It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:33 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Bagels wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Christian churches/pastors where HUGE in the civil rights movement. Go back to before the civil war. John Brown and all those guys were Christians!

John Brown? The murderer?

That sounds very christian.


you can murder. it's in the 2nd commandment


Is that the one Jesus gave Chas?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
He thought ending slavery was worth dying for, I guess.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Hatchetman wrote:
He thought ending slavery was worth dying for, I guess.



A true hero.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93646
Location: To the left of my post
Hatchetman wrote:
OK, show me all the "free" countries that were not Christian.
During what time period? Are you referring to the time around when we fought the Revolutionary War?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43867
Hatchetman wrote:
He thought ending slavery was worth dying for, I guess.

Dude was a domestic terrorist. You can agree with his tactics and opinions if you want, but to claim he was following god's word is ridiculous.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I'm talking about today. List all the free countries today that were not overwhelmingly "Christian" at some point in the past century.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Douchebag wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
He thought ending slavery was worth dying for, I guess.

Dude was a domestic terrorist. You can agree with his tactics and opinions if you want, but to claim he was following god's word is ridiculous.


To be fair, most terrorists today are following their god's word, so, maybe he was interpreting his god's word was to blow shit up.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Douchebag wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
He thought ending slavery was worth dying for, I guess.

Dude was a domestic terrorist. You can agree with his tactics and opinions if you want, but to claim he was following god's word is ridiculous.


I'm saying the human movement toward civil rights & liberty on earth was heavily influenced by Christian thought. I'm not defending him nor I defending the KKK who used "Christian" themes as well.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:32 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Hatchetman wrote:
Christian churches/pastors where HUGE in the civil rights movement. Go back to before the civil war. John Brown and all those guys were Christians!


You are right, but it's also important to note that Christianity plays a crucial role in the formation of the KKK and the ascent of other white supremacist ideologies.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93646
Location: To the left of my post
Hatchetman wrote:
I'm talking about today. List all the free countries today that were not overwhelmingly "Christian" at some point in the past century.

Hatchetman wrote:
It doesn't matter if God exists. It matters that the founding fathers "thought" he exists. Christian thought is entwined with human rights & liberty concepts that emerged in western europe. Obviously the "freest" countries on earth we formerly Christian nations.
If you are talking about today then why did you mention the founding fathers?

You don't really want to mention today though. Most of the modern day "freedom" has come with huge declines in religious participation in those countries.

It is safe to say that the Christian religion existed in parallel with most of the advances in freedom over history but in the past few decades the biggest obstacles to increased freedom have come from religion.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Yeah, I would say religion in the United States is what is currently suppressing MANY people's freedoms and liberties.

I'm pretty sure the federal government wouldn't give a shit about abortions or gay marriage if the religious types weren't involved.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
sure if you define freedom as having abortions. then I agree.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Hatchetman wrote:
sure if you define freedom as having abortions. then I agree.


Well, no one should be able to determine what an individual can do with their own body.

That includes the government.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Douchebag wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
He thought ending slavery was worth dying for, I guess.

Dude was a domestic terrorist. You can agree with his tactics and opinions if you want, but to claim he was following god's word is ridiculous.



One man's domestic terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33906
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Well, no one should be able to determine what an individual can do with their own body.

That includes the government.


Which body are you talking about? People would care about abortions even in the absence of religion. I don't have a strong opinion on gay rights but I'm starting to as their rights are intensifying? I don't know if that's the best way to say it but I don't agree with some of the things they are demanding. My disagreement does not stem from religion nor does it come from a place of hatred.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93646
Location: To the left of my post
Spaulding wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Well, no one should be able to determine what an individual can do with their own body.

That includes the government.


Which body are you talking about? People would care about abortions even in the absence of religion. I don't have a strong opinion on gay rights but I'm starting to as their rights are intensifying? I don't know if that's the best way to say it but I don't agree with some of the things they are demanding. My disagreement does not stem from religion nor does it come from a place of hatred.
What are they demanding?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:56 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80556
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
sure if you define freedom as having abortions. then I agree.


Well, no one should be able to determine what an individual can do with their own body.

That includes the government.


There's more than one body there though, isn't there? Liberals find it tough to argue with me on abortion because they usually have never discussed it with someone who isn't coming at it from a religious perspective. The way the law is now I couldn't possibly find much fault with a woman that gives birth and tosses the baby in a garbage can considering she could have had a "doctor" do it for her a few hours earlier.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93646
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's more than one body there though, isn't there? Liberals find it tough to argue with me on abortion because they usually have never discussed it with someone who isn't coming at it from a religious perspective. The way the law is now I couldn't possibly find much fault with a woman that gives birth and tosses the baby in a garbage can considering she could have had a "doctor" do it for her a few hours earlier.
The issue is that there is a scientifically provable time in which a future baby cannot survive without one single individual. That scenario does not exist with your point about either a few hours earlier or a few hours later.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:03 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80556
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's more than one body there though, isn't there? Liberals find it tough to argue with me on abortion because they usually have never discussed it with someone who isn't coming at it from a religious perspective. The way the law is now I couldn't possibly find much fault with a woman that gives birth and tosses the baby in a garbage can considering she could have had a "doctor" do it for her a few hours earlier.
The issue is that there is a scientifically provable time in which a future baby cannot survive without one single individual. That scenario does not exist with your point about either a few hours earlier or a few hours later.


