It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 8:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 292 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:33 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.


Trump won't be killing reporters. I'm certain of that.

Do you think the press is reporting honestly now? Debate moderators crying at the results. One candidate getting questions in advance. Why do you trust the media?


I'm not surprised that you are fine with the Trump administration reporting the news. You were fine with them when they were reporting things you agreed with. Sounds like you want state media.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:
America wrote:
The media rigged a debate for Hillary against Sanders. The media pushed a "he cannot win" narrative all spring that was literally written word for word by the Clinton campaign. Not only would Sanders have won with an impartial establishment media, we SHOULD have won because he would've won OH, MI, PA and WI (and thus the presidency). But the media, along with a disingenuous appeal to identity politics #HERstory, robbed the Democrats of their rightful nominee.

I dont think they really expected Trump to win until around May, and that was when you saw them get really nasty against him. The fact that they still call him a sexual predator over that silly tape, which of course caused a major "HE MUST DROP OUT" freakout from the media, is proof enough of that.



Sanders lost by more than 4 million votes and no one knows for sure if he would have won the general. He performed very poorly in non Caucus states and to be honest the media kept the Email stuff in the news the entire and promoted the notion that all the energy was with his campaign. There also wasn't any negative coverage of him.

Right Sanders lost all the southern states that neither Clinton nor Sanders had a prayer of winning anyways. This somehow convinced the democrats all over the country that he couldn't win the states that matter.



He gladly accepted the wins in a number of states like Utah that he had no chance of winning either

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:
America wrote:
The media rigged a debate for Hillary against Sanders. The media pushed a "he cannot win" narrative all spring that was literally written word for word by the Clinton campaign. Not only would Sanders have won with an impartial establishment media, we SHOULD have won because he would've won OH, MI, PA and WI (and thus the presidency). But the media, along with a disingenuous appeal to identity politics #HERstory, robbed the Democrats of their rightful nominee.

I dont think they really expected Trump to win until around May, and that was when you saw them get really nasty against him. The fact that they still call him a sexual predator over that silly tape, which of course caused a major "HE MUST DROP OUT" freakout from the media, is proof enough of that.



Sanders lost by more than 4 million votes and no one knows for sure if he would have won the general. He performed very poorly in non Caucus states and to be honest the media kept the Email stuff in the news the entire and promoted the notion that all the energy was with his campaign. There also wasn't any negative coverage of him.

Right Sanders lost all the southern states that neither Clinton nor Sanders had a prayer of winning anyways. This somehow convinced the democrats all over the country that he couldn't win the states that matter.



He gladly accepted the wins in a number of states like Utah that he had no chance of winning either

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
long time guy wrote:
He gladly accepted the wins in a number of states like Utah that he had no chance of winning either

Yea but Utah wasn't sold as a privotal state to decide who was more electable. South Carolina was though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:32 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80542
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.



You know, I've often pointed out- usually in conversations with Boilermaker Rick- that all of our systems and the things that ties us together as a society are a lot more fragile than most people believe. I'm certain many Jews in 1930s Germany thought Hitler "could never happen here". But you have to look at the circumstances. At least half the country hates Trump. The climate really doesn't exist for him to seize all power and declare himself a dictator.

All of this alarmism and over-the-top hysteria is coming from a media that was pushing another candidate in a way that was unprecedented. The concept that Trump is somehow different from all other presidents and "not normal" has been developed and promoted by this same media. What is actually different is the way Wall Street and its cronies in corporate globalism, including many foreign entities along with the mainstream media, led a charge for a particular candidate and are now attempting to undermine the person that beat her at every turn before he has even taken office.

The bottom line here is that the most important thing we have is The Constitution. That is our safeguard if someone like Trump actually turns out to be a Mussolini. And we must be diligent instead of complacent when people, specifically presidents with their executive orders, try to circumvent The Constitution or chip away at its power, regardless of whether that president is a Democrat or a Republican.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.


Trump won't be killing reporters. I'm certain of that.

Do you think the press is reporting honestly now? Debate moderators crying at the results. One candidate getting questions in advance. Why do you trust the media?


I'm not surprised that you are fine with the Trump administration reporting the news. You were fine with them when they were reporting things you agreed with. Sounds like you want state media.


