It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 571 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
#FreeKhantraceptives

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4808
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
My ultimate take is that the media has a very short attention span, and this will blow over in a day or two. What more can they do with it, when today CNN showed the Khans in a staged scene at their son's grave? What a disgrace.

Despite whatever bounce the media says Hillary got from this past week, the Khantroversy it's going to sway people one way or the other. Their minds are already decided, and with Hillary getting millions less votes than she did four years ago against Obama, Trump should win.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38041
Location: ...
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Funny how this Khan Khasshole has the khballs to hold up the Constitution (in book form) and talk about equal protection under the law and liberty but then goes and furiously advocates for Sharia Law and sucks at the teat of Saudi Arabia and the Clinton's.

Fuck this guy.

Khanstitution**

Do better, friend.


Khanstant Khantradiction

I'm not surprised. Most frauds are khan men also.


and they start with a bad khancept.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
BeerFan wrote:
Dems Doing The Khan-Khan
Posted on August 1, 2016 by tonyheller


If we had proper screening of Muslims entering the country while Bill Clinton was president, the World Trade Center would still be standing, Hillary Clinton would never have voted to invade Iraq, and Captain Khan would still be alive.

Image

That sort of screening is exactly what Trump is proposing, and Hillary Clinton is rejecting.

Logic and rational thought is impossible for progressives – and almost anyone who watches cable news.

#HillaryIsaKhant
Captain Khan wouldn't have been allowed in America.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
And?

#NeoKhans

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Nas wrote:
BeerFan wrote:
Dems Doing The Khan-Khan
Posted on August 1, 2016 by tonyheller


If we had proper screening of Muslims entering the country while Bill Clinton was president, the World Trade Center would still be standing, Hillary Clinton would never have voted to invade Iraq, and Captain Khan would still be alive.

Image

That sort of screening is exactly what Trump is proposing, and Hillary Clinton is rejecting.

Logic and rational thought is impossible for progressives – and almost anyone who watches cable news.

#HillaryIsaKhant
Captain Khan wouldn't have been allowed in America.


Don't be a media shill, we be talking screening for Refugees.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:40 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Dignified Rube wrote:
My ultimate take is that the media has a very short attention span, and this will blow over in a day or two. What more can they do with it, when today CNN showed the Khans in a staged scene at their son's grave? What a disgrace.

Despite whatever bounce the media says Hillary got from this past week, the Khantroversy it's going to sway people one way or the other. Their minds are already decided, and with Hillary getting millions less votes than she did four years ago against Obama, Trump should win.


Trump is Khanstantly putting his foot in his mouth. He'll khantinue to disrespect the Khan's.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
BeerFan wrote:
Dems Doing The Khan-Khan
Posted on August 1, 2016 by tonyheller


If we had proper screening of Muslims entering the country while Bill Clinton was president, the World Trade Center would still be standing, Hillary Clinton would never have voted to invade Iraq, and Captain Khan would still be alive.

Image

That sort of screening is exactly what Trump is proposing, and Hillary Clinton is rejecting.

Logic and rational thought is impossible for progressives – and almost anyone who watches cable news.

#HillaryIsaKhant
Captain Khan wouldn't have been allowed in America.


Don't be a media shill, we be talking screening for Refugees.


Weren't the Khan's refugees 25 years ago?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
BeerFan wrote:
#FreeKhantraceptives


:lol:

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
leashyourkids wrote:
BeerFan wrote:
#FreeKhantraceptives


:lol:

Image

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
W_Z wrote:
well he ain't no khandoleezza rice!


winner, winner chickhan deener.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Nas wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
BeerFan wrote:
Dems Doing The Khan-Khan
Posted on August 1, 2016 by tonyheller


If we had proper screening of Muslims entering the country while Bill Clinton was president, the World Trade Center would still be standing, Hillary Clinton would never have voted to invade Iraq, and Captain Khan would still be alive.

Image

That sort of screening is exactly what Trump is proposing, and Hillary Clinton is rejecting.

Logic and rational thought is impossible for progressives – and almost anyone who watches cable news.

#HillaryIsaKhant
Captain Khan wouldn't have been allowed in America.


Don't be a media shill, we be talking screening for Refugees.


Weren't the Khan's refugees 25 years ago?


We're talking now, not 25 khyears ago.

Stop being a khock khsucking Khouchebag.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
BeerFan wrote:
Dems Doing The Khan-Khan
Posted on August 1, 2016 by tonyheller


If we had proper screening of Muslims entering the country while Bill Clinton was president, the World Trade Center would still be standing, Hillary Clinton would never have voted to invade Iraq, and Captain Khan would still be alive.

Image

That sort of screening is exactly what Trump is proposing, and Hillary Clinton is rejecting.

Logic and rational thought is impossible for progressives – and almost anyone who watches cable news.

#HillaryIsaKhant
Captain Khan wouldn't have been allowed in America.


Don't be a media shill, we be talking screening for Refugees.


