It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:28 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
You are wrong.
Until 1987 they'd never cracked 2 million. That record year their average daily comes out to 25k, in a park that can comfortably hold 10k more. If you were there you were on some hardcore shit and seeing things. These numbers are published. You shouldn't take this stance.


If you don't know what you're talking about, it's probably best to shut the fuck up.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
yes.

the maple leafs are the "next one"


Yes, but I disagree on the Maple Leafs.

I love the NHL, but no one cares about Toronto.

I think the Indians or one of the NFL rust belt teams (Lions/Browns/Bills) are probably next up.

[/quote]
Yea, you're right. No one cares about hockey so it's not a huge deal in the U.S.

Personally it's the Maple Leafs. Torontonians are a buncha dicksmokers but they've gone through a lot of shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
You are wrong.
Until 1987 they'd never cracked 2 million. That record year their average daily comes out to 25k, in a park that can comfortably hold 10k more. If you were there you were on some hardcore shit and seeing things. These numbers are published. You shouldn't take this stance.


If you don't know what you're talking about, it's probably best to shut the fuck up.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

OK sorry i missed 84 and 85... in which 84 they damn near went to the world series and still didn't fill 30 percent of the seats.
But you're still very wrong. The packed house (with the exception of a few years in mid 80s when they looked like ws contenders) they're weren't filling the place, not selling out games. They had an average attendance under 26k. Park can handle 40.


Edited for clarity... I said didn't fill 30 percent of the seats... when I mean is 30 percent were unfilled.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Last edited by Darkside on Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
You are wrong.
Until 1987 they'd never cracked 2 million. That record year their average daily comes out to 25k, in a park that can comfortably hold 10k more. If you were there you were on some hardcore shit and seeing things. These numbers are published. You shouldn't take this stance.


If you don't know what you're talking about, it's probably best to shut the fuck up.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

Where is the filled to capacity Wrigley that you speak of though? Roughly 27000 per game is not a full Wrigley not even by 80's capacity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Scooter wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
You are wrong.
Until 1987 they'd never cracked 2 million. That record year their average daily comes out to 25k, in a park that can comfortably hold 10k more. If you were there you were on some hardcore shit and seeing things. These numbers are published. You shouldn't take this stance.


If you don't know what you're talking about, it's probably best to shut the fuck up.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

Where is the filled to capacity Wrigley that you speak of though? Roughly 27000 per game is not a full Wrigley not even by 80's capacity.

Once again the packed house is a very recent phenomenon. We're talking about a 100 plus year old stadium that never cracked 30k per game until 1989.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scooter wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
You are wrong.
Until 1987 they'd never cracked 2 million. That record year their average daily comes out to 25k, in a park that can comfortably hold 10k more. If you were there you were on some hardcore shit and seeing things. These numbers are published. You shouldn't take this stance.


If you don't know what you're talking about, it's probably best to shut the fuck up.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

Where is the filled to capacity Wrigley that you speak of though? Roughly 27000 per game is not a full Wrigley not even by 80's capacity.


I never used the word "capacity". Of course there are shitty games in April that bring the average down. But in the middle of summer the park has been pretty much full ever since '84 and attendance really went up in the 90s. Attendance went up across baseball. I think the Cubs have only drawn less than 2,000,000 a couple times since 1984. From the late 90s on it's been closer to 2.7 million every season.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
sports didn't always report paid attendance, right? didn't they use to report turnstile attendance?

those tank years were some really empty games. i would score bleacher tix for like $5-$20 bucks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I never used the word "capacity".


:lol:

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55851
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Kirkwood wrote:
sports didn't always report paid attendance, right? didn't they use to report turnstile attendance?

Yeah, the circa-late-'90s change from reporting asses in seats to tickets distributed coincides with fans freaking out over attendance figures. Funny how that works.

