It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
IMU hit Brick with the Stone Cold Stunner

In 2018 he can say that. Right now it's baseless speculation.

Also in 2018 the cubs will likely have a massive payroll. Not exactly a tough rebuild when you outspent almost everyone.


Are you really criticizing the Cubs for their payroll in two years? Come on, brother Boilermaker. Sit back and root against them. It's much easier. Your joints won't hurt as bad.

It's not a criticism. Do what you need to win 100 games and be happy. Just don't pretend you didn't spend heavily to do it. There is a good portion of Cubs fans that want to act like they were the low budget Rays or A's and it just isn't true.


:lol: Who?

You're seeing ghosts, man.
Look back and see why I asked the question initially.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Do your own research.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
IMU hit Brick with the Stone Cold Stunner


Also in 2018 the cubs will likely have a massive payroll. Not exactly a tough rebuild when you outspent almost everyone.


Strange that if you won't waste 200+mm on Jake Peavy, Adam Dunn, Alex Rios, Adam Laroche, Jeff Keppinger, Melky Cabrera, David Robertson, and Zach Duke to win an average of 80 games a year, when your cheap prospects finally hit you can break the bank for the FA's that you need to take you over the top.

I'm sure those 7-8 extra wins a year from a 71 win team to an 80 win team were worth it though...

What does your post have to do with anything?


My post just illustrates that organizations only have so much money to spend on the product on the field. The Cubs were wise stewards of their money when they knew the team sucked. They didn't waste much money on marginal guys during 2010-2015 so they could spend lots of money on guys from 2016-2020.

Are the Cubs going to spend lots of money the next five years? Yes. Will they likely have more money to spend the next five years because they were frugal for the prior five years? Yes.

Right or wrong not every organization has embraced this concept.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
IMU hit Brick with the Stone Cold Stunner


Also in 2018 the cubs will likely have a massive payroll. Not exactly a tough rebuild when you outspent almost everyone.


Strange that if you won't waste 200+mm on Jake Peavy, Adam Dunn, Alex Rios, Adam Laroche, Jeff Keppinger, Melky Cabrera, David Robertson, and Zach Duke to win an average of 80 games a year, when your cheap prospects finally hit you can break the bank for the FA's that you need to take you over the top.

I'm sure those 7-8 extra wins a year from a 71 win team to an 80 win team were worth it though...

What does your post have to do with anything?


My post just illustrates that organizations only have so much money to spend on the product on the field. The Cubs were wise stewards of their money when they knew the team sucked. They didn't waste much money on marginal guys during 2010-2015 so they could spend lots of money on guys from 2016-2020.

Are the Cubs going to spend lots of money the next five years? Yes. Will they likely have more money to spend the next five years because they were frugal for the prior five years? Yes.

Right or wrong not every organization has embraced this concept.

I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Image

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
tho i gotta admit that whoever "the sports executive" is working with belichick in new england is pretty damn good and very arguably the best thing going on in pro sports right now. do us laymen even have any idea who the patriots GM is, or have we been conditioned/trained to just attribute that franchise's perpetual excellence to belichick Himself?

Some Man of Questionable Sexuality From the Soccer Thread wrote:
yeah hey you know that guy arsene wenger isn't doing a bad job compared to all of his contemporaries spending hundreds of millions of pounds sterling on, well, sterling *pounds head against the side of the newest "Football Death Star" in Manchester *


(yeah i know you said "north america" but i always have visions on THE WORLD! MWAHAHAHHHAAA!!!! </SuperVillianShuffle>)

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55851
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
The Patriots don't have a general manager. Belichick is in charge of all the personnel decisions. Scott Pioli was sort of a GM-like consigliere to Belichick back when he was there. I don't even think they had one before Belichick, it was just Bill Parcells and Robert Kraft as de facto co-GMs forever sniping at and undermining each other.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I wouldn't say the Cubs have a ridiculous payroll, they are within a million of San Francisco and Anaheim in the 180-182 million range..nearly a hundred million behind the Dodgers, the Dodgers n Yanks have an obscene payroll.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
IMU hit Brick with the Stone Cold Stunner


Also in 2018 the cubs will likely have a massive payroll. Not exactly a tough rebuild when you outspent almost everyone.


