's the route we're going, I'll agree.


Show me where I said that every pitcher that makes the big leagues constitutes a good pitcher.

Just use the quote function, it should be easy for you.

Christ, you have the reading comprehension of an aardvark.


By definition isn't every big league pitcher within the 99th percentile of anyone who ever picked up a baseball? Are you now going to make personal insults to let everyone know how you're winning this argument?



Absolutely, that is my point.

This isn't hard to figure out, we should judge whether Cain was good or not by comparing him to the other people who have pitched in the major leagues, that's the baseline.

Of all the people in the world, anyone who pitches an inning in the big leagues is in the 99th percentile. But of those we have Matt Cain, a guy who by one measure has created more value in throwing a baseball than all but 250 or so of those people in the 99th percentile. That's a guy who was a good pitcher.

And a guy with a losing record.

Trust me shitbag, if you're getting operated on and they tell you that your surgeon is in the top 1% of all the surgeons that have ever lived, you'd be smiling ear to ear.


Well, shitbag, if you actually believe Matt Cain is one of the best 250 pitchers in major league history, you're simply wrong and whatever number you're using to arrive at such a conclusion is flawed.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
One Post,
Is Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post,
Is Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle?


No

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post,
Is Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle?


No
I said One Post, not One Hundred Thousand Posts.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
One Post wrote:

Trust me shitbag, if you're getting operated on and they tell you that your surgeon is in the top 1% of all the surgeons that have ever lived, you'd be smiling ear to ear.



Every time somebody recommends a doctor, he's always the best. "Oh, is he good?" "Oh, he's the best. This guy's the best." They can't all be the best. There can't be this many bests. Someone's graduating at the bottom of these classes, where are these doctors?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post,
Is Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle?


No
I said One Post, not One Hundred Thousand Posts.


I can't read

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You stuck your nose into a discussion between me and One Post apparently without reading the thread or understanding what was happening. And yeah, Wood and Kershaw may have equal accumulative WAR, but that doesn't mean they were equal pitchers. And to say that Cain "should" have a winning record is just claptrap. He doesn't have a winning record because he faced men who pitched better than he did in the games in which they were actually competing.

This has been my topic on this board from the word go. I'm sticking my nose into nothing. You seem rattled that you have to fight this battle on so many fronts...I wonder why.

The only one that called Wood and Kershaw equal pitchers is you.

This W/L discussion is you, your buddy Tom and FF on one side and everyone else I've ever met on the other. I'm comfortable where I stand.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post,
Is Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle?


No
I said One Post, not One Hundred Thousand Posts.


I can't read
But you are correct.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You stuck your nose into a discussion between me and One Post apparently without reading the thread or understanding what was happening. And yeah, Wood and Kershaw may have equal accumulative WAR, but that doesn't mean they were equal pitchers. And to say that Cain "should" have a winning record is just claptrap. He doesn't have a winning record because he faced men who pitched better than he did in the games in which they were actually competing.

This has been my topic on this board from the word go. I'm sticking my nose into nothing. You seem rattled that you have to fight this battle on so many fronts...I wonder why.

The only one that called Wood and Kershaw equal pitchers is you.

This W/L discussion is you, your buddy Tom and FF on one side and everyone else I've ever met on the other. I'm comfortable where I stand.


You can't admit you were wrong. It's making you look bad. You "fucking lol"ed me when you thought I was the one using cumulative WAR, but the fact is it was One Post, who you agree with on larger basis, so now it's okay apparently. The posts are all there for anyone who cares to read.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR is "respected"? By whom? You and a bunch of guys who read the Internet? If it's so "respected" why is there a need for different versions? Anyway, I'm not talking about the respect or value of WAR, I'm talking about blindly throwing it out there as some kind of argument ender instanter.

Image


Again, show me where I said WAR is the end all be all of stats.

This should be easy for you, just use the quote function. Shouldn't take you more than a second.


