It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 8:03 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38943
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Not sure how Chicago works exactly but I read this about LA and Boston this morning which said basically the same thing. The mechanism seems to be that the local cops are not allowed to ask suspected illegals (read hispanics) to show proof of citizenship if they come into contact with them. There also is some part of not cooperating with border or homeland authorities.

For some people this is a good thing. For others while trying to understand the humane arguments they do not like blatant disregard for the law.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
A misdemeanor I can agree with not deportation, any felony should be automatic deportation on any illegal immigrant.. If Chicago or LA or Boston doesn't follow through..cut off the tap from the federal titty, they will fall in line quick.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6592
pizza_Place: Giordano's
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?


have there been instances of the Fed coming into any of these cities and doing raids for illegal immigrants ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6592
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Bagels wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?


have there been instances of the Fed coming into any of these cities and doing raids for illegal immigrants ?



No idea, but if they do it will be TREMENDOUS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38943
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?

Well I guess that's my point . How much leeway do states or cities get in deciding what laws they're going to enforce without the Fed saying , No, you WILL enforce this one.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
badrogue17 wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?

Well I guess that's my point . How much leeway do states or cities get in deciding what laws they're going to enforce without the Fed saying , No, you WILL enforce this one.


I am not really sure. The feds can pressure whatever they want though. Remember back to when they wanted to initially get every state to not have a speed limit higher than 55. The feds simply threatened to withhold highway funds. It took a little longer for some states but they relented. This happens all the time.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Bagels wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?


have there been instances of the Fed coming into any of these cities and doing raids for illegal immigrants ?

Not sure, but there are deportations all the time. Obviously, Obama deported millions, but I would never hear of this if it weren't for the occasional student comment ("My mother was deported") and the fact that students I know travel to the deportation center once a month to pray for those being deported on that day.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6592
pizza_Place: Giordano's
badrogue17 wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?

Well I guess that's my point . How much leeway do states or cities get in deciding what laws they're going to enforce without the Fed saying , No, you WILL enforce this one.



It is a good question. I think when it comes to basic human rights, maybe it is different. I think if people are contributing and are illegal, maybe leave them alone. This might be a Red vs Blue thing, and maybe with the Fed being Red, and a city like Chicago Blue something will happen?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
After Chas sleeps off his hangover, he will explain this to you.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<ยบ)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33243
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
My understanding is that sanctuary cities do not allow law enforcement officials to turn over illegal immigrants to the Feds. Most places have a mechanism for informing ICE when illegal immigrants are arrested.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
pittmike wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?

Well I guess that's my point . How much leeway do states or cities get in deciding what laws they're going to enforce without the Fed saying , No, you WILL enforce this one.


I am not really sure. The feds can pressure whatever they want though. Remember back to when they wanted to initially get every state to not have a speed limit higher than 55. The feds simply threatened to withhold highway funds. It took a little longer for some states but they relented. This happens all the time.








With hold the federal funds to police departments will absolutely get cops to follow orders.

http://www.latimes.com/#nt=mastheadnavbar

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?

Well I guess that's my point . How much leeway do states or cities get in deciding what laws they're going to enforce without the Fed saying , No, you WILL enforce this one.



It is a good question. I think when it comes to basic human rights, maybe it is different. I think if people are contributing and are illegal, maybe leave them alone. This might be a Red vs Blue thing, and maybe with the Fed being Red, and a city like Chicago Blue something will happen?

On the other hand, an illegal crashed into my car last summer. He didn't have insurance, naturally, so I had to pay ($1700) or have my rates skyrocket. If they stay, they gotta play by the rules. Fix it so they can. Otherwise, GTFO.

I have sympathy for them--to a point.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6592
pizza_Place: Giordano's
formerlyknownas wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?

Well I guess that's my point . How much leeway do states or cities get in deciding what laws they're going to enforce without the Fed saying , No, you WILL enforce this one.



It is a good question. I think when it comes to basic human rights, maybe it is different. I think if people are contributing and are illegal, maybe leave them alone. This might be a Red vs Blue thing, and maybe with the Fed being Red, and a city like Chicago Blue something will happen?

On the other hand, an illegal crashed into my car last summer. He didn't have insurance, naturally, so I had to pay ($1700) or have my rates skyrocket. If they stay, they gotta play by the rules. Fix it so they can. Otherwise, GTFO.

I have sympathy for them--to a point.



I agree. I can not say I am literate with citizenship costs and the hoops to jump through. Perhaps make that easier.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
The federal government could easily step in and demand Chicago and CPD enforce this law. When Marty Walsh and Rahm Emanuel say this shit they are just making a stand against Trump in the media because it will go over well with their constituents. The past two administrations have not been keen on making a big issue of illegal immigration so cities like Chicago, LA etc. have gotten away with this without much resistance. That has changed dramatically, Trump campaigned hard on the issue and won.

The question is whether Trump will make these mayors kiss the ring once in office, or if he'll keep up this charade of appearing presidential when it comes to dealing with them.

I also hit by illegals driving somebody elses car (ofc no insurance). Out $1000 deductible plus my rates skyrocketed...cops even told me at the scene I was in for a nightmare.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Cashman wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Cashman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess he did this last night but I need the great minds plus Nas of the CFMB to educate me on what that exactly means. Is it that we will not deport illegal immigrants if they're caught breaking another law? Do we ignore that they're here illegally ? How do cities get away with not enforcing federal law? Thanks in advance fer educatin' me.



Federal law says Mary Jane is illegal, yet States passed laws to make it legal. Why is this different?

Well I guess that's my point . How much leeway do states or cities get in deciding what laws they're going to enforce without the Fed saying , No, you WILL enforce this one.



It is a good question. I think when it comes to basic human rights, maybe it is different. I think if people are contributing and are illegal, maybe leave them alone. This might be a Red vs Blue thing, and maybe with the Fed being Red, and a city like Chicago Blue something will happen?

On the other hand, an illegal crashed into my car last summer. He didn't have insurance, naturally, so I had to pay ($1700) or have my rates skyrocket. If they stay, they gotta play by the rules. Fix it so they can. Otherwise, GTFO.

I have sympathy for them--to a point.



I agree. I can not say I am literate with citizenship costs and the hoops to jump through. Perhaps make that easier.

I'd be fine with the US giving amnesty to every non-criminal undocumented person if we stopped immigration. Too many people as it is, and it is killing the environment. We need fewer people everywhere. Pretty soon Sycamore is gonna be a suburb.

I'd bet a lot of undocumented people want to play by the rules, but can't....

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6592
pizza_Place: Giordano's
formerlyknownas wrote:
I'd be fine with the US giving amnesty to every non-criminal undocumented person if we stopped immigration. Too many people as it is, and it is killing the environment. We need fewer people everywhere. Pretty soon Sycamore is gonna be a suburb.

I'd bet a lot of undocumented people want to play by the rules, but can't....



Unleash Genghis Khannnnnnnnnn!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Cashman wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
I'd be fine with the US giving amnesty to every non-criminal undocumented person if we stopped immigration. Too many people as it is, and it is killing the environment. We need fewer people everywhere. Pretty soon Sycamore is gonna be a suburb.

I'd bet a lot of undocumented people want to play by the rules, but can't....



Unleash Genghis Khannnnnnnnnn!

Long as he has papers...

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group