Strange that if you won't waste 200+mm on Jake Peavy, Adam Dunn, Alex Rios, Adam Laroche, Jeff Keppinger, Melky Cabrera, David Robertson, and Zach Duke to win an average of 80 games a year, when your cheap prospects finally hit you can break the bank for the FA's that you need to take you over the top.

I'm sure those 7-8 extra wins a year from a 71 win team to an 80 win team were worth it though...

What does your post have to do with anything?


My post just illustrates that organizations only have so much money to spend on the product on the field. The Cubs were wise stewards of their money when they knew the team sucked. They didn't waste much money on marginal guys during 2010-2015 so they could spend lots of money on guys from 2016-2020.

Are the Cubs going to spend lots of money the next five years? Yes. Will they likely have more money to spend the next five years because they were frugal for the prior five years? Yes.

Right or wrong not every organization has embraced this concept.


Every owner with adequate cash on hand sells parts of his team.

Cubs are still in the fairly early stages of a $500 million facilities improvement investment and are paying down a reportedly highly leveraged loan. I wouldn't be so sure about their baseball spending over the next 2-3 years.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Curious Hair wrote:
The Patriots don't have a general manager. Belichick is in charge of all the personnel decisions. Scott Pioli was sort of a GM-like consigliere to Belichick back when he was there. I don't even think they had one before Belichick, it was just Bill Parcells and Robert Kraft as de facto co-GMs forever sniping at and undermining each other.

You would think other organizations would learn to stop hiring from the Patriots after each branch of the Belicheck tree seems to shrivel up and die.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
good dolphin wrote:

Every owner with adequate cash on hand sells parts of his team.

Cubs are still in the fairly early stages of a $500 million facilities improvement investment and are paying down a reportedly highly leveraged loan. I wouldn't be so sure about their baseball spending over the next 2-3 years.


"Highly leveraged loan", isn't a loan by definition highly leveraged?

Do you mean highly leveraged purchase? Not trying to be a smart ass here I just trying to clarify.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
One Post has good dolphin begging for his mokra pielęgniarka.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
One Post wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

Every owner with adequate cash on hand sells parts of his team.

Cubs are still in the fairly early stages of a $500 million facilities improvement investment and are paying down a reportedly highly leveraged loan. I wouldn't be so sure about their baseball spending over the next 2-3 years.


"Highly leveraged loan", isn't a loan by definition highly leveraged?

Do you mean highly leveraged purchase? Not trying to be a smart ass here I just trying to clarify.


Loans are 100% leveraged unless I'm missing something.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.


but still, the mere act of "spending money" isn't automatic, you still have to spend on the right people..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40615
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.


but still, the mere act of "spending money" isn't automatic, you still have to spend on the right people..

- Heyward.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.


but still, the mere act of "spending money" isn't automatic, you still have to spend on the right people..
Of course. Thsts why I don't get why people get so upset when it is pointed out that the current Cubs team is mostly built on free agency and then a few great trades.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 427
Location: Griffith, IN
pizza_Place: House of Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.

Yeah, signing Jason Heyward, Lester and Lacky was far more important than drafting Kris Bryant and Kyle Schwarber or trading for Rizzo, Arrieta, Hendricks and Russell. One of those things are a core the other thing is a supplement to that core. You know which is which.

Have better baseball thoughts.

_________________
JohnKirk wrote: I dont get it...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
PcB wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.

Yeah, signing Jason Heyward, Lester and Lacky was far more important than drafting Kris Bryant and Kyle Schwarber or trading for Rizzo, Arrieta, Hendricks and Russell. One of those things are a core the other thing is a supplement to that core. You know which is which.

Have better baseball thoughts.