One Post wrote:
As it currently stands Matt Cain is 256th in all time pitcher WAR. Think about that for a second, of the tens of thousands of people who have pitched in major league baseball over the past 120+ years, Matt Cain has been better than all but about 250 of them.


Did you not declare Matt Cain to be the 256th best pitcher of all-time? If not WAR what is it that prompted you to make such a statement?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR is "respected"? By whom? You and a bunch of guys who read the Internet? If it's so "respected" why is there a need for different versions? Anyway, I'm not talking about the respect or value of WAR, I'm talking about blindly throwing it out there as some kind of argument ender instanter.

Image


Again, show me where I said WAR is the end all be all of stats.

This should be easy for you, just use the quote function. Shouldn't take you more than a second.


One Post wrote:
As it currently stands Matt Cain is 256th in all time pitcher WAR. Think about that for a second, of the tens of thousands of people who have pitched in major league baseball over the past 120+ years, Matt Cain has been better than all but about 250 of them.


Did you not declare Matt Cain to be the 256th best pitcher of all-time? If not WAR what is it that prompted you to make such a statement?
:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
The only one that called Wood and Kershaw equal pitchers is you.


Can you please show me where I did that?

Actually, the closest anyone has come to doing so is you:

IMU wrote:
Wood pitched 19 seasons. Kershaw has pitched 9 so far. And they are about even.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38690
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post,
Is Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle?


No
I said One Post, not One Hundred Thousand Posts.

:lol: :lol:
Team shitpost is on the board

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4047
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post,
Is Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle?


No
I said One Post, not One Hundred Thousand Posts.


Both good pitchers, but I'd slot Buehrle over Vazquez. At least after a brief look at their numbers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Back to back jacks by Rick and Bagels earlier on this page.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22468
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The thing is though, I don't just read a newsletter from some little fat guy who declares something like "RBI are meaningless" and say, "Hey everyone says this, it must be right and I'll say it too." The "analytics community" is more dogmatic and arrogant than any group of hidebound tobacco chewing old scouts ever was.


Ahhh, I get it now....

Image

This is about your distaste for Bernstein's parroting of Sheehan's newsletter whenever it comes out, then screaming at callers as if the ideas were his own. You're projecting, and that's OK, just get it under control.

Quote:
And if analytics leads people to somehow believe that Javy Vazquez had a better career than Mark Buerhle I think we need to question the analysis.


Who said that?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4047
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR is "respected"? By whom? You and a bunch of guys who read the Internet? If it's so "respected" why is there a need for different versions? Anyway, I'm not talking about the respect or value of WAR, I'm talking about blindly throwing it out there as some kind of argument ender instanter.

Image


Again, show me where I said WAR is the end all be all of stats.

This should be easy for you, just use the quote function. Shouldn't take you more than a second.


One Post wrote:
As it currently stands Matt Cain is 256th in all time pitcher WAR. Think about that for a second, of the tens of thousands of people who have pitched in major league baseball over the past 120+ years, Matt Cain has been better than all but about 250 of them.


Did you not declare Matt Cain to be the 256th best pitcher of all-time? If not WAR what is it that prompted you to make such a statement?


Show me in that quote where I said Cain was the 256th best pitcher of all-time?

It just isn't in there pal. I said that Matt Cain currently stands 256th all time in WAR. That's what I said, and whether you like WAR or not that's a fact. Then I simply pointed out that using that metric, Cain has been better than "all but about 250 of them."

So again, where did I declare that Cain is precisely the 256th best pitcher of all time.

Don't read too hard there aardvark, because I didn't say it.

Let's reset. I said Cain was a good pitcher. You said he wasn't. I merely pointed out that Cain is the 256th ranked pitcher all time in terms of cumulative value relative to all other pitchers who threw a pitch in the big leagues. He's in a very high percentile in terms of value compared to the baseline. Even if you want to say he's been better than all but about 500 of them, he's still very high in terms of value when it comes to pitchers. Somone in that high of a percentile when it comes to value creation is good at their job whether they are a pitcher, catcher, shortstop, pilot, engineer, or ditch digger.

