It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 8:00 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 764 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 26  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
He's not trying to shut down free speech. He's just a whiny child who has more important things to worry about. Again, embarrassing.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Doesn't matter. A president shouldn't respond.
Of course he shouldn't. We just don't need to make it more than it is.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Saying it sucks is fine. It's the unbiased part that is really disturbing. I hope his fans know that a president trying to intimidate satirists is totally fine...in autocratic societies.
I don't know why SNL would feel intimidated by pointing out they are biased. I mean, they showed it when they did this right after the election. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BG-_ZDrypec

I don't think that was "satire". It was basically a "Hillary, we feel your pain!" moment that doesn't really make sense for a comedy show that should be better than that.


They don't feel intimidated. And they'll trot Baldwin back out there next week. It's actually the opposite. Trump isn't trying to silence SNL. Clinton supporters are trying to silence Trump. We can argue about whether we want a president who wastes his time with trivialities like this. I would argue we don't. But to act as if Trump is attempting to shut down free speech is nothing but trying to act like a victim for political gain.


The biased claim at best is totally irrelevant. It's a humor show - they can do whatever they want. Say bias when it comes to CNN or the NYT, but not when it comes to something like snl. Plus he won the campaign and is the top story in the country. What the hell else does he want them to lampoon? Perhaps those who agree with the bias claim want snl to stage a skit where Hillary runs into some random soccer mom in the woods while hiking, in addition to a standard skit about Trump. Maybe that'll be more fair?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
The biased claim at best is totally irrelevant. It's a humor show - they can do whatever they want. Say bias when it comes to CNN or the NYT, but not when it comes to something like snl. Plus he won the campaign and is the top story in the country. What the hell else does he want them to lampoon? Perhaps those who agree with the bias claim want snl to stage a skit where Hillary runs into some random soccer mom in the woods while hiking, in addition to a standard skit about Trump. Maybe that'll be more fair?
Did you see the video I posted. That was the first thing they did right after the election. It wasn't even meant to be funny or satirical. It was like the whole staff spent the week crying that Hillary lost and they did that to help with the healing.

Obviously they don't have to be fair and balanced but we also don't have to pretend they aren't just because they are a "comedy show".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:08 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80540
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The biased claim at best is totally irrelevant. It's a humor show - they can do whatever they want. Say bias when it comes to CNN or the NYT, but not when it comes to something like snl. Plus he won the campaign and is the top story in the country. What the hell else does he want them to lampoon? Perhaps those who agree with the bias claim want snl to stage a skit where Hillary runs into some random soccer mom in the woods while hiking, in addition to a standard skit about Trump. Maybe that'll be more fair?
Did you see the video I posted. That was the first thing they did right after the election. It wasn't even meant to be funny or satirical. It was like the whole staff spent the week crying that Hillary lost and they did that to help with the healing.

Obviously they don't have to be fair and balanced but we also don't have to pretend they aren't just because they are a "comedy show".


Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
It's things like this that make it seem like me and others are "Trump defenders". A lot of these Trump controversies are pretty much meaningless and there is a new one every day. It's just like him taking a call from Taiwan. Everyone was like "YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE CHINA MAD!" and then I think people started to realize that it wasn't a big deal and if China doesn't like it then they can deal with it. We spent all election hearing about how Trump is going to be controlled by Russia but then he violates a policy that is literally "Don't talk to Taiwan because China says not to!". It's just laughable.

Trump is an idiot on twitter but as long as he stays as a harmless idiot on twitter it isn't a big deal.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The biased claim at best is totally irrelevant. It's a humor show - they can do whatever they want. Say bias when it comes to CNN or the NYT, but not when it comes to something like snl. Plus he won the campaign and is the top story in the country. What the hell else does he want them to lampoon? Perhaps those who agree with the bias claim want snl to stage a skit where Hillary runs into some random soccer mom in the woods while hiking, in addition to a standard skit about Trump. Maybe that'll be more fair?
Did you see the video I posted. That was the first thing they did right after the election. It wasn't even meant to be funny or satirical. It was like the whole staff spent the week crying that Hillary lost and they did that to help with the healing.

Obviously they don't have to be fair and balanced but we also don't have to pretend they aren't just because they are a "comedy show".


Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.


Rick, I have seen that video in the past. It is clearly, as you and other said, sympathetic to Clinton. I don't think SNL has tried to run away from its liberal leanings. That being said, it was still bizarre, but maybe it's something the staff/talent really wanted to do. Not sure, but anyway it's not "bias," it's just a left-leaning show doing something left-leaning. Now, again, if an "objective" news organization did something similiar, we should definitely be outraged. It's just that sometimes I think the objective questioning of Trump on substantive issues is seen by some as bias, when to see that as bias more so a possible case of one's own bias speaking, at least that's how I see it.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.


It's not a direct threat, sure, but I will maintain that attacks against purported objective investigating reporting of government and government officials, to the extent that they're internalized and taken seriously by a large amount of the population are not healthy for a democracy. If I were to say Trump's tweet was an assault on free speech, you may be right in accusing me of reading too much into that tweet, but I'll just say the subtext of Tweets like that doesn't come off too well. And it's not the first time he's done it.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
It's things like this that make it seem like me and others are "Trump defenders". A lot of these Trump controversies are pretty much meaningless and there is a new one every day. It's just like him taking a call from Taiwan. Everyone was like "YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE CHINA MAD!" and then I think people started to realize that it wasn't a big deal and if China doesn't like it then they can deal with it. We spent all election hearing about how Trump is going to be controlled by Russia but then he violates a policy that is literally "Don't talk to Taiwan because China says not to!". It's just laughable.

Trump is an idiot on twitter but as long as he stays as a harmless idiot on twitter it isn't a big deal.


I'm not going to go too far deep into the Taiwan thing, but I'll just say the issue there is clearly more complicated than what you summarized above. It's been a long-standing understanding for more than 25 years for a reason. That being said, Trump did say he was going to shake things up, and he's obviously already started doing that. I read the call as a logical extension of Trump's anti-China rhetoric during the campaign, and I think it's stupid that the call is being covered as a breach of protocol when it's obvious that Trump has ulterior motives. Plus when did Trump give a shit about protocol anyway?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
It's things like this that make it seem like me and others are "Trump defenders". A lot of these Trump controversies are pretty much meaningless and there is a new one every day. It's just like him taking a call from Taiwan. Everyone was like "YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE CHINA MAD!" and then I think people started to realize that it wasn't a big deal and if China doesn't like it then they can deal with it. We spent all election hearing about how Trump is going to be controlled by Russia but then he violates a policy that is literally "Don't talk to Taiwan because China says not to!". It's just laughable.

Trump is an idiot on twitter but as long as he stays as a harmless idiot on twitter it isn't a big deal.


That's the point, though. Many, such as myself, fear that Twitter is a foreshadowing of things to come (or very well could be). It isn't Twitter itself that worries people - it's that if he really thinks it's appropriate to go on social media and blast a comedy show that probably is biased (but again, who cares?), what is he going to do when provoked by actual dangerous people and regimes? It's an indicator of his temperament. And while I don't believe he is trying to stifle free speech, it is disconcerting to me that he is ignorant enough not to know how careful a president has to be regarding criticism of the media. It's just a general awareness that is lacking.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
It's things like this that make it seem like me and others are "Trump defenders". A lot of these Trump controversies are pretty much meaningless and there is a new one every day. It's just like him taking a call from Taiwan. Everyone was like "YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE CHINA MAD!" and then I think people started to realize that it wasn't a big deal and if China doesn't like it then they can deal with it. We spent all election hearing about how Trump is going to be controlled by Russia but then he violates a policy that is literally "Don't talk to Taiwan because China says not to!". It's just laughable.

Trump is an idiot on twitter but as long as he stays as a harmless idiot on twitter it isn't a big deal.


That's the point, though. Many, such as myself, fear that Twitter is a foreshadowing of things to come (or very well could be). It isn't Twitter itself that worries people - it's that if he really thinks it's appropriate to go on social media and blast a comedy show that probably is biased (but again, who cares?), what is he going to do when provoked by actual dangerous people and regimes? It's an indicator of his temperament. And while I don't believe he is trying to stifle free speech, it is disconcerting to me that he is ignorant enough not to know how careful a president has to be regarding criticism of the media. It's just a general awareness that is lacking.


