It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:00 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 571 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:15 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80554
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Hussra wrote:
well, there is that whole eternal life everlasting in heaven vs burning in hell for all eternity thing, if you believe.


Do most of the believers here think they are on track for the everlasting life option? :lol:

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Jim Jones committed a terrorist act and cited passages from the Bible as justification for his act. Do the actions committed by Jim Jones serve to vilify all Christians? Does the fact that Jim Jones used the bible and cited god mean that Christianity is a murderous religion? Or is Jim Jones considered an outlier? Are his views considered to be that of a drug induced whack job or those typical of a follower of Christianity?


You won't get any argument from me that Christianity can be a dangerous delusion, but let's look at the stories of the prophets in each religion.

Jesus sacrificed himself to the "sins" of mankind.

Muhammed conquered most of the Middle East, punished infidels and taxed followers of other faiths. There is no Christian equivalent to Jihad as far as i know.

In both cases, I am willing to admit that faith can be dangerous and lead people to commit terrible atrocities.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Last edited by WaitingforRuffcorn on Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I sure hope the Christians are right for all our sake.


Why would you say that? The Christian god is mercurial. That motherfucker might change his mind at any moment and rip that New Covenant right in half and flood your ass right out of existence. Then you'd be regretting your statement and begging Seacrest to let you on his ark.


:lol: I love you

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93644
Location: To the left of my post
Why doesn't God come down and create a third series of books? Why did he suck so much at the first set that he had to redo a lot of it?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why doesn't God come down and create a third series of books? Why did he suck so much at the first set that he had to redo a lot of it?


Best not question him or he will send you wondering in the desert for a generation or two.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why doesn't God come down and create a third series of books? Why did he suck so much at the first set that he had to redo a lot of it?

God writes slower than George R. R. Martin. So he's been working on it awhile but he just sent it to the Holy Spirit for some notes and he will finish up the re-writes on the last few chapters.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93644
Location: To the left of my post
Phil McCracken wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why doesn't God come down and create a third series of books? Why did he suck so much at the first set that he had to redo a lot of it?

God writes slower than George R. R. Martin. So he's been working on it awhile but he just sent it to the Holy Spirit for some notes and he will finish up the re-writes on the last few chapters.
George R. R. Martin wouldn't even include talking animals.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Must be Bash God Friday. I'm out

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93644
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Must be Bash God Friday. I'm out
I'm a fan of God. I'm just not willing to give him a pass because of what he did in the past.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hussra wrote:
well, there is that whole eternal life everlasting in heaven vs burning in hell for all eternity thing, if you believe.


Do most of the believers here think they are on track for the everlasting life option? :lol:

Nietzsche was right; heaven is a nihilistic idea.

If there were any evidence of heaven (or hell), I'd change my tune, but there isn't a single shred.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80554
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why doesn't God come down and create a third series of books?



Jesus didn't give him any grandchildren that he has to put through college.

Image

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why doesn't God come down and create a third series of books?



Jesus didn't give him any grandchildren that he has to put through college.

Image

Is the 8th habit napping? Cause if so I am interested in this book.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80554
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Phil McCracken wrote:
Is the 8th habit napping? Cause if so I am interested in this book.


I don't know. I refuse to buy the book. I don't condone a motherfucker holding back a habit.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Is the 8th habit napping? Cause if so I am interested in this book.


I don't know. I refuse to buy the book. I don't condone a motherfucker holding back a habit.

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why doesn't God come down and create a third series of books?



Jesus didn't give him any grandchildren that he has to put through college.

Image

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hussra wrote:
well, there is that whole eternal life everlasting in heaven vs burning in hell for all eternity thing, if you believe.


Do most of the believers here think they are on track for the everlasting life option? :lol:


it's like buying a powerball ticket, the triumph of hope over experience. wait, that's 2nd marriages. n'mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
The ontological fallacy of expecting a light at the end of the tunnel, well, that's what the preacher sells, same as a shrink. See, the preacher, he encourages your capacity for illusion. Then he tells you it's a fucking virtue. Always a buck to be had doing that, and it's such a desperate sense of entitlement, isn't it?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
FavreFan wrote:
The ontological fallacy of expecting a light at the end of the tunnel, well, that's what the preacher sells, same as a shrink. See, the preacher, he encourages your capacity for illusion. Then he tells you it's a fucking virtue. Always a buck to be had doing that, and it's such a desperate sense of entitlement, isn't it?

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80554
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Phil McCracken wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Is the 8th habit napping? Cause if so I am interested in this book.


I don't know. I refuse to buy the book. I don't condone a motherfucker holding back a habit.

Image


:lol:

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:44 pm
Posts: 11
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Must be Bash God Friday. I'm out
... I'm just not willing to give him a pass because of what he did in the past.


