It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:28 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 790 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:22 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
pittmike wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
My problem with Hillary Clinton is that she is absolutely Nixonian. Nixon was driven from office and no one would have considered voting for him after his misdeeds came to light. But 45 years later voting for Clinton feels like voting for Nixon after becoming aware of all the bad stuff. The only reason to vote for her is that she is running against Mussolini. If I were in a battleground state I absolutely would vote for her, but I'm not "with her" and I wouldn't feel good about doing it.



This is a good example of the problems today. If no one knew that it was you writing the paragraph above it would be labelled as that of a Trump supporter or right winger. Worse yet it would be dismissed as not being honest and somehow an attack rather than simply an opinion. Then some on the left would feel the need to attack back and actually defend Clinton and maybe more. Maybe it was LTG somewhere in the earlier posts. Reasonable discussion is generally not possible right now.


Who says some don't feel that way? Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective. Some of his issues with her are definitely valid but his over the top hate for her makes it easy to disregard most of his thoughts about her.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
My problem with Hillary Clinton is that she is absolutely Nixonian. Nixon was driven from office and no one would have considered voting for him after his misdeeds came to light. But 45 years later voting for Clinton feels like voting for Nixon after becoming aware of all the bad stuff. The only reason to vote for her is that she is running against Mussolini. If I were in a battleground state I absolutely would vote for her, but I'm not "with her" and I wouldn't feel good about doing it.



This is a good example of the problems today. If no one knew that it was you writing the paragraph above it would be labelled as that of a Trump supporter or right winger. Worse yet it would be dismissed as not being honest and somehow an attack rather than simply an opinion. Then some on the left would feel the need to attack back and actually defend Clinton and maybe more. Maybe it was LTG somewhere in the earlier posts. Reasonable discussion is generally not possible right now.


Stop being dramatic. There is reasonable discussion on this board every day.


My comments and most of this thread are not really about the board but the situation the electorate is in general.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Small government republicans aren't really considered right wing. When liberals reference right wing they typically mean Christian right neo con types. Small government fiscal conservatives typically are referenced to mean Eisenhower Republicans.


I understand. That's why I mentioned the changing definition. The point is, Trump is far from a conservative candidate.


He isn't really a Republican candidate at all. That is why I made the argument regarding xenophobia and racism earlier during the election. His promotion of racist, as well as xenophobic ideas is what initially endeared him to Republican voters. The purist within Republican circles immediately embraced him once he took the lead on the Birther movement. He doubled and triple down by targeting Mexicans and Muslims. Once this occurred his Republican bona fides were cemented.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:26 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Small government republicans aren't really considered right wing. When liberals reference right wing they typically mean Christian right neo con types. Small government fiscal conservatives typically are referenced to mean Eisenhower Republicans.


I understand. That's why I mentioned the changing definition. The point is, Trump is far from a conservative candidate.


Hillary is more conservative than Trump.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Nah, Trumps refusing to accept the election results has potentially far worse consequences. It may be nothing... but it could be something big and it continues to erode trust in things that we have to have people believe in.


I have to disagree with that. It's hysteria. What do you think might happen? That Trump will lead a group of West Virginians with pitchforks to throw Hillary out of the White House? Him "not accepting" the result would be as significant as the Dodgers not accepting their loss in the NLCS because Gonzales was safe at home, that is to say not at all.

leashyourkids wrote:
It's absolutely true. The arrogance of left wingers certainly exists, but some of it is justified. The extreme Right (Trump's biggest fans) believe that working with any Democrat is treason, and that irrationality is primarily stoked by news outlets and talk radio.


I realize that the definition of "right wing" has been changed colloquially to mean a racist hater, but it traditionally refers to conservatives, and the true right wingers, i.e. small government conservatives, don't support Trump at all. Trump's base is the uneducated, unemployed, dispossessed white guy who is looking for government to fix his problems. That's really as far from right wing as you can get.


My problem with Hillary Clinton is that she is absolutely Nixonian. Nixon was driven from office and no one would have considered voting for him after his misdeeds came to light. But 45 years later voting for Clinton feels like voting for Nixon after becoming aware of all the bad stuff. The only reason to vote for her is that she is running against Mussolini. If I were in a battleground state I absolutely would vote for her, but I'm not "with her" and I wouldn't feel good about doing it.


