It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13257
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
"To the Bernie-or-bust people, you're being ridiculous."

STFU



She is right and I would repeatedly.

Mark me down for both as well.

Pouty, petulant children who have no sense of anything outside of their own drum circle nor any understanding, or respect for, differentiating between playing the short game while still executing a plan based on the long-term goal(s). Dopes.

Agreed. Silverman was both correct and the correct person to say it.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Sarah Silverman's Twitter Hacked After DNC Speech
by ALYSSA NEWCOMB

Comedian Sarah Silverman probably wasn't laughing when she opened her Twitter account today to discover she had been hacked.

The now deleted tweet included the message, "America, are you awakening?" along with a video titled "Anonymous - A Message to Hillary Clinton." The tweet included the hashtags #Hilary4Prison and #Anonymous, according to a screen grab posted by Mashable.

Silverman posted in all caps this morning: "MY TWITTER ACCT GOT HACKED THIS IS NOT ME ."

MY TWITTER ACCT GOT HACKED THIS IS NOT ME https://t.co/hmZYLdrjxi
— Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) July 27, 2016
The hack comes after Silverman told booing Bernie Sanders supporters they were being "ridiculous" during her speech Monday night at the Democratic National Convention.

The comedian backed the Vermont senator during the primary but said Clinton has her full support in the general election.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:45 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
I am amazed that anyone is surprised or outraged by Sanders' support for Clinton. He clearly signaled he was going to do this throughout the campaign, especially in the debates when he described "the danger" of a Trump presidency and noted Clinton's clear contrast to Trump.

Despite his flaws, Bernie still radically altered the political discourse in this country and helped validate a kind of New Deal liberalism that was discredited in the 80s and largely expunged from political memory since the Clintons took office in the 90s.

With or without Bernie, there is a movement out there if you want to join it. As even a cursory examination of American history will demonstrate, real political and economic change can only come from the grass roots. Reform of our economic and political system will not occur without popular struggle. It is naive and historically ignorant to think otherwise.

The obsessive need (by some) to continually eviscerate Sanders as a "fraud" strikes me as a kind of cynical fantasy that disparages "politics" and "politicians" as an unconscious way of excusing people from fulfilling their responsibilities as citizens of a democracy and informed, engaged political actors. There is a kind of willful paralysis at work in some cases, and it's unwittingly escapist if not overtly disingenuous.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:53 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tall Midget wrote:
I am amazed that anyone is surprised or outraged by Sanders' support for Clinton. He clearly signaled he was going to do this throughout the campaign, especially in the debates when he described "the danger" of a Trump presidency and noted Clinton's clear contrast to Trump.

Despite his flaws, Bernie still radically altered the political discourse in this country and helped validate a kind of New Deal liberalism that was discredited in the 80s and largely expunged from political memory since the Clintons took office in the 90s.

With or without Bernie, there is a movement out there if you want to join it. As even a cursory examination of American history will demonstrate, real political and economic change can only come from the grass roots. Reform of our economic and political system will not occur without popular struggle. It is naive and historically ignorant to think otherwise.

The obsessive need (by some) to continually eviscerate Sanders as a "fraud" strikes me as a kind of cynical fantasy that disparages "politics" and "politicians" as an unconscious way of excusing people from fulfilling their responsibilities as citizens of a democracy and informed, engaged political actors. There is a kind of willful paralysis at work in some cases, and it's unwittingly escapist if not overtly disingenuous.



Yeah, he never made any bones about what he was going to do. He kid-gloved her the whole time. I think it was a mistake, but so what? Sanders was a symbol for a movement rather than the movement itself. Now he's become a symbol for a different movement, one that allows Clinton and the party regulars to posture and pretend they learned from him and try to keep as many of his voters in line as possible. I think he feels a little bad about that. He'll probably feel worse when she pats his head and sends him home to Vermont.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Tall Midget wrote:
I am amazed that anyone is surprised or outraged by Sanders' support for Clinton. He clearly signaled he was going to do this throughout the campaign, especially in the debates when he described "the danger" of a Trump presidency and noted Clinton's clear contrast to Trump.

