It is currently Mon Nov 18, 2024 5:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4542 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81 ... 152  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
They have MANY problems right now.


And bein' in the World Series ain't one.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Rick, you can't just change "the larger point." He specifically said the Cubs could have trades Schwarber for a WS title, which is wrong and convoluted logic.
Unless they blow it, that is pretty much what Cleveland did.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38680
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Sox nation with some awful baseball thoughts here .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Rick, you can't just change "the larger point." He specifically said the Cubs could have trades Schwarber for a WS title, which is wrong and convoluted logic.
Unless they blow it, that is pretty much what Cleveland did.


The Indians traded Kyle Schwarber for Andrew Miller and won a WS title?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
badrogue17 wrote:
Sox nation with some awful baseball thoughts here .


I thought old Cub fans were reactionary simpletons, but maybe it's not just us.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Rick, you can't just change "the larger point." He specifically said the Cubs could have trades Schwarber for a WS title, which is wrong and convoluted logic.
Unless they blow it, that is pretty much what Cleveland did.


The Indians traded Kyle Schwarber for Andrew Miller and won a WS title?
They were willing to meet the Yankees asking price for Andrew Miller.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Rick, you can't just change "the larger point." He specifically said the Cubs could have trades Schwarber for a WS title, which is wrong and convoluted logic.
Unless they blow it, that is pretty much what Cleveland did.


The Indians traded Kyle Schwarber for Andrew Miller and won a WS title?
They were willing to meet the Yankees asking price for Andrew Miller.


So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?
I think they would win it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?
I think they would win it.


Why?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 998
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?
I think they would win it.


Why?

While I am not sure I agree with the sentiment, I will guess the answer would be because he would not be on Cleveland and kicking the Cubs' asses right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
leashyourkids wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Sox nation with some awful baseball thoughts here .


I thought old Cub fans were reactionary simpletons, but maybe it's not just us.

Cubs fans taking out their teams futility on Sox fans.

But the good news is that you should be happy because the Cubs have a good team for the future.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Peter Puck wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?
I think they would win it.


Why?

While I am not sure I agree with the sentiment, I will guess the answer would be because he would not be on Cleveland and kicking the Cubs' asses right now.


Flawed, but I'd like to talk to Rick. No offense.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Sox nation with some awful baseball thoughts here .


I thought old Cub fans were reactionary simpletons, but maybe it's not just us.

Cubs fans taking out their teams futility on Sox fans.

But the good news is that you should be happy because the Cubs have a good team for the future.


:lol: Futility... they're in the World Series. :lol:

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 998
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
leashyourkids wrote:
Peter Puck wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?
I think they would win it.


Why?

While I am not sure I agree with the sentiment, I will guess the answer would be because he would not be on Cleveland and kicking the Cubs' asses right now.


Flawed, but I'd like to talk to Rick. No offense.

I am sure he will get back to you quickly. I want to see if my guess is right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
GoldenJet wrote:
312player wrote:
Game 3 was the back breaker, had to hit that bum with the wind blowing out and they choked, I give a 2% chance to win 3 straight.


They had a terrible approach...they were all over swinging when "nice and easy" would have been plenty.

Maddon is great over 162, but when there's big pressure like the playoffs, he seems to not have the right approach.


I'll take Maddon. He's not coaching Baez to swing above his head.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?
I think they would win it.


Why?
It's with how he has been used. You could have pitched Lester more. Kluber is going less time because they know what they have in Miller. It's also quite a psychological advantage to know that after a certain inning you are going to find it difficult to get any runs. Also, Cleveland wouldn't have him and Theo knew that another contender was going to pick him up. Also, while it doesn't matter for this year, he is also with the team next year which is right in your "many bites at the apple" strategy.

Obviously I don't know for certain but Cleveland seems to be getting a lot of benefit from him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
veganfan21 wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
312player wrote:
Game 3 was the back breaker, had to hit that bum with the wind blowing out and they choked, I give a 2% chance to win 3 straight.


They had a terrible approach...they were all over swinging when "nice and easy" would have been plenty.

Maddon is great over 162, but when there's big pressure like the playoffs, he seems to not have the right approach.


I'll take Maddon. He's not coaching Baez to swing above his head.



I thought those whitey tighty pajama parties were supposed to smooth that out?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38680
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I think if the Cubs traded everyone they have to other teams so they have no relief pitchers who are good they'd be winning this series.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?
I think they would win it.


Why?
It's with how he has been used. You could have pitched Lester more. Kluber is going less time because they know what they have in Miller. It's also quite a psychological advantage to know that after a certain inning you are going to find it difficult to get any runs. Also, Cleveland wouldn't have him and Theo knew that another contender was going to pick him up. Also, while it doesn't matter for this year, he is also with the team next year which is right in your "many bites at the apple" strategy.

Obviously I don't know for certain but Cleveland seems to be getting a lot of benefit from him.


The bolded part is the flawed logic (well, at least part of it). You don't trade for guys simply because they might wind up on a contender that you MIGHT face. That's especially true of an AL team. I mean, are you proposing that the Cubs should have traded for every single good player on the market so that they didn't wind up on a contender?

