It is currently Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:11 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » SHOUTOUTS!!

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 3
  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
leashyourkids
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The run differential for the series was zero. They both scored 20 runs. Seven games is a short sample, but that suggests the teams are pretty even and the series could have gone either way.

The most notable incident of the best team losing is the 1960 Yankees who outscored Pittsburgh 55-27.


Right, but I'm not arguing differently. I don't think the Cubs were "clearly better" than any other team or that, in professional baseball, there is ever a clear-cut team who is "better." I don't think it really matters. The WS champion is the WS champion.

My only issue is with people who think that a World Series title completely resolved the question of who is the best team. It doesn't, but who cares?

And I made the same point about the Sox the day Bernstein said they were "lucky" or whatever dumb statement he made.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby
Top
 Profile  
 
JORR
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The run differential for the series was zero. They both scored 20 runs. Seven games is a short sample, but that suggests the teams are pretty even and the series could have gone either way.

The most notable incident of the best team losing is the 1960 Yankees who outscored Pittsburgh 55-27.


Right, but I'm not arguing differently. I don't think the Cubs were "clearly better" than any other team or that, in professional baseball, there is ever a clear-cut team who is "better." I don't think it really matters. The WS champion is the WS champion.

My only issue is with people who think that a World Series title completely resolved the question of who is the best team. It doesn't, but who cares?


It's funny because we all know each others' allegiance, so I'm seen as a "jealous Sox fan", but none of my posts on the topic have been in the pursuit of diminishing the Cubs' achievement. Every team starts the season with the same goal (except the Reds, Brewers, and Braves :lol: ). They're all playing for the same thing. The Cubs are the one that accomplished it. I'd say that alone makes them the "best team". And it doesn't need to be considered any further. I have no problem defining the ""best team" as the one that wins the title, in any sport. But if you want to ask if they played this series 100 times do the Cubs win more than half the time, well, I'm not sure.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8
Top
 Profile  
 
leashyourkids
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The run differential for the series was zero. They both scored 20 runs. Seven games is a short sample, but that suggests the teams are pretty even and the series could have gone either way.

The most notable incident of the best team losing is the 1960 Yankees who outscored Pittsburgh 55-27.


Right, but I'm not arguing differently. I don't think the Cubs were "clearly better" than any other team or that, in professional baseball, there is ever a clear-cut team who is "better." I don't think it really matters. The WS champion is the WS champion.

My only issue is with people who think that a World Series title completely resolved the question of who is the best team. It doesn't, but who cares?


It's funny because we all know each others' allegiance, so I'm seen as a "jealous Sox fan", but none of my posts on the topic have been in the pursuit of diminishing the Cubs' achievement. Every team starts the season with the same goal (except the Reds, Brewers, and Braves :lol: ). They're all playing for the same thing. The Cubs are the one that accomplished it. I'd say that alone makes them the "best team". And it doesn't need to be considered any further. I have no problem defining the ""best team" as the one that wins the title, in any sport. But if you want to ask if they played this series 100 times do the Cubs win more than half the time, well, I'm not sure.


Right. We're in complete agreement... the problem comes in when people say "World Series championship or bust" for a GM when that's a very black-and-white way of looking at it. What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93200
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.
Darkside said if the Cubs won the World Series this year that Theo would get double the money he would otherwise. Scooter agreed with him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
312player
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The run differential for the series was zero. They both scored 20 runs. Seven games is a short sample, but that suggests the teams are pretty even and the series could have gone either way.

The most notable incident of the best team losing is the 1960 Yankees who outscored Pittsburgh 55-27.


Right, but I'm not arguing differently. I don't think the Cubs were "clearly better" than any other team or that, in professional baseball, there is ever a clear-cut team who is "better." I don't think it really matters. The WS champion is the WS champion.

My only issue is with people who think that a World Series title completely resolved the question of who is the best team. It doesn't, but who cares?


It's funny because we all know each others' allegiance, so I'm seen as a "jealous Sox fan", but none of my posts on the topic have been in the pursuit of diminishing the Cubs' achievement. Every team starts the season with the same goal (except the Reds, Brewers, and Braves :lol: ). They're all playing for the same thing. The Cubs are the one that accomplished it. I'd say that alone makes them the "best team". And it doesn't need to be considered any further. I have no problem defining the ""best team" as the one that wins the title, in any sport. But if you want to ask if they played this series 100 times do the Cubs win more than half the time, well, I'm not sure.


