It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Fine, Hillary only talked about togetherness, inclusiveness, and gathering everyone under the same big tent.

It doesn't matter today anyway.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Bernie's 3rd house came from money he was paid for a book advance to chronicle his campaign for President fighting for the 1% of the population who have trouble affording their rent each month. After selling out and backing the great defender of Wall St, Hillary Clinton.


So are you saying that the book advance had something to do with his support for Hillary? If so, please provide evidence. If not, why bring it up? And if you aren't implying a connection, then how exactly did Sanders sell out? Are you suggesting that his support for Hillary was a sellout? Why? It's a pretty common belief that Trump is a lot worse than Hillary.



The attempt on Nordberg's life left me shaken and disturbed. The questions kept coming up again and again, like bubbles in a case of soda. Who was this character in the hospital? Why was he trying to kill Nordberg...and for whom? Did Ludwig lie to me? l didn't have any proof, but somehow, l didn't entirely trust him. Why was the ''l Luv You'' not listed in Ludwig's records? lf it was, did he know about it? lf he didn't, who did? And where the hell was l?

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 1000
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
dolpgin, can you please stop ignoring TM's question? Why do you assume most of these protestors didn't vote? The few people I know who went to the protest here voted.


I'll make sure to address every question and comment directed at me at this place to your satisfaction no matter if it is hidden within another question or appears within a fast moving thread.

Obama voters abstained from this election and it looked to me like the protestors fit the youngish and diverse demographic of otherwise absent voters Obama had brought to the polls. Did you expect an in depth study?


It took 3 pages to get this. Did anyone ever think that turnout for Obama was/is maybe the anomaly? The people that turned out for him just don't vote regularly.

In the future, it may be wise for Democrats to pay attention to a) more than just urban and suburban voters and b) more than just "blue" states and stop whining about the Electoral College. (Also, stop trying to take peoples' guns away.) JFC, Clinton won, what, 19 states? Democrats don't seem to care about half of the states. Whatever happened to Howard Dean's 50-State Strategy?

Plus, how about pointing the finger at Obama? How have Dems fared the past 8 years? Lost the House. Lost the Senate. Lost half of the governorships. Lost state legislatures. (Rising healthcare premiums right before the election.) While Obama's personal numbers may be good, he did squat for the party.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:10 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Don Tiny wrote:
Fine, Hillary only talked about togetherness, inclusiveness, and gathering everyone under the same big tent.

It doesn't matter today anyway.


For a guy who claims to have a problem with mischaracterization, you sure don't seem to have a problem engaging in some mischaracterizations of your own.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38351
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Bernie's 3rd house came from money he was paid for a book advance to chronicle his campaign for President fighting for the 1% of the population who have trouble affording their rent each month. After selling out and backing the great defender of Wall St, Hillary Clinton.


So are you saying that the book advance had something to do with his support for Hillary? If so, please provide evidence. If not, why bring it up? And if you aren't implying a connection, then how exactly did Sanders sell out? Are you suggesting that his support for Hillary was a sellout? Why? It's a pretty common belief that Trump is a lot worse than Hillary.


His book advance had to do with selling a message he doesn't appear to believe is relevant to himself. While the 1% struggles to make rent, Bernie champions them long enough to get a book advance for a vacation home.

His support for Hillary was a sellout. Same as Ted Cruz ended up selling out his "message."

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:15 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Peter Puck wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
dolpgin, can you please stop ignoring TM's question? Why do you assume most of these protestors didn't vote? The few people I know who went to the protest here voted.


I'll make sure to address every question and comment directed at me at this place to your satisfaction no matter if it is hidden within another question or appears within a fast moving thread.

Obama voters abstained from this election and it looked to me like the protestors fit the youngish and diverse demographic of otherwise absent voters Obama had brought to the polls. Did you expect an in depth study?


It took 3 pages to get this. Did anyone ever think that turnout for Obama was/is maybe the anomaly? The people that turned out for him just don't vote regularly.

In the future, it may be wise for Democrats to pay attention to a) more than just urban and suburban voters and b) more than just "blue" states and stop whining about the Electoral College. (Also, stop trying to take peoples' guns away.) JFC, Clinton won, what, 19 states? Democrats don't seem to care about half of the states. Whatever happened to Howard Dean's 50-State Strategy?

Plus, how about pointing the finger at Obama? How have Dems fared the past 8 years? Lost the House. Lost the Senate. Lost half of the governorships. Lost state legislatures. (Rising healthcare premiums right before the election.) While Obama's personal numbers may be good, he did squat for the party.


