It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 518 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
GoldenJet wrote:
Godfella wrote:
This is an observation not an attack, endorsement or stance on either candidate...

20+ years ago there were a handful of conservatives on one network calling the Clintons "liars, untruthful and deceptive". The Clintons unleashed their team to discredit and destroy those people. Even Bill's direct opponents would not mutter the word "liar" while publicly speaking.

Now, Trump is on nationally televised debates carried on probably a dozen networks wagging his finger in Hillary's face publicly shaming her and calling her and her husband liars.

To Peoria Matt's point - Trump is taking her on and it clearly appears that the gloves are off. It seems that nobody has ever done that to the Clintons without major retaliation.

Again, an observation only. I remember the 1992 & 1996 elections very clearly.



Oh please. For decades, nobody has hesitated to badmouth the Clintons in an attempt to discredit them.


Agreed. Limbaugh and Hannity owe their millions to Clinton bashing. Fox News owes its Network to Clinton bashing

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

She has many more useful traits than he does. She's competent, for starters. And, even if done for political purposes, she has accomplished at least a few good things in her career. You have a hatred for her that is deep... deeper than mine, but don't let it skew your view. "Faking" civility and pretending to care about people (as Hillary does) is still far better than what he does. She's a terrible candidate, and the Dems shouldn't have nominated her, but I think your hatred for her is causing you to understate how awful Trump really is.


Again, I've stepped away from this because I don't want it to seem like I support Trump in any way, but I'm not sure what "she's competent" means. Competent at what exactly? Making a bunch of money while spending her entire life in "public service"?

It seems like civility is very important to you in the political sphere. I don't value it nearly as much.


Civility? Is that what we're calling NOT mocking handicapped people, implying that a debate moderator was on her period, threatening to sue all media outlets who disagree with you, encouraging foreign countries to hack the U.S., threatening to jail your opponent, and bringing alleged rape victims to a debate? I would call it acting like a somewhat well-adjusted human being, but yeah, "civility"...



Let's not forget his advocacy for the assassination of a presidential candidate

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
IkeSouth wrote:
Oh come on shes not awful. Shes a product of the system but not a bad person and she will be a decent president. Everyone is so blinded by her shit personality they dont look at her work. She deserves to be in charge.


No, she truly is bad. I agree with your criticism of her last night, but you do realize that one of the reasons she can't go after him is because she has so many skeletons of her own, right? Any other candidate with a shred of integrity would be beating trump by 60 percentage points.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80562
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
The Clintons may have actually had political opponents assassinated.

She's not some fragile lamb. She can be as ruthless and nasty as Trump. She's just not as idiotic about it.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Clintons may have actually had political opponents assassinated.

She's not some fragile lamb. She can be as ruthless and nasty as Trump. She's just not as idiotic about it.

Exactly.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
leashyourkids wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
Oh come on shes not awful. Shes a product of the system but not a bad person and she will be a decent president. Everyone is so blinded by her shit personality they dont look at her work. She deserves to be in charge.


No, she truly is bad. I agree with your criticism of her last night, but you do realize that one of the reasons she can't go after him is because she has so many skeletons of her own, right? Any other candidate with a shred of integrity would be beating trump by 60 percentage points.

Seriously, come on Ike. This is Clinton 101.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:37 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
If Hillary Clinton is the albatross that MANY keep suggesting how did ever win the nomination? Why didn't the Dems run someone against her? Warren, Biden, back Sanders. Hell anybody but her. That's all I keep reading here yet she won the nomination rather easily. She also is about to win the Presidency too.


Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it. From strategy to policy she was there every step of the way. She deserves credit for that.

In terms of Obama it is beginning to take the shape of Williams/Hahn

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Clintons may have actually had political opponents assassinated.

She's not some fragile lamb. She can be as ruthless and nasty as Trump. She's just not as idiotic about it.



Too much speculation. Which opponents?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Nas wrote:
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.


If he's setting it up, he'll probably run it into bankruptcy in 3 years.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
long time guy wrote:
If Hillary Clinton is the albatross that MANY keep suggesting how did ever win the nomination? Why didn't the Dems run someone against her? Warren, Biden, back Sanders. Hell anybody but her. That's all I keep reading here yet she won the nomination rather easily. She also is about to win the Presidency too.


Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it. From strategy to policy she was there every step of the way. She deserves credit for that.

In terms of Obama it is beginning to take the shape of Williams/Hahn

I don't feel like having a debate about it, but what exactly is Hillary going to do for you if she gets elected?

Personally, I really do not want my taxes raised, or the industry I work in to slow down again.

I'm not pro Trump either. I just want to know what Hillary is going to do for LTG specifically.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
long time guy wrote:
If Hillary Clinton is the albatross that MANY keep suggesting how did ever win the nomination? Why didn't the Dems run someone against her? Warren, Biden, back Sanders. Hell anybody but her. That's all I keep reading here yet she won the nomination rather easily. She also is about to win the Presidency too.

It was her turn.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80562
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.



Trump TV led by Roger Ailes to take on Fox.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Troll Nas takes two more down.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.



Trump TV led by Roger Ailes to take on Fox.


sjboyd0137 wrote:
Nas wrote:
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.


If he's setting it up, he'll probably run it into bankruptcy in 3 years.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:53 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jbi11s wrote:
Troll Nas takes two more down.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.



Trump TV led by Roger Ailes to take on Fox.


sjboyd0137 wrote:
Nas wrote:
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.


If he's setting it up, he'll probably run it into bankruptcy in 3 years.


No trolling here. I've read and heard that this morning.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Jbi11s wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Hillary Clinton is the albatross that MANY keep suggesting how did ever win the nomination? Why didn't the Dems run someone against her? Warren, Biden, back Sanders. Hell anybody but her. That's all I keep reading here yet she won the nomination rather easily. She also is about to win the Presidency too.


Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it. From strategy to policy she was there every step of the way. She deserves credit for that.

In terms of Obama it is beginning to take the shape of Williams/Hahn

I don't feel like having a debate about it, but what exactly is Hillary going to do for you if she gets elected?

Personally, I really do not want my taxes raised, or the industry I work in to slow down again.

I'm not pro Trump either. I just want to know what Hillary is going to do for LTG specifically.



Probably nothing. I'm good in life. The hope is that she will do things for the Middle Class and poor people. Bush and Obama really haven't. Bill Clinton did. Check the facts and not talking points and you will easily discern that.

The hope is also that she will stay away from foreign entanglements too.

If she raises taxes and generates more revenue for the country the hope is that she will implement programs that help people. I don't hate govt nor do I hate politicians either. I didn't grow up in a time in which politics was supposed to be inherently evil. The toxicity is not solely in guys like Trump either. The toxicity is in the people that vote for him.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Troll Nas takes two more down.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.



Trump TV led by Roger Ailes to take on Fox.


sjboyd0137 wrote:
Nas wrote:
MANY are saying that Trump knows he can't win now and his goal is to set up an anti Hillary organization that will be profitable for the next 4 years.


If he's setting it up, he'll probably run it into bankruptcy in 3 years.


No trolling here. I've read and heard that this morning.


:roll:

Yeah, ok.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Clintons may have actually had political opponents assassinated.

She's not some fragile lamb. She can be as ruthless and nasty as Trump. She's just not as idiotic about it.

No penis, either, which keeps some of the stupid thoughts at bay...

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80562
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
long time guy wrote:
Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it.


You can't really take the good from Bill Clinton and Obama without also accepting the bad. That's a problem she has.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
long time guy wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Hillary Clinton is the albatross that MANY keep suggesting how did ever win the nomination? Why didn't the Dems run someone against her? Warren, Biden, back Sanders. Hell anybody but her. That's all I keep reading here yet she won the nomination rather easily. She also is about to win the Presidency too.


Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it. From strategy to policy she was there every step of the way. She deserves credit for that.

In terms of Obama it is beginning to take the shape of Williams/Hahn

I don't feel like having a debate about it, but what exactly is Hillary going to do for you if she gets elected?

Personally, I really do not want my taxes raised, or the industry I work in to slow down again.

I'm not pro Trump either. I just want to know what Hillary is going to do for LTG specifically.