Despite his flaws, Bernie still radically altered the political discourse in this country and helped validate a kind of New Deal liberalism that was discredited in the 80s and largely expunged from political memory since the Clintons took office in the 90s.

With or without Bernie, there is a movement out there if you want to join it. As even a cursory examination of American history will demonstrate, real political and economic change can only come from the grass roots. Reform of our economic and political system will not occur without popular struggle. It is naive and historically ignorant to think otherwise.

The obsessive need (by some) to continually eviscerate Sanders as a "fraud" strikes me as a kind of cynical fantasy that disparages "politics" and "politicians" as an unconscious way of excusing people from fulfilling their responsibilities as citizens of a democracy and informed, engaged political actors. There is a kind of willful paralysis at work in some cases, and it's unwittingly escapist if not overtly disingenuous.

You use your keyboard purdier than a $20 whore.

I like what you're saying, and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
What is the result of this "movement"? When do we see these results?

I've also never gotten a good answer as to what Bernie would have done if Kasich or Rubio would have been the nominee. If you take away his "Anyone but Trump" excuse what is he doing differently?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Wrong thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
I am amazed that anyone is surprised or outraged by Sanders' support for Clinton. He clearly signaled he was going to do this throughout the campaign, especially in the debates when he described "the danger" of a Trump presidency and noted Clinton's clear contrast to Trump.

Despite his flaws, Bernie still radically altered the political discourse in this country and helped validate a kind of New Deal liberalism that was discredited in the 80s and largely expunged from political memory since the Clintons took office in the 90s.

With or without Bernie, there is a movement out there if you want to join it. As even a cursory examination of American history will demonstrate, real political and economic change can only come from the grass roots. Reform of our economic and political system will not occur without popular struggle. It is naive and historically ignorant to think otherwise.

The obsessive need (by some) to continually eviscerate Sanders as a "fraud" strikes me as a kind of cynical fantasy that disparages "politics" and "politicians" as an unconscious way of excusing people from fulfilling their responsibilities as citizens of a democracy and informed, engaged political actors. There is a kind of willful paralysis at work in some cases, and it's unwittingly escapist if not overtly disingenuous.



Yeah, he never made any bones about what he was going to do. He kid-gloved her the whole time. I think it was a mistake, but so what? Sanders was a symbol for a movement rather than the movement itself. Now he's become a symbol for a different movement, one that allows Clinton and the party regulars to posture and pretend they learned from him and try to keep as many of his voters in line as possible. I think he feels a little bad about that. He'll probably feel worse when she pats his head and sends him home to Vermont.

The look on Bernie's face was one of someone who realizes he's been had. Not saying he believed this, because, as Tall Midget said, Bernie maintained all along that he'd support Hillary against Trump, and Bernie has that resting bitch face anyway . . . but he didn't respond in any noticeable way when Hillary was extolling the virtues of his movement.

Or maybe that was his FU to her because he knows how the world often works, how people lie all the time to get what they want, how he knows his ideas won't matter to Hillary after the election.

Or maybe his reaction was just an authentic one and Bernie was thinking about his next move and wasn't gonna react any differently for Hillary or the cameras.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:08 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is the result of this "movement"? When do we see these results?

I've also never gotten a good answer as to what Bernie would have done if Kasich or Rubio would have been the nominee. If you take away his "Anyone but Trump" excuse what is he doing differently?


The two major ploitical parties are being reshaped before your eyes. You seem to believe Hillary wins, everything goes back to "normal", your 401(k) is safe, and life goes on. I'm gonna say that isn't how it plays out.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is the result of this "movement"? When do we see these results?

I've also never gotten a good answer as to what Bernie would have done if Kasich or Rubio would have been the nominee. If you take away his "Anyone but Trump" excuse what is he doing differently?


The two major ploitical parties are being reshaped before your eyes. You seem to believe Hillary wins, everything goes back to "normal", your 401(k) is safe, and life goes on. I'm gonna say that isn't how it plays out.

That isn't how it plays out in that Trump wins or that Hillary does not go back to normal and does things people do not expect?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is the result of this "movement"? When do we see these results?

I've also never gotten a good answer as to what Bernie would have done if Kasich or Rubio would have been the nominee. If you take away his "Anyone but Trump" excuse what is he doing differently?


