It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:14 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 228 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93644
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
I just read an interesting opinion on this. Their take was Comey had to come out with it so not to be accused of playing a favorite later. The hypothetical was if it came out after the election HRC is guilty of something he could be accused of sitting on a smoking gun before the election. So theoretically Comey could have made the wrong decision either way.
Sounds like either way we need to arrest him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Okay , let us look at this objectively.
If there are any emails on there to/from HRC and/or her staff containing any emails that are of a classified nature this brings up to me two points.
1) Her and everyone who was interviewed and questioned under oath by the F.B.I. is making false statements to the said F.B.I. witch is a crime that puts you in jail.

2) HRC and all her people who went before congress and where questioned under oath are guilty of making false statements to Congress another act that puts you in jail.

We as Illinoisans should be familiar with these as most of our former governors are in jail for these crimes. It is the one thing that if they can't get you o anything else they get you on. The going before Congress and flat out telling bullshit is worse and generally will get you more time in jail, but the simple fact is if there is one email that invalidates what HRC and her people said to both the FBI and Congress while under oath. It is more than a simple mistake, people have gone to jail, not for short time either but for long terms, for that stuff. Now at this point in time we do not know exactly what has been going on inside the Clinton organization because them people are kinda loyal in the Nazi mold because they have seen what happens when you try to jump ship. Vince Foster ,anyone? I'm not saying he was murdered but he may have been driven to it but the evidence and the shit that went down around his death should give anyone pause as to what WJC and HRc are capable of doing.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Comey shouldn't have released this until he had something concrete. This really appears to be a political version of the whole who's on first joke. She may be guilty but to insinuate that she is without having anything to base it on is really stupid. If she is found innocent then the usual Clinton conspiracy theorists are going to believe that there was governmental subterfuge involved. It gets old after awhile.

The only way this makes sense is that he HAD something concrete, and he was covering his own ass.


At this very moment there is no way of knowing since they couldn't LEGALLY look at the information without a warrant.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
long time guy wrote:
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Comey shouldn't have released this until he had something concrete. This really appears to be a political version of the whole who's on first joke. She may be guilty but to insinuate that she is without having anything to base it on is really stupid. If she is found innocent then the usual Clinton conspiracy theorists are going to believe that there was governmental subterfuge involved. It gets old after awhile.

The only way this makes sense is that he HAD something concrete, and he was covering his own ass.


At this very moment there is no way of knowing since they couldn't LEGALLY look at the information without a warrant.


Explain why they could not in the course of an ongoing investigation? Do you know they did not have one? Or that Wiener being a continual dick that he is just not turn it over?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay , let us look at this objectively.
If there are any emails on there to/from HRC and/or her staff containing any emails that are of a classified nature this brings up to me two points.
1) Her and everyone who was interviewed and questioned under oath by the F.B.I. is making false statements to the said F.B.I. witch is a crime that puts you in jail.

2) HRC and all her people who went before congress and where questioned under oath are guilty of making false statements to Congress another act that puts you in jail.

We as Illinoisans should be familiar with these as most of our former governors are in jail for these crimes. It is the one thing that if they can't get you o anything else they get you on. The going before Congress and flat out telling bullshit is worse and generally will get you more time in jail, but the simple fact is if there is one email that invalidates what HRC and her people said to both the FBI and Congress while under oath. It is more than a simple mistake, people have gone to jail, not for short time either but for long terms, for that stuff. Now at this point in time we do not know exactly what has been going on inside the Clinton organization because them people are kinda loyal in the Nazi mold because they have seen what happens when you try to jump ship. Vince Foster ,anyone? I'm not saying he was murdered but he may have been driven to it but the evidence and the shit that went down around his death should give anyone pause as to what WJC and HRc are capable of doing.


Thank you for that objective analysis.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56754
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
pittmike wrote:
The hypothetical was if it came out after the election HRC is guilty of something he could be accused of sitting on a smoking gun before the election.

Well, if that would get him launched from running the FBI, he could always go cover the Bulls.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol: Reader going full partisan hack in this thread while complaining about partisan hackery AND hypocrisy. Just priceless. Man, I can't wait until this fucking election is over.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
FavreFan wrote:
:lol: Reader going full partisan hack in this thread while complaining about partisan hackery AND hypocrisy. Just priceless. Man, I can't wait until this fucking election is over.


