It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 8:28 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
These elections are rigged. Only rich oligarchs win. If Hilary would have won some people would have higher taxes, and it's likely more brown people would have been bombed. But let's not think she was some change agent.


The system prevents change more than anything. They make it hard for legislation to get passed and then everything screams about there being no change.

Unless you can effectively work with other side nothing will get done. Unfortunately when you do that you are criticized for selling out the party. People need to be honest about the role played by everyone in this. There are differences but people are unwilling to compromise and that is ultimately what the system is built upon.


I appreciate you mention this as the system rather than just Republicans.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
I find the notion that the results jn WI, MI & PA shouldn't be challenged hilarious, especially in light of the state governments in two of those states, possible hacking and or racketeering. I find it funnier that many of the same haven't said boo about what's going on in NC, where republicans are creating a constitutional crisis with their attempts to rewrite government in a power's lame duck session.

As Zack noted, it's ok when they do it, and MANY that claim not to approve remain quiet or willfully oblivious there although they'll quickly give thousands of words when they feign disgust over what Hillary might do.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:09 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
Greg Palast was predicting the presidency would be stolen a couple months before the election took place: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890.

This is Palast's preliminary report on the 2016 results: http://www.gregpalast.com/election-stolen-heres/.

Fascinating stuff.


Interesting. What about the Russian hacking to learn the systems?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
It's like the card game in The Sting. Paul Newman cheated better than Lonigan.


Great scene. Great movie.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
pittmike wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
These elections are rigged. Only rich oligarchs win. If Hilary would have won some people would have higher taxes, and it's likely more brown people would have been bombed. But let's not think she was some change agent.


The system prevents change more than anything. They make it hard for legislation to get passed and then everything screams about there being no change.

Unless you can effectively work with other side nothing will get done. Unfortunately when you do that you are criticized for selling out the party. People need to be honest about the role played by everyone in this. There are differences but people are unwilling to compromise and that is ultimately what the system is built upon.


I appreciate you mention this as the system rather than just Republicans.



I'm not a partisan hack I bashed Bernie more than anyone on here. Could you say the same about yourself? I just have a problem with racist idiots running the White House. If he doesn't govern in that way fine.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Tall Midget wrote:
Greg Palast was predicting the presidency would be stolen a couple months before the election took place: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890.

This is Palast's preliminary report on the 2016 results: http://www.gregpalast.com/election-stolen-heres/.

Fascinating stuff.


I have been posting stuff like this for years, and MANY people just refuse to believe it, because it was easy for them to vote. Some insist that people voting multiple times happens as often as people speed in their car, despite zero evidence. They're the anti-vaxxers of the political spectrum.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Even if there is proof Hillary has to accept the election results for the sake of our country. It's really that simple. Gore and Nixon had a better argument about 1 state.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
These elections are rigged. Only rich oligarchs win. If Hilary would have won some people would have higher taxes, and it's likely more brown people would have been bombed. But let's not think she was some change agent.


The system prevents change more than anything. They make it hard for legislation to get passed and then everything screams about there being no change.

Unless you can effectively work with other side nothing will get done. Unfortunately when you do that you are criticized for selling out the party. People need to be honest about the role played by everyone in this. There are differences but people are unwilling to compromise and that is ultimately what the system is built upon.


Ironically, I think this might be why Trump isn't a total disaster. He certainly isn't beholden to the rank and file GOP. They all actively tried to get him to lose. I can see him wheeling and dealing with both sides just to get the most things done so he can stroke his ego and say "Look at everything I was able to do!!!"

I can also see him spending a ton of time in NYC and letting Pence fuck around and he is very much an establishment rank and file dude.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Chus wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Greg Palast was predicting the presidency would be stolen a couple months before the election took place: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890.

This is Palast's preliminary report on the 2016 results: http://www.gregpalast.com/election-stolen-heres/.

Fascinating stuff.


I have been posting stuff like this for years, and MANY people just refuse to believe it, because it was easy for them to vote. Some insist that people voting multiple times happens as often as people speed in their car, despite zero evidence. They're the anti-vaxxers of the political spectrum.