Great post, and the stuff about the 50-state strategy is especially important. The Democrats have abandoned it because they have largely become the party of the professional-managerial class (not the working class or even the middle class) and have no idea how to appeal to voters in most sections of the country.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Tall Midget wrote:
Peter Puck wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
dolpgin, can you please stop ignoring TM's question? Why do you assume most of these protestors didn't vote? The few people I know who went to the protest here voted.


I'll make sure to address every question and comment directed at me at this place to your satisfaction no matter if it is hidden within another question or appears within a fast moving thread.

Obama voters abstained from this election and it looked to me like the protestors fit the youngish and diverse demographic of otherwise absent voters Obama had brought to the polls. Did you expect an in depth study?


It took 3 pages to get this. Did anyone ever think that turnout for Obama was/is maybe the anomaly? The people that turned out for him just don't vote regularly.

In the future, it may be wise for Democrats to pay attention to a) more than just urban and suburban voters and b) more than just "blue" states and stop whining about the Electoral College. (Also, stop trying to take peoples' guns away.) JFC, Clinton won, what, 19 states? Democrats don't seem to care about half of the states. Whatever happened to Howard Dean's 50-State Strategy?

Plus, how about pointing the finger at Obama? How have Dems fared the past 8 years? Lost the House. Lost the Senate. Lost half of the governorships. Lost state legislatures. (Rising healthcare premiums right before the election.) While Obama's personal numbers may be good, he did squat for the party.


Great post, and the stuff about the 50-state strategy is especially important. The Democrats have abandoned it because they have largely become the party of the professional-managerial class (not the working class or even the middle class) and have no idea how to appeal to voters in most sections of the country.


Clearly, they need to pose on more forklifts.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Tall Midget wrote:
Great post, and the stuff about the 50-state strategy is especially important. The Democrats have abandoned it because they have largely become the party of the professional-managerial class (not the working class or even the middle class) and have no idea how to appeal to voters in most sections of the country.


This is true. Many people probably don't feel they can leave the Dem party but it really does little for them. Maybe this is why some protest? They think they are protesting Trump but really should be mad at their own party.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:22 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Republicans control the entire country with the exception of about 10 states. We should all be concerned.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:31 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Bernie's 3rd house came from money he was paid for a book advance to chronicle his campaign for President fighting for the 1% of the population who have trouble affording their rent each month. After selling out and backing the great defender of Wall St, Hillary Clinton.


So are you saying that the book advance had something to do with his support for Hillary? If so, please provide evidence. If not, why bring it up? And if you aren't implying a connection, then how exactly did Sanders sell out? Are you suggesting that his support for Hillary was a sellout? Why? It's a pretty common belief that Trump is a lot worse than Hillary.


His book advance had to do with selling a message he doesn't appear to believe is relevant to himself. While the 1% struggles to make rent, Bernie champions them long enough to get a book advance for a vacation home.

His support for Hillary was a sellout. Same as Ted Cruz ended up selling out his "message."


I think you have completely misunderstood Sanders' message. He doesn't inherently oppose the idea of wealth; rather, he opposes the social conditions that prevent people from living comfortable lives. He doesn't want people to live poorly, he wants them to live well--and he has worked consistently, if not effectively, to create a society where this is possible.

In any event, I sure don't see how accepting a book advance betrays any loyalties to the working class. The guy has championed the same ideas for most of his life, which he has lived quite modestly; if he wants a vacation home to enjoy before he kicks the bucket, I really don't think that's such a bad thing. And by the way, most of the house was paid for with proceeds from the sale of a home that his wife inherited, not the book advance.

Finally, the fact that you interpret Sanders' support as a sellout doesn't make it so, no matter how many times you restate your belief without supporting it.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Bernie's 3rd house came from money he was paid for a book advance to chronicle his campaign for President fighting for the 1% of the population who have trouble affording their rent each month. After selling out and backing the great defender of Wall St, Hillary Clinton.


So are you saying that the book advance had something to do with his support for Hillary? If so, please provide evidence. If not, why bring it up? And if you aren't implying a connection, then how exactly did Sanders sell out? Are you suggesting that his support for Hillary was a sellout? Why? It's a pretty common belief that Trump is a lot worse than Hillary.


His book advance had to do with selling a message he doesn't appear to believe is relevant to himself. While the 1% struggles to make rent, Bernie champions them long enough to get a book advance for a vacation home.

His support for Hillary was a sellout. Same as Ted Cruz ended up selling out his "message."


I think you have completely misunderstood Sanders' message. He doesn't inherently oppose the idea of wealth; rather, he opposes the social conditions that prevent people from living comfortable lives. He doesn't want people to live poorly, he wants them to live well--and he has worked consistently, if not effectively, to create a society where this is possible.

