It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:27 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
I wish stoneroses were here to give his analysis of the Yankees essentially making a white flag trade

They are above .500, trending upward and only 4.5 out of the wild card.

THE YANKEES!

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
good dolphin wrote:
As a non Cub fan and a person who never follows the minor leagues, I should not have known the name Gleybar Torres...but yet I do. I'm sure it was simply based on the sober and well reasoned analysis of Cub fans.

Or perhaps MANY sox fans are much more obsessed with the Cubs organization, than they are with their own, but 6 of one half dozen of the other I suppose.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
When the Cubs front office decided to move Torres, and McKinny, or any other player what they become is a non-issue.

It's what you get back for them at that point. Whether he's Ty Griffin or Ryne Sandberg in the future, he's an asset right now, and you've got to maximize your return on an asset.

The Royals had a whole bunch of assets last year and they turned them into Johnny Cueto and Ben Zobrist.

Did the Cubs maximize the return on their assets as it stands now? I dunno, 30-40 innings of Chapman over the next 60 games and X number of playoff games, he better make them count.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Come on now. There are many posts on this board about how great Torres was going to be. Now it's like the fox and the sour grapes.

(a) Define 'many'; and then,
(b) Who are the 'many' that make up the 'many'; and then,
(c) Present these posts to us.


:lol: Are you denying that Torres was part of the next "wave of talent"? I never heard any of you Cub fans compare him to Ty Griffin until today.

I don't think this is a bad trade, but don't tell me Cubs fans- yeah, all of you- don't strut around this fucking board crowing about the Cubs' RICH FARM SYSTEM. Who you crappin'?

So you're not going to even attempt to back your assertion then?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
WHEN HE WAS A CUB:

Elmhurst Steve wrote:
He is a guy many think can be the best SS of them all in a couple years. Figuring out where he will play/who to trade, will become crucial decisions for Hoyer and Epstein. Nice problem to have in some ways, but make the wrong decisions and it will haunt them.


RFDC wrote:
Saw this kid play this summer in south bend. He made a couple spectacular plays at SS. You could just tell he was the best player on the field for either team.


Buster wrote:
gotta love it

Signed for $1.7 million out of Venezuela as part of the Cubs' $8.2 million international signing spree in 2013, Torres was even better than advertised in his first year as a pro. He had no trouble making his U.S. debut at age 17 and easily handled a jump to the short-season Northwest League in August.

An extremely advanced hitter for his age, Torres has a quick, short right-handed stroke and handles the bat well. He uses the entire field and has good knowledge of the strike zone. He's not physically imposing but has some strength that could produce close to average power once he learns to turn on pitches more often.

Because he has just average speed and quickness, Torres may wind up at second base in the long run. But he looked better at shortstop than expected and his instincts may allow him to stay there. His strong arm will allow him to play anywhere in the infield.


ONCE HE GOT TRADED TO THE YANKEES:

Phil McCracken wrote:
Torres could be the next Ty Griffin for all we know.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WHEN HE WAS A CUB:

Elmhurst Steve wrote:
He is a guy many think can be the best SS of them all in a couple years. Figuring out where he will play/who to trade, will become crucial decisions for Hoyer and Epstein. Nice problem to have in some ways, but make the wrong decisions and it will haunt them.


RFDC wrote:
Saw this kid play this summer in south bend. He made a couple spectacular plays at SS. You could just tell he was the best player on the field for either team.


Buster wrote:
gotta love it

Signed for $1.7 million out of Venezuela as part of the Cubs' $8.2 million international signing spree in 2013, Torres was even better than advertised in his first year as a pro. He had no trouble making his U.S. debut at age 17 and easily handled a jump to the short-season Northwest League in August.

An extremely advanced hitter for his age, Torres has a quick, short right-handed stroke and handles the bat well. He uses the entire field and has good knowledge of the strike zone. He's not physically imposing but has some strength that could produce close to average power once he learns to turn on pitches more often.

Because he has just average speed and quickness, Torres may wind up at second base in the long run. But he looked better at shortstop than expected and his instincts may allow him to stay there. His strong arm will allow him to play anywhere in the infield.


ONCE HE GOT TRADED TO THE YANKEES:

Phil McCracken wrote:
Torres could be the next Ty Griffin for all we know.