The two major ploitical parties are being reshaped before your eyes. You seem to believe Hillary wins, everything goes back to "normal", your 401(k) is safe, and life goes on. I'm gonna say that isn't how it plays out.
That isn't an answer to my questions.

We heard the same stuff at the end of OWS too.

I just want to know what to expect.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
RFDC wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is the result of this "movement"? When do we see these results?

I've also never gotten a good answer as to what Bernie would have done if Kasich or Rubio would have been the nominee. If you take away his "Anyone but Trump" excuse what is he doing differently?


The two major ploitical parties are being reshaped before your eyes. You seem to believe Hillary wins, everything goes back to "normal", your 401(k) is safe, and life goes on. I'm gonna say that isn't how it plays out.

That isn't how it plays out in that Trump wins or that Hillary does not go back to normal and does things people do not expect?


If Trump wins, who knows? Hillary winning is going to tear the Democrats apart more than ever.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I'm amazed at all the excuses being made for Bernie. "He said he was going to do this." "He feels bad." "Look at his face." Cut all bullshit. Bernie Sanders is a conman. He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win. He fell in line like he's always done when his vote was needed.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
I'm amazed at all the excuses being made for Bernie. "He said he was going to do this." "He feels bad." "Look at his face." Cut all bullshit. Bernie Sanders is a conman. He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win. He fell in line like he's always done when his vote was needed.


Even if true, why do you care at this point? What is the point in continually bashing Sanders?

Edit: nevermind, I didn't see the posts above.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is the result of this "movement"? When do we see these results?


We get it. You believe America was founded on blind allegiance and maintaining the status quo.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
I wouldn't say the parties are being re-shaped just yet. Trump has made a joke out of the GOP but it's not re-shaped yet. He'd have to win it and actually force the hands of the GOP Congressman to seal the deal. Not sure he's going to win. If Trump loses, the GOP will have the chance to re-group and invest in a better, smarter candidate than Jeb or Cruz. There's a kink in the GOP armor, but they're not dismantled yet.

Agree with JORR and this is really becoming more apparent...If Trump wins, the Democratic party will unite and stay intact for the next election....and likely win. If Hill wins, the unrest will continue and you could see some real in-fighting in 4 years. This has nothing to do with Bernie. Bernie will be dead by then and to Nas' point, he's just a party lemming.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is the result of this "movement"? When do we see these results?


We get it. You believe America was founded on blind allegiance and maintaining the status quo.
You guys keep on acting like things changed with the Bernie campaign. I simply want to know what you think will actually happen.

I actually agree with Bernie on a few ideas. I just don't think we need to pretend like what he did was more than he did especially since he seems to have cut the legs off the movement with what he did after he was clearly going to lose.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Last edited by Brick on Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Nas wrote:
He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win.

If you can supply evidence for this (or any of the other statements), I'd like to see it.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
wdelaney72 wrote:
Agree with JORR and this is really becoming more apparent...If Trump wins, the Democratic party will unite and stay intact for the next election....and likely win. If Hill wins, the unrest will continue and you could see some real in-fighting in 4 years. This has nothing to do with Bernie. Bernie will be dead by then and to Nas' point, he's just a party lemming.
I doubt that is true. Bernie lost by a margin larger than Hillary lost in 2008. Bernie also got a big bump from independents who may not be true Democrats but also aren't going to suddenly switch to being Republicans.

Not to mention that the Democrats are already creating the next contenders for President as we speak who will pretty easily keep the party united. At Hillary's age, it wouldn't shock me if she doesn't run for reelection either especially if she is unpopular. She got what she always wanted.

Eventually the Republicans have to return back towards the middle of the political landscape and that may eventually hurt the Democrats(though as the Democrats know, latinos are very brand loyal so they will stick with the Democrats).

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:07 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
formerlyknownas wrote:
Nas wrote:
He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win.

If you can supply evidence for this (or any of the other statements), I'd like to see it.