In any event, I sure don't see how accepting a book advance betrays any loyalties to the working class. The guy has championed the same ideas for most of his life, which he has lived quite modestly; if he wants a vacation home to enjoy before he kicks the bucket, I really don't think that's such a bad thing. And by the way, most of the house was paid for with proceeds from the sale of a home that his wife inherited, not the book advance.

Finally, the fact that you interpret Sanders' support as a sellout doesn't make it so, no matter how many times you restate your belief without supporting it.


:alien: :alien: :alien:

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:47 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38351
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Bernie's 3rd house came from money he was paid for a book advance to chronicle his campaign for President fighting for the 1% of the population who have trouble affording their rent each month. After selling out and backing the great defender of Wall St, Hillary Clinton.


So are you saying that the book advance had something to do with his support for Hillary? If so, please provide evidence. If not, why bring it up? And if you aren't implying a connection, then how exactly did Sanders sell out? Are you suggesting that his support for Hillary was a sellout? Why? It's a pretty common belief that Trump is a lot worse than Hillary.


His book advance had to do with selling a message he doesn't appear to believe is relevant to himself. While the 1% struggles to make rent, Bernie champions them long enough to get a book advance for a vacation home.

His support for Hillary was a sellout. Same as Ted Cruz ended up selling out his "message."


I think you have completely misunderstood Sanders' message. He doesn't inherently oppose the idea of wealth; rather, he opposes the social conditions that prevent people from living comfortable lives. He doesn't want people to live poorly, he wants them to live well--and he has worked consistently, if not effectively, to create a society where this is possible.

In any event, I sure don't see how accepting a book advance betrays any loyalties to the working class. The guy has championed the same ideas for most of his life, which he has lived quite modestly; if he wants a vacation home to enjoy before he kicks the bucket, I really don't think that's such a bad thing. And by the way, most of the house was paid for with proceeds from the sale of a home that his wife inherited, not the book advance.

Finally, the fact that you interpret Sanders' support as a sellout doesn't make it so, no matter how many times you restate your belief without supporting it.



Most of the house was not paid for by his wife. A quarter of it was.

Bernie had been a pretty good example before this of giving what he had left to charities.

Buying a 3rd home while claiming to champion the working class without one of their own rings incredibly hollow.

He has spent most of his life championing the poor. Which is what makes this behavior a sellout now. Your unwillingness to acknowledge the obvious doesn't make it any less obvious.

The fact that you think it's ok that he buys a vacation home is a nod toward entitlement.

Like I said, LTG nailed this one.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:04 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Bernie's 3rd house came from money he was paid for a book advance to chronicle his campaign for President fighting for the 1% of the population who have trouble affording their rent each month. After selling out and backing the great defender of Wall St, Hillary Clinton.


So are you saying that the book advance had something to do with his support for Hillary? If so, please provide evidence. If not, why bring it up? And if you aren't implying a connection, then how exactly did Sanders sell out? Are you suggesting that his support for Hillary was a sellout? Why? It's a pretty common belief that Trump is a lot worse than Hillary.


His book advance had to do with selling a message he doesn't appear to believe is relevant to himself. While the 1% struggles to make rent, Bernie champions them long enough to get a book advance for a vacation home.

His support for Hillary was a sellout. Same as Ted Cruz ended up selling out his "message."


I think you have completely misunderstood Sanders' message. He doesn't inherently oppose the idea of wealth; rather, he opposes the social conditions that prevent people from living comfortable lives. He doesn't want people to live poorly, he wants them to live well--and he has worked consistently, if not effectively, to create a society where this is possible.

In any event, I sure don't see how accepting a book advance betrays any loyalties to the working class. The guy has championed the same ideas for most of his life, which he has lived quite modestly; if he wants a vacation home to enjoy before he kicks the bucket, I really don't think that's such a bad thing. And by the way, most of the house was paid for with proceeds from the sale of a home that his wife inherited, not the book advance.

Finally, the fact that you interpret Sanders' support as a sellout doesn't make it so, no matter how many times you restate your belief without supporting it.



Most of the house was not paid for by his wife. A quarter of it was.

Bernie had been a pretty good example before this of giving what he had left to charities.

Buying a 3rd home while claiming to champion the working class without one of their own rings incredibly hollow.

He has spent most of his life championing the poor. Which is what makes this behavior a sellout now. Your unwillingness to acknowledge the obvious doesn't make it any less obvious.

The fact that you think it's ok that he buys a vacation home is a nod toward entitlement.

Like I said, LTG nailed this one.


How is he selling out the poor? Has he somehow stopped advocating for a more just society? He seems to be the same guy he's always been--flawed but fundamentally decent.