Right. We're in complete agreement... the problem comes in when people say "World Series championship or bust" for a GM when that's a very black-and-white way of looking at it. What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.








I don't think you are a jealous Sox fan, you are like a lot of my friends who are Sox fans..you've laughed at the Cubs for so long and you were always right..you're in " I can't believe those losers pulled it off" mode...I do think you will be a jealous Sox fan soon though, this team is young and talented and should win multiple rings.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.
Top
 Profile  
 
leashyourkids
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.
Darkside said if the Cubs won the World Series this year that Theo would get double the money he would otherwise. Scooter agreed with him.


Do I speak on their behalf or they mine?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby
Top
 Profile  
 
leashyourkids
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
312player wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The run differential for the series was zero. They both scored 20 runs. Seven games is a short sample, but that suggests the teams are pretty even and the series could have gone either way.

The most notable incident of the best team losing is the 1960 Yankees who outscored Pittsburgh 55-27.


Right, but I'm not arguing differently. I don't think the Cubs were "clearly better" than any other team or that, in professional baseball, there is ever a clear-cut team who is "better." I don't think it really matters. The WS champion is the WS champion.

My only issue is with people who think that a World Series title completely resolved the question of who is the best team. It doesn't, but who cares?


It's funny because we all know each others' allegiance, so I'm seen as a "jealous Sox fan", but none of my posts on the topic have been in the pursuit of diminishing the Cubs' achievement. Every team starts the season with the same goal (except the Reds, Brewers, and Braves :lol: ). They're all playing for the same thing. The Cubs are the one that accomplished it. I'd say that alone makes them the "best team". And it doesn't need to be considered any further. I have no problem defining the ""best team" as the one that wins the title, in any sport. But if you want to ask if they played this series 100 times do the Cubs win more than half the time, well, I'm not sure.


Right. We're in complete agreement... the problem comes in when people say "World Series championship or bust" for a GM when that's a very black-and-white way of looking at it. What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.








I don't think you are a jealous Sox fan, you are like a lot of my friends who are Sox fans..you've laughed at the Cubs for so long and you were always right..you're in " I can't believe those losers pulled it off" mode...I do think you will be a jealous Sox fan soon though, this team is young and talented and should win multiple rings.


Are you talking to me?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93200
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.
Darkside said if the Cubs won the World Series this year that Theo would get double the money he would otherwise. Scooter agreed with him.


Do I speak on their behalf or they mine?
Educate your fellow Cubs fans.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The run differential for the series was zero. They both scored 20 runs. Seven games is a short sample, but that suggests the teams are pretty even and the series could have gone either way.

The most notable incident of the best team losing is the 1960 Yankees who outscored Pittsburgh 55-27.


Right, but I'm not arguing differently. I don't think the Cubs were "clearly better" than any other team or that, in professional baseball, there is ever a clear-cut team who is "better." I don't think it really matters. The WS champion is the WS champion.

My only issue is with people who think that a World Series title completely resolved the question of who is the best team. It doesn't, but who cares?


It's funny because we all know each others' allegiance, so I'm seen as a "jealous Sox fan", but none of my posts on the topic have been in the pursuit of diminishing the Cubs' achievement. Every team starts the season with the same goal (except the Reds, Brewers, and Braves :lol: ). They're all playing for the same thing. The Cubs are the one that accomplished it. I'd say that alone makes them the "best team". And it doesn't need to be considered any further. I have no problem defining the ""best team" as the one that wins the title, in any sport. But if you want to ask if they played this series 100 times do the Cubs win more than half the time, well, I'm not sure.



If both teams were healthy and playing at the top of their game, who do you think wins?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93200
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
If both teams were healthy and playing at the top of their game, who do you think wins?
Cleveland.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
leashyourkids
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.
Darkside said if the Cubs won the World Series this year that Theo would get double the money he would otherwise. Scooter agreed with him.


Do I speak on their behalf or they mine?
Educate your fellow Cubs fans.