Same here man, It looks like Prop 2 is gonna pass here in Florida. Gonna be awesome once it is.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38943
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
The hypothetical was if it came out after the election HRC is guilty of something he could be accused of sitting on a smoking gun before the election.

Well, if that would get him launched from running the FBI, he could always go cover the Bulls.

:lol:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Comey shouldn't have released this until he had something concrete. This really appears to be a political version of the whole who's on first joke. She may be guilty but to insinuate that she is without having anything to base it on is really stupid. If she is found innocent then the usual Clinton conspiracy theorists are going to believe that there was governmental subterfuge involved. It gets old after awhile.

The only way this makes sense is that he HAD something concrete, and he was covering his own ass.


At this very moment there is no way of knowing since they couldn't LEGALLY look at the information without a warrant.


Explain why they could not in the course of an ongoing investigation? Do you know they did not have one? Or that Wiener being a continual dick that he is just not turn it over?


Local authorities in New York had the computer as a result of Weiner sexting and found the files and turned it over to Feds due to jurisdiction. While the Feds are now in possession of the computer the warrant is necessary it seems to look at the emails.

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Comey shouldn't have released this until he had something concrete. This really appears to be a political version of the whole who's on first joke. She may be guilty but to insinuate that she is without having anything to base it on is really stupid. If she is found innocent then the usual Clinton conspiracy theorists are going to believe that there was governmental subterfuge involved. It gets old after awhile.

The only way this makes sense is that he HAD something concrete, and he was covering his own ass.


At this very moment there is no way of knowing since they couldn't LEGALLY look at the information without a warrant.


Explain why they could not in the course of an ongoing investigation? Do you know they did not have one? Or that Wiener being a continual dick that he is just not turn it over?


They could only look at Emails specifically related to Wiener's case. Needed a search warrant to view Hillary's Emails

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Chus wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay , let us look at this objectively.
If there are any emails on there to/from HRC and/or her staff containing any emails that are of a classified nature this brings up to me two points.
1) Her and everyone who was interviewed and questioned under oath by the F.B.I. is making false statements to the said F.B.I. witch is a crime that puts you in jail.

2) HRC and all her people who went before congress and where questioned under oath are guilty of making false statements to Congress another act that puts you in jail.

We as Illinoisans should be familiar with these as most of our former governors are in jail for these crimes. It is the one thing that if they can't get you o anything else they get you on. The going before Congress and flat out telling bullshit is worse and generally will get you more time in jail, but the simple fact is if there is one email that invalidates what HRC and her people said to both the FBI and Congress while under oath. It is more than a simple mistake, people have gone to jail, not for short time either but for long terms, for that stuff. Now at this point in time we do not know exactly what has been going on inside the Clinton organization because them people are kinda loyal in the Nazi mold because they have seen what happens when you try to jump ship. Vince Foster ,anyone? I'm not saying he was murdered but he may have been driven to it but the evidence and the shit that went down around his death should give anyone pause as to what WJC and HRc are capable of doing.


Thank you for that objective analysis.

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
Don Tiny wrote:
Chus wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay , let us look at this objectively.
If there are any emails on there to/from HRC and/or her staff containing any emails that are of a classified nature this brings up to me two points.
1) Her and everyone who was interviewed and questioned under oath by the F.B.I. is making false statements to the said F.B.I. witch is a crime that puts you in jail.

2) HRC and all her people who went before congress and where questioned under oath are guilty of making false statements to Congress another act that puts you in jail.

We as Illinoisans should be familiar with these as most of our former governors are in jail for these crimes. It is the one thing that if they can't get you o anything else they get you on. The going before Congress and flat out telling bullshit is worse and generally will get you more time in jail, but the simple fact is if there is one email that invalidates what HRC and her people said to both the FBI and Congress while under oath. It is more than a simple mistake, people have gone to jail, not for short time either but for long terms, for that stuff. Now at this point in time we do not know exactly what has been going on inside the Clinton organization because them people are kinda loyal in the Nazi mold because they have seen what happens when you try to jump ship. Vince Foster ,anyone? I'm not saying he was murdered but he may have been driven to it but the evidence and the shit that went down around his death should give anyone pause as to what WJC and HRc are capable of doing.