We've had that for the past 18 months.

You weren't complaining.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
As untrustworthy as MSM is, the other media (i.e. Patriot News, Young Cons, Deadspin (Gawker) are much worse

But the MSM can't be trusted people seem to trust anything that's NOT main stream. Weird.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:49 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80542
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.


Trump won't be killing reporters. I'm certain of that.

Do you think the press is reporting honestly now? Debate moderators crying at the results. One candidate getting questions in advance. Why do you trust the media?


I'm not surprised that you are fine with the Trump administration reporting the news. You were fine with them when they were reporting things you agreed with. Sounds like you want state media.


We've had that for the past 18 months.

You weren't complaining.



Trump is meeting with Sulzberger today. Probably to discuss turning the New York Times into Pravda.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:55 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80542
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
rogers park bryan wrote:
As untrustworthy as MSM is, the other media (i.e. Patriot News, Young Cons, Deadspin (Gawker) are much worse

But the MSM can't be trusted people seem to trust anything that's NOT main stream. Weird.



Well, Twitter/Facebook have really been revolutionary. They have fueled actual revolutions. If the mainstream media is painting one story but there are many unrelated people on the scene saying a different thing on Twitter, who are you going to believe? Of course, the powers that be are trying to put a lid on this as you can see with the censorship of certain accounts and certain "fake news" on these platforms. The stuff that is getting censored all shares a particular ideological bent that is not in line with what The Establishment has been pushing. That should be a bigger concern than the fantasy that Trump will be seizing control of the media. I really don't want Mark Zuckerberg and @Jack deciding what is and isn't worthy of being read.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
https://nypost.com/2016/11/21/donald-tr ... ing-squad/

looks like he's telling them to STFU now
(and yes i realize it's the NY Post so maybe 5% is true, but still)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:24 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80542
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
The Internet, by it's nature, can make something small into something giant or can take something that is wrong and easily promote it as fact. Aggregators pick up stories and if those stories are bullshit, they are suddenly all over the place, part of the very fabric of the World Wide Web. For an example of this, think of a song to which you absolutely know the lyrics and look up those lyrics on the Web. If you find one site that has them wrong, you will find countless others that have them wrong in the exact same way. The Internet has now effectively rewritten the song.

Just this morning my wife advised me of Trump supporters shouting, "Lügenpresse!" at rallies. Naturally, I was appalled by this. In my mind I immediately pictured the images of Leni Riefenstahl, modernized and brought to life in Western Pennsylvania. Of course, in our modern age when everyone has a camera there had to be video of this. The only thing I could find was these two morons, one of whom obviously had no idea what the word meant or where it came from:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/the- ... .ewEVwZP1J

Now, maybe there are huge swaths of Trump supporters out there screaming, "Lügenpresse!" at rallies all over the place, but I haven't seen any evidence of such and thus, I remain dubious. And one should be able to understand why the media taking video of these two goofs and turning that into the broad statement that "Trump supporters have adopted old Nazi term" calls the reliability of that media into question.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 9:12 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.



You know, I've often pointed out- usually in conversations with Boilermaker Rick- that all of our systems and the things that ties us together as a society are a lot more fragile than most people believe. I'm certain many Jews in 1930s Germany thought Hitler "could never happen here". But you have to look at the circumstances. At least half the country hates Trump. The climate really doesn't exist for him to seize all power and declare himself a dictator.

All of this alarmism and over-the-top hysteria is coming from a media that was pushing another candidate in a way that was unprecedented. The concept that Trump is somehow different from all other presidents and "not normal" has been developed and promoted by this same media. What is actually different is the way Wall Street and its cronies in corporate globalism, including many foreign entities along with the mainstream media, led a charge for a particular candidate and are now attempting to undermine the person that beat her at every turn before he has even taken office.

The bottom line here is that the most important thing we have is The Constitution. That is our safeguard if someone like Trump actually turns out to be a Mussolini. And we must be diligent instead of complacent when people, specifically presidents with their executive orders, try to circumvent The Constitution or chip away at its power, regardless of whether that president is a Democrat or a Republican.



