It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:37 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56751
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Something Terrific!

Quote:
One Republican lobbyist said that in discussions about a plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act without a replacement, insurers are “painting a picture of the market that isn't very pretty and Republican staffers are getting the picture.”

“They want to pump money back in to the insurers without appearing like they’re giving them a handout or bailing them out,” the lobbyist added.

A second lobbyist said Republican staff is discussing the effects of actually getting into law a repeal bill similar to the one passed last year through the fast-track process known as reconciliation. That measure would have taken out the core of ObamaCare on a two-year delay.

The lobbyist said Republicans are discussing: “What's the impact on the 2018 plan year for that, and if it's as bad as some people say, what are our options to mitigate the impact without looking like we're bailing out the health insurance industry?”

Asked about the talks with insurers, a Republican House Ways and Means Committee aide said: “We’re talking with all stakeholders and discussing the best next steps as we work to reform this broken healthcare system.”

It is unclear what specific policies could end up being enacted. A starting point is programs similar to ObamaCare’s risk adjustment, reinsurance and risk corridors.

Those programs help guard insurers against losses by shifting money from insurers faring better financially to those faring worse.

Republicans, though, long denounced those programs as “bailouts” of insurers.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33243
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Well it ain't that simple. ObamaCare forced insurers to pay out a minimum of 85% of premiums as losses, and any less is returned to policyholders. So they put a cap on profits. Since companies were forced to take all comers, they also put in a stop loss for when companies had combined ratios above 100%. That is the risk corridor. The problem is, for all the companies who lost money, the government hasn't been paying out. So they capped profits, forced companies to take poor health risk, and promised to spread the wealth across the industry. But they didn't make good on that promise of spreading the wealth.

It is just another case of bad government policy hurting the market. I wouldn't support a bailout. They deserve to lose money for playing ball with the ObamaCare. Everyone in insurance knew it is a house of cards.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
What I had read was the Republicans in congress (house I assume) are trying to use up to three years to real and replace. The theme was there are too many aspects that are accepted and no longer negotiable by anyone as far as have to stay. Examples are the up to year 26 thing and pre-existing conditions. For the life of me I cannot see how they work that one out. Morally it makes sense but making an insurance company pay for something that did not begin "under their watch" so to speak seems bad business.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56751
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Obamacare was terrible and doomed to fail. Medicare for all is the only thing that's going to work. We tried it the Republicans' way and it failed. We tried it the Democrats' way and that failed too. The only attempt left is "the rest of the developed world's way."

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57670
Curious Hair wrote:
Obamacare was terrible and doomed to fail. Medicare for all is the only thing that's going to work. We tried it the Republicans' way and it failed. We tried it the Democrats' way and that failed too. The only attempt left is "the rest of the developed world's way."

How is that way paid for?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56751
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Taxes in lieu of private health insurance payments combined with increased purchasing power for the government. You'd come out ahead. And if you want to fight passionately against it ever happening like Hillary Clinton, you can go get lost in the forest with her.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
RFDC wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Obamacare was terrible and doomed to fail. Medicare for all is the only thing that's going to work. We tried it the Republicans' way and it failed. We tried it the Democrats' way and that failed too. The only attempt left is "the rest of the developed world's way."

How is that way paid for?

Don't you worry. Trump will negotiate the deal. It'll be terrific. Everyone will be amazed at what a tremendous win he will negotiate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57670
Curious Hair wrote:
Taxes in lieu of private health insurance payments combined with increased purchasing power for the government. You'd come out ahead. And if you want to fight passionately against it ever happening like Hillary Clinton, you can go get lost in the forest with her.


Not sure I buy that.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
No way to repeal Obamacare. Modifying it is the only thing that will happen.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Curious Hair wrote:
Taxes in lieu of private health insurance payments combined with increased purchasing power for the government. You'd come out ahead. And if you want to fight passionately against it ever happening like Hillary Clinton, you can go get lost in the forest with her.


As long as I'm not paying more each year and I don't have to wait 10 years to get a surgery, I don't really care what system we have.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57670
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Taxes in lieu of private health insurance payments combined with increased purchasing power for the government. You'd come out ahead. And if you want to fight passionately against it ever happening like Hillary Clinton, you can go get lost in the forest with her.


As long as I'm not paying more each year and I don't have to wait 10 years to get a surgery, I don't really care what system we have.