I'm just trying to use a metric to judge pitchers other than the JORR Coalcar Full of Bullshit Ambiguous Good Pitcher Rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
I don't think the shitbag insults were necessary, unless it is an acronym for a stat I am unaware of

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post,
Is Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle?


No
I said One Post, not One Hundred Thousand Posts.


:lol:

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR is "respected"? By whom? You and a bunch of guys who read the Internet? If it's so "respected" why is there a need for different versions? Anyway, I'm not talking about the respect or value of WAR, I'm talking about blindly throwing it out there as some kind of argument ender instanter.

Image


Again, show me where I said WAR is the end all be all of stats.

This should be easy for you, just use the quote function. Shouldn't take you more than a second.


One Post wrote:
As it currently stands Matt Cain is 256th in all time pitcher WAR. Think about that for a second, of the tens of thousands of people who have pitched in major league baseball over the past 120+ years, Matt Cain has been better than all but about 250 of them.


Did you not declare Matt Cain to be the 256th best pitcher of all-time? If not WAR what is it that prompted you to make such a statement?


Show me in that quote where I said Cain was the 256th best pitcher of all-time?

It just isn't in there pal. I said that Matt Cain currently stands 256th all time in WAR. That's what I said, and whether you like WAR or not that's a fact. Then I simply pointed out that using that metric, Cain has been better than "all but about 250 of them."

So again, where did I declare that Cain is precisely the 256th best pitcher of all time.

Don't read too hard there aardvark, because I didn't say it.

Let's reset. I said Cain was a good pitcher. You said he wasn't. I merely pointed out that Cain is the 256th ranked pitcher all time in terms of cumulative value relative to all other pitchers who threw a pitch in the big leagues. He's in a very high percentile in terms of value compared to the baseline. Even if you want to say he's been better than all but about 500 of them, he's still very high in terms of value when it comes to pitchers. Somone in that high of a percentile when it comes to value creation is good at their job whether they are a pitcher, catcher, shortstop, pilot, engineer, or ditch digger.

I'm just trying to use a metric to judge pitchers other than the JORR Coalcar Full of Bullshit Ambiguous Good Pitcher Rankings.


Are you fucking serious???????

One Post wrote:
of the tens of thousands of people who have pitched in major league baseball over the past 120+ years, Matt Cain has been better than all but about 250 of them.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You stuck your nose into a discussion between me and One Post apparently without reading the thread or understanding what was happening. And yeah, Wood and Kershaw may have equal accumulative WAR, but that doesn't mean they were equal pitchers. And to say that Cain "should" have a winning record is just claptrap. He doesn't have a winning record because he faced men who pitched better than he did in the games in which they were actually competing.

This has been my topic on this board from the word go. I'm sticking my nose into nothing. You seem rattled that you have to fight this battle on so many fronts...I wonder why.

The only one that called Wood and Kershaw equal pitchers is you.

This W/L discussion is you, your buddy Tom and FF on one side and everyone else I've ever met on the other. I'm comfortable where I stand.


You can't admit you were wrong. It's making you look bad. You "fucking lol"ed me when you thought I was the one using cumulative WAR, but the fact is it was One Post, who you agree with on larger basis, so now it's okay apparently. The posts are all there for anyone who cares to read.

I'm continuing to fucking lol. Matt Cain was brought up as he is a good pitcher with a negative W/L ratio over a lengthy career. WAR was just one piece of evidence One Post referenced... he also mentioned things that give you a chub like World Series, a perfect game, Cy Young races....and you just ignored those.

How about this? Mark Buehrle was a 117 ERA+ pitcher. Cain? 113 ERA+

Pretty damn close. Cain had a better WHIP, and they had approximately the same K/BB. But Cain had a way higher SO%. And you're a huge fan of that number...since you say a strikeout is the worst thing a batter can do.

You're arguing that Cain > Buerhle and you don't even know it!

