It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 7:51 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
David Haugh
Chicago Tribune



Kevin Schnall still remembers the look on Tommy La Stella's face the day Coastal Carolina University coaches openly doubted his ability to play second base.

"We said, 'Tommy, with your range and your hands, we don't think you can do it,''' the school's hitting coach said. "And he became outstanding.''

Then there was the day before La Stella's final season at Coastal in 2011 when Schnall asked him to jot down some goals.

"I looked at the numbers he wrote down,'' said Schnall, who La Stella called the most influential coach of his career. "And I said, 'Tommy, that's great but I don't feel like these are attainable … and he came pretty damn close. He loved defying odds and proving people wrong.''


That is the driven overachiever Schnall recalls when he thinks of La Stella, the guy named Big South player of the year in 2011, not the pouty spoilsport who went home to New Jersey for three weeks after refusing the Cubs' minor-league assignment in July.

Why Cubs President Theo Epstein confirmed Monday plans to promote La Stella this week remains baffling. Who gets to come back to a good job after taking an unexcused three-week vacation? The Cubs figure to stay the best team in baseball with or without La Stella's lively left-handed bat off the bench. Their World Series hopes don't hinge on a part-time player hitting .295 before a demotion caused by a numbers game everybody but La Stella understood.

Adding a utility infielder who turned his back on teammates hardly creates the same ethical dilemma as, say, acquiring baseball's most feared relief pitcher with a troubled past. La Stella doesn't affect World Series aspirations to the degree Aroldis Chapman does, so it would be easier for the Cubs to just move on without the infielder and send an organizational-wide message about loyalty. That's what I would do. La Stella acted too selfishly for me to deserve a spot on a team full of selfless players poised to make history.

But the Cubs will let La Stella return, a conclusion team officials reached after private discussions they plan to keep that way. They have shown tremendous patience and the way they speak about the 27-year-old player privately implies his reaction involves something deeper. One team source called the situation "complicated.'' If any manager can deal with whatever distraction La Stella creates, it is Joe Maddon, a man who vows daily to do simple better.

For his part, La Stella has declined all interviews but would ingratiate himself quicker back in Chicago if he is as transparent as possible. Schnall declined to comment on La Stella's commitment to baseball, allowing only that his well-rounded former pupil loved the game but "doesn't have all his eggs in one basket.'' He has exchanged texts with his fellow New Jersey native and believes La Stella can overcome any doubts, which typically drive him.


"His intelligence, competitive and work ethic is infectious,'' Schnall said. "I want him in my foxhole. I'm from New Jersey so I can say this: Tommy is like that Italian guy who feels like everybody is against him. He thrives on that.''

Not always passionate about baseball, La Stella emerged as a prospect his senior year at St. Joseph Regional High School in Montvale, N.J. He became a walk-on at St. John’s, where he hoped hitting .320 as a freshman would allow the school to fulfill its pledge of a scholarship. When St. John’s didn’t, La Stella bolted for a better opportunity at Coastal Carolina, where he made a quick impression.

"The thing I appreciate now most about Tommy was you had to be prepared as a coach at practice because, if you weren't, he would call you out,'' Schnall said.

For example, La Stella often questioned coaches' strategy behind baserunning or defensive decisions. His intense conversations on hitting changed the way Schnall handled other players.

"Tommy was one of the first guys who developed a deeper understanding of high-level swing mechanics,'' Schnall said. "He forced me to be prepared to have dialogue on the field.''

La Stella was motivated even more after no team selected him in the 2010 amateur draft despite his hitting .375. After his numbers improved the following year, the Braves took him in the eighth round.

"I apologized on behalf of the industry that we missed him the previous year,'' Braves scout Billy Best said over the phone.

Best, who spotted La Stella at an open tryout in 2009, remembered a minor-leaguer with major-league confidence.

"Tommy always knew he could hit but it took others awhile to figure it out,'' Best said.

A rough start at Class A Rome (Ga.) hardly made it obvious. He initially struggled so badly that he told his parents not to come to games and stayed in his room on trips.

"I've never seen a kid in my life take it as hard as he did,'' Best said. "That's the way Tommy was, very emotional but a great kid with high highs, low lows.''

Based on his actions since July 27, that's the way La Stella still is — yet, for reasons hard for me to grasp, the Cubs will welcome him back anyway.

dhaugh@chicagotribune.com

Twitter @DavidHaugh

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Haugh is an idiot, of course he's welcome back, he's earned it..he never should have been sent down in the first place..all of this could gave been avoidable if Epstein or Hoyer told him" listen, I know it ain't right but just go put in 25 days in AAA for me and I get ya back up in September.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16459
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
312player wrote:
all of this could gave been avoidable if Epstein or Hoyer told him" listen, I know it ain't right but just go put in 25 days in AAA for me and I get ya back up in September.