He is also following the most media savvy president of all time. That makes Trump's unpredictable and childish demeanor all the more glaring.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80540
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
It's things like this that make it seem like me and others are "Trump defenders". A lot of these Trump controversies are pretty much meaningless and there is a new one every day. It's just like him taking a call from Taiwan. Everyone was like "YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE CHINA MAD!" and then I think people started to realize that it wasn't a big deal and if China doesn't like it then they can deal with it. We spent all election hearing about how Trump is going to be controlled by Russia but then he violates a policy that is literally "Don't talk to Taiwan because China says not to!". It's just laughable.

Trump is an idiot on twitter but as long as he stays as a harmless idiot on twitter it isn't a big deal.



Right, and there is a clear bias among what I would refer as "respectable" media, i.e. those that are believed to have gravitas, who might act as debate moderators, etc. rather than the "fringe" media like Breitbart.

For example, there's this overwhelming desire to paint almost everything Trump does as "dangerous". And whether you believe he is dangerous or not isn't the point. He may well be the most dangerous man to ever hold the office. But I don't recall the "respectable" media- the same media that is now challenging Trump at every turn- ever characterizing a Secretary of State who also ran a foundation that accepted large sums from foreign governments as "dangerous", though I'd say it had the potential, at a bare minimum, to be far more dangerous than anything Trump has said or done thus far.

Additionally, regarding the sudden hue and cry over "fake news", does anyone really believe that anyone would be talking about this had Clinton won? It wasn't the American right that blurred the lines between comedy and political commentary.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Rick, I have seen that video in the past. It is clearly, as you and other said, sympathetic to Clinton. I don't think SNL has tried to run away from its liberal leanings. That being said, it was still bizarre, but maybe it's something the staff/talent really wanted to do. Not sure, but anyway it's not "bias," it's just a left-leaning show doing something left-leaning. Now, again, if an "objective" news organization did something similiar, we should definitely be outraged. It's just that sometimes I think the objective questioning of Trump on substantive issues is seen by some as bias, when to see that as bias more so a possible case of one's own bias speaking, at least that's how I see it.
I agree they don't have to be unbiased. In reality, I don't think any political show needs to be unbiased unless they truly are striving to be the news. Maddow and Rush can have their biases come through just like SNL and The Daily Show can. The 6 o'clock news should be unbiased but those aren't personality driven shows.

However, it is fair to point out the biases of anyone who gets into political discussions in the media.

veganfan21 wrote:
I'm not going to go too far deep into the Taiwan thing, but I'll just say the issue there is clearly more complicated than what you summarized above. It's been a long-standing understanding for more than 25 years for a reason. That being said, Trump did say he was going to shake things up, and he's obviously already started doing that. I read the call as a logical extension of Trump's anti-China rhetoric during the campaign, and I think it's stupid that the call is being covered as a breach of protocol when it's obvious that Trump has ulterior motives. Plus when did Trump give a shit about protocol anyway?
I think it would be different if they were discussing policy or negotiating with them(like we do with Iran while they want to destroy Israel). Accepting a congratulatory phone call from them is not a big deal even if China doesn't like it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80540
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
It's things like this that make it seem like me and others are "Trump defenders". A lot of these Trump controversies are pretty much meaningless and there is a new one every day. It's just like him taking a call from Taiwan. Everyone was like "YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE CHINA MAD!" and then I think people started to realize that it wasn't a big deal and if China doesn't like it then they can deal with it. We spent all election hearing about how Trump is going to be controlled by Russia but then he violates a policy that is literally "Don't talk to Taiwan because China says not to!". It's just laughable.

Trump is an idiot on twitter but as long as he stays as a harmless idiot on twitter it isn't a big deal.


That's the point, though. Many, such as myself, fear that Twitter is a foreshadowing of things to come (or very well could be). It isn't Twitter itself that worries people - it's that if he really thinks it's appropriate to go on social media and blast a comedy show that probably is biased (but again, who cares?), what is he going to do when provoked by actual dangerous people and regimes? It's an indicator of his temperament. And while I don't believe he is trying to stifle free speech, it is disconcerting to me that he is ignorant enough not to know how careful a president has to be regarding criticism of the media. It's just a general awareness that is lacking.