Sounds an awful lot like something God would say. Are you... God?

_________________
Bear Down, Boiler Up, Cub... Around?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Layze23 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Must be Bash God Friday. I'm out
... I'm just not willing to give him a pass because of what he did in the past.


Sounds an awful lot like something God would say. Are you... God?

:lol:

I didn't realize layze23 was posting here. Where's Bendetta and TrustB?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93644
Location: To the left of my post
Layze23 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Must be Bash God Friday. I'm out
... I'm just not willing to give him a pass because of what he did in the past.


Sounds an awful lot like something God would say. Are you... God?
Some here think so.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 4:40 pm 
BRick.... If somebody asks you if you're a god you say YES!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2016 10:39 am
Posts: 1493
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
denisdman wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

It's a total copout to compare the lack of knowledge about the origin of the universe to the "leap of faith" in believing in a Christian stories/God. For Christianity to be "true" it would have to mean that God chose to reveal himself to only a certain part of the world, while condemning several generations in all of Asian, the Americas and Australia to eternal damnation. In the mean time you are also betting that your version of God is correct rather than the Islamic God, the Hindu Gods, or even if you chose the right sect of Christianity.

Believing that is quite a leap of faith, while the question of why is there life at all? We don't know, yet, but we are working on it.


I have struggled with both theories of evolution and Christian belief. I have a basis of knowledge for both with an undergrad degree in BioChem and having been raised Christian and spending lots of time reading up on the "historical" Jesus.

I don't have any answers that will sway you. Christian belief is not some pie in the sky theory and faith doesn't come out of no where. The death and resurrection of Jesus, along with the miracles he performed make a good case for Christ as the Son of God. Maybe it's all made up, and I certainly don't know. I can say that if you simply lived your life like Christ, you'd be a better person for it. I am not particularly religious, but I do have faith.

Evolution is a huge leap as well. There's lots of scientific evidence for evolution, and there are a ton of holes. It takes a big leap to believe we go from the big bang, to the creation of our solar system to amino acids eventually coming together until we move all the way to man kind.

I have even wondered if God put the universe in motion and used evolution as his manner of "development". Once man came into being through evolution, then maybe a lot of the Bible stories start to make sense. God didn't like where man was headed and sent his Son. I don't know.


Here are some thoughts for him who has ears to hear:

The "historical Jesus" was discussed by the Jesus Seminar people who basically believe that none of the miracles in the Bible are real. Most people even if they don't believe in God or the Bible tend not to say bad things about Jesus. But if Jesus claims to be divine and is lying or crazy then his teaching is clearly suspect. Either he is the Son of God or he's a very disturbing individual.

Evolution is basically what scientists turn to instead of God. The Bible says that the heavens declare the glory of God. But the person who sees a beautiful sunset and doesn't acknowledge that a superior being put it together is blind to the truth. There are wonderful TV shows and movies about all parts of nature and things that God has created, but a lot of those people aren't thankful to God for making all those things or don't acknowledge that he did it.

I don't think that God used evolution on a macro level. He created the world by voice command. The Bible claims that Jesus was the Word of God meaning that when God the Father said, "Let there be light" it was Jesus who was the word that was accomplishing the creation.

If you look at the three major religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam all three recognize the Old Testament as a holy book. If you read the Old Testament the prophecies about Jesus Christ that were fulfilled hundreds of years later were fulfilled with remarkable accuracy. In the Exodus story the lamb is sacrificed and its blood is spread on the corners of the door which was similar to the Lamb of God dying on a tree. God asks Abraham to sacrifice his son and then stops him, but God sacrifices his son and does not step in to stop the sacrifice. The Israelites were struck by a plague in the desert where they had to look at a snake on a pole to be healed. This was a foreshadowing of Jesus on the cross. Jesus was prophesied to be born of a virgin, from the tribe of Judah, born in Bethlehem and from Nazareth. Along with that one of the Psalms written by David mentions specifically how Jesus would be crucified.

The irony is that people in Jesus' day that saw his miracles wanted more of a sign to believe in him. If you read the Bible it said he heals the blind, the lepers, the paraylytics, women with internal bleeding, he drives out demons, he raises three people from the dead, he turns water into wine, he catches a miraculous amount of fish, he feeds a multitude with a small amount of food, he walks on water, he was transfigured, he calms the storm, he cursed a fig tree, he predicted his own death and resurrection, he resurrects, walks through walls and ascends to heaven. Those are greater things than any superhero in the movies has ever done and yet the people still refused to believe in him.

