It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 8:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 228 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Bagels wrote:
is that Frank ?


Too many clothes.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
Inauguration in January, Impeachment in March.

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
Inauguration in January, Impeachment in March.

Not really, of course ... but, were it to happen, I'd give smiley chipmunk a chance ... maybe he'd appoint Bernie as VP. :lol:

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Don Tiny wrote:
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
Inauguration in January, Impeachment in March.

Not really, of course ... but, were it to happen, I'd give smiley chipmunk a chance ... maybe he'd appoint Bernie as VP. :lol:


Do you get to appoint a new VP or do you just finish the term with no VP until the next election?

EDIT: Here is what the interwebz has to say...

When the position of vice president becomes vacant, the 25th Amendment states:


25th Amendment: Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

The vice president takes the same oath of office as members of Congress. The 25th amendment was precipitated by the very case our reader asks about: When Lyndon B. Johnson became president after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the position of vice president remained vacant for the remainder of his term. Had Johnson left office during that time, House Speaker John W. McCormack of Massachusetts would have been next in line to take his place as president. After Johnson won the 1964 election, his running mate, Hubert H. Humphrey, became vice president. A few years later, in Feb. 1967, the 25th amendment was ratified.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay , let us look at this objectively.
If there are any emails on there to/from HRC and/or her staff containing any emails that are of a classified nature this brings up to me two points.
1) Her and everyone who was interviewed and questioned under oath by the F.B.I. is making false statements to the said F.B.I. witch is a crime that puts you in jail.

2) HRC and all her people who went before congress and where questioned under oath are guilty of making false statements to Congress another act that puts you in jail.

We as Illinoisans should be familiar with these as most of our former governors are in jail for these crimes. It is the one thing that if they can't get you o anything else they get you on. The going before Congress and flat out telling bullshit is worse and generally will get you more time in jail, but the simple fact is if there is one email that invalidates what HRC and her people said to both the FBI and Congress while under oath. It is more than a simple mistake, people have gone to jail, not for short time either but for long terms, for that stuff. Now at this point in time we do not know exactly what has been going on inside the Clinton organization because them people are kinda loyal in the Nazi mold because they have seen what happens when you try to jump ship. Vince Foster ,anyone? I'm not saying he was murdered but he may have been driven to it but the evidence and the shit that went down around his death should give anyone pause as to what WJC and HRc are capable of doing.


I really thought you were going to be objective. They would have to KNOWINGLY have made false statements.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Nas wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay , let us look at this objectively.
If there are any emails on there to/from HRC and/or her staff containing any emails that are of a classified nature this brings up to me two points.
1) Her and everyone who was interviewed and questioned under oath by the F.B.I. is making false statements to the said F.B.I. witch is a crime that puts you in jail.

2) HRC and all her people who went before congress and where questioned under oath are guilty of making false statements to Congress another act that puts you in jail.

We as Illinoisans should be familiar with these as most of our former governors are in jail for these crimes. It is the one thing that if they can't get you o anything else they get you on. The going before Congress and flat out telling bullshit is worse and generally will get you more time in jail, but the simple fact is if there is one email that invalidates what HRC and her people said to both the FBI and Congress while under oath. It is more than a simple mistake, people have gone to jail, not for short time either but for long terms, for that stuff. Now at this point in time we do not know exactly what has been going on inside the Clinton organization because them people are kinda loyal in the Nazi mold because they have seen what happens when you try to jump ship. Vince Foster ,anyone? I'm not saying he was murdered but he may have been driven to it but the evidence and the shit that went down around his death should give anyone pause as to what WJC and HRc are capable of doing.


I really thought you were going to be objective. They would have to KNOWINGLY have made false statements.


So the fact that there are emails on an unsecured computer, that apparently some one who did not have clearance to see them had access to them is not bad enough. The fact that Huma was asked if there where any other devices with emails out there. Fact if there are emails on this device that had been deleted on other devices and they show that there was classified material transmitted like this with no care for security does not matter to you ? WTF?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Liberal media bout to go scorched earth on Comey

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/31/so-much ... isan-hack/
Maybe Trump is right.



