Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The biased claim at best is totally irrelevant. It's a humor show - they can do whatever they want. Say bias when it comes to CNN or the NYT, but not when it comes to something like snl. Plus he won the campaign and is the top story in the country. What the hell else does he want them to lampoon? Perhaps those who agree with the bias claim want snl to stage a skit where Hillary runs into some random soccer mom in the woods while hiking, in addition to a standard skit about Trump. Maybe that'll be more fair?
Did you see the video I posted. That was the first thing they did right after the election. It wasn't even meant to be funny or satirical. It was like the whole staff spent the week crying that Hillary lost and they did that to help with the healing.
Obviously they don't have to be fair and balanced but we also don't have to pretend they aren't just because they are a "comedy show".
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
Rick, I have seen that video in the past. It is clearly, as you and other said, sympathetic to Clinton. I don't think SNL has tried to run away from its liberal leanings. That being said, it was still bizarre, but maybe it's something the staff/talent really wanted to do. Not sure, but anyway it's not "bias," it's just a left-leaning show doing something left-leaning. Now, again, if an "objective" news organization did something similiar, we should definitely be outraged. It's just that sometimes I think the objective questioning of Trump on substantive issues is seen by some as bias, when to see that as bias more so a possible case of one's own bias speaking, at least that's how I see it.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
It's not a direct threat, sure, but I will maintain that attacks against purported objective investigating reporting of government and government officials, to the extent that they're internalized and taken seriously by a large amount of the population are not healthy for a democracy. If I were to say Trump's tweet was an assault on free speech, you may be right in accusing me of reading too much into that tweet, but I'll just say the subtext of Tweets like that doesn't come off too well. And it's not the first time he's done it.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, they don't have to be fair or unbiased, but the problem with Trump pointing out that they clearly aren't isn't some threat to the Republic, it's just dumb and embarrassing like leash said.
It's things like this that make it seem like me and others are "Trump defenders". A lot of these Trump controversies are pretty much meaningless and there is a new one every day. It's just like him taking a call from Taiwan. Everyone was like "YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE CHINA MAD!" and then I think people started to realize that it wasn't a big deal and if China doesn't like it then they can deal with it. We spent all election hearing about how Trump is going to be controlled by Russia but then he violates a policy that is literally "Don't talk to Taiwan because China says not to!". It's just laughable.
Trump is an idiot on twitter but as long as he stays as a harmless idiot on twitter it isn't a big deal.
I'm not going to go too far deep into the Taiwan thing, but I'll just say the issue there is clearly more complicated than what you summarized above. It's been a long-standing understanding for more than 25 years for a reason. That being said, Trump did say he was going to shake things up, and he's obviously already started doing that. I read the call as a logical extension of Trump's anti-China rhetoric during the campaign, and I think it's stupid that the call is being covered as a breach of protocol when it's obvious that Trump has ulterior motives. Plus when did Trump give a shit about protocol anyway?