It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
One Post wrote:
[The Cubs are going to get 40 innings out of Chapman, better make them count for what they gave away.

.


realistically, the first 25 or so are a warm up. The trade will be judged on the last 15.


He hasn't proven that he can be trusted in key games. He's only been to the playoffs twice and he SUCKED both times. They gave up a Kings ransom to rent a guy that's unproven when they'll need him most. They had the same need in the offseason and could have acquired Chapman for substantially less.


that wasn't a king's ransom


They gave up a top 30 prospect and a top 75ish prospect. It's pretty good for a guy that will throw 40 innings and be gone.

The Red Sox gave up one to top 30 prospect and they got back a guy under team control for the next 3 years or something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas and One Post. Stop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Terry's Peeps wrote:
In the Cubs section?

Poor form.

Shouldn't even be separate sections

One MLB section to rule them all!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
One Post wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
One Post wrote:
[The Cubs are going to get 40 innings out of Chapman, better make them count for what they gave away.

.


realistically, the first 25 or so are a warm up. The trade will be judged on the last 15.


He hasn't proven that he can be trusted in key games. He's only been to the playoffs twice and he SUCKED both times. They gave up a Kings ransom to rent a guy that's unproven when they'll need him most. They had the same need in the offseason and could have acquired Chapman for substantially less.


that wasn't a king's ransom


They gave up a top 30 prospect and a top 75ish prospect. It's pretty good for a guy that will throw 40 innings and be gone.

The Red Sox gave up one to top 30 prospect and they got back a guy under team control for the next 3 years or something.


It was a nice haul for the Yankees but it wasn't some mind blowing amount of talent that I would term a king's ransom. Were you shocked by this trade?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23759
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
rogers park bryan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
In the Cubs section?

Poor form.

Shouldn't even be separate sections

One MLB section to rule them all!


Not until they add or drop the DH!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Decent move. Could come back to bite the team in long run but ya do what you gotta do


I didn't really care that Donaldson became an MVP 6 years after being traded for Harden

Maybe Torres will have a quicker rise but he's probably a 2018 guy

I wanted to sign Chapman. I'm usually against paying for closers but I'd roll dice on him


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
good dolphin wrote:
One Post wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
One Post wrote:
[The Cubs are going to get 40 innings out of Chapman, better make them count for what they gave away.

.


realistically, the first 25 or so are a warm up. The trade will be judged on the last 15.


He hasn't proven that he can be trusted in key games. He's only been to the playoffs twice and he SUCKED both times. They gave up a Kings ransom to rent a guy that's unproven when they'll need him most. They had the same need in the offseason and could have acquired Chapman for substantially less.


that wasn't a king's ransom


They gave up a top 30 prospect and a top 75ish prospect. It's pretty good for a guy that will throw 40 innings and be gone.

The Red Sox gave up one to top 30 prospect and they got back a guy under team control for the next 3 years or something.


It was a nice haul for the Yankees but it wasn't some mind blowing amount of talent that I would term a king's ransom. Were you shocked by this trade?


Shocked? No, based on the rumors, not shocked.

Do I think the Cubs could have taken the base pieces in the deal Torres, and McKinney and paired them with something else that could have fetched a player to help for this year and beyond? Yes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
One Post wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
One Post wrote:
[The Cubs are going to get 40 innings out of Chapman, better make them count for what they gave away.

.


realistically, the first 25 or so are a warm up. The trade will be judged on the last 15.


He hasn't proven that he can be trusted in key games. He's only been to the playoffs twice and he SUCKED both times. They gave up a Kings ransom to rent a guy that's unproven when they'll need him most. They had the same need in the offseason and could have acquired Chapman for substantially less.


that wasn't a king's ransom


They gave up a top 30 prospect and a top 75ish prospect. It's pretty good for a guy that will throw 40 innings and be gone.

The Red Sox gave up one to top 30 prospect and they got back a guy under team control for the next 3 years or something.


It was a nice haul for the Yankees but it wasn't some mind blowing amount of talent that I would term a king's ransom. Were you shocked by this trade?