He is also following the most media savvy president of all time. That makes Trump's unpredictable and childish demeanor all the more glaring.


I think that Trump himself is probably the most media savvy president himself. He certainly wrote the blueprint on how social media will be used in future campaigns. For everyone here who is angered or dismayed by Trump's tweets- and I maintain that this board leans left- there is at least one other person somewhere who is saying "Go Trump!"

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
That's the point, though. Many, such as myself, fear that Twitter is a foreshadowing of things to come (or very well could be). It isn't Twitter itself that worries people - it's that if he really thinks it's appropriate to go on social media and blast a comedy show that probably is biased (but again, who cares?), what is he going to do when provoked by actual dangerous people and regimes? It's an indicator of his temperament. And while I don't believe he is trying to stifle free speech, it is disconcerting to me that he is ignorant enough not to know how careful a president has to be regarding criticism of the media. It's just a general awareness that is lacking.
To me it is the "Boy who cried wolf" syndrome though. Some of his appointments are downright scary. Why the hell is Ben Carson being in charge of HUD? Steve Bannon has a very divisive history. Trump saying we should jail or deport flag burners is stupid but probably just a dumb thing he said that will never be mentioned again.

The problem is that people also make a big deal about him fighting with SNL and him taking a call from Taiwan. It all gets lost in the noise.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:45 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Doesn't matter. A president shouldn't respond.
Of course he shouldn't. We just don't need to make it more than it is.


What was he trying to do when he attacked Hamilton?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
That's the point, though. Many, such as myself, fear that Twitter is a foreshadowing of things to come (or very well could be). It isn't Twitter itself that worries people - it's that if he really thinks it's appropriate to go on social media and blast a comedy show that probably is biased (but again, who cares?), what is he going to do when provoked by actual dangerous people and regimes? It's an indicator of his temperament. And while I don't believe he is trying to stifle free speech, it is disconcerting to me that he is ignorant enough not to know how careful a president has to be regarding criticism of the media. It's just a general awareness that is lacking.
To me it is the "Boy who cried wolf" syndrome though. Some of his appointments are downright scary. Why the hell is Ben Carson being in charge of HUD? Steve Bannon has a very divisive history. Trump saying we should jail or deport flag burners is stupid but probably just a dumb thing he said that will never be mentioned again.

The problem is that people also make a big deal about him fighting with SNL and him taking a call from Taiwan. It all gets lost in the noise.


You may be right; I don't know of anyone on this board making a big deal out of the SNL tweets, though... unless you're just generally talking about the media. I posted that in the Trump Tweet thread because it is just another in a long line of "dumb" tweets. It's not even close to the worst thing he's ever done, obviously.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Doesn't matter. A president shouldn't respond.
Of course he shouldn't. We just don't need to make it more than it is.


What was he trying to do when he attacked Hamilton?


He was pissed off that his VP got lectured when he went out to see a play with his family. Obama would have stood up for Biden too.

The 'very overrated' comment is his personality. If he disagrees with something, or if something pisses him off he thinks it must suck.

Or he is a secret genius and he did that to take the heat off of his Trump U settlement.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Rick, I have seen that video in the past. It is clearly, as you and other said, sympathetic to Clinton. I don't think SNL has tried to run away from its liberal leanings. That being said, it was still bizarre, but maybe it's something the staff/talent really wanted to do. Not sure, but anyway it's not "bias," it's just a left-leaning show doing something left-leaning. Now, again, if an "objective" news organization did something similiar, we should definitely be outraged. It's just that sometimes I think the objective questioning of Trump on substantive issues is seen by some as bias, when to see that as bias more so a possible case of one's own bias speaking, at least that's how I see it.
I agree they don't have to be unbiased. In reality, I don't think any political show needs to be unbiased unless they truly are striving to be the news. Maddow and Rush can have their biases come through just like SNL and The Daily Show can. The 6 o'clock news should be unbiased but those aren't personality driven shows.

