Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Bernie's 3rd house came from money he was paid for a book advance to chronicle his campaign for President fighting for the 1% of the population who have trouble affording their rent each month. After selling out and backing the great defender of Wall St, Hillary Clinton.
So are you saying that the book advance had something to do with his support for Hillary? If so, please provide evidence. If not, why bring it up? And if you aren't implying a connection, then how exactly did Sanders sell out? Are you suggesting that his support for Hillary was a sellout? Why? It's a pretty common belief that Trump is a lot worse than Hillary.
His book advance had to do with selling a message he doesn't appear to believe is relevant to himself. While the 1% struggles to make rent, Bernie champions them long enough to get a book advance for a vacation home.
His support for Hillary was a sellout. Same as Ted Cruz ended up selling out his "message."
I think you have completely misunderstood Sanders' message. He doesn't inherently oppose the idea of wealth; rather, he opposes the social conditions that prevent people from living comfortable lives. He doesn't want people to live poorly, he wants them to live well--and he has worked consistently, if not effectively, to create a society where this is possible.
In any event, I sure don't see how accepting a book advance betrays any loyalties to the working class. The guy has championed the same ideas for most of his life, which he has lived quite modestly; if he wants a vacation home to enjoy before he kicks the bucket, I really don't think that's such a bad thing. And by the way, most of the house was paid for with proceeds from the sale of a home that his wife inherited, not the book advance.
Finally, the fact that you interpret Sanders' support as a sellout doesn't make it so, no matter how many times you restate your belief without supporting it.
Most of the house was not paid for by his wife. A quarter of it was.
Bernie had been a pretty good example before this of giving what he had left to charities.
Buying a 3rd home while claiming to champion the working class without one of their own rings incredibly hollow.
He has spent most of his life championing the poor. Which is what makes this behavior a sellout now. Your unwillingness to acknowledge the obvious doesn't make it any less obvious.
The fact that you think it's ok that he buys a vacation home is a nod toward entitlement.
Like I said, LTG nailed this one.
_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.