I've been doing it from the beginning. Before his poll numbers improved. Bernie Sanders has been a niche politician. He says all the things MANY of us agree with because it won't cost him in Vermont. He's never proposed a piece of legislation or really fought for anything. Whenever his vote has been needed he falls in line. If he truly cared we would see something beyond words after 3 decades in Washington.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Nas wrote:
I'm amazed at all the excuses being made for Bernie. "He said he was going to do this." "He feels bad." "Look at his face." Cut all bullshit. Bernie Sanders is a conman. He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win. He fell in line like he's always done when his vote was needed.


Your level of unbecoming indignation towards Bernie is trending heavily towards the absurdity of the whole TM/OKC deal.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:18 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm amazed at all the excuses being made for Bernie. "He said he was going to do this." "He feels bad." "Look at his face." Cut all bullshit. Bernie Sanders is a conman. He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win. He fell in line like he's always done when his vote was needed.


Your level of unbecoming indignation towards Bernie is trending heavily towards the absurdity of the whole TM/OKC deal.


I think people like him are harmful to any movement.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:19 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm amazed at all the excuses being made for Bernie. "He said he was going to do this." "He feels bad." "Look at his face." Cut all bullshit. Bernie Sanders is a conman. He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win. He fell in line like he's always done when his vote was needed.


Your level of unbecoming indignation towards Bernie is trending heavily towards the absurdity of the whole TM/OKC deal.


I think people like him are harmful to any movement.


Agreed. OKC is toxic.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Nas wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Nas wrote:
He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win.

If you can supply evidence for this (or any of the other statements), I'd like to see it.


I've been doing it from the beginning. Before his poll numbers improved. Bernie Sanders has been a niche politician. He says all the things MANY of us agree with because it won't cost him in Vermont. He's never proposed a piece of legislation or really fought for anything. Whenever his vote has been needed he falls in line. If he truly cared we would see something beyond words after 3 decades in Washington.

He's been fighting for civil rights since your icon was among the living. Opposed NAFTA, the Iraq War.....(what did Hillary do?)....sponsored veterans bills and environmental bills...and actually talked about how we hardly even have a middle class any longer (rather than ignoring the issue).

Look, the guy ain't perfect. I disagree with him on a variety of issues. But conman?

Not to be a jerk, but I'm reporting you to the moderators.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm amazed at all the excuses being made for Bernie. "He said he was going to do this." "He feels bad." "Look at his face." Cut all bullshit. Bernie Sanders is a conman. He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win. He fell in line like he's always done when his vote was needed.


Your level of unbecoming indignation towards Bernie is trending heavily towards the absurdity of the whole TM/OKC deal.


I think people like him are harmful to any movement.


Agreed. OKC is toxic.

Speaking of OKC, the owner of that basketball team is the sweatiest f-ing guy ever. Every time I see him on tv, he has a sheen of sweat on him.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
I'm amazed at all the excuses being made for Bernie. "He said he was going to do this." "He feels bad." "Look at his face." Cut all bullshit. Bernie Sanders is a conman. He doesn't give a crap about the movement and he didn't want to win. He fell in line like he's always done when his vote was needed.


You don't get it. You keep thinking it was about Bernie Sanders.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:28 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is the result of this "movement"? When do we see these results?


We get it. You believe America was founded on blind allegiance and maintaining the status quo.


BRick to Thomas Paine: Everybody I know is doing pretty well under the monarchy, so things can't be too bad. Look at all these fine textiles and delicious tea we enjoy as subjects of the British Empire! Let's call this revolution off, go home , watch the fire, and admire my new wrought iron chamber pot.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:30 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Not to mention that the Democrats are already creating the next contenders for President as we speak who will pretty easily keep the party united.


Who are they? Tim Kaine? Cory Booker?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Not to mention that the Democrats are already creating the next contenders for President as we speak who will pretty easily keep the party united.


Who are they? Tim Kaine? Cory Booker?

Everyone's hard for Tulsi Gabbard from Hawai'i.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Silverman
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Not to mention that the Democrats are already creating the next contenders for President as we speak who will pretty easily keep the party united.


Who are they? Tim Kaine? Cory Booker?


The cupboard is bare. Booker will most likely be in jail by the next election and Kaine is a non starter. Dude is a tard.

That's the DNC's fault, though. String arming any possible contenders, cutting off the money and rigging the game kept, probably, a lot of special snowflakes off of the national stage.

They have sacrificed all for Hillary.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group