Proving my point. Thanks!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 427
Location: Griffith, IN
pizza_Place: House of Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
PcB wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.

Yeah, signing Jason Heyward, Lester and Lacky was far more important than drafting Kris Bryant and Kyle Schwarber or trading for Rizzo, Arrieta, Hendricks and Russell. One of those things are a core the other thing is a supplement to that core. You know which is which.

Have better baseball thoughts.

Proving my point. Thanks!

You said the "spending spree" was "probably more important" than anything else they did. It's obviously not more important than the things I just listed.

_________________
JohnKirk wrote: I dont get it...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Well Schwarber isn't playing and you ignored a few other key free agents.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.


but still, the mere act of "spending money" isn't automatic, you still have to spend on the right people..
Of course. Thsts why I don't get why people get so upset when it is pointed out that the current Cubs team is mostly built on free agency and then a few great trades.


yea i guess i'm confused as to what the argument really is
(i assumed) it was that it supposedly takes more intelligence and skill to draft players and execute trades, where any ol' moron can open up the checkbook and spend. Therefore tarnishing the image of Theo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 427
Location: Griffith, IN
pizza_Place: House of Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Well Schwarber isn't playing and you ignored a few other key free agents.

FA's

Lester
Lackey
Heyward
Dexter
Soler
Zobrist
Montero
Ross
Hammel

Non-FA

Rizzo
Baez
Russell
Bryant
Coghlan
LaStella
Contreras
Almora Jr.
Hendricks
Grimm
Rondon
Strop
Chapman
Montgomery
Wood
Arrieta
Edwards Jr.

I can't think of anything else off the top of my head

_________________
JohnKirk wrote: I dont get it...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.


but still, the mere act of "spending money" isn't automatic, you still have to spend on the right people..
Of course. Thsts why I don't get why people get so upset when it is pointed out that the current Cubs team is mostly built on free agency and then a few great trades.


Because that's not The Right Way™. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8N8_CRpL6wk

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not saying they were wrong to do it. I'm saying they did it and we shouldn't pretend they didn't.


I don't think anyone here is pretending that they didn't/won't spend money. I mean Theo himself said that when the time was right they were going to spend a bunch of money. They've probably got more money to spend now because they didn't burn it on marginal FA.

There are a lot of people that won't acknowledge that the spening spree was at least and probably more important than anything else they did.


but still, the mere act of "spending money" isn't automatic, you still have to spend on the right people..
Of course. Thsts why I don't get why people get so upset when it is pointed out that the current Cubs team is mostly built on free agency and then a few great trades.


yea i guess i'm confused as to what the argument really is
(i assumed) it was that it supposedly takes more intelligence and skill to draft players and execute trades, where any ol' moron can open up the checkbook and spend. Therefore tarnishing the image of Theo

I don't care how you win 100 games. It's always impressive. My point is that a lot of Cubs fans try and portray it like they did it as a lie budget club built organically when a big spending spree is just as important as anything they did and maybe more important. A few great trades did help though too.

I'm not tarnishing anything. It's just the reality that the cubs were built with a big payroll that will get much bigger in the future.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's just the reality that the cubs were built with a big payroll

Implying the Cubs' success is due to the payroll is a disingenuous statement, and everyone knows it.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Yeah, it's not true, but even if it was, who cares? The Sock trolling of the Cub is really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

You guys have tried to poke fun at the Cubs for being bad for years, and now that they are good, they're not good in the right way? :lol:

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Yeah, it's not true, but even if it was, who cares? The Sock trolling of the Cub is really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

You guys have tried to poke fun at the Cubs for being bad for years, and now that they are good, they're not good in the right way? :lol:

Intentionally obtuse.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Yeah, it's not true, but even if it was, who cares? The Sock trolling of the Cub is really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

You guys have tried to poke fun at the Cubs for being bad for years, and now that they are good, they're not good in the right way? :lol:

Intentionally obtuse.


Not intentionally.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group