It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 8:33 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 293 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You're either purposely misunderstanding or trying to paint me as a bigot and I don't appreciate either one. I've never said every Muslim is a terrorist or that every Muslim is a criminal or anything even close to that. But every Muslim does share a particular set of beliefs and ideologies. And there is no majority Muslim country where I believe you would be comfortable living.

Do you think David Duke's beliefs are incompatible with Western values? I don't know if he's committed any crimes or terrorist acts. It's his beliefs that are incompatible with our values. That's enough that you would never defend him. It's enough for me too.

Neither of those is true.

Your argument style on this topic makes it to where you can't be persuaded by facts, as you just dismiss them. You say Islamic belief is incompatible with living in the West. I point out the tens of millions who have already integrated just fine, and you counter with saying those aren't real Muslims.

As for your last paragraph, I'm not sure about that either. There is a very large contingent of the United States who believes almost exactly what David Duke does. It's tough to make the argument that his beliefs are incompatible with Western values when we just elected a President who largely ran on those same beliefs.

So are we going to say that over half the country is incompatible with Western values? We have all current Muslims and all racists already(despite Elmhurst Steve and veganfan doing just fine, presumably). That's gotta come close to half. I'm sure we can add more groups too.

I'm not misunderstanding you and I'm not calling you a bigot. I'm simply saying that you are wrong here, and I've shown why.


Muslims in the U.S. are a very small fraction of the population. They don't have the power in numbers to make any real demands on American society.

Religion by its very nature is supremacist. Especially a religion that hasn't had hundreds of years of secularism and enlightenment to polish down its rough edges. And Islam makes claims that no other religion makes, A) that it is the final Word of God, and B) that there is an imperative to conquer the earth in its name. It's a political ideology as much as it is a religion. It isn't designed to be a live and let live ideology. I couldn't give a shit if a guy prays five times a day and eats halal. To tell you the truth, I don't give a shit if he thinks gays should be thrown off buildings and women are second class people. But when enough of his fellow believers begin acting on those things, I see it as a problem.

If you look at the polling numbers on subjects like apostasy, homosexuality, the role of women, etc. it becomes clear that vast numbers of Muslims have views that we would consider incompatible with our society.


You lose credibility with that statement.

Do you really see it as a problem when "enough" of his fellow believers do it?


Why are Muslims the only group that isn't judged on their associations and the bad actions of their fellows? That seems pretty odd when Trump voters are all being lumped together. They share at least one thing in common- they voted for Donald Trump. Clinton's "deplorable" statement was ill-advised, but it wasn't all that wrong, you know.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you look at the polling numbers on subjects like apostasy, homosexuality, the role of women, etc. it becomes clear that vast numbers of Muslims have views that we would consider incompatible with our society.

The same could be set of David Duke and his ilk, and they largely just helped Trump become President here. What do you think we are talking about when we talk about Western values anyway?

Free speech, due process, innocent til proven guilty? MANY on the left don't even believe in that stuff anymore.

Freedom of expression and encouragement of individuality? Again, MANY on both sides of the spectrum here don't fit that description either.

Freedom of the press? Not if our new President-elect has his say.

Freedom of religion? Well, sure, unless they are Muslim.

Seperation of Church and State? Tell that to Mike Pence and Ted Cruz, and let me know when we elect an athiest to lead us(pretty sure Trump is one but hes claiming not to be so whatever)

No matter what your definition is, a large number of Americans will look "incompatible" with it as well, including MANY who represent us in government.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
denisdman wrote:
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
So as a "liberal" FF, which Muslim country would you feel comfortable being a citizen in?


Indonesia


One of their states has Sharia law, but they are largely quite tolerant.


In "tolerant" Indonesia there are still journalists being arrested for not showing the Prophet enough respect. This woman was flogged in public for standing too close to her boyfriend: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... riend.html

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't think we should derail this thread for yet another Muslim argument.

However, I would like to derail it by asking JORR more about his stance that he doesn't believe in property rights. I do find that somewhat contradictory from someone who has said that he is a nationalist who believes in an "us vs. them" mentality. You do realize that the original Declaration of Independence was going to say "Life, Liberty, and the Ownership of Property" rather than "the pursuit of happiness," right?


:lol: When have I ever said that I was a nationalist or that I have an "us vs. them" mentality? That's the nature of the world I was born into 53 years ago. It's not the way I would have set it up. The same thing goes for the ownership of property. Yes, I have owned land. But I think if we look at it from a standpoint of if we were gods and we were setting up a worldwide society, would some people having the right/ability to own the actual ground be something we see as moral and right?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
The same could be set of David Duke and his ilk, and they largely just helped Trump become President here.


Right, but nobody is leaping to defend David Duke or those who share his views, regardless of whether they are law abiding citizens who largely mind their own business.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't think we should derail this thread for yet another Muslim argument.

However, I would like to derail it by asking JORR more about his stance that he doesn't believe in property rights. I do find that somewhat contradictory from someone who has said that he is a nationalist who believes in an "us vs. them" mentality. You do realize that the original Declaration of Independence was going to say "Life, Liberty, and the Ownership of Property" rather than "the pursuit of happiness," right?