You will be paying more each year no matter what happens.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
We all pay for the health care of others already because we as a society (rightfully) don't allow people to die simply because they can't pay for an ER visit. That should be the starting point of the discussion.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10261
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Nas wrote:
No way to repeal Obamacare. Modifying it is the only thing that will happen.

Obamacare was put in place as a poison pill to make a later generation have to go to single payer because every other option is fucked beyond belief. Nobody involved with Obamacare's design could have actually thought it would work long term.

Medicare today is designed to bankrupt you if you really get sick with something that can be treated with medications. Before she died earlier this year, my mom was paying $2500/month for prescriptions (well check that, I was paying it) for her at-home cancer meds because she had gone over the upper limit on prescriptions and had to pay 40% of list the rest of the year. Imagine taking that model and applying it to the parents of a 4-year-old with some horrible disease where the kid probably will live to 14-15, but not to 35, and will probably never be well enough to work a day in his or her life. A kid sick enough that one of his parents will have to stop working to be able to be home enough because daycare is not an option.

I'm not reflexively for completely single payer. I like the fact that the physician group I go to has instituted $35 video calls for really routine things, where they will not bill insurance, period. This is DuPage County, most of us can afford $35.

But one of the major national medical groups sent our COO a letter during the W administration stating in a barely veiled way, "hey, if your employee with brain cancer doesn't get around to dying this year, we're going to drop your company as a client because we can't make any money on you." So I don't mind seeing the medical insurance companies have to fear for their survival just a little bit.


edited to clear up a typo.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
free penis reduction here we come!!

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
We need to invest more in preventing hospital visits in the first place. Beefing up public health programs. Implementing better health education programs in school. Expanding low to no income public clinics to encourage visits before it gets to the ER point. The ACA was designed to do this but instead focused on fucking down insurance companies as much as possible.

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56751
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The ACA was designed to make it illegal not to buy those companies' products. Poor them!

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Hatchetman wrote:
free penis reduction here we come!!

So leash really is leaving the board then ...

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nas wrote:
No way to repeal Obamacare. Modifying it is the only thing that will happen.


Pelosi and Biden knew that.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
We need to invest more in preventing hospital visits in the first place. Beefing up public health programs. Implementing better health education programs in school. Expanding low to no income public clinics to encourage visits before it gets to the ER point. The ACA was designed to do this but instead focused on fucking down insurance companies as much as possible.


The ACA was the largest mandate in the history of the United States forcing consumers to purchase a product from private companies.

That said, it's not like the ACA was necessarily good for these companies. The regulations crippled them (not that I give a shit) by regulating their combined ratio to an absurd point. They have basically been turned into public utilities who have a cap on how much profit they can earn (if any). The saving grace is that they added no value even before ACA. Health insurance is nothing but a way for "insurers" (they are not really insurers) to offer a product for a monthly fee with unlimited use and roll the dice that most of the people who use it won't use it much or at all. It's an actuarial game that does nothing to encourage cost reduction or preventative measures to reduce costs. They also take a piece of the action every time they profit (until the government doesn't allow them to).

We may as well just adopt a single payer system or privatize the whole thing... or at the very least, stop tying health insurance to employment. The way we currently do things is one of the most bizarre and inefficient systems one could dream up.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
The only solution is single payer full on. Or you eliminate the crap and just reimburse people their private premiums. Both have pitfalls. Obamacare was in between and worse. The poison pill was the right comment. It was just a step to make the electorate accept healthcare is government's responsibility.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
We need to invest more in preventing hospital visits in the first place. Beefing up public health programs. Implementing better health education programs in school. Expanding low to no income public clinics to encourage visits before it gets to the ER point. The ACA was designed to do this but instead focused on fucking down insurance companies as much as possible.


The ACA was the largest mandate in the history of the United States forcing consumers to purchase a product from private companies.

That said, it's not like the ACA was necessarily good for these companies. The regulations crippled them (not that I give a shit) by regulating their combined ratio to an absurd point. They have basically been turned into public utilities who have a cap on how much profit they can earn (if any). The saving grace is that they added no value even before ACA. Health insurance is nothing but a way for "insurers" (they are not really insurers) to offer a product for a monthly fee with unlimited use and roll the dice that most of the people who use it won't use it much or at all. It's an actuarial game that does nothing to encourage cost reduction or preventative measures to reduce costs. They also take a piece of the action every time they profit (until the government doesn't allow them to).