To rent an unproven (in the postseason) relief pitcher for a few months it is. A loaded farm system just lost their best prospect and a top 5 to top 10 prospect for a guy that's never been successful in the playoffs. You trade your best prospects for starters.

The Yankees have gotten a lot of good players from the Cubs this year and all they have to show for it is Chapman for 3 months.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
I dig the trade recognizing the high price for it. At this point I trust Hoyerstein to make the right choice in trades like this. They know the value of Torres/McKinney to every team in baseball. There wasn't a next best alternative of a cost controlled starter out there for that pair. And if that trade is out there, the player is going to be in single A. He wouldn't be an impact player for this post season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
One Post wrote:

Shocked? No, based on the rumors, not shocked.

Do I think the Cubs could have taken the base pieces in the deal Torres, and McKinney and paired them with something else that could have fetched a player to help for this year and beyond? Yes.


Of course they could have. They could have gotten a young starter for not much more. He what they've given the Yankees could have gotten them a Quintana or very close to it.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2016 10:39 am
Posts: 1493
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
The flip side of this is that since he's on the Cubs the Cubs don't have to face him in the playoffs.

_________________
God is the uncaused cause of the universe. He had no beginning and has no end. He is not bound by the laws of the universe he created.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Drake LaRrieta wrote:
The flip side of this is that since he's on the Cubs the Cubs don't have to face him in the playoffs.


True. He hasn't proven that he can lights out in the playoffs though.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Nas wrote:
One Post wrote:

Shocked? No, based on the rumors, not shocked.

Do I think the Cubs could have taken the base pieces in the deal Torres, and McKinney and paired them with something else that could have fetched a player to help for this year and beyond? Yes.


Of course they could have. They could have gotten a young starter for not much more. He what they've given the Yankees could have gotten them a Quintana or very close to it.


I doubt that is true. If the Sox open offers for Quintana to the league everyone from contenders to teams hoping to be good next year are bidders.

No one is saying they didn't give up talent. It just wasn't a shocking amount of talent.

You think they should have given up nothing of value. This isn't your fantasy football league

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
One Post wrote:

Shocked? No, based on the rumors, not shocked.

Do I think the Cubs could have taken the base pieces in the deal Torres, and McKinney and paired them with something else that could have fetched a player to help for this year and beyond? Yes.


Of course they could have. They could have gotten a young starter for not much more. He what they've given the Yankees could have gotten them a Quintana or very close to it.


I doubt that is true. If the Sox open offers for Quintana to the league everyone from contenders to teams hoping to be good next year are bidders.

No one is saying they didn't give up talent. It just wasn't a shocking amount of talent.

You think they should have given up nothing of value. This isn't your fantasy football league


How do you compare Quintana to Shark? Shark netted a top 6 prospect. I don't see Torres + a little more netting Quintana. Even if you add in Jiminez whom is now their top prospect, I don't take that if I'm the sox. Short of bringing major league pieces, the Cubs don't have the bullets for a cost controlled starter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
One Post wrote:

Shocked? No, based on the rumors, not shocked.

Do I think the Cubs could have taken the base pieces in the deal Torres, and McKinney and paired them with something else that could have fetched a player to help for this year and beyond? Yes.


Of course they could have. They could have gotten a young starter for not much more. He what they've given the Yankees could have gotten them a Quintana or very close to it.


I doubt that is true. If the Sox open offers for Quintana to the league everyone from contenders to teams hoping to be good next year are bidders.

No one is saying they didn't give up talent. It just wasn't a shocking amount of talent.

You think they should have given up nothing of value. This isn't your fantasy football league


We'll see what happens what Quintana is traded. The Cubs essentially traded Castro, Torres and McKinney for 3 months of Chapman. I imagine a Soler thrown in or another player could get you Quintana.

No one said give up nothing. I would just pass if I had to give up this much to rent an unproven guy. Especially considering that I could have gotten him for 70% less in the winter.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Nobody wants Jorge Soler. That's like me pretending Avisail Garcia has any sort of value.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
America wrote:
Nobody wants Jorge Soler. That's like me pretending Avisail Garcia has any sort of value.