This just isn't true. The media went out of their way to appear "fair and balanced" when they should have been reporting on Trump. They covered him like he was the same as Hillary. They gave him $2 billion in free advertising because he helped their ratings. Hell they promoted the opening of one of his establishments. They spent the last few weeks of the campaign almost focused entirely on negative Hillary stories about emails and falling poll numbers. There may have been individuals who wanted Hillary to win but with the exception of CNN the rest of the networks covered the election like it was a reality tv show. I didn't see a full Hillary speech after the Democratic National Convention until she was with Obama in Philly a day before the election. I saw MANY full speeches from Trump. The networks are probably excited about Trump being president.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 9:14 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.


Trump won't be killing reporters. I'm certain of that.

Do you think the press is reporting honestly now? Debate moderators crying at the results. One candidate getting questions in advance. Why do you trust the media?


I'm not surprised that you are fine with the Trump administration reporting the news. You were fine with them when they were reporting things you agreed with. Sounds like you want state media.


We've had that for the past 18 months.

You weren't complaining.


I and MANY other people were complaining about 24 hour Trump tv. Even Republicans complained during the primaries.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
You're missing the entire point, Nas.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:09 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Internet, by it's nature, can make something small into something giant or can take something that is wrong and easily promote it as fact. Aggregators pick up stories and if those stories are bullshit, they are suddenly all over the place, part of the very fabric of the World Wide Web. For an example of this, think of a song to which you absolutely know the lyrics and look up those lyrics on the Web. If you find one site that has them wrong, you will find countless others that have them wrong in the exact same way. The Internet has now effectively rewritten the song.

Just this morning my wife advised me of Trump supporters shouting, "Lügenpresse!" at rallies. Naturally, I was appalled by this. In my mind I immediately pictured the images of Leni Riefenstahl, modernized and brought to life in Western Pennsylvania. Of course, in our modern age when everyone has a camera there had to be video of this. The only thing I could find was these two morons, one of whom obviously had no idea what the word meant or where it came from:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/the- ... .ewEVwZP1J

Now, maybe there are huge swaths of Trump supporters out there screaming, "Lügenpresse!" at rallies all over the place, but I haven't seen any evidence of such and thus, I remain dubious. And one should be able to understand why the media taking video of these two goofs and turning that into the broad statement that "Trump supporters have adopted old Nazi term" calls the reliability of that media into question.

The incident your wife was likely referencing is this one: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/richard-spencer-speech-npi/508379/. And yeah, it's pretty fucking disturbing.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Internet, by it's nature, can make something small into something giant or can take something that is wrong and easily promote it as fact. Aggregators pick up stories and if those stories are bullshit, they are suddenly all over the place, part of the very fabric of the World Wide Web. For an example of this, think of a song to which you absolutely know the lyrics and look up those lyrics on the Web. If you find one site that has them wrong, you will find countless others that have them wrong in the exact same way. The Internet has now effectively rewritten the song.

Just this morning my wife advised me of Trump supporters shouting, "Lügenpresse!" at rallies. Naturally, I was appalled by this. In my mind I immediately pictured the images of Leni Riefenstahl, modernized and brought to life in Western Pennsylvania. Of course, in our modern age when everyone has a camera there had to be video of this. The only thing I could find was these two morons, one of whom obviously had no idea what the word meant or where it came from:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/the- ... .ewEVwZP1J

Now, maybe there are huge swaths of Trump supporters out there screaming, "Lügenpresse!" at rallies all over the place, but I haven't seen any evidence of such and thus, I remain dubious. And one should be able to understand why the media taking video of these two goofs and turning that into the broad statement that "Trump supporters have adopted old Nazi term" calls the reliability of that media into question.


FROM YOUR LINK:
Quote:
The term, which means “lying press” in German, has a history dating back to the mid-1800s and was used by the Nazis to discredit the media. In recent years, it has been revived by German far-right anti-immigrant groups. And on Saturday, it made an appearance at a Trump rally in Cleveland, Ohio.

Fucking Buzzfeed...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:52 pm
Posts: 360
pizza_Place: Local entrepreneurs only
rogers park bryan wrote:
As untrustworthy as MSM is, the other media (i.e. Patriot News, Young Cons, Deadspin (Gawker) are much worse

But the MSM can't be trusted people seem to trust anything that's NOT main stream. Weird.