I have to believe that's exactly what they told him...do you think they said, "yeah, we think Coghlan is better than you, have fun in Iowa"? If they didn't try to explain the business aspect of it, then they would truly be idiots.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
They sign a domestic abuser and there's outcry about bringing back an insubordinate?

Pfft.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
312player wrote:
Haugh is an idiot, of course he's welcome back, he's earned it..he never should have been sent down in the first place..all of this could gave been avoidable if Epstein or Hoyer told him" listen, I know it ain't right but just go put in 25 days in AAA for me and I get ya back up in September.


By all reports, this is exactly what happened and he still threw a temper tantrum.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91932
Location: To the left of my post
LaStella was just doing what he was allowed to do. It didn't even hurt the Cubs unlike what Theo did with Bryant which cost him millions of dollars with an undeserved demotion to the minors.

You can't get mad at LaStella without also being mad at Theo for what he did with Bryant. Both did what was in their best interest.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Quote:
You can't get mad at LaStella without also being mad at Theo for what he did with Bryant. Both did what was in their best interest.


Of course you can be mad at LaStella. He acted like a putz and possibly damaged his career in the process.

What does it have to do with Bryant? In both cases, the team was doing what it could to maximize their talent base for as long as possible.

Anyone mad at Theo for keeping Bryant down to gain the extra year of control and for sending LaStella down because he was the only man up that still had an option...you're an idiot.

Theo has done what is in the best interests of the team. Bryant played along and is in position to win an MVP in his second season. LaStella didn't play along and has nearly gotten bounced out of baseball. One player was smart...one, not so much.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91932
Location: To the left of my post
GoldenJet wrote:
Theo has done what is in the best interests of the team.
LaStella did what was in the best interest of himself and it did not hurt the Cubs in the slightest. That is the point. Bryant was damaged by losing out on millions of dollars on his next contract based on the actions of the Cubs and Theo. LaStella damaged the Cubs how exactly?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
312player wrote:
Haugh is an idiot


he once blocked me on twitter for calling him a dipshit =(

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Theo has done what is in the best interests of the team.
LaStella did what was in the best interest of himself and it did not hurt the Cubs in the slightest. That is the point. Bryant was damaged by losing out on millions of dollars on his next contract based on the actions of the Cubs and Theo. LaStella damaged the Cubs how exactly?


Bryant has lost no money on his next contract. He will still end up getting paid a ton of money for his last year of arbitration if he is one of the best players in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91932
Location: To the left of my post
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Bryant has lost no money on his next contract. He will still end up getting paid a ton of money for his last year of arbitration if he is one of the best players in baseball.
Yes he did.

You don't think he'd make more money being a free agent rather than under Cubs control?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Bryant has lost no money on his next contract. He will still end up getting paid a ton of money for his last year of arbitration if he is one of the best players in baseball.
Yes he did.

You don't think he'd make more money being a free agent rather than under Cubs control?


But his next contract will not be LESS because of his extra year with the Cubs. Unless that year he gets hurt. He will still be in his prime and get a 10 year deal north of $300M (assuming he continues his play to date).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91932
Location: To the left of my post
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Bryant has lost no money on his next contract. He will still end up getting paid a ton of money for his last year of arbitration if he is one of the best players in baseball.
Yes he did.

You don't think he'd make more money being a free agent rather than under Cubs control?


But his next contract will not be LESS because of his extra year with the Cubs. Unless that year he gets hurt. He will still be in his prime and get a 10 year deal north of $300M (assuming he continues his play to date).
No.

Assume he signs a 1 year deal as a free agent to keep things equal and then he signs the ten year deal. The 1 year deal will be much better than what he will get while under Cubs control because every team can have him. The price difference there is the money he lost by Theo sending him down to the minors. That's why they did it.

Of course his first free agent deal will be roughly the same(though he has slightly less value being a year older). He just has to wait a year and he'll have one less year in his career not playing with a deal with the max value.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Theo has done what is in the best interests of the team.
LaStella did what was in the best interest of himself and it did not hurt the Cubs in the slightest. That is the point. Bryant was damaged by losing out on millions of dollars on his next contract based on the actions of the Cubs and Theo. LaStella damaged the Cubs how exactly?


Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Of course his first free agent deal will be roughly the same(though he has slightly less value being a year older). He just has to wait a year and he'll have one less year in his career not playing with a deal with the max value.


You proved my point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91932
Location: To the left of my post
Seriously? :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Seriously? :lol:


Yes. You said he would lose millions on his next contract. Then you said his first FA contract (his next contract) would be the same.

You apparently cannot grasp that fact.

His career earning might be lower, but his next contract is not affected, as you claim.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91932
Location: To the left of my post
Well, as I pointed out, he would see a decrease based on the contract being one less year of him in his prime. So even your extremely literal attempt is wrong.

You agree he lost millions of dollars because of that move though so you agree with the overall point anyways.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Well, as I pointed out, he would see a decrease based on the contract being one less year of him in his prime. So even your extremely literal attempt is wrong.

You agree he lost millions of dollars because of that move though so you agree with the overall point anyways.


His age will have zero affect on his next contract. He will not be 34 when he hits FA. You are an idiot.

Who knows what your overall point was since it was clearly not communicated properly.

Your underlying point is that you hate the Cubs, but that is nothing new.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91932
Location: To the left of my post
Big Chicagoan wrote:
His age will have zero affect on his next contract. He will not be 34 when he hits FA. You are an idiot.
Of course it will. If you are signing a ten year deal how old you are in years 6-10 get taken into consideration. Whatever team signs him is getting one less year of him in his "prime". Do you really think they don't pay attention to that?

I know you are kind of embarrassed here but no reason to name call.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
His age will have zero affect on his next contract. He will not be 34 when he hits FA. You are an idiot.
Of course it will. If you are signing a ten year deal how old you are in years 6-10 get taken into consideration. Whatever team signs him is getting one less year of him in his "prime". Do you really think they don't pay attention to that?

I know you are kind of embarrassed here but no reason to name call.



He will be 30. No one will care what he does in the age 40 season. You aren't paying for that season. Just ask the Angels about Pujols, who they gave a 10 yr/ $240M deal at age 32. It's not like they would have given him more if he was 31?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91932
Location: To the left of my post
Big Chicagoan wrote:
He will be 30. No one will care what he does in the age 40 season. You aren't paying for that season. Just ask the Angels about Pujols, who they gave a 10 yr/ $240M deal at age 32. It's not like they would have given him more if he was 31?
Are you that thick? He will be 30. A team will decide they believe his prime will be until he is X age(I'll say 34 just for discussion). They will value him a certain way for 30-34 and another way for 35-40. Now, take whatever those numbers are, and add his age 29 season and he gets more money.

The Angels also would have paid more for Pujols if he was a year younger.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
He's back and playing 2B today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16459
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Big Chicagoan wrote:
He's back and playing 2B today.


Fan reaction will be interesting.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
maybe he can just call himself "Tommy DiStella" like he did when he was on the lam and nobody will be the wiser? =P

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
LaStella was just doing what he was allowed to do. It didn't even hurt the Cubs unlike what Theo did with Bryant which cost him millions of dollars with an undeserved demotion to the minors.

You can't get mad at LaStella without also being mad at Theo for what he did with Bryant. Both did what was in their best interest.


But it's what is best for the TEAM that matters (to me) over the individual. So I can celebrate what Theo did in extending the club control over Bryant an extra season, while what LaStella did in refusing to report did nothing to help the team and was insubordinate.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16459
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Why would the Cubs bring him back today, and waste an option on Patton, when they could have waited one day for the rosters to expand? What am I missing here?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Why would the Cubs bring him back today, and waste an option on Patton, when they could have waited one day for the rosters to expand? What am I missing here?

I was thinking about that earlier, when I heard that he was called up today. Very curious.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19345
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Why would the Cubs bring him back today, and waste an option on Patton, when they could have waited one day for the rosters to expand? What am I missing here?


Options go by years, not individual times sent down. You could be sent up and down 15 times in a season and it all counts as one option year. It is a little more complicated than that but it doesn't change anything with him.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
312player wrote:
all of this could gave been avoidable if Epstein or Hoyer told him" listen, I know it ain't right but just go put in 25 days in AAA for me and I get ya back up in September.


I have to believe that's exactly what they told him...do you think they said, "yeah, we think Coghlan is better than you, have fun in Iowa"? If they didn't try to explain the business aspect of it, then they would truly be idiots.









I think Maddon told him and he never spoke to anyone higher...IMO

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19345
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bryant was damaged by losing out on millions of dollars on his next contract based on the actions of the Cubs and Theo.


And if the Cubs brought him up right away you would be criticizing Theo for not getting the extra year of control.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group