cluv8484 wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
He is a racist and neofascist.
That said, it is a catastrophically stupid campaign strategy for Clinton, her surrogates, and her media supporters to attribute Trump's popularity to racism. Clinton cannot win the election simply by attacking Trump. The Clintons adopted a variation of this strategy in the 1990s and it enabled the Republicans to take control of the House. If she is going to win the presidency, she needs to persuasively present a coherent vision for the future of the country under her leadership. This will be a difficult task for her since she doesn't seem to have one that lasts longer than a week or two.
Sources and evidence? Don't just make claims, please provide evidence and proof of this, totally open to changing my view if you have this
There's been plenty written about his housing discrimination policies, the covert and overt racism of his birtherism, his obvious and subtle flirtations with white supremacists, and his installation of a leading "alt right" figure as campaign CEO. If Trump isn't a racist as those who describe him as a pragmatic businessman claim, we must remember that he still behaves as if he were a racist. In other words, the above defense makes a distinction between Trump as an earnest racist and Trump as a Machiavellian political operator without identifying a tangible difference between those two descriptions.
His neofascism is slightly more complicated, but we can certainly recognize the emergence of such a discourse in his disdain for a free press and his willingness to lower the standard for libel judgments, his veneration of autocratic rulers such as Putin (and, apparently, Mussolini himself), his incitement of violence at his political rallies, his understanding of "political correctness" as a cause of national decline, his scapegoating of/attacks on Muslim and Mexican immigrants, and his
development of a campaign platform designed to amplify cultural polarization and consolidate white people of varying social classes and ethnic lineages into a single voting bloc.Tall Midget I want ask you a very specific question. This is independent of this election and simply politics in the US as a whole. We are bombarded with news stories about voting blocks from all sides of the spectrum as well as the politicians. Always talk about a Black Bloc that supposedly votes in lock step and even worse the Hispanic Bloc which not only has a incredibly diverse background but also crossover with other blocs. So we seemingly are comfortable with blocs. The question is then is it automatically racist to try to treat white voters as some sort of bloc? If so, treating others in blocs must also be racist or at the least demeaning and patronizing.