What is wrong with those cites except for Gawker which was rightfully shut down because they messed with the wrong people? The other cites report the truth straight from Trump's mouth without the bullshit questioning. All this questioning bullshit just allows the MSM to bullshit and spin his words some more. Its best for the country that the MSM be shut down so we just have pure news and updates from the White house and no more lies from crooked's favorite people (MSM).

_________________
libtard's personfied:

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
You said "naked" and bearing breasts (which are reproductive organs and thus technically "genitals" are they not?) is "naked" for all intents and purposes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.



You know, I've often pointed out- usually in conversations with Boilermaker Rick- that all of our systems and the things that ties us together as a society are a lot more fragile than most people believe. I'm certain many Jews in 1930s Germany thought Hitler "could never happen here". But you have to look at the circumstances. At least half the country hates Trump. The climate really doesn't exist for him to seize all power and declare himself a dictator.

All of this alarmism and over-the-top hysteria is coming from a media that was pushing another candidate in a way that was unprecedented. The concept that Trump is somehow different from all other presidents and "not normal" has been developed and promoted by this same media. What is actually different is the way Wall Street and its cronies in corporate globalism, including many foreign entities along with the mainstream media, led a charge for a particular candidate and are now attempting to undermine the person that beat her at every turn before he has even taken office.

The bottom line here is that the most important thing we have is The Constitution. That is our safeguard if someone like Trump actually turns out to be a Mussolini. And we must be diligent instead of complacent when people, specifically presidents with their executive orders, try to circumvent The Constitution or chip away at its power, regardless of whether that president is a Democrat or a Republican.


He doesn't have to be the second coming of Hitler to be an autocrat though. That is the point that is missed in all of this. He doesn't respect politicians nor the political process and that is a problem. Will he be able to sit down and hammer out legislation with people that he dislikes personally and disrespects politically? I don't think he can. He is very thin skinned and he is way too enamored with his own greatness to ever work with people for an extended period of time. He needs loyalist/asslickers in his stead in order to feel good about himself.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:32 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
As untrustworthy as MSM is, the other media (i.e. Patriot News, Young Cons, Deadspin (Gawker) are much worse

But the MSM can't be trusted people seem to trust anything that's NOT main stream. Weird.



Well, Twitter/Facebook have really been revolutionary. They have fueled actual revolutions. If the mainstream media is painting one story but there are many unrelated people on the scene saying a different thing on Twitter, who are you going to believe? Of course, the powers that be are trying to put a lid on this as you can see with the censorship of certain accounts and certain "fake news" on these platforms. The stuff that is getting censored all shares a particular ideological bent that is not in line with what The Establishment has been pushing. That should be a bigger concern than the fantasy that Trump will be seizing control of the media. I really don't want Mark Zuckerberg and @Jack deciding what is and isn't worthy of being read.


The corporate control of the media is a massive problem--as the left has been arguing for decades--that has undermined our democracy and paved the way for the rise of someone like Trump. He knows that Americans largely distrust and perhaps even despise the media. As a result, he has consistently campaigned against the press while cultivating his own communication channels. The problem here, though, is that Trump is far more dishonest than the mainstream media, where fact-based journalism and legitimate investigative reporting is still conducted amid a broader pro-corporate ideological environment. Trump and his surrogates appear to have little regard or no regard for facts. They are capitalizing on the chaotic hegemony of neoliberalism--which has undermined social institutions such as the press, labor unions, the public school system, etc--apparently in hopes of erecting a new system that will amplify Trump's message--regardless of whether it is truthful or not.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82999
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.



You know, I've often pointed out- usually in conversations with Boilermaker Rick- that all of our systems and the things that ties us together as a society are a lot more fragile than most people believe. I'm certain many Jews in 1930s Germany thought Hitler "could never happen here". But you have to look at the circumstances. At least half the country hates Trump. The climate really doesn't exist for him to seize all power and declare himself a dictator.

All of this alarmism and over-the-top hysteria is coming from a media that was pushing another candidate in a way that was unprecedented. The concept that Trump is somehow different from all other presidents and "not normal" has been developed and promoted by this same media. What is actually different is the way Wall Street and its cronies in corporate globalism, including many foreign entities along with the mainstream media, led a charge for a particular candidate and are now attempting to undermine the person that beat her at every turn before he has even taken office.