We probably won't ever agree on this, as I view the public discourse generated by leaders to be more important than you do. But I do want to clarify that I'm not saying Armageddon is going to occur when Donald Trump stomps his feet and throws a fit like a child upon his loss. What I'm saying is that it is yet another example (in a long line of them) of Trump encouraging his psychopath militant base to believe more preposterous things. That is bad for our country... I mean, it's hard to imagine a choice for president as bad as this one, but I don't expect any change as long as people are so easily manipulated by morons like him. And, let's be clear, he's a moron. He's not a political savant. He's not intelligent. He's not nuanced. He is 100% a pathetic, thin-skinned, narcissistic, petulant baby who has no idea the ramifications of what he says. I don't believe any of his comments are calculated, and I don't think he knows one goddamned thing about what is important to maintain a Democratic Republic (trust in the system is a huge component).

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
My problem with Hillary Clinton is that she is absolutely Nixonian. Nixon was driven from office and no one would have considered voting for him after his misdeeds came to light. But 45 years later voting for Clinton feels like voting for Nixon after becoming aware of all the bad stuff. The only reason to vote for her is that she is running against Mussolini. If I were in a battleground state I absolutely would vote for her, but I'm not "with her" and I wouldn't feel good about doing it.



This is a good example of the problems today. If no one knew that it was you writing the paragraph above it would be labelled as that of a Trump supporter or right winger. Worse yet it would be dismissed as not being honest and somehow an attack rather than simply an opinion. Then some on the left would feel the need to attack back and actually defend Clinton and maybe more. Maybe it was LTG somewhere in the earlier posts. Reasonable discussion is generally not possible right now.


Who says some don't feel that way? Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective. Some of his issues with her are definitely valid but his over the top hate for her makes it easy to disregard most of his thoughts about her.


Again I am only referencing this one post of his as if we didn't know who wrote it. And the reason why I did is because he certainly is not right wing it is a reasonable opinion to be discussed. If someone else made it on the board or in the general landscape it might be viewed differently.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:27 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective.


Not true. Any criticism of Hillary- and there's a whole lot to criticize- is taken as support of Trump by MANY.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:28 am 
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Obamacare is the reason we need single payer. If they thought the insurance companies were going to lose one penny of profit and not use the ACA as an excuse to jack rates for even more profit they were naive.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Baby McNown wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Obamacare is the reason we need single payer. If they thought the insurance companies were going to lose one penny of profit and not use the ACA as an excuse to jack rates for even more profit they were naive.
A public option "maybe" but we should never ever have a single payer system.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
My problem with Hillary Clinton is that she is absolutely Nixonian. Nixon was driven from office and no one would have considered voting for him after his misdeeds came to light. But 45 years later voting for Clinton feels like voting for Nixon after becoming aware of all the bad stuff. The only reason to vote for her is that she is running against Mussolini. If I were in a battleground state I absolutely would vote for her, but I'm not "with her" and I wouldn't feel good about doing it.



This is a good example of the problems today. If no one knew that it was you writing the paragraph above it would be labelled as that of a Trump supporter or right winger. Worse yet it would be dismissed as not being honest and somehow an attack rather than simply an opinion. Then some on the left would feel the need to attack back and actually defend Clinton and maybe more. Maybe it was LTG somewhere in the earlier posts. Reasonable discussion is generally not possible right now.


Who says some don't feel that way? Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective. Some of his issues with her are definitely valid but his over the top hate for her makes it easy to disregard most of his thoughts about her.

Wrong. Jorr is one of the more objective Hillary posters on this website. She is close to being a historically bad candidate, who inexplicably got lucky enough to go up against an even worse one.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Baby McNown wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Obamacare is the reason we need single payer. If they thought the insurance companies were going to lose one penny of profit and not use the ACA as an excuse to jack rates for even more profit they were naive.


Correct. That is why I said way back when this is a disaster. They could have and maybe should have simply cut checks for everyone uninsured to Blue Cross. It would have been cheaper and a whole lot less trouble than what we have gone through now. So if the country is going to agree on insurance is a right then it must go all the way. The half measure was never going to hold up.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Term limits aren't going to help. We'll just end up electing a new bunch of selfish, ignorant leaders. That's what our system produces.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.