It's how Bush won Ohio in 2004. This would be a good cause for someone on the left to take up. Would be nice to see Obama champion this as his post presidency cause. Fair and open elections. What a concept.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:14 am 
The only person who is going to try to sue their way to a victory is Pat McCrory - Republican - NC. He's actively trying to steal it. HRC hasn't said shit.

Project much?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Regular Reader wrote:
I find the notion that the results jn WI, MI & PA shouldn't be challenged hilarious, especially in light of the state governments in two of those states, possible hacking and or racketeering. I find it funnier that many of the same haven't said boo about what's going on in NC, where republicans are creating a constitutional crisis with their attempts to rewrite government in a power's lame duck session.

As Zack noted, it's ok when they do it, and MANY that claim not to approve remain quiet or willfully oblivious there although they'll quickly give thousands of words when they feign disgust over what Hillary might do.


Do you think that could possibly be good for the country? Even Nixon didn't force the issue like that.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Do you think that could possibly be good for the country? Even Nixon didn't force the issue like that.


Nixon attempted far worse, even after the Saturday Night Massacre embarrassed the country & office.

I don't think "good of the country" in the vein you suggest is a viable alternative at this point. To borrow one of TM's themes, there needs to be a difficult purging and acknowledgement of the current ills of our system. One man, one vote means little in most eyes, the federal judiciary and budget is being held hostage by petulant bomb throwers doing the bidding of their/our corporate overlords, civil rights mean little in some areas, and the media is completely complicit in the now brazen attempt to finish turning our country into an oligarchy. Hell it's acceptable in many circles to run against the notion of investment in public education, health or greater levels of voting while gleefully turning isolationist and bigoted in the face of changing world realities. This country needs an enema.

I'll admit that Hillary isn't the best overseer during this process, but I certainly wouldn't trust a grifter like Trump, a sniveling hypocrite like Ryan or Romney, nor a demagogue like Ted Cruz.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Do you think that could possibly be good for the country? Even Nixon didn't force the issue like that.


Nixon attempted far worse, even after the Saturday Night Massacre embarrassed the country & office.


I was speaking specifically about Daley stealing 1960 in Chicago.

Regular Reader wrote:
I don't think "good of the country" in the vein you suggest is a viable alternative at this point. To borrow one of TM's themes, there needs to be a difficult purging and acknowledgement of the current ills of our system. One man, one vote means little in most eyes, the federal judiciary and budget is being held hostage by petulant bomb throwers doing the bidding of their/our corporate overlords, civil rights mean little in some areas, and the media is completely complicit in the now brazen attempt to finish turning our country into an oligarchy. Hell it's acceptable in many circles to run against the notion of investment in public education, health or greater levels of voting while gleefully turning isolationist and bigoted in the face of changing world realities. This country needs an enema.


I have no problem with complete revolution. I think even the most desperate Americans still have it a little too soft for that to really happen. We'll eventually get there. You and I probably won't be alive to see it.

I think you and I disagree on just how bigoted most of the country is. It is a fact that most of those counties in Western Pennsylvania that went for Trump this time went for Obama the last two times out. Those people didn't suddenly become racists (not that voting for Obama necessarily means a person isn't racist). Who is benefiting the most from the global economy? Not Lunchbucket Pete, that's for sure. He may not be sophisticated enough to understand that unwinding all trade deals and going backward would be a disaster in its own right. He just knows he isn't doing great. And his TV constantly assaults him with all the crap he thinks he "needs".

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18498
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Do you think that could possibly be good for the country? Even Nixon didn't force the issue like that.


Nixon attempted far worse, even after the Saturday Night Massacre embarrassed the country & office.


I was speaking specifically about Daley stealing 1960 in Chicago.