Further, is there some kind of lifestyle threshold that one has to live below in order not to be a "sellout"? Why are two homes OK, as you imply, and not three? Why is one home acceptable at all in the first place? The fact that you implicitly embrace the existential validity of private property would seem by your logic to be a "nod toward entitlement".

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:14 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Bernie Sanders has gotten rich off the government unlike a guy like Biden. From dirt floors to 3 homes.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
pittmike wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Great post, and the stuff about the 50-state strategy is especially important. The Democrats have abandoned it because they have largely become the party of the professional-managerial class (not the working class or even the middle class) and have no idea how to appeal to voters in most sections of the country.


This is true. Many people probably don't feel they can leave the Dem party but it really does little for them. Maybe this is why some protest? They think they are protesting Trump but really should be mad at their own party.



What has the Conservative movement done for African Americans? What have they attempted to do for African Americans? I continually ask this question and never get a response. Instead it's the Condescending implication that they are stupid for voting Democratic. I admit they aren't a panacea but they have reached out to blacks in a much more forthright way than have Republicans. Not even close on that.

I'd also state very emphatically that they have enacted programs which theoretically were designed to address racial economic and social inequities. What have Republicans done in this regard?

Which programs have Republicans designed which

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38351
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Bernie Sanders has gotten rich off the government unlike a guy like Biden. From dirt floors to 3 homes.


He had not before the 2016 election cycle.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Bernie Sanders has gotten rich off the government unlike a guy like Biden. From dirt floors to 3 homes.


Don't Biden and Sanders have about the same net worth?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Seacrest wrote:
Nas wrote:
Bernie Sanders has gotten rich off the government unlike a guy like Biden. From dirt floors to 3 homes.


He had not before the 2016 election cycle.


We never saw his tax returns so it's hard to say.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Bernie Sanders has gotten rich off the government unlike a guy like Biden. From dirt floors to 3 homes.


Don't Biden and Sanders have about the same net worth?


I could tell you if I saw his tax returns.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38351
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Nas wrote:
Bernie Sanders has gotten rich off the government unlike a guy like Biden. From dirt floors to 3 homes.


He had not before the 2016 election cycle.


We never saw his tax returns so it's hard to say.


He filed his disclosure reports yearly. He was a man of virtually no means with as much as $65K in credit card debt in 2015. He made a small pension from the city of Burlington and his salary as a Senator.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:30 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Bernie Sanders has gotten rich off the government unlike a guy like Biden. From dirt floors to 3 homes.


One of those homes is a condo in D.C. The size of the mortgage is relatively small, so it's cheaper for him to own than rent. What an outrage.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
:lol: The Bernie hatred continues. Of all the crooked, corrupt motherfuckers in this country, he's the one that everyone takes shots at. Astounding.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
leashyourkids wrote:
:lol: The Bernie hatred continues. Of all the crooked, corrupt motherfuckers in this country, he's the one that everyone takes shots at. Astounding.


Nas is just trying to distract himself from the fact that Blacks, Hispanics and white women cost Hillary the election.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:49 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
:lol: The Bernie hatred continues. Of all the crooked, corrupt motherfuckers in this country, he's the one that everyone takes shots at. Astounding.


Nas is just trying to distract himself from the fact that Blacks, Hispanics and white women cost Hillary the election.


Berniebros and Bernie__s. I know a lot of them.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
leashyourkids wrote:
:lol: The Bernie hatred continues. Of all the crooked, corrupt motherfuckers in this country, he's the one that everyone takes shots at. Astounding.

All because he bought a house that cost $600,000. A price that is probably lower than houses that MANY here live in. What a snob.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Tall Midget wrote:
The other point to remember is that the leaked Clinton/Podesta emails show that the Clinton campaign ACTIVELY tried to elevate the candidacy of Trump and other "lunatic fringe" candidates because they preffered to run against them over Bush or Rubio.

In other words, the Clintons helped amplify the very racist and misogynist rhetoric they claimed to oppose. How deplorable.

Shades of Irish Boy calling the Mannywood Dodgers the perfect opponent for the 08 Cubs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82224
inherited wealth is evil

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
We can't blame 3rd party voters every time there is a close election.

That's the kind of silliness that limits our choice now.

Obama, Bill, and Reagan didn't sweat the third party vote


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38351
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Douchebag wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
:lol: The Bernie hatred continues. Of all the crooked, corrupt motherfuckers in this country, he's the one that everyone takes shots at. Astounding.

All because he bought a house that cost $600,000. A price that is probably lower than houses that MANY here live in. What a snob.


I'm happy for you that you live in a house that costs $600K. How much do your other two houses come in at?

Pretty sad that the movement ended on the shores of Lake Champlain.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group