You realize Obamacare eliminated the caps on lifetime coverage? All employer plans had a maximum payout limit before ($2M in many cases). So if you have a person in your plan with a chronic disease, there is no limit to how much your company would have to pay out. Most employer plans are self insured. Everyone thinks that United Health, etc al is insuring you, but that is not the case. Most are ASO plans where your employer picks up your medical bills and the insurance company services the claims and provides network access.

Imagine if State Farm was required to offer unlimited liability coverage when you get an accident. You drive home drunk from a ballgame and kill a family. State Farm has unlimited exposure instead of a $1M limit.

My point- you have to charge for those risks. It changes the whole game.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:33 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective.


Not true. Any criticism of Hillary- and there's a whole lot to criticize- is taken as support of Trump by MANY.


There is a lot to criticize and dislike about her. Most of the talk about Hillary mixes in valid issue with a bunch of crap. IMO the crap isn't needed.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective.


Not true. Any criticism of Hillary- and there's a whole lot to criticize- is taken as support of Trump by MANY.


You've been clear and even handed. They are both unlikable for MANY reasons.

If we'll all being sincere, most would admit that neither is worthy of our vote.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective.


Not true. Any criticism of Hillary- and there's a whole lot to criticize- is taken as support of Trump by MANY.


To be honest I never thought you were a Trump guy. I know you touted the greatness of Lincoln Chafee early in the process. I do think you have defended Trump on issues that are in my opinion indefensible.

I also think that you pooh pooh some of his transgressions also. This latest stunt by Trump further serves to chip away at the Democratic process. It plants the seed that there is something inherently corrupt about government.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective.


Not true. Any criticism of Hillary- and there's a whole lot to criticize- is taken as support of Trump by MANY.


There is a lot to criticize and dislike about her. Most of the talk about Hillary mixes in valid issue with a bunch of crap. IMO the crap isn't needed.

Most of what you think is "crap" is legitimate criticism that her supporters have no answer for.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
FavreFan wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Term limits aren't going to help. We'll just end up electing a new bunch of selfish, ignorant leaders. That's what our system produces.


We have term limits for President. How's that working out for us this election cycle?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Obamacare is the reason we need single payer. If they thought the insurance companies were going to lose one penny of profit and not use the ACA as an excuse to jack rates for even more profit they were naive.
A public option "maybe" but we should never ever have a single payer system.


A public option is completely necessary if the goal of Obamacare is to decrease insurance costs. You can't ask a pool that consists entirely of private companies to comply with more regulations (such as no denial for pre-existing conditions or eliminating caps on policies) and expect their costs to go down. What was the theory, that a larger pool of people paying in would somehow create better margins for insurance companies? If so, that's nonsense. Obamacare will never, ever decrease costs unless you have a public option to compete against the private companies. Every single additional coverage in an insurance policy has to be funded, and they are funded through higher premiums.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
denisdman wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Term limits aren't going to help. We'll just end up electing a new bunch of selfish, ignorant leaders. That's what our system produces.


We have term limits for President. How's that working out for us this election cycle?

Exactly

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:37 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective.


Not true. Any criticism of Hillary- and there's a whole lot to criticize- is taken as support of Trump by MANY.


There is a lot to criticize and dislike about her. Most of the talk about Hillary mixes in valid issue with a bunch of crap. IMO the crap isn't needed.

Most of what you think is "crap" is legitimate criticism that her supporters have no answer for.


She's had people killed and all the other conspiracy theories aren't legitimate.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
My problem with Hillary Clinton is that she is absolutely Nixonian. Nixon was driven from office and no one would have considered voting for him after his misdeeds came to light. But 45 years later voting for Clinton feels like voting for Nixon after becoming aware of all the bad stuff. The only reason to vote for her is that she is running against Mussolini. If I were in a battleground state I absolutely would vote for her, but I'm not "with her" and I wouldn't feel good about doing it.



This is a good example of the problems today. If no one knew that it was you writing the paragraph above it would be labelled as that of a Trump supporter or right winger. Worse yet it would be dismissed as not being honest and somehow an attack rather than simply an opinion. Then some on the left would feel the need to attack back and actually defend Clinton and maybe more. Maybe it was LTG somewhere in the earlier posts. Reasonable discussion is generally not possible right now.