I'm an atheist. Like I said, I don't have a religious perspective on it. I've swatted many flies in my lifetime. I've also eaten many pork chops. It would be pretty disingenuous for me to rail on against the killing of a sentient being with less intelligence than a pig. On the other hand, humanity has to mean something. I think the wanton destruction of pre-born humans decreases the value of all of our lives.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Spaulding wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Well, no one should be able to determine what an individual can do with their own body.

That includes the government.


Which body are you talking about? People would care about abortions even in the absence of religion. I don't have a strong opinion on gay rights but I'm starting to as their rights are intensifying? I don't know if that's the best way to say it but I don't agree with some of the things they are demanding. My disagreement does not stem from religion nor does it come from a place of hatred.


The way I'm looking at it, the idea that the government can mandate what a woman is allowed to do with her body is wrong, IMO. The concept of abortion, to me, is a personal choice. If a woman and the father in question have determined that is the only way, they have to be the ones to live with themselves. In a situation of a sexual assault, or if the mother's health is in danger, and we are talking early on in the pregnancy here, then a decision needs to be made. The way a "late term abortion" was laid out during the debates was complete BS. Most "late term abortions" are due to medical complications. Think of it this way. You are at 32 weeks, and you go in for a checkup. The doctor determines that there is no heartbeat. A "late term abortion" is a procedure to remove a dead fetus from you. Should you have to carry that to term? My wife had a friend that they were able to determine that the baby had no developed brain at like 28 or 32 weeks (I can't remember what she told me). The baby was not viable outside the womb. She carried the baby to term, because she is a devout pro-lifer, but that was a personal choice. Should the government been able to determine that she was required to do that?

As far as gay marriage goes, I have no issue with that. If they are committing themselves the same way a heterosexual marriage is committed, why should they not enjoy the same government benefits of it.

When it comes to the trans bathroom thing, I have a problem with this whole "gender identity" thing. Go through the process, then you can use whatever bathroom your plumbing allows.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33906
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What are they demanding?


I don't want to be in a bathroom with Parker Molloy, mostly because she is crazy. The demand of acceptance and understanding on their end should be just as great as they expect of me. If I'm not being outwardly rude or trying my best to understand their journey (when I don't), the other side should be patient with me on mine.

I think gay couples should have rights like any other couple as far as medical, financial, and legal situations go. I not completely on board with gay couples having kids. I think it's a difficult issue to sort out. Age, not religion, is the factor that is most prevalant indicating support of gay marriage.


Last edited by Spaulding on Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Hatchetman wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
He thought ending slavery was worth dying for, I guess.

Dude was a domestic terrorist. You can agree with his tactics and opinions if you want, but to claim he was following god's word is ridiculous.


I'm saying the human movement toward civil rights & liberty on earth was heavily influenced by Christian thought. I'm not defending him nor I defending the KKK who used "Christian" themes as well.


Secular humanism, especially in modern times, came from the Enlightenment, which was about casting aside religious beliefs in favor of reason. Christianity is a fable based upon the idea that there is something better after we die and that human sacrifice if the ultimate expression of love.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's more than one body there though, isn't there? Liberals find it tough to argue with me on abortion because they usually have never discussed it with someone who isn't coming at it from a religious perspective. The way the law is now I couldn't possibly find much fault with a woman that gives birth and tosses the baby in a garbage can considering she could have had a "doctor" do it for her a few hours earlier.
The issue is that there is a scientifically provable time in which a future baby cannot survive without one single individual. That scenario does not exist with your point about either a few hours earlier or a few hours later.


I'm an atheist. Like I said, I don't have a religious perspective on it. I've swatted many flies in my lifetime. I've also eaten many pork chops. It would be pretty disingenuous for me to rail on against the killing of a sentient being with less intelligence than a pig. On the other hand, humanity has to mean something. I think the wanton destruction of pre-born humans decreases the value of all of our lives.


See, the wanton destruction just "because" to me, as a personal choice, is wrong. Abortion should not be birth control. But, to some it is. My only argument is that those that want to choose that are making a personal decision, not one I agree with, but not one I think that the government should be able to decide for them, either.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
sjboyd0137 wrote:

When it comes to the trans bathroom thing, I have a problem with this whole "gender identity" thing. Go through the process, then you can use whatever bathroom your plumbing allows.


You sound like one of those Christian wackos to me. :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Well, no one should be able to determine what an individual can do with their own body.

That includes the government.


Which body are you talking about? People would care about abortions even in the absence of religion. I don't have a strong opinion on gay rights but I'm starting to as their rights are intensifying? I don't know if that's the best way to say it but I don't agree with some of the things they are demanding. My disagreement does not stem from religion nor does it come from a place of hatred.