You see it a lot in the great North-versus-South hockey debates, where some assclown comes in like "Actually, Hartford only drew 11,000 a night while Carolina draws 16,000!", notwithstanding the fact that any eye test could tell you there haven't been 16,000 people at a Hurricanes game since they won the Cup, if then.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scooter wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
You are wrong.
Until 1987 they'd never cracked 2 million. That record year their average daily comes out to 25k, in a park that can comfortably hold 10k more. If you were there you were on some hardcore shit and seeing things. These numbers are published. You shouldn't take this stance.


If you don't know what you're talking about, it's probably best to shut the fuck up.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

Where is the filled to capacity Wrigley that you speak of though? Roughly 27000 per game is not a full Wrigley not even by 80's capacity.


I never used the word "capacity". Of course there are shitty games in April that bring the average down. But in the middle of summer the park has been pretty much full ever since '84 and attendance really went up in the 90s. Attendance went up across baseball. I think the Cubs have only drawn less than 2,000,000 a couple times since 1984. From the late 90s on it's been closer to 2.7 million every season.

You said full ballpark of lunatics bathing in the sunshine watching an inferior baseball team or at least that was what you meant. Of course attendance falls off for shitty weather and the like as well as it booms when a really good team is playing on splendid summer days. Pick a side. I am amazed the Sox drew that well those seasons that were mentioned. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Anyway... what's JORRs larger point?
Is it that if the team is bad the fans should not be filling the stadium?
Ok. Maybe I buy that. How does that coincide with jorr saying if you don't go to games you're not really a fan though?
Is jorr saying that the only real fans are fair weather fans?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Darkside wrote:
Anyway... what's JORRs larger point?
Is it that if the team is bad the fans should not be filling the stadium?
Ok. Maybe I buy that. How does that coincide with jorr saying if you don't go to games you're not really a fan though?
Is jorr saying that the only real fans are fair weather fans?

He is saying that he is unhappy because the White Sox do not have a plan of action or the management to be a real threat to be a WS contender anytime in the near future. As a long suffering Cub fan I once felt that panic and despair. It vanished last evening as we celebrate the first of hopefully many more titles to come.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:49 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scooter wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scooter wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
You are wrong.
Until 1987 they'd never cracked 2 million. That record year their average daily comes out to 25k, in a park that can comfortably hold 10k more. If you were there you were on some hardcore shit and seeing things. These numbers are published. You shouldn't take this stance.


If you don't know what you're talking about, it's probably best to shut the fuck up.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... misc.shtml

Where is the filled to capacity Wrigley that you speak of though? Roughly 27000 per game is not a full Wrigley not even by 80's capacity.


I never used the word "capacity". Of course there are shitty games in April that bring the average down. But in the middle of summer the park has been pretty much full ever since '84 and attendance really went up in the 90s. Attendance went up across baseball. I think the Cubs have only drawn less than 2,000,000 a couple times since 1984. From the late 90s on it's been closer to 2.7 million every season.

You said full ballpark of lunatics bathing in the sunshine watching an inferior baseball team or at least that was what you meant. Of course attendance falls off for shitty weather and the like as well as it booms when a really good team is playing on splendid summer days. Pick a side. I am amazed the Sox drew that well those seasons that were mentioned. :lol:


Now you're gonna just make shit up. Have another glass of rotgut whiskey, why don't you?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
Anyway... what's JORRs larger point?
Is it that if the team is bad the fans should not be filling the stadium?
Ok. Maybe I buy that. How does that coincide with jorr saying if you don't go to games you're not really a fan though?
Is jorr saying that the only real fans are fair weather fans?


The larger point is that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs. To deny that is just disingenuous.

I don't think winning or losing needs to have anything to do with whether the fans attend, but for most teams that's just the way it works.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Anyway... what's JORRs larger point?
Is it that if the team is bad the fans should not be filling the stadium?
Ok. Maybe I buy that. How does that coincide with jorr saying if you don't go to games you're not really a fan though?
Is jorr saying that the only real fans are fair weather fans?


The larger point is that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs. To deny that is just disingenuous.

I don't think winning or losing needs to have anything to do with whether the fans attend, but for most teams that's just the way it works.