Who says some don't feel that way? Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective. Some of his issues with her are definitely valid but his over the top hate for her makes it easy to disregard most of his thoughts about her.

Wrong. Jorr is one of the more objective Hillary posters on this website. She is close to being a historically bad candidate, who inexplicably got lucky enough to go up against an even worse one.


She didn't lucky. They chose the person they believed was the best person to go up against her. Trump easily lapped the field. It wasn't too long ago that everyone bought the hype about change election. Well this is what it got us.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Baby McNown wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Obamacare is the reason we need single payer. If they thought the insurance companies were going to lose one penny of profit and not use the ACA as an excuse to jack rates for even more profit they were naive.


ACA rates are going up because of all the reasons folks told you it would fail:

You can only charge the sick and elderly a max multiple of rates for young and healthy people. You force plans to take all comers. You did not force the young and healthy to buy in.

Young are overcharged.
Sick are undercharged.

Sick sign up. Young do not. Surprise, rates need to go up for all.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Nah, Trumps refusing to accept the election results has potentially far worse consequences. It may be nothing... but it could be something big and it continues to erode trust in things that we have to have people believe in.


I have to disagree with that. It's hysteria. What do you think might happen? That Trump will lead a group of West Virginians with pitchforks to throw Hillary out of the White House? Him "not accepting" the result would be as significant as the Dodgers not accepting their loss in the NLCS because Gonzales was safe at home, that is to say not at all.

leashyourkids wrote:
It's absolutely true. The arrogance of left wingers certainly exists, but some of it is justified. The extreme Right (Trump's biggest fans) believe that working with any Democrat is treason, and that irrationality is primarily stoked by news outlets and talk radio.


I realize that the definition of "right wing" has been changed colloquially to mean a racist hater, but it traditionally refers to conservatives, and the true right wingers, i.e. small government conservatives, don't support Trump at all. Trump's base is the uneducated, unemployed, dispossessed white guy who is looking for government to fix his problems. That's really as far from right wing as you can get.


My problem with Hillary Clinton is that she is absolutely Nixonian. Nixon was driven from office and no one would have considered voting for him after his misdeeds came to light. But 45 years later voting for Clinton feels like voting for Nixon after becoming aware of all the bad stuff. The only reason to vote for her is that she is running against Mussolini. If I were in a battleground state I absolutely would vote for her, but I'm not "with her" and I wouldn't feel good about doing it.


We probably won't ever agree on this, as I view the public discourse generated by leaders to be more important than you do. But I do want to clarify that I'm not saying Armageddon is going to occur when Donald Trump stomps his feet and throws a fit like a child upon his loss. What I'm saying is that it is yet another example (in a long line of them) of Trump encouraging his psychopath militant base to believe more preposterous things. That is bad for our country... I mean, it's hard to imagine a choice for president as bad as this one, but I don't expect any change as long as people are so easily manipulated by morons like him. And, let's be clear, he's a moron. He's not a political savant. He's not intelligent. He's not nuanced. He is 100% a pathetic, thin-skinned, narcissistic, petulant baby who has no idea the ramifications of what he says. I don't believe any of his comments are calculated, and I don't think he knows one goddamned thing about what is important to maintain a Democratic Republic (trust in the system is a huge component).


I don't see it as anything more than bad form, a lack of decorum, and disrespect for tradition. But these things hardly began with the ignoramus Donald Trump, nor are they the purview of one particular political party or those of a certain ideological bent.

I generally dislike rules, but there are certain protocols and ways of doing things that are the glue that holds society together. I am a traditionalist in that way.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Obamacare is the reason we need single payer. If they thought the insurance companies were going to lose one penny of profit and not use the ACA as an excuse to jack rates for even more profit they were naive.
A public option "maybe" but we should never ever have a single payer system.


A public option is completely necessary if the goal of Obamacare is to decrease insurance costs. You can't ask a pool that consists entirely of private companies to comply with more regulations (such as no denial for pre-existing conditions or eliminating caps on policies) and expect their costs to go down. What was the theory, that a larger pool of people paying in would somehow create better margins for insurance companies? If so, that's nonsense. Obamacare will never, ever decrease costs unless you have a public option to compete against the private companies. Every single additional coverage in an insurance policy has to be funded, and they are funded through higher premiums.
The issue is just how they are "competing" with insurance companies. If they are simply driving them out of business by subsidizing the losses with tax dollars then it really isn't a good option either.