I stand by my statement

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
JORR killing it again.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Come on now. There are many posts on this board about how great Torres was going to be. Now it's like the fox and the sour grapes.

(a) Define 'many'; and then,
(b) Who are the 'many' that make up the 'many'; and then,
(c) Present these posts to us.


:lol: Are you denying that Torres was part of the next "wave of talent"? I never heard any of you Cub fans compare him to Ty Griffin until today.

I don't think this is a bad trade, but don't tell me Cubs fans- yeah, all of you- don't strut around this fucking board crowing about the Cubs' RICH FARM SYSTEM. Who you crappin'?

So you're not going to even attempt to back your assertion then?


I know Joe did but that thing speaks for itself...like I said, I, a person relatively ignorant of minor league baseball, know his name

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
:lol: oh JORR, you are a piece of work man.

He was the best player on the field that night, but that in no way said I thought he was going to be a hall of famer or the next big thing.

You continue to lump all Cubs fans and media together. If Bernsie says something about the Cubs then it is attributed to all Cub fans. If IMU says something about the Cubs it is attributed to all of us.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
good dolphin wrote:
I know Joe did but that thing speaks for itself...like I said, I, a person relatively ignorant of minor league baseball, know his name

Because you read the Cubs section here religiously.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
One Post wrote:
When the Cubs front office decided to move Torres, and McKinny, or any other player what they become is a non-issue.

It's what you get back for them at that point. Whether he's Ty Griffin or Ryne Sandberg in the future, he's an asset right now, and you've got to maximize your return on an asset.

The Royals had a whole bunch of assets last year and they turned them into Johnny Cueto and Ben Zobrist.

Did the Cubs maximize the return on their assets as it stands now? I dunno, 30-40 innings of Chapman over the next 60 games and X number of playoff games, he better make them count.

My ultimate feeling as well.

The opportunity cost of trading Gleyber is what bugs me. If he was deemed expendable then I'd rather have used him in a package for a young starter. The Cubs rotation the past two years has had ridiculously great luck with over-30 starters making 4/5th of the rotation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I know Joe did but that thing speaks for itself...like I said, I, a person relatively ignorant of minor league baseball, know his name

Because you read the Cubs section here religiously.


and, what information has that reading provided me?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
good dolphin wrote:
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I know Joe did but that thing speaks for itself...like I said, I, a person relatively ignorant of minor league baseball, know his name

Because you read the Cubs section here religiously.


and, what information has that reading provided me?

The fact that you know his name. And then you will add the rest as needed.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
Kirkwood wrote:
One Post wrote:
When the Cubs front office decided to move Torres, and McKinny, or any other player what they become is a non-issue.

It's what you get back for them at that point. Whether he's Ty Griffin or Ryne Sandberg in the future, he's an asset right now, and you've got to maximize your return on an asset.

The Royals had a whole bunch of assets last year and they turned them into Johnny Cueto and Ben Zobrist.

Did the Cubs maximize the return on their assets as it stands now? I dunno, 30-40 innings of Chapman over the next 60 games and X number of playoff games, he better make them count.

My ultimate feeling as well.

The opportunity cost of trading Gleyber is what bugs me. If he was deemed expendable then I'd rather have used him in a package for a young starter. The Cubs rotation the past two years has had ridiculously great luck with over-30 starters making 4/5th of the rotation.


Yeah, I mean this is an honest question for the Sox guys in this thread.

How close is Torres and McKinny + something else (Soler?) for Quintana?

Granted the Sox are under no compulsion to move Quintana but if Sale goes, you'd think Quintana goes quickly after that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I know Joe did but that thing speaks for itself...like I said, I, a person relatively ignorant of minor league baseball, know his name

Because you read the Cubs section here religiously.


and, what information has that reading provided me?

The fact that you know his name. And then you will add the rest as needed.


right. I'd remember the name of a guy that wasn't being discussed often with unrealistic adjectives being attached to his ability.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
RFDC wrote:
:lol: oh JORR, you are a piece of work man.

He was the best player on the field that night, but that in no way said I thought he was going to be a hall of famer or the next big thing.