The bottom line here is that the most important thing we have is The Constitution. That is our safeguard if someone like Trump actually turns out to be a Mussolini. And we must be diligent instead of complacent when people, specifically presidents with their executive orders, try to circumvent The Constitution or chip away at its power, regardless of whether that president is a Democrat or a Republican.


Remember all those Republicans who were standing up against him even in the general election? Those guys don't exist anymore. People won on his coattails. So now he is in charge of the executive and the legislative. He will be in charge of the judicial sometime in his four years as well.

Bush ran roughshod over the Constitution to the cheers of many. Obama was the one person I thought both capable and willing to correct the trend. He didn't and now we have a guy who will abuse power like no president we have seen

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
President Trump doing his own reporting is dangerous.


Trump can't "report". He can speak directly. Why do you feel that people need an extra layer in between?


Huh? Because this isn't Russia.



You know, I've often pointed out- usually in conversations with Boilermaker Rick- that all of our systems and the things that ties us together as a society are a lot more fragile than most people believe. I'm certain many Jews in 1930s Germany thought Hitler "could never happen here". But you have to look at the circumstances. At least half the country hates Trump. The climate really doesn't exist for him to seize all power and declare himself a dictator.

All of this alarmism and over-the-top hysteria is coming from a media that was pushing another candidate in a way that was unprecedented. The concept that Trump is somehow different from all other presidents and "not normal" has been developed and promoted by this same media. What is actually different is the way Wall Street and its cronies in corporate globalism, including many foreign entities along with the mainstream media, led a charge for a particular candidate and are now attempting to undermine the person that beat her at every turn before he has even taken office.

The bottom line here is that the most important thing we have is The Constitution. That is our safeguard if someone like Trump actually turns out to be a Mussolini. And we must be diligent instead of complacent when people, specifically presidents with their executive orders, try to circumvent The Constitution or chip away at its power, regardless of whether that president is a Democrat or a Republican.


He doesn't have to be the second coming of Hitler to be an autocrat though. That is the point that is missed in all of this. He doesn't respect politicians nor the political process and that is a problem. Will he be able to sit down and hammer out legislation with people that he dislikes personally and disrespects politically? I don't think he can. He is very thin skinned and he is way too enamored with his own greatness to ever work with people for an extended period of time. He needs loyalist/asslickers in his stead in order to feel good about himself.



Were you writing about Obama?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Last edited by pittmike on Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:05 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
I'm not a Trump fan but he really seems to be shaking up Washington.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not a Trump fan but he really seems to be shaking up Washington.


I said a long time ago when this started that if Trump won or lost (at that point it was the early primaries) wasn't important to me. Really no one gave him a chance. I felt though he could blow this whole damn thing up. Welcome to change.

We will survive just fine I truly believe that. National politics (parties, media and coverage) is not likely to be the same anymore.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not a Trump fan but he really seems to be shaking up Washington.


I said a long time ago when this started that if Trump won or lost (at that point it was the early primaries) wasn't important to me. Really no one gave him a chance. I felt though he could blow this whole damn thing up. Welcome to change.

We will survive just fine I truly believe that. National politics (parties, media and coverage) is not likely to be the same anymore.
Trump may not be the hero we wanted but he may be the hero we need.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Tall Midget wrote:
[
The corporate control of the media is a massive problem--as the left has been arguing for decades--that has undermined our democracy and paved the way for the rise of someone like Trump. He knows that Americans largely distrust and perhaps even despise the media. As a result, he has consistently campaigned against the press while cultivating his own communication channels. The problem here, though, is that Trump is far more dishonest than the mainstream media, where fact-based journalism and legitimate investigative reporting is still conducted amid a broader pro-corporate ideological environment. Trump and his surrogates appear to have little regard or no regard for facts. They are capitalizing on the chaotic hegemony of neoliberalism--which has undermined social institutions such as the press, labor unions, the public school system, etc--apparently in hopes of erecting a new system that will amplify Trump's message--regardless of whether it is truthful or not.