Probably nothing. I'm good in life. The hope is that she will do things for the Middle Class and poor people. Bush and Obama really haven't. Bill Clinton did.

Bill did a lot for the middle class, but nothing he did was good. I'm surprised to hear someone say this.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Kirkwood wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Hillary Clinton is the albatross that MANY keep suggesting how did ever win the nomination? Why didn't the Dems run someone against her? Warren, Biden, back Sanders. Hell anybody but her. That's all I keep reading here yet she won the nomination rather easily. She also is about to win the Presidency too.

It was her turn.


Based on what though? Why would they feel the need to reserve this for her? There had to be a feeling that she was the best person for the job.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
long time guy wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Hillary Clinton is the albatross that MANY keep suggesting how did ever win the nomination? Why didn't the Dems run someone against her? Warren, Biden, back Sanders. Hell anybody but her. That's all I keep reading here yet she won the nomination rather easily. She also is about to win the Presidency too.


Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it. From strategy to policy she was there every step of the way. She deserves credit for that.

In terms of Obama it is beginning to take the shape of Williams/Hahn

I don't feel like having a debate about it, but what exactly is Hillary going to do for you if she gets elected?

Personally, I really do not want my taxes raised, or the industry I work in to slow down again.

I'm not pro Trump either. I just want to know what Hillary is going to do for LTG specifically.



Probably nothing. I'm good in life. The hope is that she will do things for the Middle Class. Bush and Obama really haven't. Bill Clinton did. Check the facts and not talking points and you will easily discern that.

The hope is also that she will stay away from foreign entanglements too.

If she raises taxes and generates more revenue for the country the hope is that she will implement programs that help people. I don't hate govt nor do I hate politicians either. I didn't grow up in a time in which politics was supposed to be inherently evil. The toxicity is not solely in guys like Trump either. The toxicity is in the people that vote for him.


I also hope she helps the middle class. The housing crisis and Obamacare really haven't over the last 12 years. If she implements more programs that hurt small businesses then I don't see how she's helping the middle class. Also, if she tries to raise the minimum wage to $15/hr how does that help small businesses stay functional? She's as tied to Wall Street as Trump. Maybe more. I'm skeptical about who she is truly trying to help with her proposed policies.

I just simply don't trust a career politician who takes back a husband again and again after all the shit he's done. I don't trust that weakness.

I really do not like Donald Trump, but somehow I loathe Clinton just as much. It's sad man. This isn't how someone should feel right before an election.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it.


You can't really take the good from Bill Clinton and Obama without also accepting the bad. That's a problem she has.



There was more good with Clinton than there has been with Obama. The economy was strong, no wars, and he was able to work along big partisan lines.

I keep laughing at all of this revisionism about the evilness of center right too. Bill Clinton ascended to the Presidency because he rightly surmised that liberalism and left wing politics were not going to win anything. Carter Mondale and Dukakis all lost. Liberals weren't going to win anything. Conservatism was the order of the day. He took that on and won. His policies helped the country too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it.


You can't really take the good from Bill Clinton and Obama without also accepting the bad. That's a problem she has.



There was more good with Clinton than there has been with Obama. The economy was strong, no wars, and he was able to work along big partisan lines.

I keep laughing at all of this revisionism about the evilness of center right too. Bill Clinton ascended to the Presidency because he rightly surmised that liberalism and left wing politics were not going to win anything. Carter Mondale and Dukakis all lost. Liberals weren't going to win anything. Conservatism was the order of the day. He took that on and won. His policies helped the country too.


Laughable. Clinton abandoned all principles and deregulated Wall Street. Real hero for the middle class. Also, Clinton had next to nothing to do with the strong economy, and failing to go after Bin Laden paid off shortly after he left office. Obama inherited far worst and has done far more.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Jbi11s wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Hillary Clinton is the albatross that MANY keep suggesting how did ever win the nomination? Why didn't the Dems run someone against her? Warren, Biden, back Sanders. Hell anybody but her. That's all I keep reading here yet she won the nomination rather easily. She also is about to win the Presidency too.


Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it. From strategy to policy she was there every step of the way. She deserves credit for that.

In terms of Obama it is beginning to take the shape of Williams/Hahn

I don't feel like having a debate about it, but what exactly is Hillary going to do for you if she gets elected?