Nobody is a large pool of shit. Like your posts. Soler could be traded right now for a viable MLB player. Cubs will wait for the right deal and he will be gone also if the right deal is in place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Scooter wrote:
America wrote:
Nobody wants Jorge Soler. That's like me pretending Avisail Garcia has any sort of value.

Nobody is a large pool of shit. Like your posts. Soler could be traded right now for a viable MLB player. Cubs will wait for the right deal and he will be gone also if the right deal is in place.

I think you overvalue Solar. He alone gets nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
rogers park bryan wrote:
I think you overvalue Solar. He alone gets nothing.

I'm a big proponent of Solar energy.

Soler however, can't see getting much in return for a guy who up to this point, has shown he has no legs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16773
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Isn't Chapman a Boras product ? Don't see the Cubs being anything other than stalking-horse bidders for Chapman before he signs with Yanks/Detroit/Red Sox/Dodgers/other Boras level payroll team here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
TurdFerguson wrote:

How do you compare Quintana to Shark? Shark netted a top 6 prospect. I don't see Torres + a little more netting Quintana. Even if you add in Jiminez whom is now their top prospect, I don't take that if I'm the sox. Short of bringing major league pieces, the Cubs don't have the bullets for a cost controlled starter.


Well you're wrong on this point. They have the bullets, it is a question if they want to spend them.

Trust me, Schwarber, Torres, McKinney, Soler, Contreras and Happ constitute enough ammo to get every pitcher on the market except maybe one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
One Post wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:

How do you compare Quintana to Shark? Shark netted a top 6 prospect. I don't see Torres + a little more netting Quintana. Even if you add in Jiminez whom is now their top prospect, I don't take that if I'm the sox. Short of bringing major league pieces, the Cubs don't have the bullets for a cost controlled starter.


Well you're wrong on this point. They have the bullets, it is a question if they want to spend them.

Trust me, Schwarber, Torres, McKinney, Soler, Contreras and Happ constitute enough ammo to get every pitcher on the market except maybe one.


I consider soler, contreras, and schwarber major league pieces now. My package is happ, Torres and eloy. I don't think much of McKinney in AA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:06 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
..

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
TurdFerguson wrote:
One Post wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:

How do you compare Quintana to Shark? Shark netted a top 6 prospect. I don't see Torres + a little more netting Quintana. Even if you add in Jiminez whom is now their top prospect, I don't take that if I'm the sox. Short of bringing major league pieces, the Cubs don't have the bullets for a cost controlled starter.


Well you're wrong on this point. They have the bullets, it is a question if they want to spend them.

Trust me, Schwarber, Torres, McKinney, Soler, Contreras and Happ constitute enough ammo to get every pitcher on the market except maybe one.


I consider soler, contreras, and schwarber major league pieces now. My package is happ, Torres and eloy. I don't think much of McKinney in AA.


Fair enough, although if that is the interpretation there are probably only one (Braves) or three teams (Phillies)/(Indians) has the minor league ammo to get a Quintana


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 5:10 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I dont even know what to make of this.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/07/26/ ... leepy/amp/

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Yeah,I don't think anyone will argue he is something "different" but as long as he strikes out the world,nothing else matters,right Cub fans?!?

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I dont even know what to make of this.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/07/26/ ... leepy/amp/


I do. It means Cubs leadership is merely paying lip service to Chapman being "vetted" and how they give a rat's ass about him being an upstanding citizen. They feel forced to do this because of morons like Julie DiCaro.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 5:22 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Maybe.

But why would Cubs brass make up a story about having a conversation with him?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Maybe.

But why would Cubs brass make up a story about having a conversation with him?


To make it look like they are invested in his being a good citizen.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chapman to Cubs
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 2609
pizza_Place: Lucio's
Baseball people say he is a good teammate so that's good enough for me. That and 105 MPH and not having to face him in the post season.

Doubt he resigns though.

As to the prospects - who cares. It's been 108 fucking years.

Get it done this year.

At least make it to the WS.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group