Regular Reader wrote:
I don't think "good of the country" in the vein you suggest is a viable alternative at this point. To borrow one of TM's themes, there needs to be a difficult purging and acknowledgement of the current ills of our system. One man, one vote means little in most eyes, the federal judiciary and budget is being held hostage by petulant bomb throwers doing the bidding of their/our corporate overlords, civil rights mean little in some areas, and the media is completely complicit in the now brazen attempt to finish turning our country into an oligarchy. Hell it's acceptable in many circles to run against the notion of investment in public education, health or greater levels of voting while gleefully turning isolationist and bigoted in the face of changing world realities. This country needs an enema.


I have no problem with complete revolution. I think even the most desperate Americans still have it a little too soft for that to really happen. We'll eventually get there. You and I probably won't be alive to see it.

I think you and I disagree on just how bigoted most of the country is. It is a fact that most of those counties in Western Pennsylvania that went for Trump this time went for Obama the last two times out. Those people didn't suddenly become racists (not that voting for Obama necessarily means a person isn't racist). Who is benefiting the most from the global economy? Not Lunchbucket Pete, that's for sure. He may not be sophisticated enough to understand that unwinding all trade deals and going backward would be a disaster in its own right. He just knows he isn't doing great. And his TV constantly assaults him with all the crap he thinks he "needs".

I think we a way overdue for a revolt......should have happen during the Johnson administration

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
What's the endgame for a true revolt though? I don't think the United States of America can really have a revolution. We are too polarized right now. The people that would lead any revolution are too far on ends of the spectrum, I don't want a revolution spearheaded by the dopes out protesting the election and I certainly don't want it led by the dopes throwing up heil hitler salutes and calling themselves the alt-right. The true revolution would need to come from the moderate middle class and why would they want to revolt... A house, 2.5 kids, a couple of cars, whisky, crippling debt and only a path to move down the social scale. What more could an American ask for?

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.


She won the states with big cities....New York, California, Illinois.....why? because they have huge minority populations and she carried the minority votes. Allowing the cities to determine what is best for the nation (most of which does not reside in the big cities) is ridiculous. There is nothing wrong with the current process. It best represents the nation as a whole.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:09 pm
Posts: 29
pizza_Place: Booby's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What's the endgame for a true revolt though? I don't think the United States of America can really have a revolution. We are too polarized right now. The people that would lead any revolution are too far on ends of the spectrum, I don't want a revolution spearheaded by the dopes out protesting the election and I certainly don't want it led by the dopes throwing up heil hitler salutes and calling themselves the alt-right. The true revolution would need to come from the moderate middle class and why would they want to revolt... A house, 2.5 kids, a couple of cars, whisky, crippling debt and only a path to move down the social scale. What more could an American ask for?



You're a Great American, Hank. Heh, heh, heh, heh.

_________________
I'm With Me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:37 pm 
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.


She won the states with big cities....New York, California, Illinois.....why? because they have huge minority populations and she carried the minority votes. Allowing the cities to determine what is best for the nation (most of which does not reside in the big cities) is ridiculous. There is nothing wrong with the current process. It best represents the nation as a whole.

The most predictable reply this thread will have. Are you happy you can wear your sheet in public now Steve?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Do you think that could possibly be good for the country? Even Nixon didn't force the issue like that.


Nixon attempted far worse, even after the Saturday Night Massacre embarrassed the country & office.


I was speaking specifically about Daley stealing 1960 in Chicago.

Regular Reader wrote:
I don't think "good of the country" in the vein you suggest is a viable alternative at this point. To borrow one of TM's themes, there needs to be a difficult purging and acknowledgement of the current ills of our system. One man, one vote means little in most eyes, the federal judiciary and budget is being held hostage by petulant bomb throwers doing the bidding of their/our corporate overlords, civil rights mean little in some areas, and the media is completely complicit in the now brazen attempt to finish turning our country into an oligarchy. Hell it's acceptable in many circles to run against the notion of investment in public education, health or greater levels of voting while gleefully turning isolationist and bigoted in the face of changing world realities. This country needs an enema.


I have no problem with complete revolution. I think even the most desperate Americans still have it a little too soft for that to really happen. We'll eventually get there. You and I probably won't be alive to see it.