The way I'm looking at it, the idea that the government can mandate what a woman is allowed to do with her body is wrong, IMO. The concept of abortion, to me, is a personal choice. If a woman and the father in question have determined that is the only way, they have to be the ones to live with themselves. In a situation of a sexual assault, or if the mother's health is in danger, and we are talking early on in the pregnancy here, then a decision needs to be made. The way a "late term abortion" was laid out during the debates was complete BS. Most "late term abortions" are due to medical complications. Think of it this way. You are at 32 weeks, and you go in for a checkup. The doctor determines that there is no heartbeat. A "late term abortion" is a procedure to remove a dead fetus from you. Should you have to carry that to term? My wife had a friend that they were able to determine that the baby had no developed brain at like 28 or 32 weeks (I can't remember what she told me). The baby was not viable outside the womb. She carried the baby to term, because she is a devout pro-lifer, but that was a personal choice. Should the government been able to determine that she was required to do that?

As far as gay marriage goes, I have no issue with that. If they are committing themselves the same way a heterosexual marriage is committed, why should they not enjoy the same government benefits of it.

When it comes to the trans bathroom thing, I have a problem with this whole "gender identity" thing. Go through the process, then you can use whatever bathroom your plumbing allows.


He has zero say in the matter. There has never been one court ruling forcing a woman to keep a baby so the father can go it alone.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:11 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80556
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
The way I'm looking at it, the idea that the government can mandate what a woman is allowed to do with her body is wrong, IMO. The concept of abortion, to me, is a personal choice. If a woman and the father in question have determined that is the only way, they have to be the ones to live with themselves.


The father has no say.

sjboyd0137 wrote:
The way a "late term abortion" was laid out during the debates was complete BS.


I thought Clinton handled that question well. And I'm sure she had the right numbers and it was something she was not lying about. But that being the case, why not limit abortions to a certain gestation period? There is no getting around the fact that "danger to the mother's health" is very broad and ambiguous.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:14 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80556
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's more than one body there though, isn't there? Liberals find it tough to argue with me on abortion because they usually have never discussed it with someone who isn't coming at it from a religious perspective. The way the law is now I couldn't possibly find much fault with a woman that gives birth and tosses the baby in a garbage can considering she could have had a "doctor" do it for her a few hours earlier.
The issue is that there is a scientifically provable time in which a future baby cannot survive without one single individual. That scenario does not exist with your point about either a few hours earlier or a few hours later.


I'm an atheist. Like I said, I don't have a religious perspective on it. I've swatted many flies in my lifetime. I've also eaten many pork chops. It would be pretty disingenuous for me to rail on against the killing of a sentient being with less intelligence than a pig. On the other hand, humanity has to mean something. I think the wanton destruction of pre-born humans decreases the value of all of our lives.


See, the wanton destruction just "because" to me, as a personal choice, is wrong. Abortion should not be birth control. But, to some it is. My only argument is that those that want to choose that are making a personal decision, not one I agree with, but not one I think that the government should be able to decide for them, either.


Obviously, I have my opinion on it. I probably shouldn't have used a charged phrase like "wanton destruction". I actually went back and edited "children" to "humans" in order to be more neutral.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33906
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I'm an atheist. Like I said, I don't have a religious perspective on it. I've swatted many flies in my lifetime. I've also eaten many pork chops. It would be pretty disingenuous for me to rail on against the killing of a sentient being with less intelligence than a pig. On the other hand, humanity has to mean something. I think the wanton destruction of pre-born humans decreases the value of all of our lives.


I don't think you can deny the 15-22 year old, somebody that abuses drugs/alcohol, or somebody in a terrible or nonexistent relationship that she has changed and most likely ruined her life and the life of somebody she can't care for, doesn't know, and doesn't want. The world is fucked up. No sense in fucking up yourself or the world more.

If I had gotten pregnant at 16, there was no way I'd go home and tell my dad. I'd sooner have run away or killed myself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93646
Location: To the left of my post
Spaulding wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What are they demanding?


I don't want to be in a bathroom with Parker Molloy, mostly because she is crazy. The demand of acceptance and understanding on their end should be just as great as they expect of me. If I'm not being outwardly rude or trying my best to understand their journey (when I don't), the other side should be patient with me on mine.

I think gay couples should have rights like any other couple as far as medical, financial, and legal situations go. I not completely on board with gay couples having kids. I think it's a difficult issue to sort out. Age, not religion, is the factor that is most prevalant indicating support of gay marriage.
The bathroom situation is somewhat understandable though my opinion is that it really makes no difference to anyone but the ones who are banned from going to the bathroom they identify with.

The rest of the rights they want are just what any other person wants. I don't see how you can be against gay people having/adopting kids with so many single parent households that do just fine.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
[

Secular humanism, especially in modern times, came from the Enlightenment, which was about casting aside religious beliefs in favor of reason. Christianity is a fable based upon the idea that there is something better after we die and that human sacrifice if the ultimate expression of love.


lot of falsities here. The Enligtenment did not cast aside Christian morals/ethics, it cast aside the fanciful "magical" thoughts in Christianity. Today we see Christian morals as just "common sense" that anyone could have thought up on their own.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group