The teaching of Jesus is very offensive. He says that he is the only way people can know God the Father and that he is one with the Father. He calls people to lives of repentance. He says those who believe in him will never die. He promises eternal life to his followers. He simplifies all the commands in the Bible down to loving God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength and loving your neighbor as yourself. He says that people need to have a spiritual birth to enter the Kingdom of God.

Here's something I came across tonight:

According to Alfred North Whitehead and J. Robert Oppenheimer, both renowned philosophers and scientists of our era (but not Christians themselves), modern science was born out of the Christian world view. Whitehead said that Christianity is the "mother of science" because of the insistence on the rationality of God.[1] Entomologist Stanley Beck,though not a Christian himself, acknowledged the corner-stone premises of science which the Judeo-Christian world view offers: "The first of the unprovable premises on which science has been based is the belief that the world is real and the human mind is capable of knowing its real nature. The second and best-known postulate underlying the structure of scientific knowledge is that of cause and effect. The third basic scientific premise is that nature is unified."[2] In other words, the epistemological foundation of technology has been the Judeo-Christian world view presented in the Bible.

_________________
God is the uncaused cause of the universe. He had no beginning and has no end. He is not bound by the laws of the universe he created.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 11:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Religion is the biggest bullshit story ever told. Death is as natural as birth and nobody remembers anything before birth and death is the same. Right? Yep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 11:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RFDC wrote:
long time guy wrote:
RFDC wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Once I demonstrated with FACTS that Islamic aggression against America started following American intervention ....... My argument was never that terrorism started with U.S. intervention.


huh?


Apparently you and Brick are working out of the same do it yourself comprehension kit.

Is dodgeball your favorite game?


If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.


Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, and...Dodge.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
With all due respect to my religious friends, many "believers" have weighed in in this thread, and not a single point has been provided in favor of the existence of God that can't be easily refuted within a sentence or two.

If I were religious, I'd probably just keep my beliefs to myself and not try to prove that they're right. It's a losing battle.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93644
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
With all due respect to my religious friends, many "believers" have weighed in in this thread, and not a single point has been provided in favor of the existence of God that can't be easily refuted within a sentence or two.

If I were religious, I'd probably just keep my beliefs to myself and not try to prove that they're right. It's a losing battle.

Haven't you seen the Facebook posts about God curing cancer?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43867
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
With all due respect to my religious friends, many "believers" have weighed in in this thread, and not a single point has been provided in favor of the existence of God that can't be easily refuted within a sentence or two.

If I were religious, I'd probably just keep my beliefs to myself and not try to prove that they're right. It's a losing battle.

Haven't you seen the Facebook posts about God curing cancer?

Seacrest's chiropractor is God?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khan Controversy
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
denisdman wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

It's a total copout to compare the lack of knowledge about the origin of the universe to the "leap of faith" in believing in a Christian stories/God. For Christianity to be "true" it would have to mean that God chose to reveal himself to only a certain part of the world, while condemning several generations in all of Asian, the Americas and Australia to eternal damnation. In the mean time you are also betting that your version of God is correct rather than the Islamic God, the Hindu Gods, or even if you chose the right sect of Christianity.

Believing that is quite a leap of faith, while the question of why is there life at all? We don't know, yet, but we are working on it.


I have struggled with both theories of evolution and Christian belief. I have a basis of knowledge for both with an undergrad degree in BioChem and having been raised Christian and spending lots of time reading up on the "historical" Jesus.

I don't have any answers that will sway you. Christian belief is not some pie in the sky theory and faith doesn't come out of no where. The death and resurrection of Jesus, along with the miracles he performed make a good case for Christ as the Son of God. Maybe it's all made up, and I certainly don't know. I can say that if you simply lived your life like Christ, you'd be a better person for it. I am not particularly religious, but I do have faith.

Evolution is a huge leap as well. There's lots of scientific evidence for evolution, and there are a ton of holes. It takes a big leap to believe we go from the big bang, to the creation of our solar system to amino acids eventually coming together until we move all the way to man kind.

I have even wondered if God put the universe in motion and used evolution as his manner of "development". Once man came into being through evolution, then maybe a lot of the Bible stories start to make sense. God didn't like where man was headed and sent his Son. I don't know.


Sure it is. The only reason that you distinguish it from any other religion or myth is because you were raised with it.

You state that it takes a big leap to go from the big bang to where we are today. Given the alternatives, I disagree. You are literally arguing in favor of a story that was written by man and which no one can prove through any observations.

I'm not sure what "holes" you think there are in evolution. We most certainly have seen species evolve before our very eyes... but complete evolution from, say, our common primate ancestor to modern day humans is something that takes tens or hundreds of thousands of years. I'm not sure when you think we would have "observed" something completely evolve.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... faq.php#a2

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 571 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group