Personally, I really do not want my taxes raised, or the industry I work in to slow down again.

I'm not pro Trump either. I just want to know what Hillary is going to do for LTG specifically.



Probably nothing. I'm good in life. The hope is that she will do things for the Middle Class. Bush and Obama really haven't. Bill Clinton did. Check the facts and not talking points and you will easily discern that.

The hope is also that she will stay away from foreign entanglements too.

If she raises taxes and generates more revenue for the country the hope is that she will implement programs that help people. I don't hate govt nor do I hate politicians either. I didn't grow up in a time in which politics was supposed to be inherently evil. The toxicity is not solely in guys like Trump either. The toxicity is in the people that vote for him.


I also hope she helps the middle class. The housing crisis and Obamacare really haven't over the last 12 years. If she implements more programs that hurt small businesses then I don't see how she's helping the middle class. Also, if she tries to raise the minimum wage to $15/hr how does that help small businesses stay functional? She's as tied to Wall Street as Trump. Maybe more. I'm skeptical about who she is truly trying to help with her proposed policies.

I just simply don't trust a career politician who takes back a husband again and again after all the shit he's done. I don't trust that weakness.

I really do not like Donald Trump, but somehow I loathe Clinton just as much. It's sad man. This isn't how someone should feel right before an election.



The personal between her and Bill doesn't trouble me. The Wall Street ties do but I think she is really going to try and raise taxes on wealthy people. She has more of a record of helping disenfranchised people than possibly anyone that has been President over the past 40 years. That is one I look at. I look at the history of the candidate. I also think that she will bring pragmatism back to the office.

Lastly she likes politics. No more of the arrogant types that think they are either above it or absolutely hate it. She devoted her life to politics. She has to love it in order to stay in it that long. How many times does Trump use the word "disaster" while describing policy.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Bill Clinton had a successful Presidency and she had something to do with it.


You can't really take the good from Bill Clinton and Obama without also accepting the bad. That's a problem she has.



There was more good with Clinton than there has been with Obama. The economy was strong, no wars, and he was able to work along big partisan lines.

I keep laughing at all of this revisionism about the evilness of center right too. Bill Clinton ascended to the Presidency because he rightly surmised that liberalism and left wing politics were not going to win anything. Carter Mondale and Dukakis all lost. Liberals weren't going to win anything. Conservatism was the order of the day. He took that on and won. His policies helped the country too.


Laughable. Clinton abandoned all principles and deregulated Wall Street. Real hero for the middle class. Also, Clinton had next to nothing to do with the strong economy, and failing to go after Bin Laden paid off shortly after he left office. Obama inherited far worst and has done far more.



Classic revisionism and what I reference with Hahn and Willams. Clinton balanced the budget by reducing spending and raising taxes.

The Clinton administration also created the most jobs since Eisenhower.

I also do not think that Clinton would have bailed out the banks either. Of course we will never know but how has that benefitted anyone other than Wall Street? That was Obama and Bush. A number of people believed that they should have let it crash and burn

And while everyone keeps clinging to left wing liberalism it wasn't winning anything. Liberalism at the national level was dead in 92. That is a fact.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
long time guy wrote:

The Clinton administration also created the most jobs since Eisenhower.

With a population of 100 million more. And shit jobs with no benefits.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
formerlyknownas wrote:
long time guy wrote:

The Clinton administration also created the most jobs since Eisenhower.

With a population of 100 million more. And shit jobs with no benefits.



Middle class wages increased during Clinton's administration. Don't Obama and Bush have an even greater increase in pop. Where is the job creation? You just stated that Obama has done a better job. Based on what? What has he done that was so much better?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33906
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Hillary likes power and wealth. I really don't see how anybody can hate Trump so much and in the same breath say how great the Clintons are. She's every bit the piece of crap Trump is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:32 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80562
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Spaulding wrote:
Hillary likes power and wealth. I really don't see how anybody can hate Trump so much and in the same breath say how great the Clintons are. She's every bit the piece of crap Trump is.


On a personal level, that's probably true, but there is no comparison between the two in so much as who is more fit to lead the country.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 518 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group