Additionally, Cleveland wasn't even considered a favorite in the AL. Are the Cubs supposed to acquire players for every possible scenario? (That's rhetorical... obviously, that's impossible.)

The third point would be that the Cubs biggest deficiency in the playoffs has been their offense. Acquiring Miller does nothing to help that. And if he's as valuable as you say he is, they wouldn't even be facing the Indians.

Lastly, the Cubs are in the World Series. They're as good as any team in baseball. If they lose this series, which seems likely, you tip your cap to the Indians for having a great run and give it another go next year.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
badrogue17 wrote:
I think if the Cubs traded everyone they have to other teams so they have no relief pitchers who are good they'd be winning this series.


I know Rogue is being facetious here, but he's right. This is the same logic you are all applying.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19359
So instead of Cleveland it would be Toronto up 3-1 right now if Cubs had Miller.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
The bolded part is the flawed logic (well, at least part of it). You don't trade for guys simply because they might wind up on a contender that you MIGHT face. That's especially true of an AL team. I mean, are you proposing that the Cubs should have traded for every single good player on the market so that they didn't wind up on a contender?
Miller was the prize of the whole trade deadline though and the cost was primarily going to be a guy that played two games for the Cubs and who has no future of being an every day player on any team in the NL.
leashyourkids wrote:
Additionally, Cleveland wasn't even considered a favorite in the AL. Are the Cubs supposed to acquire players for every possible scenario? (That's rhetorical... obviously, that's impossible.)
No, but maybe get the best one available if you want to give yourself the best chance to win the World Series.
leashyourkids wrote:
The third point would be that the Cubs biggest deficiency in the playoffs has been their offense. Acquiring Miller does nothing to help that. And if he's as valuable as you say he is, they wouldn't even be facing the Indians.
Are you now trying to say the Cubs would not be significantly better with Miller?
leashyourkids wrote:
Lastly, the Cubs are in the World Series. They're as good as any team in baseball. If they lose this series, which seems likely, you tip your cap to the Indians for having a great run and give it another go next year.
Well, you would have had Miller for next year too. Will Theo go all-in for next year if they don't win it this year?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38680
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
So, you think that if the Cubs had traded Schwarber for Andrew Miller, they'd win the World Series easily?
I think they would win it.


Why?
It's with how he has been used. You could have pitched Lester more. Kluber is going less time because they know what they have in Miller. It's also quite a psychological advantage to know that after a certain inning you are going to find it difficult to get any runs. Also, Cleveland wouldn't have him and Theo knew that another contender was going to pick him up. Also, while it doesn't matter for this year, he is also with the team next year which is right in your "many bites at the apple" strategy.

Obviously I don't know for certain but Cleveland seems to be getting a lot of benefit from him.


The bolded part is the flawed logic (well, at least part of it). You don't trade for guys simply because they might wind up on a contender that you MIGHT face. That's especially true of an AL team. I mean, are you proposing that the Cubs should have traded for every single good player on the market so that they didn't wind up on a contender?

Additionally, Cleveland wasn't even considered a favorite in the AL. Are the Cubs supposed to acquire players for every possible scenario? (That's rhetorical... obviously, that's impossible.)

The third point would be that the Cubs biggest deficiency in the playoffs has been their offense. Acquiring Miller does nothing to help that. And if he's as valuable as you say he is, they wouldn't even be facing the Indians.

Lastly, the Cubs are in the World Series. They're as good as any team in baseball. If they lose this series, which seems likely, you tip your cap to the Indians for having a great run and give it another go next year.

Nonwithstanding the fact that the guy who they "should've"' traded is probably the main reason they won the only game they have so far this series .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
WTF, Miller is why the Cubs have won only 1 game?

Are Kluber and Tomlin figments of everyone's imagination?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
Kirkwood wrote:
WTF, Miller is why the Cubs have won only 1 game?

Are Kluber and Tomlin figments of everyone's imagination?
Why will Kluber be available for 3 games this series?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
WTF, Miller is why the Cubs have won only 1 game?

Are Kluber and Tomlin figments of everyone's imagination?
Why will Kluber be available for 3 games this series?

He's a really good pitcher who has been able to get through 6 innings without throwing 90 pitches in either outing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57213
Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
veganfan21 wrote:
I'll take Maddon. He's not coaching Baez to swing above his head.


Again, the concept of "good" managing is really just an illusion and actually nothing more than players performing.

I would say that Francona is over-managing his team in this series and it has happened to work out because his players have simply performed. Pulling those starters so early when they are cruising along is great when Miller/Shaw/etc. come in and shut the opponent down, but if that doesn't happen, believe me, there are Indians fans wondering why the fuck he would remove Tomlin in the fifth inning with a two-hitter and less than 60 pitches.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
Kirkwood wrote:
He's a really good pitcher who has been able to get through 6 innings without throwing 90 pitches in either outing.
I'm no baseball expert so I'll defer to you. To me, it seems like Andrew Miller is valuable. I guess he isn't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
No one in this thread Miller is not valuable.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4542 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81 ... 152  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group