Huh? The DNC is supposed to be neutral during Democratic primaries. That's why this is a story.

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

Republicans are going to be much more inclined to accept Hillary than Bernie. I can't believe you truly think otherwise.

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

The RNC did the exact same thing to Newt and it wasn't much of a story. I think it's a story because there are people that want to admit that the better candidate won.

Was there actual sabotage or were there simply emails which displayed an interest in seeing Sanders lose?

Are you talking about Congressional Republicans? They wouldn't work with Clinton or Sanders.

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

if they did the stuff to Newt that the DNC did to Sanders, then yes it should have been a story too.

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

The thing is that Bernie never really stood up to the negative campaign ads that Hillary has. I know the supporters of Bernie don't like to admit it but there was a lot of things to attack him on. Hillary didn't do it to avoid making his supporters even more mad than they were but the Republicans certainly would have.

There are many articles that state the Republicans wanted Bernie to win the nomination as he would easily have been characterized as someone the average American didn't want.

Trump isn't going to beat Hillary.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

Hillary took the high road during the primary. She didn't even campaign against Sanders. I wish she would've.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

if by winning elections you mean putting forth a candidate that is so disliked that would lose to anyone but Trump, I'd understand your point. But that's not the case. Bernie was more electable. Don't crap me now, no no.

The RNC did the exact same thing to Newt and it wasn't much of a story. I think it's a story because there are people that want to admit that the better candidate won.

Was there actual sabotage or were there simply emails which displayed an interest in seeing Sanders lose?

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

I think it's a story because there are people that want to admit that the better candidate won.

Huh? The DNC is supposed to be neutral during Democratic primaries. That's why this is a story.

They are much more likely to work with Hillary.

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

For what? She won the nomination. What would you have hoped she gained?

Again, I don't understand the sheer hatred for Sanders by HRC supporters. Even after defeating him, you guys can't stop ripping him.

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

The DNC was actively trying to generate negative stories about Sanders.That's sabotage.

Why are you using the muted reaction to the RNC's corruption 4 years ago to justify the DNC's current corruption? That makes no sense.

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

Do you have anything that supports your belief on what they are supposed to do?

I'm willing to be swayed but in practice, every level of "regular democratic party" has favorites in primaries.

In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

The better candidate won? The candidate that won is likely to end up embarrassing the Democratic Party the same way Nixon embarrassed Republicans. Whatever you think about Sanders, he wasn't going to do that.

Yeah, the bylaws of the Democratic party sstate the following:



Article 5, Section 4

Whatever negative stories they attempted to generate never saw the light of day. Corruption? It is corruption for DWS to want Hillary to win secretly?

RNC is relevant and so is history. They begin to coordinate with whomever they believe will win. There are no rules to it and I can't remember a single instance where the DNC openly campaigned against Sanders.

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .

Yeah, the bylaws of the Democratic party sstate the following:



Article 5, Section 4

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

Okay, even if true, there is no data to show what these hypothetical attacks would have done to his numbers or his reputation. We do have objective data that shows him doing better in a national election.

Hypothetical Jay Cutler > Hypothetical Bernie

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

At what point will republicans accept that the Hill Dawg isn't going to prison?

If they are chomping at the bit to take Hillary on, then why is Manafort making statements like this?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w ... tyIA8l3lbg

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

If they are chomping at the bit to take Hillary on, then why is Manafort making statements like this?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w ... tyIA8l3lbg

For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.

Okay, even if true, there is no data to show what these hypothetical attacks would have done to his numbers or his reputation. We do have objective data that shows him doing better in a national election.

Hypothetical Jay Cutler > Hypothetical Bernie

There's no reason for Republicans not to work with Hillary. She's essentially running as a Burkean conservative: everything's fine, let's keep doing what we're doing, and any issues that do come up can be addressed at a cautious pace by the wealthy and well-educated. Sounds like something Mitt Romney would have said, especially now that Romney and Hillary both think Russia is their greatest enemy.

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.