If it ran like the post office which is kind of like a company that competes with private companies then that would be fine.

Though, in my opinion, the smartest move would be to get government out of health care outside of Medicare/Medicaid but then setup a system where catastrophic medical bills are covered by the government. If you get cancer or have a kid who requires a lot of medical procedures then you get that covered. We don't really need them involved with day to day operations.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective.


Not true. Any criticism of Hillary- and there's a whole lot to criticize- is taken as support of Trump by MANY.


There is a lot to criticize and dislike about her. Most of the talk about Hillary mixes in valid issue with a bunch of crap. IMO the crap isn't needed.

Most of what you think is "crap" is legitimate criticism that her supporters have no answer for.


She's had people killed and all the other conspiracy theories aren't legitimate.

And that pretty much never gets mentioned except among crazy people. Most criticism of her focuses on her dishonesty, corruption, and past support of terrible policy.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:40 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
FavreFan wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Term limits aren't going to help. We'll just end up electing a new bunch of selfish, ignorant leaders. That's what our system produces.


I think a publicly funded campaign finance system would produce a better crop of candidates and elected officials. I also believe that a rank voting system would help bring about the demise of our political duopoly and immeasurably benefit our government.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79554
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Reality is JORR's opinion of Hillary has never been objective.


Not true. Any criticism of Hillary- and there's a whole lot to criticize- is taken as support of Trump by MANY.


To be honest I never thought you were a Trump guy. I know you touted the greatness of Lincoln Chafee early in the process. I do think you have defended Trump on issues that are in my opinion indefensible.

I also think that you pooh pooh some of his transgressions also. This latest stunt by Trump further serves to chip away at the Democratic process. It plants the seed that there is something inherently corrupt about government.


I think we've reached a point where there is something inherently corrupt about government, don't you?

I know Lincoln Chafee personally and I would vouch for his integrity any time. He is unquestionably a better human being than either of these candidates.

I'm curious as to what indefensible positions of Trump you believe I have defended.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I want to say that its pointless and it doesn't matter but Obamacare gave an excuse to employers to jack up the insurance costs and offer worse service. I pay far more now for the same level of service. I suppose that things matter much more on the legislators we elect rather than president. Until we have term limits, we are stuck with the same group of idiots from presidency to presidency.

Obamacare is the reason we need single payer. If they thought the insurance companies were going to lose one penny of profit and not use the ACA as an excuse to jack rates for even more profit they were naive.
A public option "maybe" but we should never ever have a single payer system.


A public option is completely necessary if the goal of Obamacare is to decrease insurance costs. You can't ask a pool that consists entirely of private companies to comply with more regulations (such as no denial for pre-existing conditions or eliminating caps on policies) and expect their costs to go down. What was the theory, that a larger pool of people paying in would somehow create better margins for insurance companies? If so, that's nonsense. Obamacare will never, ever decrease costs unless you have a public option to compete against the private companies. Every single additional coverage in an insurance policy has to be funded, and they are funded through higher premiums.


Medicare and Medicaid only survive because they force doctors to accept rates lower than the private market. Not sure if we have any MD's here, but if you know one, ask them if they accept Medicaid patients. Most will not take new patients. Medicaid is not even paying providers for services rendered. Both underpay relative to the costs of those services.

Unfortuately, health insurance is not insurance at all. It is a dollar trading scheme. Real insurance would be plans that attach at very high deductibles, and individuals would pick up 100% of all the routine costs. In that way, people would care about the cost and usage of such services and reduce the overall dollars being spent in the system. Premiums would be much lower because insurers wouldn't be picking up all those routine costs (the dollar trade).

What we have today is this: People pay a huge amount of money upfront in biweekly premiums. For that, they can use unlimited medical costs with low deductibles and low co-pays. It encourages overuse. It is like paying for your groceries through a payroll deduction. When you show up at Jewel, you can fill up your cart as much as you want and are only charged for 10% of the cost. What do you think happens to prices and the amount purchased?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 790 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group