That hurt a little, didn't it? #2016

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:03 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
If both teams were healthy and playing at the top of their game, who do you think wins?
Cleveland.


Okay

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
312player
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
If both teams were healthy and playing at the top of their game, who do you think wins?
Cleveland.







:lol:

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93200
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
If both teams were healthy and playing at the top of their game, who do you think wins?
Cleveland.


Okay
Cleveland had a lot of injuries to deal with and they were very important people.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
leashyourkids
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
If both teams were healthy and playing at the top of their game, who do you think wins?
Cleveland.


Okay
Cleveland had a lot of injuries to deal with and they were very important people.


Are we talking IMU important or Denis important?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93200
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
If both teams were healthy and playing at the top of their game, who do you think wins?
Cleveland.


Okay
Cleveland had a lot of injuries to deal with and they were very important people.


Are we talking IMU important or Denis important?
No, actually important.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
sjboyd0137
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
If both teams were healthy and playing at the top of their game, who do you think wins?
Cleveland.


Okay
Cleveland had a lot of injuries to deal with and they were very important people.


Are we talking IMU important or Denis important?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
rogers park bryan
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Cubs finished with 114 wins.
Indians finished with 104 wins.

Hence the Cubs are better.


The Cubs played the Reds and Brewers 38 times. Hence it's a poor comparison.


Without their best power hitter


Really? Bryant played every game.

Anyway, the Indians were without their best player for most of the season and didn't have their 2 and 3 starters in the postseason.

I think Lindor may have passed where Brantley peaked
Top
 Profile  
 
rogers park bryan
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think it's fair to say that blowing a 3-1 lead is choking, even if it is against a better team. It really doesn't matter either way though.


Well, I wouldn't say they choked. The Cubs pitching was just in better shape when it came down to the end. And that horrible Cleveland outfield play isn't choking, that's just who those guys are.

First you tell me I'm wrong then you tell me I'm right immediately after.


I agree with you that Cleveland didn't choke. I don't agree that the Cubs are "just plain better". A ball bounces a different way and you're crying and not saying that. There's no evidence that the Cubs are definitively better. They won. Isn't that enough? Now all Chicago baseball fans have celebrated a World Series victory. Welcome to the club.

10 year old Sox fans giving you the evil eye
Top
 Profile  
 
sjboyd0137
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think it's fair to say that blowing a 3-1 lead is choking, even if it is against a better team. It really doesn't matter either way though.


Well, I wouldn't say they choked. The Cubs pitching was just in better shape when it came down to the end. And that horrible Cleveland outfield play isn't choking, that's just who those guys are.

First you tell me I'm wrong then you tell me I'm right immediately after.


I agree with you that Cleveland didn't choke. I don't agree that the Cubs are "just plain better". A ball bounces a different way and you're crying and not saying that. There's no evidence that the Cubs are definitively better. They won. Isn't that enough? Now all Chicago baseball fans have celebrated a World Series victory. Welcome to the club.

10 year old Sox fans giving you the evil eye

:lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
Matches Malone
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.
Darkside said if the Cubs won the World Series this year that Theo would get double the money he would otherwise. Scooter agreed with him.

Granted it was signed prior to winning the World Series, but he did more than double his previous contract.
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93200
Location: To the left of my post
Matches Malone wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
What if the Cubs lost Wednesday and Theo's contract was up? Are we really saying we wouldn't extend him because he didn't win a World Series? That's completely ridiculous, and you know it is. Educate your fellow Sox fans.
Darkside said if the Cubs won the World Series this year that Theo would get double the money he would otherwise. Scooter agreed with him.

Granted it was signed prior to winning the World Series, but he did more than double his previous contract.

They said it would double from what he would otherwise get. I think they both called me stupid for saying they were wrong.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
formerlyknownas
 Post subject: Re: The Indians
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The run differential for the series was zero. They both scored 20 runs. Seven games is a short sample, but that suggests the teams are pretty even and the series could have gone either way.

The most notable incident of the best team losing is the 1960 Yankees who outscored Pittsburgh 55-27.

and a defensive specialist hit the big one to win it...weird one.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 3
  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » SHOUTOUTS!!

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group