I agree that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs but I'd say as far as fans go it's a small part. To the larger audience and the National crowd it's a large part. It's a part I'm glad to be rid of. I have no problem with this being what redefines the team. It's what we've always prayed for. I'm fine with it. If that's what redefines them then I say mission accomplished and I'll enjoy the new team definition.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Kirkwood wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
yes.

the maple leafs are the "next one"


Yes, but I disagree on the Maple Leafs.

I love the NHL, but no one cares about Toronto.

I think the Indians or one of the NFL rust belt teams (Lions/Browns/Bills) are probably next up.


Yea, you're right. No one cares about hockey so it's not a huge deal in the U.S.

Personally it's the Maple Leafs. Torontonians are a buncha dicksmokers but they've gone through a lot of shit.[/quote]

Yeah, honestly, fuck Toronto. My favorite Canadian team is Montreal.

I'm kind of hoping for the Browns, personally. Maybe it's because they're so ungodly pathetic, maybe it's because I really hate the Baltimore Ravens.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Darkside is really arguing that fandom didn't embrace being lovable losers?

#1 Fan Bill Murray himself said as much in the post game locker room interview.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
good dolphin wrote:
Darkside is really arguing that fandom didn't embrace being lovable losers?

#1 Fan Bill Murray himself said as much in the post game locker room interview.


2016

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:47 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Anyway... what's JORRs larger point?
Is it that if the team is bad the fans should not be filling the stadium?
Ok. Maybe I buy that. How does that coincide with jorr saying if you don't go to games you're not really a fan though?
Is jorr saying that the only real fans are fair weather fans?


The larger point is that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs. To deny that is just disingenuous.

I don't think winning or losing needs to have anything to do with whether the fans attend, but for most teams that's just the way it works.

I agree that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs but I'd say as far as fans go it's a small part. To the larger audience and the National crowd it's a large part. It's a part I'm glad to be rid of. I have no problem with this being what redefines the team. It's what we've always prayed for. I'm fine with it. If that's what redefines them then I say mission accomplished and I'll enjoy the new team definition.


Some of you seem to be struggling to find a new brand.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Anyway... what's JORRs larger point?
Is it that if the team is bad the fans should not be filling the stadium?
Ok. Maybe I buy that. How does that coincide with jorr saying if you don't go to games you're not really a fan though?
Is jorr saying that the only real fans are fair weather fans?


The larger point is that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs. To deny that is just disingenuous.

I don't think winning or losing needs to have anything to do with whether the fans attend, but for most teams that's just the way it works.

I agree that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs but I'd say as far as fans go it's a small part. To the larger audience and the National crowd it's a large part. It's a part I'm glad to be rid of. I have no problem with this being what redefines the team. It's what we've always prayed for. I'm fine with it. If that's what redefines them then I say mission accomplished and I'll enjoy the new team definition.


Some of you seem to be struggling to find a new brand.


"We're ordinary and we know it" doesn't quite have the same emotional weight as "lovable losers".

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I saw shirts at Dick's that said Lovable Winners. I wanted to light them all on fire. That narrative was never mine. Part of what makes this so special is that the goat/Bartman/black cat/Lovable Losers thing is dead forever. It's gone. That's not just a good thing its a great thing...hell it might be the best thing of all. Let the media pimp a new storyline.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I saw shirts at Dick's that said Lovable Winners. I wanted to light them all on fire. That narrative was never mine. Part of what makes this so special is that the goat/Bartman/black cat/Lovable Losers thing is dead forever. It's gone. That's not just a good thing its a great thing...hell it might be the best thing of all. Let the media pimp a new storyline.


Are you sure? You guys are like the greyhound that caught the mechanical rabbit. What do you do now?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I saw shirts at Dick's that said Lovable Winners. I wanted to light them all on fire. That narrative was never mine. Part of what makes this so special is that the goat/Bartman/black cat/Lovable Losers thing is dead forever. It's gone. That's not just a good thing its a great thing...hell it might be the best thing of all. Let the media pimp a new storyline.


Are you sure? You guys are like the greyhound that caught the mechanical rabbit. What do you do now?