I think you and I disagree on just how bigoted most of the country is. It is a fact that most of those counties in Western Pennsylvania that went for Trump this time went for Obama the last two times out. Those people didn't suddenly become racists (not that voting for Obama necessarily means a person isn't racist). Who is benefiting the most from the global economy? Not Lunchbucket Pete, that's for sure. He may not be sophisticated enough to understand that unwinding all trade deals and going backward would be a disaster in its own right. He just knows he isn't doing great. And his TV constantly assaults him with all the crap he thinks he "needs".


Just adding to the class. I have news for you all. While there obviously has to be some racists out this way the Oh, Pa, WV belt went Trump for jobs, coal, guns and religion in no particular order. Many here can tell you exactly where they were when Obama made the clinging comment and the war on coal is serious.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
pittmike wrote:
Just adding to the class. I have news for you all. While there obviously has to be some racists out this way the Oh, Pa, WV belt went Trump for jobs, coal, guns and religion in no particular order. Many here can tell you exactly where they were when Obama made the clinging comment and the war on coal is serious.


c'mon Mike, next you'll be explaining how they feel Obama actually came for their guns or religion, right?!? And, btw, the war on whale oil was just as serious. How'd that one work out?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Regular Reader wrote:
And, btw, the war on whale oil was just as serious. How'd that one work out?


Time is gonna tell on that one!! Whale futures are up big, I'm watching the ticker as we speak!!!

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Why would one vote Trump for religion?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Regular Reader wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just adding to the class. I have news for you all. While there obviously has to be some racists out this way the Oh, Pa, WV belt went Trump for jobs, coal, guns and religion in no particular order. Many here can tell you exactly where they were when Obama made the clinging comment and the war on coal is serious.


c'mon Mike, next you'll be explaining how they feel Obama actually came for their guns or religion, right?!? And, btw, the war on whale oil was just as serious. How'd that one work out?


People out here hunt and love guns what you want me to tell you? As far as the coal if you tell someone you are going to eliminate their lives/careers as an industry they might just believe you. I am only reporting from the field.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
leashyourkids wrote:
Why would one vote Trump for religion?


IDK, ask the Evangelicals? Deal with the lesser devil?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
pittmike wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just adding to the class. I have news for you all. While there obviously has to be some racists out this way the Oh, Pa, WV belt went Trump for jobs, coal, guns and religion in no particular order. Many here can tell you exactly where they were when Obama made the clinging comment and the war on coal is serious.


c'mon Mike, next you'll be explaining how they feel Obama actually came for their guns or religion, right?!? And, btw, the war on whale oil was just as serious. How'd that one work out?


People out here hunt and love guns what you want me to tell you? As far as the coal if you tell someone you are going to eliminate their lives/careers as an industry they might just believe you. I am only reporting from the field.


I believe you, it's just that I think their hopes are delusional, much like the old whalers and kerosene producers.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
leashyourkids wrote:
Why would one vote Trump for religion?


Because their evangelic "pastors" are telling them to.

Hell, if they've been convinced of the rapture(?) or other apocalypse already, its just one more toss of the yo-yo for them in my book.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
While it is certainly a dick move, is pointing out voters with incorrect information really stealing an election?

I mean, if you move, and you don't change your address, and someone points that out then isn't it mostly the voters fault?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57670
Once again JORR is a voice of reason in this discussion.

Yet he is a Trumpet :roll:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 2:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
Once again JORR is a voice of reason in this discussion.

Yet he is a Trumpet :roll:


You're really taking this hard. I think virtually all of us agreed that this election shouldn't be challenged.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57670
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Once again JORR is a voice of reason in this discussion.

Yet he is a Trumpet :roll:


You're really taking this hard. I think virtually all of us agreed that this election shouldn't be challenged.

Not taking anything hard. I have enjoyed this whole process. Been amazing to watch.

Just find it ridiculous that you cannot be objective enough to see JORR is not a Trumpet.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group