It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 571 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
This is becoming khantankerous.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Looks to be a very "Pro Sharia Law" type of guy.

But, the damage is done, mission accomplished, Hillary get an agent of hers to "do the job." Wonder what position in a possible Hillary admin he will have? Or what gifts his law firm will be getting in the future....or maybe they will have to pay the Clinton Foundation Toll for that.

What kind of disposable, soulless piece of shit would use a fallen soldier, someone's dead son as political bait?

Holy Marconi shoe eating!


Are you khanstipated?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
It's khanceivable this could be a negative for the Clinton campaign.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Looks to be a very "Pro Sharia Law" type of guy.

But, the damage is done, mission accomplished, Hillary get an agent of hers to "do the job." Wonder what position in a possible Hillary admin he will have? Or what gifts his law firm will be getting in the future....or maybe they will have to pay the Clinton Foundation Toll for that.

What kind of disposable, soulless piece of shit would use a fallen soldier, someone's dead son as political bait?

Holy Marconi shoe eating!


Are you khanstipated?


Probably not. I think he takes Fiber Kahn.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Peoria Matt wrote:
:lol:


+ :lol:

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Arguing vehemently for Sharia Law doesn't seem very "apple pie, baseball and Facebook" to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
pittmike wrote:
People digging on Senor Khan. Deleted his website.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/


diskhancerting


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38783
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hussra wrote:
pittmike wrote:
People digging on Senor Khan. Deleted his website.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/


diskhancerting



What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38041
Location: ...
looking forward to the comic khan in a few weeks. got a photo op with gillian anderson and david duchovny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Seacrest wrote:
Hussra wrote:
pittmike wrote:
People digging on Senor Khan. Deleted his website.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/


diskhancerting



What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information.


Yup. SomeGuy is, once again, way ahead of the curve on this one.

One could say that the "media" is abandoning their duty by not doing even basic research on this guy and simply acting in a coordinated attack pattern with other outlets and the actual DNC/Clinton Campaign. But then again, this was no accident and it's all been planned in advance. I'm sure Debbie WasermanCunt had a few more "sit downs" with a few "newsrooms" before this whole thing.

The elite aren't even trying to hide it anymore. All right out in the open.

Only WikiLeaks can save us now!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4808
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
SomeGuy wrote:
Looks to be a very "Pro Sharia Law" type of guy.

But, the damage is done, mission accomplished, Hillary get an agent of hers to "do the job." Wonder what position in a possible Hillary admin he will have? Or what gifts his law firm will be getting in the future....or maybe they will have to pay the Clinton Foundation Toll for that.

What kind of disposable, soulless piece of shit would use a fallen soldier, someone's dead son as political bait?

Holy Marconi shoe eating!


Well said, SomeGuy. I salute you.

The son's been dead for ELEVEN years. If these people should be talking about anything, it should be how we shouldn't have gone in Iraq in the first place. And Trump was against the war in Iraq.

Talk about Hillary pulling a skeleton out of her closet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Seacrest wrote:
Hussra wrote:
pittmike wrote:
People digging on Senor Khan. Deleted his website.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/


diskhancerting



What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information.


First their email server gets hacked by some weirdo named Julian; now they serve up this meatball over the heart of the plate for Trump to put into the seats? If there's that much baggage attached to Khan and he's that tied to Hillary, then Trump will be twittering about Khan-Immigration-Saudis-hrc17@ related shenanigans right up to election day.

Wonder if Khan was a Debbie Wasserman Schultz pick/find/selection to speak at the DNC? Unkhannily similar to how the Red Sox had to overcome Theo's Carl Crawford deal before they could win the World Series once he left for the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Dignified Rube wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Looks to be a very "Pro Sharia Law" type of guy.

But, the damage is done, mission accomplished, Hillary get an agent of hers to "do the job." Wonder what position in a possible Hillary admin he will have? Or what gifts his law firm will be getting in the future....or maybe they will have to pay the Clinton Foundation Toll for that.

What kind of disposable, soulless piece of shit would use a fallen soldier, someone's dead son as political bait?

Holy Marconi shoe eating!


Well said, SomeGuy. I salute you.

The son's been dead for ELEVEN years. If these people should be talking about anything, it should be how we shouldn't have gone in Iraq in the first place. And Trump was against the war in Iraq.

Talk about Hillary pulling a skeleton out of her closet.