I never said you did.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
Go ahead and find all these unrealistic adjectives that were used to describe him, dolphin

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
One Post wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
One Post wrote:
When the Cubs front office decided to move Torres, and McKinny, or any other player what they become is a non-issue.

It's what you get back for them at that point. Whether he's Ty Griffin or Ryne Sandberg in the future, he's an asset right now, and you've got to maximize your return on an asset.

The Royals had a whole bunch of assets last year and they turned them into Johnny Cueto and Ben Zobrist.

Did the Cubs maximize the return on their assets as it stands now? I dunno, 30-40 innings of Chapman over the next 60 games and X number of playoff games, he better make them count.

My ultimate feeling as well.

The opportunity cost of trading Gleyber is what bugs me. If he was deemed expendable then I'd rather have used him in a package for a young starter. The Cubs rotation the past two years has had ridiculously great luck with over-30 starters making 4/5th of the rotation.


Yeah, I mean this is an honest question for the Sox guys in this thread.

How close is Torres and McKinny + something else (Soler?) for Quintana?

Granted the Sox are under no compulsion to move Quintana but if Sale goes, you'd think Quintana goes quickly after that.


I would hope it would be a quick no.

Shelby Miller level return is the starting point.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
RFDC wrote:
Go ahead and find all these unrealistic adjectives that were used to describe him, dolphin



From Baseball Prospectus (I'm sure this will be adjusted now that he is no longer a Cub):

Gleyber Torres, MI, Chicago Cubs Why He'll Succeed: There’s no real weakness to Torres’ game. Everything but the power flashes above-average to plus, and his instincts both at the plate and in the field are impressive for any age, much less a 19-year-old.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
good dolphin wrote:
One Post wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
One Post wrote:
When the Cubs front office decided to move Torres, and McKinny, or any other player what they become is a non-issue.

It's what you get back for them at that point. Whether he's Ty Griffin or Ryne Sandberg in the future, he's an asset right now, and you've got to maximize your return on an asset.

The Royals had a whole bunch of assets last year and they turned them into Johnny Cueto and Ben Zobrist.

Did the Cubs maximize the return on their assets as it stands now? I dunno, 30-40 innings of Chapman over the next 60 games and X number of playoff games, he better make them count.

My ultimate feeling as well.

The opportunity cost of trading Gleyber is what bugs me. If he was deemed expendable then I'd rather have used him in a package for a young starter. The Cubs rotation the past two years has had ridiculously great luck with over-30 starters making 4/5th of the rotation.


Yeah, I mean this is an honest question for the Sox guys in this thread.

How close is Torres and McKinny + something else (Soler?) for Quintana?

Granted the Sox are under no compulsion to move Quintana but if Sale goes, you'd think Quintana goes quickly after that.


I would hope it would be a quick no.

Shelby Miller level return is the starting point.


Uhhh, well then I think you should have fun watching Quintana for the duration of the contract.

Just because the Diamondbacks are dumb, doesn't mean that sets the market.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
RFDC wrote:
Go ahead and find all these unrealistic adjectives that were used to describe him, dolphin


research projects get handed to associates.

Have a go at it.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
good dolphin wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Go ahead and find all these unrealistic adjectives that were used to describe him, dolphin


research projects get handed to associates.

Have a go at it.

Just as I thought.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Go ahead and find all these unrealistic adjectives that were used to describe him, dolphin



From Baseball Prospectus (I'm sure this will be adjusted now that he is no longer a Cub):

Gleyber Torres, MI, Chicago Cubs Why He'll Succeed: There’s no real weakness to Torres’ game. Everything but the power flashes above-average to plus, and his instincts both at the plate and in the field are impressive for any age, much less a 19-year-old.

By Baseball prospectus, not by any posters here.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
One Post wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
One Post wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
One Post wrote:
When the Cubs front office decided to move Torres, and McKinny, or any other player what they become is a non-issue.

It's what you get back for them at that point. Whether he's Ty Griffin or Ryne Sandberg in the future, he's an asset right now, and you've got to maximize your return on an asset.

The Royals had a whole bunch of assets last year and they turned them into Johnny Cueto and Ben Zobrist.

Did the Cubs maximize the return on their assets as it stands now? I dunno, 30-40 innings of Chapman over the next 60 games and X number of playoff games, he better make them count.

My ultimate feeling as well.

