It is currently Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 261 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10867
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Obama has done far worse than Hillary has done but he's loved by more than half our country and Hillary is hated by more than half.


Could you expound on that?

Well, we know for a fact he's ordered the deaths of hundreds(possibly thousands) of innocent civilians including small children. We don't know for a fact that Hillary has ever ordered someone to be killed.


Exactly! MANY of his policies were designed to continue the screwing of the working poor. His rhetoric clearly doesn't match his actual policies.


W was a bad President. Obama has been the same in many ways but even worse. I do agree that Hillary is more Presidential than both but we will continue to see the working poor get ass raped by policy under her Presidency. Trump not the answer, but at least the GOP is now in disarray. Who will the DEMs blame after 4 years of Hillary and 12 years controlling the White House?

Obama approval ratings only show the ignorance and stupidity of voting Americans.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72554
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I'm 100% sure he ordered drone strikes where he was 100% sure little children would die. You'd have to be pretty damn naive to think he just made several hundred mistakes all in the same way.


We'll have to disagree. And I don't think we even know what the numbers are. Of course the other side claims that the evil U.S. is wantonly killing innocent women and children. We should probably look with a more critical eye. I don't doubt that individual soldiers, particularly the mercenaries in the employ of the U.S. government, have purposely targeted civilians or at the very least not paid much mind to who they were killing, but that's far different than suggesting targeting civilians is U.S. policy.

:lol: You serious? C'mon, man. Obama admitted he's killed between 64 and 116 civilians already! And let's also acknowledge that that estimate clearly demonstrates his administration has no fucking clue what the actual specific number is.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/oba ... e-attacks/

Quote:
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration said Friday that between 64 and 116 civilians have been killed by drone and other U.S. strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Africa since President Barack Obama took office in 2009.

But the administration’s first such public assessment put the civilian death toll significantly lower than estimates by various human rights groups. These range as high as 1,100 killed

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
In any case, Clinton is likely to be far more hawkish than Obama.

What Hillary may be really doesn't change what Obama has been.

MANY call Bush and Cheney evil but has Obama's actions really been better? I guess rhetoric is more important than actions.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
wdelaney72 wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Obama has done far worse than Hillary has done but he's loved by more than half our country and Hillary is hated by more than half.


Could you expound on that?

Well, we know for a fact he's ordered the deaths of hundreds(possibly thousands) of innocent civilians including small children. We don't know for a fact that Hillary has ever ordered someone to be killed.


Exactly! MANY of his policies were designed to continue the screwing of the working poor. His rhetoric clearly doesn't match his actual policies.


W was a bad President. Obama has been the same in many ways but even worse. I do agree that Hillary is more Presidential than both but we will continue to see the working poor get ass raped by policy under her Presidency. Trump not the answer, but at least the GOP is now in disarray. Who will the DEMs blame after 4 years of Hillary and 12 years controlling the White House?

Obama approval ratings only show the ignorance and stupidity of voting Americans.


Paul Ryan.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Obama admitted he's killed between 64 and 116 civilians already! And let's also acknowledge that that estimate clearly demonstrates his administration has no fucking clue what the actual specific number is.


I don't think anyone knows what the number is. But 64 to 116 doesn't really sound like a lot, unless of course you're one of them. War is hell.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Obama admitted he's killed between 64 and 116 civilians already! And let's also acknowledge that that estimate clearly demonstrates his administration has no fucking clue what the actual specific number is.


I don't think anyone knows what the number is. But 64 to 116 doesn't really sound like a lot, unless of course you're one of them. War is hell.



What war?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Obama admitted he's killed between 64 and 116 civilians already! And let's also acknowledge that that estimate clearly demonstrates his administration has no fucking clue what the actual specific number is.


I don't think anyone knows what the number is. But 64 to 116 doesn't really sound like a lot, unless of course you're one of them. War is hell.



What war?

We've always been at war.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:00 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
What Hillary may be really doesn't change what Obama has been.


You tried to compare the two with an unfavorable light on Obama. I'd take a third term of Obama over Clinton or Trump and I'm guessing most other Americans would too.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:01 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Obama admitted he's killed between 64 and 116 civilians already! And let's also acknowledge that that estimate clearly demonstrates his administration has no fucking clue what the actual specific number is.


I don't think anyone knows what the number is. But 64 to 116 doesn't really sound like a lot, unless of course you're one of them. War is hell.



What war?

We've always been at war.


I was told that the wars were over.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93200
Location: To the left of my post
The worst part about Trump being the nominee(besides all the racism and mysogony and dumb things he says) is that it gives Hillary an excuse for everything.

I don't see her supporters being able to say "Yeah, but Kasich is worse because he is against abortion!".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:03 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
What Hillary may be really doesn't change what Obama has been.


You tried to compare the two with an unfavorable light on Obama. I'd take a third term of Obama over Clinton or Trump and I'm guessing most other Americans would too.


Obama has clearly done far worse things. It's a fact that can't be disputed. Your hate for Hillary blinds you.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72554
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Obama admitted he's killed between 64 and 116 civilians already! And let's also acknowledge that that estimate clearly demonstrates his administration has no fucking clue what the actual specific number is.


I don't think anyone knows what the number is. But 64 to 116 doesn't really sound like a lot, unless of course you're one of them. War is hell.

It's funny to me that you blindly accept that the US government is telling the truth about how many innocent civilians they killed and accusing international human rights groups of cooking the numbers because of an agenda. Plus, one glance at that estimate makes me laugh. "We either killed 64 people...or possibly maybe almost twice that number. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19490
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
What Hillary may be really doesn't change what Obama has been.