He was for it before he was against it. At least President Bush respected military families.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
Are you khanstipated?

Probably not. I think he takes Fiber Kahn.

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4808
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
SomeGuy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Hussra wrote:
pittmike wrote:
People digging on Senor Khan. Deleted his website.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/


diskhancerting



What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information.


Yup. SomeGuy is, once again, way ahead of the curve on this one.

One could say that the "media" is abandoning their duty by not doing even basic research on this guy and simply acting in a coordinated attack pattern with other outlets and the actual DNC/Clinton Campaign. But then again, this was no accident and it's all been planned in advance. I'm sure Debbie WasermanCunt had a few more "sit downs" with a few "newsrooms" before this whole thing.

The elite aren't even trying to hide it anymore. All right out in the open.

Only WikiLeaks can save us now!


Don't worry, Assange said more is coming on Hillary. And there's the possibility of Hillary eating herself out of the Presidency, too.

The media has abandoned their duty to not even look at what Trump actually said, which was nothing. Yet, they spin it as "Trump bashes parents of fallen soldier for being Muslim", when it was Khan who shot off at Trump first with false accusations. Of course, Trump should be able to respond if Khan makes himself political by stepping on the Democrat stage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
For the first time in my life I hate this country.

Image

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
"Trump is unacceptable", says B Hussein Soetero.

Image

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
BeerFan wrote:
For the first time in my life I hate this country.

Image


You shouldn't be so kahnfrontational, Jimmy.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
BeerFan wrote:
For the first time in my life I hate this country.

Image


You shouldn't be so kahnfrontational, Jimmy.

You shouldn't be so khandescending, leash.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38041
Location: ...
well he ain't no khandoleezza rice!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Funny how this Khan Khasshole has the khballs to hold up the Constitution (in book form) and talk about equal protection under the law and liberty but then goes and furiously advocates for Sharia Law and sucks at the teat of Saudi Arabia and the Clinton's.

Fuck this guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SomeGuy wrote:
Funny how this Khan Khasshole has the khballs to hold up the Constitution (in book form) and talk about equal protection under the law and liberty but then goes and furiously advocates for Sharia Law and sucks at the teat of Saudi Arabia and the Clinton's.

Fuck this guy.

Khanstitution**

Do better, friend.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
W_Z wrote:
well he ain't no khandoleezza rice!
I can khanfirm that she was smart enough to avoid the Republican Khanvention.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Funny how this Khan Khasshole has the khballs to hold up the Constitution (in book form) and talk about equal protection under the law and liberty but then goes and furiously advocates for Sharia Law and sucks at the teat of Saudi Arabia and the Clinton's.

Fuck this guy.

Khanstitution**

Do better, friend.


Khanstant Khantradiction

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
BeerFan wrote:
For the first time in my life I hate this country.

Image


You shouldn't be so kahnfrontational, Jimmy.

You shouldn't be so khandescending, leash.


Au Kahntraire

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Funny how this Khan Khasshole has the khballs to hold up the Constitution (in book form) and talk about equal protection under the law and liberty but then goes and furiously advocates for Sharia Law and sucks at the teat of Saudi Arabia and the Clinton's.

Fuck this guy.

Khanstitution**

Do better, friend.


Khanstant Khantradiction


:lol: You're getting out of hand.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
W_Z wrote:
well he ain't no khandoleezza rice!
I can khanfirm that she was smart enough to avoid the Republican Khanvention.

I think most respected Republicans were making a khancerted effort to avoid that circus. Khant say I blame them.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Funny how this Khan Khasshole has the khballs to hold up the Constitution (in book form) and talk about equal protection under the law and liberty but then goes and furiously advocates for Sharia Law and sucks at the teat of Saudi Arabia and the Clinton's.

Fuck this guy.

Khanstitution**

Do better, friend.


Khanstant Khantradiction

I'm not surprised. Most frauds are khan men also.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
Dems Doing The Khan-Khan
Posted on August 1, 2016 by tonyheller


If we had proper screening of Muslims entering the country while Bill Clinton was president, the World Trade Center would still be standing, Hillary Clinton would never have voted to invade Iraq, and Captain Khan would still be alive.

Image

That sort of screening is exactly what Trump is proposing, and Hillary Clinton is rejecting.

Logic and rational thought is impossible for progressives – and almost anyone who watches cable news.

#HillaryIsaKhant

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 571 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group