We may as well just adopt a single payer system or privatize the whole thing... or at the very least, stop tying health insurance to employment. The way we currently do things is one of the most bizarre and inefficient systems one could dream up.


Fuck you pal.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33243
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Fuckin A leash. You knocked that shit out of the park. You keep talking like that, and I'll be heading down to Naperville to present you with some rare bottle of Bourbon.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
And I'll be there to relieve him of it shortly thereafter.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I would fuck both of you.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
leashyourkids wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
We need to invest more in preventing hospital visits in the first place. Beefing up public health programs. Implementing better health education programs in school. Expanding low to no income public clinics to encourage visits before it gets to the ER point. The ACA was designed to do this but instead focused on fucking down insurance companies as much as possible.


The ACA was the largest mandate in the history of the United States forcing consumers to purchase a product from private companies.

That said, it's not like the ACA was necessarily good for these companies. The regulations crippled them (not that I give a shit) by regulating their combined ratio to an absurd point. They have basically been turned into public utilities who have a cap on how much profit they can earn (if any). The saving grace is that they added no value even before ACA. Health insurance is nothing but a way for "insurers" (they are not really insurers) to offer a product for a monthly fee with unlimited use and roll the dice that most of the people who use it won't use it much or at all. It's an actuarial game that does nothing to encourage cost reduction or preventative measures to reduce costs. They also take a piece of the action every time they profit (until the government doesn't allow them to).

We may as well just adopt a single payer system or privatize the whole thing... or at the very least, stop tying health insurance to employment. The way we currently do things is one of the most bizarre and inefficient systems one could dream up.


It's fucking hilarious that minus your professional expertise MANY like myself said this same thing when Obamacare was adopted. But wtf do I know? I was a racist righty whack job.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
No way to repeal Obamacare. Modifying it is the only thing that will happen.


Pelosi and Biden knew that.


Probably

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:16 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 34038
People have to apply for or renew Obama Care before January 1. Trump takes office on Jan 20.

He's gotta keep it for one more year. Then change it for the following year. That's what he'll do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
We need to invest more in preventing hospital visits in the first place. Beefing up public health programs. Implementing better health education programs in school. Expanding low to no income public clinics to encourage visits before it gets to the ER point. The ACA was designed to do this but instead focused on fucking down insurance companies as much as possible.


The ACA was the largest mandate in the history of the United States forcing consumers to purchase a product from private companies.

That said, it's not like the ACA was necessarily good for these companies. The regulations crippled them (not that I give a shit) by regulating their combined ratio to an absurd point. They have basically been turned into public utilities who have a cap on how much profit they can earn (if any). The saving grace is that they added no value even before ACA. Health insurance is nothing but a way for "insurers" (they are not really insurers) to offer a product for a monthly fee with unlimited use and roll the dice that most of the people who use it won't use it much or at all. It's an actuarial game that does nothing to encourage cost reduction or preventative measures to reduce costs. They also take a piece of the action every time they profit (until the government doesn't allow them to).

We may as well just adopt a single payer system or privatize the whole thing... or at the very least, stop tying health insurance to employment. The way we currently do things is one of the most bizarre and inefficient systems one could dream up.


It's fucking hilarious that minus your professional expertise MANY like myself said this same thing when Obamacare was adopted. But wtf do I know? I was a racist righty whack job.


Well, I don't disagree with you, but it's honestly pretty simple. I have no expertise in health insurance whatsoever. I work in actual insurance, as does Dennis. My observations are really just that... observations. Anyone can recognize that if you don't allow for-profit companies to profit, things won't make a lot of sense. The thing I think people didn't - and still don't - realize is that private health insurance companies honestly add no value to society whatsoever and never did. They're not insurance companies. They are basically banks with actuaries who write shitty policies and cross their fingers that they're profitable. They've always been like that. It's why I don't think a single payer option is a bad alternative. If anyone wants to talk about how bad the government would administer things, I would simply point them to a private insurer because it can't be much worse.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Yes Leash. That was my argument so long ago. It just doesn't make sense at all. But others argument as sometimes goes... what about the people hurting? I basically said write blue cross a government check or single payer. You can't do both.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I used to try to be honest and straight-forward with most people.

Then I started working in PBM.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group