Thank you for that objective analysis.

Image


is that Frank ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
Obama will give her immunity if things get too hot.

It's all a moot point.

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80554
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Image

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80554
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
I'm pretty sure that's not really them, is it?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Liberal media bout to go scorched earth on Comey

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/31/so-much ... isan-hack/

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93644
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Liberal media bout to go scorched earth on Comey

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/31/so-much ... isan-hack/
Maybe Trump is right.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Liberal media bout to go scorched earth on Comey

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/31/so-much ... isan-hack/
Maybe Trump is right.



Who you crappin? weren't you among the numerous Trump supporters that constantly castigated people (or me) for always bringing up Trump? Weren't you also a leader of the "Never Trump" movement as well? By never Trump I mean never addressing Trump for the MANY transgressions committed by him? Now all you do is heap undue praise on him at every opportunity.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93644
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Liberal media bout to go scorched earth on Comey

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/31/so-much ... isan-hack/
Maybe Trump is right.



Who you crappin? weren't you among the numerous Trump supporters that constantly castigated people (or me) for always bringing up Trump? Weren't you also a leader of the "Never Trump" movement as well? By never Trump I mean never addressing Trump for the MANY transgressions committed by him? Now all you do is pat him on the back for almost being close to getting it right.
You may need to start taking notes. You must have me confused with someone else.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Bagels wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Chus wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay , let us look at this objectively.
If there are any emails on there to/from HRC and/or her staff containing any emails that are of a classified nature this brings up to me two points.
1) Her and everyone who was interviewed and questioned under oath by the F.B.I. is making false statements to the said F.B.I. witch is a crime that puts you in jail.

2) HRC and all her people who went before congress and where questioned under oath are guilty of making false statements to Congress another act that puts you in jail.

We as Illinoisans should be familiar with these as most of our former governors are in jail for these crimes. It is the one thing that if they can't get you o anything else they get you on. The going before Congress and flat out telling bullshit is worse and generally will get you more time in jail, but the simple fact is if there is one email that invalidates what HRC and her people said to both the FBI and Congress while under oath. It is more than a simple mistake, people have gone to jail, not for short time either but for long terms, for that stuff. Now at this point in time we do not know exactly what has been going on inside the Clinton organization because them people are kinda loyal in the Nazi mold because they have seen what happens when you try to jump ship. Vince Foster ,anyone? I'm not saying he was murdered but he may have been driven to it but the evidence and the shit that went down around his death should give anyone pause as to what WJC and HRc are capable of doing.


Thank you for that objective analysis.

Image


is that Frank ?


It looks like Cheech.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80554
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Chus wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Chus wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay , let us look at this objectively.
If there are any emails on there to/from HRC and/or her staff containing any emails that are of a classified nature this brings up to me two points.
1) Her and everyone who was interviewed and questioned under oath by the F.B.I. is making false statements to the said F.B.I. witch is a crime that puts you in jail.

2) HRC and all her people who went before congress and where questioned under oath are guilty of making false statements to Congress another act that puts you in jail.

We as Illinoisans should be familiar with these as most of our former governors are in jail for these crimes. It is the one thing that if they can't get you o anything else they get you on. The going before Congress and flat out telling bullshit is worse and generally will get you more time in jail, but the simple fact is if there is one email that invalidates what HRC and her people said to both the FBI and Congress while under oath. It is more than a simple mistake, people have gone to jail, not for short time either but for long terms, for that stuff. Now at this point in time we do not know exactly what has been going on inside the Clinton organization because them people are kinda loyal in the Nazi mold because they have seen what happens when you try to jump ship. Vince Foster ,anyone? I'm not saying he was murdered but he may have been driven to it but the evidence and the shit that went down around his death should give anyone pause as to what WJC and HRc are capable of doing.


Thank you for that objective analysis.

Image


is that Frank ?


It looks like Cheech.


It's Tom Hanks.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
long time guy wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Comey shouldn't have released this until he had something concrete. This really appears to be a political version of the whole who's on first joke. She may be guilty but to insinuate that she is without having anything to base it on is really stupid. If she is found innocent then the usual Clinton conspiracy theorists are going to believe that there was governmental subterfuge involved. It gets old after awhile.

The only way this makes sense is that he HAD something concrete, and he was covering his own ass.