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are you fucking serious???????

One Post wrote:
of the tens of thousands of people who have pitched in major league baseball over the past 120+ years, Matt Cain has been better than all but about 250 of them.


Convenient that you only quoted one part of that post.

Context, anyone?

This is just sad now.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22468
pizza_Place: Giordano's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You stuck your nose into a discussion between me and One Post apparently without reading the thread or understanding what was happening. And yeah, Wood and Kershaw may have equal accumulative WAR, but that doesn't mean they were equal pitchers. And to say that Cain "should" have a winning record is just claptrap. He doesn't have a winning record because he faced men who pitched better than he did in the games in which they were actually competing.

This has been my topic on this board from the word go. I'm sticking my nose into nothing. You seem rattled that you have to fight this battle on so many fronts...I wonder why.

The only one that called Wood and Kershaw equal pitchers is you.

This W/L discussion is you, your buddy Tom and FF on one side and everyone else I've ever met on the other. I'm comfortable where I stand.


You can't admit you were wrong. It's making you look bad. You "fucking lol"ed me when you thought I was the one using cumulative WAR, but the fact is it was One Post, who you agree with on larger basis, so now it's okay apparently. The posts are all there for anyone who cares to read.

I'm continuing to fucking lol. Matt Cain was brought up as he is a good pitcher with a negative W/L ratio over a lengthy career. WAR was just one piece of evidence One Post referenced... he also mentioned things that give you a chub like World Series, a perfect game, Cy Young races....and you just ignored those.

How about this? Mark Buehrle was a 117 ERA+ pitcher. Cain? 113 ERA+

Pretty damn close. Cain had a better WHIP, and they had approximately the same K/BB. But Cain had a way higher SO%. And you're a huge fan of that number...since you say a strikeout is the worst thing a batter can do.

You're arguing that Cain > Buerhle and you don't even know it!

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are you fucking serious???????

One Post wrote:
of the tens of thousands of people who have pitched in major league baseball over the past 120+ years, Matt Cain has been better than all but about 250 of them.


Convenient that you only quoted one part of that post.

Context, anyone?


And Javier Vazquez had a better strikeout and walk rate than Cain, as well as a better career, league-adjusted FIP. Javy is better than all of them!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4047
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Are you fucking serious???????

One Post wrote:
of the tens of thousands of people who have pitched in major league baseball over the past 120+ years, Matt Cain has been better than all but about 250 of them.


Yeah, pretty serious.

Of the tens of thousands of dudes who have pitched in the bigs, Cain has been better than about 250 of them.

"About" defined: adverb near in time, number, degree, etc.; approximately.

Now in full disclosure I did get that definition from the internet, so I'm sure you think it's worthless, but it's the best I could do right now.

So yeah, Cain is better than all but "about" 250 of the guys who ever threw a ball in the bigs. Is he better than 200? 250? 350? It really doesn't matter in the context of the conversation because we are trying to judge if Cain was a good pitcher or not. That's why I used the term "about".

Using his WAR purely as a barometer for the company that he ranks with all time is a pretty solid indicator that dude was a good pitcher at the MLB level.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
Convenient that you only quoted one part of that post.

Context, anyone?

This is just sad now.


I quoted the entire post above more than once. He said that Cain was one of the best 250 pitchers in baseball history. He said it and it's there for anyone to read it. Now, he may have meant something else, but I can't really read minds. If he thought he was the 1000th best pitcher of all time, why didn't he just say that? Now he- and you- want to parse sentences and play Clintonesque word games. Additionally, you are the guy who "fucking lol" ed when you though I was buttressing the argument by using career WAR and now you are defending that because some guy who is arguing with me actually said it. That's a real douche move.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4047
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

And Javier Vazquez had a better strikeout and walk rate than Cain, as well as a better career, league-adjusted FIP. Javy is better than all of them!


Yeah, Vazquez was a good pitcher, I don't think anyone on here has said anything to the contrary.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group