You tried to compare the two with an unfavorable light on Obama. I'd take a third term of Obama over Clinton or Trump and I'm guessing most other Americans would too.


Deep down in my soul even I got to admit this is true.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Obama admitted he's killed between 64 and 116 civilians already! And let's also acknowledge that that estimate clearly demonstrates his administration has no fucking clue what the actual specific number is.


I don't think anyone knows what the number is. But 64 to 116 doesn't really sound like a lot, unless of course you're one of them. War is hell.

It's funny to me that you blindly accept that the US government is telling the truth about how many innocent civilians they killed and accusing international human rights groups of cooking the numbers because of an agenda. Plus, one glance at that estimate makes me laugh. "We either killed 64 people...or possibly maybe almost twice that number. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "


I don't blindly accept the U.S. numbers or the numbers put forth by "human rights" organizations that are bastions of Jew-hatred either.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72554
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Obama admitted he's killed between 64 and 116 civilians already! And let's also acknowledge that that estimate clearly demonstrates his administration has no fucking clue what the actual specific number is.


I don't think anyone knows what the number is. But 64 to 116 doesn't really sound like a lot, unless of course you're one of them. War is hell.

It's funny to me that you blindly accept that the US government is telling the truth about how many innocent civilians they killed and accusing international human rights groups of cooking the numbers because of an agenda. Plus, one glance at that estimate makes me laugh. "We either killed 64 people...or possibly maybe almost twice that number. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "


I don't blindly accept the U.S. numbers or the numbers put forth by "human rights" organizations that are bastions of Jew-hatred either.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Alright, dude.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I am interested in war without civilian casualties. Particularly when the opponents are pretty much armed civilians.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:11 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
pittmike wrote:
I am interested in war without civilian casualties. Particularly when the opponents are pretty much armed civilians.



How about no war at all? I don't think it's okay for FavreFan to die just because he's wearing olive drab. But now we're getting into "Imagine" territory.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72554
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I am interested in war without civilian casualties. Particularly when the opponents are pretty much armed civilians.



How about no war at all? I don't think it's okay for FavreFan to die just because he's wearing olive drab. But now we're getting into "Imagine" territory.

Image

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I am interested in war without civilian casualties. Particularly when the opponents are pretty much armed civilians.



How about no war at all? I don't think it's okay for FavreFan to die just because he's wearing olive drab. But now we're getting into "Imagine" territory.


Not wanting war means you're a pro-Putin stooge, can't have that.

Amazing how the media narrative has the public wanting war and escalation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72554
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SomeGuy wrote:
Amazing how the media narrative has the public wanting war and escalation.

Amazing how quickly the anti-war left in this country vanished in January of 2009.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
I'm not sure what your GIF means, but I'm sure you don't disagree that a soldier's life has just as much value as a civilian's? It's not like most people fighting wars, who are generally poor, are there because they have a lot of other choices. On the other hand, I've never felt bad because a Blackwater contractor making hundreds of thousands as a war profiteer got killed.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:17 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
We are not at war last time I checked. These aren't civilian deaths on a battlefield. It's some guy with a joystick blowing up places because someone said a "bad guy" may be there.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I am interested in war without civilian casualties. Particularly when the opponents are pretty much armed civilians.



How about no war at all? I don't think it's okay for FavreFan to die just because he's wearing olive drab. But now we're getting into "Imagine" territory.


Sure. I can get behind a no war policy.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I am interested in war without civilian casualties. Particularly when the opponents are pretty much armed civilians.



How about no war at all? I don't think it's okay for FavreFan to die just because he's wearing olive drab. But now we're getting into "Imagine" territory.

Image


:lol: First time I have seen that one.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
FavreFan wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Amazing how the media narrative has the public wanting war and escalation.

Amazing how quickly the anti-war left in this country vanished in January of 2009.


True.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
FavreFan wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Amazing how the media narrative has the public wanting war and escalation.

Amazing how quickly the anti-war left in this country vanished in January of 2009.


Time to get the Pershing's out of storage and hit those Ruskie's Reagan style. Gotta be tough, make that Reset Button the big red nuclear button.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16685
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
SomeGuy wrote:

Amazing how the media narrative has the public wanting war and escalation.


Yeah, I think Trump at one point said "wouldn't it be nice if we could have good relations with Russia?" and that was ripped as being an anti-American stance.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nas wrote:
We are not at war last time I checked. These aren't civilian deaths on a battlefield. It's some guy with a joystick blowing up places because someone said a "bad guy" may be there.


Many people have said that if they use the video game strategy here and there we won't need a big war anymore.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
We are not at war last time I checked.


I believe there are American soldiers who wold disagree with you.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hillary Clinton
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72554
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm not sure what your GIF means, but I'm sure you don't disagree that a soldier's life has just as much value as a civilian's? It's not like most people fighting wars, who are generally poor, are there because they have a lot of other choices. On the other hand, I've never felt bad because a Blackwater contractor making hundreds of thousands as a war profiteer got killed.

I think pittmike might be the only one that gets that meme.

I do think a civilian's life is worth more than a soldier's life when we are talking about an all volunteer Army. Being a soldier and being around soldiers who actually were in combat zones convinced me of that, actually. The vast majority seemed to agree that we all signed up for possible injury or death, losing friends, getting fucked in the head, etc. Civilians didn't sign up for any of that shit, didn't ask for any of it. I realize the lines between civilian and soldier are more blurred in the Middle East, but you simply cannot tell me we do our best at avoiding civilian deaths. If some dickwad throws a grenade in a civilian house in Afghanistan, then sure, it could be the rogue soldier or mercenary you referenced earlier. When it's a drone strike that does it, you have to acknowledge it's coming from the top of our chain of command.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 261 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group