Who you crappin? weren't you among the numerous Trump supporters that constantly castigated people (or me) for always bringing up Trump? Weren't you also a leader of the "Never Trump" movement as well? By never Trump I mean never addressing Trump for the MANY transgressions committed by him? Now all you do is pat him on the back for almost being close to getting it right.
You may need to start taking notes. You must have me confused with someone else.

I told you weeks ago you were in the "voting for Trump" category in his book....



Its not really that much of a stretch considering how everything that Trump has done seems to get completely ignored. Don't give the stuff about him being a"goof" or a "loon" or anything else that is supposed to serve as validation for anti Trumpism. Specific things that he does gets either whitewashed or ignored by the same group of people each and every time. I could name a number of things (have done it) which failed to get addressed. Meanwhile the "Never Trumpers" always try and find a way to tie it back to Hillary Clinton.

They have never addressed any issues related to Trump and what they claim to be non support really isn't that. Either they defend, ignore, or attack Hillary Clinton. Yeah that is some non support for you.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Huma would have to have KNOWINGLY lied. If it can be proven that she KNOWINGLY lied then she could be in trouble. There is ZERO chance Hillary gets in trouble. Her judgement will just be questioned again.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Comey shouldn't have released this until he had something concrete. This really appears to be a political version of the whole who's on first joke. She may be guilty but to insinuate that she is without having anything to base it on is really stupid. If she is found innocent then the usual Clinton conspiracy theorists are going to believe that there was governmental subterfuge involved. It gets old after awhile.

The only way this makes sense is that he HAD something concrete, and he was covering his own ass.


At this very moment there is no way of knowing since they couldn't LEGALLY look at the information without a warrant.


Explain why they could not in the course of an ongoing investigation? Do you know they did not have one? Or that Wiener being a continual dick that he is just not turn it over?


They could only look at Emails specifically related to Wiener's case. Needed a search warrant to view Hillary's Emails


Question: Are you a lawyer or in the legal profession?


You don't have to be in the legal profession in order to understand a simple newspaper article. You should probably ask the guy that wrote the article.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Liberal media bout to go scorched earth on Comey

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/31/so-much ... isan-hack/
Maybe Trump is right.



Who you crappin? weren't you among the numerous Trump supporters that constantly castigated people (or me) for always bringing up Trump? Weren't you also a leader of the "Never Trump" movement as well? By never Trump I mean never addressing Trump for the MANY transgressions committed by him? Now all you do is pat him on the back for almost being close to getting it right.
You may need to start taking notes. You must have me confused with someone else.

I told you weeks ago you were in the "voting for Trump" category in his book....



Its not really that much of a stretch considering how everything that Trump has done seems to get completely ignored. Don't give the stuff about him being a"goof" or a "loon" or anything else that is supposed to serve as validation for anti Trumpism. Specific things that he does gets either whitewashed or ignored by the same group of people each and every time. I could name a number of things (have done it) which failed to get addressed. Meanwhile the "Never Trumpers" always try and find a way to tie it back to Hillary Clinton.

They have never addressed any issues related to Trump and what they claim to be non support really isn't that. Either they defend, ignore, or attack Hillary Clinton. Yeah that is some non support for you.

If you think about it Trump isn't that bad.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
I have thought about it and the fact that he is a racist is enough of a disqualifier for me.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Nas wrote:
Huma would have to have KNOWINGLY lied. If it can be proven that she KNOWINGLY lied then she could be in trouble. There is ZERO chance Hillary gets in trouble. Her judgement will just be questioned again.


If there is classified emails on that computer sent through her server ,sent from her email address how can she not be in trouble? that is the definition of telling an untruth to put it mildly.

In various interviews, Clinton has said that "I did not send classified material, and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified.

Of the 2,100 emails that contained classified information, Clinton personally wrote 104 and her aides wrote hundreds more

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
long time guy wrote:
I have thought about it and the fact that he is a racist is enough of a disqualifier for me.


Plenty of Presidents were racist.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
long time guy wrote:
I have thought about it and the fact that he is a racist is enough of a disqualifier for me.