Right now? I would say get teary eyed at random times for the next day or so. :lol:

After that? Get to enjoy watching a good team for the next several seasons.

I can't deny it is a strange feeling though.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I saw shirts at Dick's that said Lovable Winners. I wanted to light them all on fire. That narrative was never mine. Part of what makes this so special is that the goat/Bartman/black cat/Lovable Losers thing is dead forever. It's gone. That's not just a good thing its a great thing...hell it might be the best thing of all. Let the media pimp a new storyline.


Are you sure? You guys are like the greyhound that caught the mechanical rabbit. What do you do now?


I like the reference JORR. In this case, wait for next year.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Anyway... what's JORRs larger point?
Is it that if the team is bad the fans should not be filling the stadium?
Ok. Maybe I buy that. How does that coincide with jorr saying if you don't go to games you're not really a fan though?
Is jorr saying that the only real fans are fair weather fans?


The larger point is that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs. To deny that is just disingenuous.

I don't think winning or losing needs to have anything to do with whether the fans attend, but for most teams that's just the way it works.

I agree that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs but I'd say as far as fans go it's a small part. To the larger audience and the National crowd it's a large part. It's a part I'm glad to be rid of. I have no problem with this being what redefines the team. It's what we've always prayed for. I'm fine with it. If that's what redefines them then I say mission accomplished and I'll enjoy the new team definition.


Some of you seem to be struggling to find a new brand.

I just wanted to tell you that I do so enjoy your trolling.
Its... effervescent.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40615
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I saw shirts at Dick's that said Lovable Winners. I wanted to light them all on fire. That narrative was never mine. Part of what makes this so special is that the goat/Bartman/black cat/Lovable Losers thing is dead forever. It's gone. That's not just a good thing its a great thing...hell it might be the best thing of all. Let the media pimp a new storyline.


Are you sure? You guys are like the greyhound that caught the mechanical rabbit. What do you do now?


I like the reference JORR. In this case, wait for next year.


I am very happy for you Dennis and many more like you that I know. Jorr is right on though regardless of what everyone else opines. After, let's say the winter meetings, this will begin to fade slightly and will never be the same. Even another World Series win next year or the year after will not be the same no matter how satisfying. Cubs are now in the trying to build a dynasty mode for better or worse.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
What is your identity now?

Champions


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Eventually should they become some sort of dynasty they will be viewed nationally like the Red Sox eventually. Insufferable. I am sure Cub fans here will take the trade off.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves with dynasty talk, but I think you're forgetting that New Englanders are naturally more insufferable than Midwesterners before you even take baseball success into account.

Minimum 8-peat


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Anyway... what's JORRs larger point?
Is it that if the team is bad the fans should not be filling the stadium?
Ok. Maybe I buy that. How does that coincide with jorr saying if you don't go to games you're not really a fan though?
Is jorr saying that the only real fans are fair weather fans?


The larger point is that losing is a part of what made the Cubs the Cubs. To deny that is just disingenuous.
.

Not so much for my generation. Born in 80. They've been a pretty normal team since then. 8 playoff appearance, 1 pennant and one WS 36 years. Not bad.

To me it was about Day games and Wriglsy

Imo, 84 killed off the loveable losers thing.


Anyway, The Cubs Won The World Series


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JORR's Cubs Theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
Man some of these posts are so fucking stupid. The Cubs fans only knew losing seasons...and lost opportunities. Nobody embraced that per se...but EVERY god damn Cubs fan embraced the idea of WINNING....SOMEDAY...and guess what? It FINALLY fucking happened. There is likely not one Cubs fan who feels somehow lost or detached from their losing past. Cubs fans are about HOPE as much as anything else. We look forward to hopefully winning the next one...or hopefully winning more in the future. The Cubs are the only team in MLB that has a chance to REPEAT. A good chance. I certainly don't feel lost or less special or whatever bullshit frustrated Sox fans want to throw at us Cubs fans. We are on top of the mountain now....and we will cheer for our team to stay there!!

#Repeat

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group