Dude, you seem like a nice guy and all but you are a socialist. of course anything you see is "pro-corporate" :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:01 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80542
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
long time guy wrote:

He doesn't have to be the second coming of Hitler to be an autocrat though. That is the point that is missed in all of this. He doesn't respect politicians nor the political process and that is a problem. Will he be able to sit down and hammer out legislation with people that he dislikes personally and disrespects politically? I don't think he can. He is very thin skinned and he is way too enamored with his own greatness to ever work with people for an extended period of time. He needs loyalist/asslickers in his stead in order to feel good about himself.


I agree that his disrespect for the process, or more likely his willful ignorance regarding the way it works, is troublesome, but his disrespect for politicians is well-earned and shared by many Americans from both parties, and one of the driving forces behind his election in the first place.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:04 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Hatchetman wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
[
The corporate control of the media is a massive problem--as the left has been arguing for decades--that has undermined our democracy and paved the way for the rise of someone like Trump. He knows that Americans largely distrust and perhaps even despise the media. As a result, he has consistently campaigned against the press while cultivating his own communication channels. The problem here, though, is that Trump is far more dishonest than the mainstream media, where fact-based journalism and legitimate investigative reporting is still conducted amid a broader pro-corporate ideological environment. Trump and his surrogates appear to have little regard or no regard for facts. They are capitalizing on the chaotic hegemony of neoliberalism--which has undermined social institutions such as the press, labor unions, the public school system, etc--apparently in hopes of erecting a new system that will amplify Trump's message--regardless of whether it is truthful or not.


Dude, you seem like a nice guy and all but you are a socialist. of course anything you see is "pro-corporate" :lol:


So you think that the corporate media is neutral or anti-corporate? :lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Part of the story is the media, hot off their heels from two weeks ago expressing genuine shock at how out of the touch they are, expected Americans to sympathize with them after Trump wrecked them all in this meeting. I don't think they quite realize how despised they are.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82999
Tall Midget wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
[
The corporate control of the media is a massive problem--as the left has been arguing for decades--that has undermined our democracy and paved the way for the rise of someone like Trump. He knows that Americans largely distrust and perhaps even despise the media. As a result, he has consistently campaigned against the press while cultivating his own communication channels. The problem here, though, is that Trump is far more dishonest than the mainstream media, where fact-based journalism and legitimate investigative reporting is still conducted amid a broader pro-corporate ideological environment. Trump and his surrogates appear to have little regard or no regard for facts. They are capitalizing on the chaotic hegemony of neoliberalism--which has undermined social institutions such as the press, labor unions, the public school system, etc--apparently in hopes of erecting a new system that will amplify Trump's message--regardless of whether it is truthful or not.


Dude, you seem like a nice guy and all but you are a socialist. of course anything you see is "pro-corporate" :lol:


So you think that the corporate media is neutral or anti-corporate? :lol:


Cubs fan

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:06 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80542
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Tall Midget wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Internet, by it's nature, can make something small into something giant or can take something that is wrong and easily promote it as fact. Aggregators pick up stories and if those stories are bullshit, they are suddenly all over the place, part of the very fabric of the World Wide Web. For an example of this, think of a song to which you absolutely know the lyrics and look up those lyrics on the Web. If you find one site that has them wrong, you will find countless others that have them wrong in the exact same way. The Internet has now effectively rewritten the song.

Just this morning my wife advised me of Trump supporters shouting, "Lügenpresse!" at rallies. Naturally, I was appalled by this. In my mind I immediately pictured the images of Leni Riefenstahl, modernized and brought to life in Western Pennsylvania. Of course, in our modern age when everyone has a camera there had to be video of this. The only thing I could find was these two morons, one of whom obviously had no idea what the word meant or where it came from:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/the- ... .ewEVwZP1J

Now, maybe there are huge swaths of Trump supporters out there screaming, "Lügenpresse!" at rallies all over the place, but I haven't seen any evidence of such and thus, I remain dubious. And one should be able to understand why the media taking video of these two goofs and turning that into the broad statement that "Trump supporters have adopted old Nazi term" calls the reliability of that media into question.

The incident your wife was likely referencing is this one: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/richard-spencer-speech-npi/508379/. And yeah, it's pretty fucking disturbing.


Whoa! I'm guessing there haven't been that many people at a Nazi rally in years.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 292 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group