So is HRC, doesn't that bother you?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Terry's Peeps wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I have thought about it and the fact that he is a racist is enough of a disqualifier for me.


Plenty of Presidents were racist.


I wouldn't have voted for any of them either.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I have thought about it and the fact that he is a racist is enough of a disqualifier for me.



So is HRC, doesn't that bother you?


Another false equivalency. Not surprising though. You are the same guy that poohed his racial discrimination lawsuit and the other racist stuff he has done.

His history and the outright racist shit that he has said during this campaign lays bare for the world who this asshole happens to be. Yeah he has really tapped into that white working class vote. Yeah let's hear about that again.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
long time guy wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I have thought about it and the fact that he is a racist is enough of a disqualifier for me.



So is HRC, doesn't that bother you?


Another false equivalency. Not surprising though. You are the same guy that poohed his racial discrimination lawsuit and the other racist stuff he has done.


Why is it a false equivalency? She made the comments?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I have thought about it and the fact that he is a racist is enough of a disqualifier for me.



So is HRC, doesn't that bother you?


Another false equivalency. Not surprising though. You are the same guy that poohed his racial discrimination lawsuit and the other racist stuff he has done.


Why is it a false equivalency? She made the comments?



And he will make the policy. Predators versus denying blacks jobs and places to live. Yeah that is some equivalency for you. You are not from the Aristotelian school are you?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
chaspoppcap wrote:
Nas wrote:
Huma would have to have KNOWINGLY lied. If it can be proven that she KNOWINGLY lied then she could be in trouble. There is ZERO chance Hillary gets in trouble. Her judgement will just be questioned again.


If there is classified emails on that computer sent through her server ,sent from her email address how can she not be in trouble? that is the definition of telling an untruth to put it mildly.

In various interviews, Clinton has said that "I did not send classified material, and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified.

Of the 2,100 emails that contained classified information, Clinton personally wrote 104 and her aides wrote hundreds more


No. When it came down to it there were 3 emails.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43867
Chas is having a real bad today.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Okay, so you are telling me he might do it based on his words , got you. She backed and promoted policy that sent minority kids to jail for long term and called the "Super" Predators. It is a fact. I am not talking about Trump, I'm talking about HRC stay on point. I am agreeing with you that Trump is a dirtbag. Now we are talking about the other candidate. You say you would not vote for a racist, fine but she has said and in fact done racist things based on something she has done in the past and yet you are defending and backing her.Seems dishonest and a load of bullshit.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Last edited by chaspoppcap on Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Nas wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Nas wrote:
Huma would have to have KNOWINGLY lied. If it can be proven that she KNOWINGLY lied then she could be in trouble. There is ZERO chance Hillary gets in trouble. Her judgement will just be questioned again.


If there is classified emails on that computer sent through her server ,sent from her email address how can she not be in trouble? that is the definition of telling an untruth to put it mildly.

In various interviews, Clinton has said that "I did not send classified material, and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified.

Of the 2,100 emails that contained classified information, Clinton personally wrote 104 and her aides wrote hundreds more


No. When it came down to it there were 3 emails.


really post your source please.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Douchebag wrote:
Chas is having a real bad today.


Why because I am basically handing Nas and LTG their ass? please.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
chaspoppcap wrote:
Nas wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Nas wrote:
Huma would have to have KNOWINGLY lied. If it can be proven that she KNOWINGLY lied then she could be in trouble. There is ZERO chance Hillary gets in trouble. Her judgement will just be questioned again.


If there is classified emails on that computer sent through her server ,sent from her email address how can she not be in trouble? that is the definition of telling an untruth to put it mildly.

In various interviews, Clinton has said that "I did not send classified material, and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified.

Of the 2,100 emails that contained classified information, Clinton personally wrote 104 and her aides wrote hundreds more


No. When it came down to it there were 3 emails.


really post your source please.