The opportunity cost of trading Gleyber is what bugs me. If he was deemed expendable then I'd rather have used him in a package for a young starter. The Cubs rotation the past two years has had ridiculously great luck with over-30 starters making 4/5th of the rotation.


Yeah, I mean this is an honest question for the Sox guys in this thread.

How close is Torres and McKinny + something else (Soler?) for Quintana?

Granted the Sox are under no compulsion to move Quintana but if Sale goes, you'd think Quintana goes quickly after that.


I would hope it would be a quick no.

Shelby Miller level return is the starting point.


Uhhh, well then I think you should have fun watching Quintana for the duration of the contract.

Just because the Diamondbacks are dumb, doesn't mean that sets the market.


If I trade Quintana, I will spend the next five years looking for a Quintana (I'll spend a lifetime looking for a Sale). A young, established, cheap, workhorse pitcher is as unique of an item on the trading block as there is in baseball. If I don't trade him today, someone will make me another offer in the off season and then another at the next trading deadline for the next several seasons.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WHEN HE WAS A CUB:

Elmhurst Steve wrote:
He is a guy many think can be the best SS of them all in a couple years. Figuring out where he will play/who to trade, will become crucial decisions for Hoyer and Epstein. Nice problem to have in some ways, but make the wrong decisions and it will haunt them.


RFDC wrote:
Saw this kid play this summer in south bend. He made a couple spectacular plays at SS. You could just tell he was the best player on the field for either team.


Buster wrote:
gotta love it

Signed for $1.7 million out of Venezuela as part of the Cubs' $8.2 million international signing spree in 2013, Torres was even better than advertised in his first year as a pro. He had no trouble making his U.S. debut at age 17 and easily handled a jump to the short-season Northwest League in August.

An extremely advanced hitter for his age, Torres has a quick, short right-handed stroke and handles the bat well. He uses the entire field and has good knowledge of the strike zone. He's not physically imposing but has some strength that could produce close to average power once he learns to turn on pitches more often.

Because he has just average speed and quickness, Torres may wind up at second base in the long run. But he looked better at shortstop than expected and his instincts may allow him to stay there. His strong arm will allow him to play anywhere in the infield.


ONCE HE GOT TRADED TO THE YANKEES:

Phil McCracken wrote:
Torres could be the next Ty Griffin for all we know.



Though I realize this is all fun and games, I have to point out that you used three people's quotes before and someone entirely different as the fourth.

It would be like us making you answer for Frank's posts as though you are both a single mind.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
denisdman wrote:
If there's no extension with Chapman, then he will have tremendous leverage over the Cubs in free agent negotiations. I wouldn't do this deal. I don't like the optics of a guy with personal life issues in the recent past. I don't like the lack of team control. Not for this price.

You're getting a one inning pitcher, so the chance that he is the difference in winning the World Series seems low.


He can just go back to the Yankees.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
good dolphin wrote:

If I trade Quintana, I will spend the next five years looking for a Quintana (I'll spend a lifetime looking for a Sale). A young, established, cheap, workhorse pitcher is as unique of an item on the trading block as there is in baseball. If I don't trade him today, someone will make me another offer in the off season and then another at the next trading deadline for the next several seasons.


I'm not saying there won't be offers, but if your price just to kick the tires is what the Diamondbacks gave for Miller, you'll be expecting an offer that isn't there.

Also, if you wait several seasons on the offer, Quintana will no longer be young, and you're hoping that he's still a workhorse. An injured pitcher is not a unique item in the baseball universe, for most pitchers it is going to happen.

I can understand the price on Quintana being high, I'm just not sure that the Shelby Miller deal sets the market. The D-backs got universally panned on that deal from the outset and with Miller at AAA, it's even worse.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
I'm actually trying to think over the past 5 years what starter under the age of 28 under a good contract got moved and what the price was.

Any help would be appreciated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Quote:
This McKinney guy has ~ 600 ABs in AA and his numbers are nothing to get excited about ... in fact they've been trending down it would seem.

His ceiling is Mike Trout.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
One Post wrote:
I'm actually trying to think over the past 5 years what starter under the age of 28 under a good contract got moved and what the price was.

Any help would be appreciated.



Jake Arietta
Gio Gonzalez


I'll think of more

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group