However, it is fair to point out the biases of anyone who gets into political discussions in the media.

veganfan21 wrote:
I'm not going to go too far deep into the Taiwan thing, but I'll just say the issue there is clearly more complicated than what you summarized above. It's been a long-standing understanding for more than 25 years for a reason. That being said, Trump did say he was going to shake things up, and he's obviously already started doing that. I read the call as a logical extension of Trump's anti-China rhetoric during the campaign, and I think it's stupid that the call is being covered as a breach of protocol when it's obvious that Trump has ulterior motives. Plus when did Trump give a shit about protocol anyway?
I think it would be different if they were discussing policy or negotiating with them(like we do with Iran while they want to destroy Israel). Accepting a congratulatory phone call from them is not a big deal even if China doesn't like it.


I actually said at the time that the call with Taiwan was overblown. And then he had to go on Twitter and talk about how much business we do with Taiwan and how everyone is hypocrites. The guy can't just be above anything.

Also, he needs to realize that he has tools to change national discourse... but it shouldn't come directly from him. If he wants to point out the hypocrisy of the media, he should have his surrogates and talking heads do it. He himself has to be above that shit.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Doesn't matter. A president shouldn't respond.
Of course he shouldn't. We just don't need to make it more than it is.


What was he trying to do when he attacked Hamilton?


He was pissed off that his VP got lectured when he went out to see a play with his family. Obama would have stood up for Biden too.

The 'very overrated' comment is his personality. If he disagrees with something, or if something pisses him off he thinks it must suck.

Or he is a secret genius and he did that to take the heat off of his Trump U settlement.


:lol:

It's definitely the former, IMO. Trump is Hanlon's Razor personified.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
This Taiwan thing is HUUGE. Maybe start the next cold war, who knows. Not saying I'm fur or agin but it is a major story. For whatever reason ($$$????) we've kowtowed to those MF'ers for 70 years.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Doesn't matter. A president shouldn't respond.
Of course he shouldn't. We just don't need to make it more than it is.


What was he trying to do when he attacked Hamilton?
I don't think he was trying to do much of anything.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Doesn't matter. A president shouldn't respond.
Of course he shouldn't. We just don't need to make it more than it is.


What was he trying to do when he attacked Hamilton?
I don't think he was trying to do much of anything.


I agree. He's just an idiot. Nas, I think you give him too much credit for his savviness.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
For everyone here who is angered or dismayed by Trump's tweets- and I maintain that this board leans left- [url]there is at least one other person somewhere who is saying "Go Trump!"[/url]

MANY closet Trumpets here on the board are cheering his tweets.

I was down in the deep South this weekend in beautiful Salem, Illinois. MANY are celebrating Chairman Trump's poor behavior.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:14 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Doesn't matter. A president shouldn't respond.
Of course he shouldn't. We just don't need to make it more than it is.


What was he trying to do when he attacked Hamilton?
I don't think he was trying to do much of anything.


I agree. He's just an idiot. Nas, I think you give him too much credit for his savviness.


I've been saying from the beginning that MANY of you all don't give him enough credit.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80540
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
That's the point, though. Many, such as myself, fear that Twitter is a foreshadowing of things to come (or very well could be). It isn't Twitter itself that worries people - it's that if he really thinks it's appropriate to go on social media and blast a comedy show that probably is biased (but again, who cares?), what is he going to do when provoked by actual dangerous people and regimes? It's an indicator of his temperament. And while I don't believe he is trying to stifle free speech, it is disconcerting to me that he is ignorant enough not to know how careful a president has to be regarding criticism of the media. It's just a general awareness that is lacking.
To me it is the "Boy who cried wolf" syndrome though. Some of his appointments are downright scary. Why the hell is Ben Carson being in charge of HUD? Steve Bannon has a very divisive history. Trump saying we should jail or deport flag burners is stupid but probably just a dumb thing he said that will never be mentioned again.

The problem is that people also make a big deal about him fighting with SNL and him taking a call from Taiwan. It all gets lost in the noise.


There is a school of thought that says he tweeted Hillary's exact flag legislation to point out media hypocrisy. If so, it worked.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
That's the point, though. Many, such as myself, fear that Twitter is a foreshadowing of things to come (or very well could be). It isn't Twitter itself that worries people - it's that if he really thinks it's appropriate to go on social media and blast a comedy show that probably is biased (but again, who cares?), what is he going to do when provoked by actual dangerous people and regimes? It's an indicator of his temperament. And while I don't believe he is trying to stifle free speech, it is disconcerting to me that he is ignorant enough not to know how careful a president has to be regarding criticism of the media. It's just a general awareness that is lacking.
To me it is the "Boy who cried wolf" syndrome though. Some of his appointments are downright scary. Why the hell is Ben Carson being in charge of HUD? Steve Bannon has a very divisive history. Trump saying we should jail or deport flag burners is stupid but probably just a dumb thing he said that will never be mentioned again.