Director Comey. The 100 number came from those emails being sent multiple times.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
really because you use this site all the time and it says it is far more than 3
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/07/clintons-handling-of-classified-information/

Quote:
We now know from the FBI investigation that:

More than 2,000 of the 30,490 emails Clinton turned over to the State Department contained classified information, including 110 emails in 52 email chains that contained classified information at the time they were sent or received. (Most emails were retroactively deemed to contain classified information by the U.S. agencies from which the information originated.)
Some of the emails containing classified information “bore markings indicating the presence of classified information,” contrary to Clinton’s claims that none was marked classified. Comey did not provide a specific number.
“[S]everal thousand work-related emails” were not turned over to the State Department in 2014, but were recovered by the FBI. Comey said “three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received.”

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay, so you are telling me he might do it based on his words based on something she has done in the past, got you. She backed and promoted policy that sent minority kids to jail for long term and called the "Super" Predators. It is a fact. I am not talking about Trump, I'm talking about HRC stay on point. I am agreeing with you that Trump is a dirtbag. Now we are talking about the other candidate. You say you would not vote for a racist, fine but she has said and in fact done racist things and yet you are defending and backing her.Seems dishonest and a load of bullshit.



I never considered the crime bill to be racist. Do you ever read anything or do you simply make comments? Hillary Clinton's work 9n the Children's defense fund Trumps anything that Trump has ever done.

They also promoted policy which led to an increase in home ownership for African Americans too. The Trump is a dirt bag angle doesn't fly either because when I originally pointed out his racism you asked me to provide proof. Once I did you pooh poohed it and stated how you didn't much care blacks that complained because you had no connection to slavery. You also stated that many immigrants in this country have overcome the odds so why can't blacks?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
long time guy wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Okay, so you are telling me he might do it based on his words based on something she has done in the past, got you. She backed and promoted policy that sent minority kids to jail for long term and called the "Super" Predators. It is a fact. I am not talking about Trump, I'm talking about HRC stay on point. I am agreeing with you that Trump is a dirtbag. Now we are talking about the other candidate. You say you would not vote for a racist, fine but she has said and in fact done racist things and yet you are defending and backing her.Seems dishonest and a load of bullshit.



I never considered the crime bill to be racist. Do you ever read anything or do you simply make comments? Hillary Clinton's work 9n the Children's defense fund Trumps anything that Trump has ever done.

They also promoted policy which led to an increase in home ownership for African Americans too. The Trump is a dirt bag angle doesn't fly either because when I originally pointed out his racism you asked me to provide proof. Once I did you pooh poohed it and stated how you didn't much care blacks that complained because you had no connection to slavery. You also stated that many immigrants in this country have overcome the odds so why can't blacks?


So you pick and choose okay fine I see your methodology. Wow man have fun in your world. Back the candidate that jail your people and called them predators. I did not say it in that manor. I said that we as a country need to move on otherwise we never will be able to advance.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
One last thing, call me a racist but it seems to me you are far more obsessed with race than anyone else here on the board. That includes Steve and he is a fucktard. Everything to you boils down to race and how it affects your segment of it, that is not a healthy attitude and outlook to have, You should change you tag to Rev Al.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:25 pm 
chaspoppcap wrote:
Nas wrote:
Huma would have to have KNOWINGLY lied. If it can be proven that she KNOWINGLY lied then she could be in trouble. There is ZERO chance Hillary gets in trouble. Her judgement will just be questioned again.


If there is classified emails on that computer sent through her server ,sent from her email address how can she not be in trouble? that is the definition of telling an untruth to put it mildly.

In various interviews, Clinton has said that "I did not send classified material, and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified.

Of the 2,100 emails that contained classified information, Clinton personally wrote 104 and her aides wrote hundreds more

Chas the facts are that at this point YOU have read just as many of the emails as Comey had when he stirred up this most recent pile of shit. This is nothing more than trying to make nice with his GOP overlords who were pissed he couldn't get her on an indictment. For fuck sake even Joe Walsh thinks it was out of line. Comey will be unemployed next Wed.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:29 pm 
chaspoppcap wrote:
One last thing, call me a racist but it seems to me you are far more obsessed with race than anyone else here on the board. That includes Steve and he is a fucktard. Everything to you boils down to race and how it affects your segment of it, that is not a healthy attitude and outlook to have, You should change you tag to Rev Al.

My friend i fear this is the wrong path for you to take.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 228 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group