At this very moment there is no way of knowing since they couldn't LEGALLY look at the information without a warrant.


Explain why they could not in the course of an ongoing investigation? Do you know they did not have one? Or that Wiener being a continual dick that he is just not turn it over?


They could only look at Emails specifically related to Wiener's case. Needed a search warrant to view Hillary's Emails


Question: Are you a lawyer or in the legal profession?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Liberal media bout to go scorched earth on Comey

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/31/so-much ... isan-hack/
Maybe Trump is right.



Who you crappin? weren't you among the numerous Trump supporters that constantly castigated people (or me) for always bringing up Trump? Weren't you also a leader of the "Never Trump" movement as well? By never Trump I mean never addressing Trump for the MANY transgressions committed by him? Now all you do is heap undue praise on him at every opportunity.


I am going to ask you a totally serious question here. Make no bones, Trump is a boorish hack. He has done a lot of sleeezy semi legal shit in his life. But tell me once where he has put American life in jeopardy or people have died because of dis fuck up? HRC has a long history of it. Tell me once where it is proven where Trump has been under oath before a federal body and lied like HRC has done ,on more than one occasion it seems.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 10220
pizza_Place: world famous
When Comey announced he wasn't recommending charges Republicans accused him of playing politics and the Democrats called them crazy and paranoid. Funny how things change.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Franky T wrote:
When Comey announced he wasn't recommending charges Republicans accused him of playing politics and the Democrats called them crazy and paranoid. Funny how things change.



Comey was a hero to many at one point.

Comey, who was deputy attorney-general from 2002 to 2005 at a time of panic over terrorism in the wake of 9/11, became a hero for many liberals for standing up to senior Bush administration officials over wiretapping. At one point, he was involved in a dramatic encounter in a hospital ward in 2004, visiting the then ailing attorney general John Ashcroft, to ensure that Bush administration officials would not take advantage of his condition to get him to sign off on an extension of the wiretaps.

Testifying before the Senate judiciary committee in 2007, Comey said he had refused to the extension on constitutional grounds, and that Ashcroft, too, had reservations. Comey threatened to resign.


"This was a very memorable period in my life; probably the most difficult time in my entire professional life. And that night was probably the most difficult night of my professional life," he told the committee.

The day after the hospital encounter, George W Bush modified the wiretapping program to take account of Comey's concerns.

During his time at the justice department, he also fought to stop waterboarding and other interrogation techniques being used at Guantánamo. His concerns are recorded in emails that were later published.

His emails to Chuck Rosenberg, his chief of staff, in April and May 2005 show his opposition to the brutal interrogations being used.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16732
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Franky T wrote:
When Comey announced he wasn't recommending charges Republicans accused him of playing politics and the Democrats called them crazy and paranoid. Funny how things change.


Who knows, this could have been orchestrated by the Dems. As LTG pointed out, there is a good chance the FBI has no official idea whether these e-mails contain anything bad, as technically a search warrant was required and only granted in the last day or so (after the Friday surprise). If Weiner and/or Abedin had any brains (I know, questionable), they may have already bleached the bad emails. So if Comey comes out in coming days and repeats that there appears to be nothing to prosecute, then Hillary comes out of it unscathed and Comey gets to say this proves he's nonpartisan. Harry Reid doth protest too much.

If nothing comes out until after the election, that's a different story.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm pretty sure that's not really them, is it?


No way. If it was, that pic would have been everywhere.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:09 pm
Posts: 29
pizza_Place: Booby's
Seacrest wrote:
Comey was a hero to many at one point.


Comey was a hero to MANY
But he never meant shit to me
Straight up Republican the sucka is, simple and plain
Motherfuck him and John McCain

_________________
I'm With Me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15198
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Liberal media bout to go scorched earth on Comey

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/31/so-much ... isan-hack/
Maybe Trump is right.



Who you crappin? weren't you among the numerous Trump supporters that constantly castigated people (or me) for always bringing up Trump? Weren't you also a leader of the "Never Trump" movement as well? By never Trump I mean never addressing Trump for the MANY transgressions committed by him? Now all you do is pat him on the back for almost being close to getting it right.
You may need to start taking notes. You must have me confused with someone else.

I told you weeks ago you were in the "voting for Trump" category in his book....

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 228 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group