The problem is that people also make a big deal about him fighting with SNL and him taking a call from Taiwan. It all gets lost in the noise.



The reason that people are making his SNL tiff a big deal is because he has made it a big deal.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There is a school of thought that says he tweeted Hillary's exact flag legislation to point out media hypocrisy. If so, it worked.
That's pretty good then.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80540
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Rick, I have seen that video in the past. It is clearly, as you and other said, sympathetic to Clinton. I don't think SNL has tried to run away from its liberal leanings. That being said, it was still bizarre, but maybe it's something the staff/talent really wanted to do. Not sure, but anyway it's not "bias," it's just a left-leaning show doing something left-leaning. Now, again, if an "objective" news organization did something similiar, we should definitely be outraged. It's just that sometimes I think the objective questioning of Trump on substantive issues is seen by some as bias, when to see that as bias more so a possible case of one's own bias speaking, at least that's how I see it.
I agree they don't have to be unbiased. In reality, I don't think any political show needs to be unbiased unless they truly are striving to be the news. Maddow and Rush can have their biases come through just like SNL and The Daily Show can. The 6 o'clock news should be unbiased but those aren't personality driven shows.

However, it is fair to point out the biases of anyone who gets into political discussions in the media.

veganfan21 wrote:
I'm not going to go too far deep into the Taiwan thing, but I'll just say the issue there is clearly more complicated than what you summarized above. It's been a long-standing understanding for more than 25 years for a reason. That being said, Trump did say he was going to shake things up, and he's obviously already started doing that. I read the call as a logical extension of Trump's anti-China rhetoric during the campaign, and I think it's stupid that the call is being covered as a breach of protocol when it's obvious that Trump has ulterior motives. Plus when did Trump give a shit about protocol anyway?
I think it would be different if they were discussing policy or negotiating with them(like we do with Iran while they want to destroy Israel). Accepting a congratulatory phone call from them is not a big deal even if China doesn't like it.


I actually said at the time that the call with Taiwan was overblown. And then he had to go on Twitter and talk about how much business we do with Taiwan and how everyone is hypocrites. The guy can't just be above anything.

Also, he needs to realize that he has tools to change national discourse... but it shouldn't come directly from him. If he wants to point out the hypocrisy of the media, he should have his surrogates and talking heads do it. He himself has to be above that shit.


Agreed. At some point he should start acting presidential.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
That's the point, though. Many, such as myself, fear that Twitter is a foreshadowing of things to come (or very well could be). It isn't Twitter itself that worries people - it's that if he really thinks it's appropriate to go on social media and blast a comedy show that probably is biased (but again, who cares?), what is he going to do when provoked by actual dangerous people and regimes? It's an indicator of his temperament. And while I don't believe he is trying to stifle free speech, it is disconcerting to me that he is ignorant enough not to know how careful a president has to be regarding criticism of the media. It's just a general awareness that is lacking.
To me it is the "Boy who cried wolf" syndrome though. Some of his appointments are downright scary. Why the hell is Ben Carson being in charge of HUD? Steve Bannon has a very divisive history. Trump saying we should jail or deport flag burners is stupid but probably just a dumb thing he said that will never be mentioned again.

The problem is that people also make a big deal about him fighting with SNL and him taking a call from Taiwan. It all gets lost in the noise.



The reason that people are making his SNL tiff a big deal is because he has made it a big deal.


His people need to tell him that tweets from the President are not equal to tweets from Donald Trump. He just did what he's always done. Someone in his administration needs to tell him he can no longer do that. His life has changed, a one off tweet about you're pissed at something on TV carries a hell of a lot more weight now.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
the board leans left? :lol:

that ship already capsized.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80540
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
And I certainly don't think a president should impetuously use a social media platform to single-handedly blow up longstanding U.S. policy and protocol.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 764 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group