Weren't the Khan's refugees 25 years ago?


We're talking now, not 25 khyears ago.

Stop being a khock khsucking Khouchebag.


I'm the beakhan of light.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This khant khantinue much longer

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
BeerFan wrote:
And?

#NeoKhans


the pun is strong with this one

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4808
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
F Obama for his staged press conference with the Singapore PM today, where they had planted a reporter from Singapore to ask Obama whether he thought Trump was fit to be President. It was all a setup, if there ever was one.

The reporter was an ass-wipe for posing the meddling question in the first place, but what did he think Obama was going to say, yes?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
Dignified Rube wrote:
F Obama for his staged press conference with the Singapore PM today, where they had planted a reporter from Singapore to ask Obama whether he thought Trump was fit to be President. It was all a setup, if there ever was one.

The reporter was an ass-wipe for posing the meddling question in the first place, but what did he think Obama was going to say, yes?

I saw that.
What a Khantrast there. The 2nd greatest Asian leader ever (his father is #1) and the worst president in US history.

#KhannieFrancis

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
leashyourkids wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?

Www.KhanservativeBullshitYouCanBelieve.com

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?

http://Www.KhanservativeBullshitYouCanBelieve.com


I was trying to position myself to say he'd been khan'd.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
leashyourkids wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/01/khizr ... haria-law/

"It is due to this that Khan writes, “to Muslims, the Quran being the very word of God, it is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of legality and every legal obligation.”

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
This whole situation has led Trump and his supporters to have a Khanniption

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 1:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
This whole situation has led Trump and his supporters to have a Khanniption

E'khan Moore will combine with Buddy Hield to provide some good spacing with the Pelicans this year. At least that's how it works in the 2K16 update. SOLID signing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4808
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
The liberal media reaction to the Khantroversy: a khantrivance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80562
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?


I don't really think that's surprising. If you're a Muslim, isn't it incumbent upon you to hold such a belief? How could one actually subscribe to any religion without believing that the word and laws prescribed by God should take precedence over some shit dreamed up by man?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?


I don't really think that's surprising. If you're a Muslim, isn't it incumbent upon you to hold such a belief? How could one actually subscribe to any religion without believing that the word and laws prescribed by God should take precedence over some shit dreamed up by man?


Surprising? No. But there's a big difference between assuming it and saying a guy said it. If the claim is that he said it, there needs to be proof he said it. There's a difference.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93652
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?


I don't really think that's surprising. If you're a Muslim, isn't it incumbent upon you to hold such a belief? How could one actually subscribe to any religion without believing that the word and laws prescribed by God should take precedence over some shit dreamed up by man?


Surprising? No. But there's a big difference between assuming it and saying a guy said it. If the claim is that he said it, there needs to be proof he said it. There's a difference.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/01/khizr-khan-has-previously-written-extensively-on-sharia-law/
Quote:
“The Shari’ah-was completed during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammed, in the Quran and Sunnah. This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic Law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah (Quran and Sunnah), which are few and limited,” Khan continues to write. “All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?


I don't really think that's surprising. If you're a Muslim, isn't it incumbent upon you to hold such a belief? How could one actually subscribe to any religion without believing that the word and laws prescribed by God should take precedence over some shit dreamed up by man?


Surprising? No. But there's a big difference between assuming it and saying a guy said it. If the claim is that he said it, there needs to be proof he said it. There's a difference.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/01/khizr-khan-has-previously-written-extensively-on-sharia-law/
Quote:
“The Shari’ah-was completed during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammed, in the Quran and Sunnah. This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic Law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah (Quran and Sunnah), which are few and limited,” Khan continues to write. “All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”


I missed that part when I initially read it. Wonder why Trump isn't jumping on that one. I assume it's because he doesn't want to be president.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80562
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hahahah, now it's been reported that Kh. Bas stated that the Constitution should always be subordinate to Sharia Law.

Im sure the "3rd Estate" will be all over this one!


Link?


I don't really think that's surprising. If you're a Muslim, isn't it incumbent upon you to hold such a belief? How could one actually subscribe to any religion without believing that the word and laws prescribed by God should take precedence over some shit dreamed up by man?


Surprising? No. But there's a big difference between assuming it and saying a guy said it. If the claim is that he said it, there needs to be proof he said it. There's a difference.


Yeah, okay. But if the guy calls himself a Muslim, I have to assume that's how he feels. And I'm not bashing Muslims. Nobody is making you believe such crazy shit, but I can at least admire someone who is really committed to a belief. If you identify as Muslim but you don't acknowledge the texts of the religion, are you really a Muslim? Of course not. It's like most of the Catholics in my family. Yeah, I guess they "believe" in God, but if you truly believed in God- and if you're a Christian the only basis for such is the Bible- wouldn't you do exactly what God said you should do? I mean, if you're not afraid of God's specific punishments as laid out in his own words, do you really expect me to believe you believe in him?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 571 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group