:lol: When have I ever said that I was a nationalist or that I have an "us vs. them" mentality? That's the nature of the world I was born into 53 years ago. It's not the way I would have set it up. The same thing goes for the ownership of property. Yes, I have owned land. But I think if we look at it from a standpoint of if we were gods and we were setting up a worldwide society, would some people having the right/ability to own the actual ground be something we see as moral and right?


Why do you hate freedom?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't think we should derail this thread for yet another Muslim argument.

However, I would like to derail it by asking JORR more about his stance that he doesn't believe in property rights. I do find that somewhat contradictory from someone who has said that he is a nationalist who believes in an "us vs. them" mentality. You do realize that the original Declaration of Independence was going to say "Life, Liberty, and the Ownership of Property" rather than "the pursuit of happiness," right?


:lol: When have I ever said that I was a nationalist or that I have an "us vs. them" mentality?

You've mentioned multiple times a quote about picking your side not because it's the right one but because it's your side.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I believe the United Arab Emirates would be fine to live in, Bahrain or Dubai...seems fairly westernized.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
define them however you want. JORR and I thought the bored was liberal. NAS said no, it is conservative and he had the numbers to back it up but declined.


When you put forth conservative ideas, you tend to feel the heat from left leaning folks. Nas is getting it from the other side because he has been highly critical of all things Trump. So he is getting the heat from opposing views.

I always felt the board had a liberal bent, but it is probably better to state that the board in general is more liberal than me. Meaning plenty of right of center guys, but they're still largely left of me.


lots of suburban white males who never set foot in urban areas on this board. That is not a liberal demographic


Sauganash Tough


it's not a matter of tough


I know.

It's not very "urban" either.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The same could be set of David Duke and his ilk, and they largely just helped Trump become President here.


Right, but nobody is leaping to defend David Duke or those who share his views.

I'm defending him in this thread only to the extent that I don't see his views as being incompatible with living in the United States, although I obviously find them deplorable. It's almost laughable to suggest that considering who we just elected President.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't think we should derail this thread for yet another Muslim argument.

However, I would like to derail it by asking JORR more about his stance that he doesn't believe in property rights. I do find that somewhat contradictory from someone who has said that he is a nationalist who believes in an "us vs. them" mentality. You do realize that the original Declaration of Independence was going to say "Life, Liberty, and the Ownership of Property" rather than "the pursuit of happiness," right?


:lol: When have I ever said that I was a nationalist or that I have an "us vs. them" mentality?

You've mentioned multiple times a quote about picking your side not because it's the right one but because it's your side.


That quote doesn't suggest that the man in question is on the wrong side.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83000
I think Joe's position on the ownership of real estate is interesting.

I was kind of blown away in real estate law with the discussion concerning where the right to ownership of land is derived. I guess it had been something that I took for granted was always present.

One side of me could kind of buy the argument that private ownership is a theft of everyone else's enjoyment. The other side of me is like, fuck off, hippie!

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The same could be set of David Duke and his ilk, and they largely just helped Trump become President here.


Right, but nobody is leaping to defend David Duke or those who share his views.

I'm defending him in this thread only to the extent that I don't see his views as being incompatible with living in the United States, although I obviously find them deplorable. It's almost laughable to suggest that considering who we just elected President.


I didn't really think you were defending him at all. My point is that everyone is entitled to their viewpoints, even if they are reprehensible. I don't think there's any room in society for thought police and litmus tests of beliefs. But that shouldn't prevent us from being able to criticize bad beliefs.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't think we should derail this thread for yet another Muslim argument.

However, I would like to derail it by asking JORR more about his stance that he doesn't believe in property rights. I do find that somewhat contradictory from someone who has said that he is a nationalist who believes in an "us vs. them" mentality. You do realize that the original Declaration of Independence was going to say "Life, Liberty, and the Ownership of Property" rather than "the pursuit of happiness," right?


:lol: When have I ever said that I was a nationalist or that I have an "us vs. them" mentality?

You've mentioned multiple times a quote about picking your side not because it's the right one but because it's your side.


That quote doesn't suggest that the man in question is on the wrong side.

Right, but it clearly suggests a belief in American Exceptionalism and us vs them, which is all leash was saying, i believe.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't think we should derail this thread for yet another Muslim argument.

However, I would like to derail it by asking JORR more about his stance that he doesn't believe in property rights. I do find that somewhat contradictory from someone who has said that he is a nationalist who believes in an "us vs. them" mentality. You do realize that the original Declaration of Independence was going to say "Life, Liberty, and the Ownership of Property" rather than "the pursuit of happiness," right?


:lol: When have I ever said that I was a nationalist or that I have an "us vs. them" mentality? That's the nature of the world I was born into 53 years ago. It's not the way I would have set it up. The same thing goes for the ownership of property. Yes, I have owned land. But I think if we look at it from a standpoint of if we were gods and we were setting up a worldwide society, would some people having the right/ability to own the actual ground be something we see as moral and right?


I didn't mean it as a slight, so calm down before me and my buddy Seacrest take you to the wood shed.

Based on your posts, I just surmised that you believe in American exceptionalism and that we are a good force in the world because we are "in charge." If I surmised wrong, I apologize (not really, but I have to maintain the appearance of being reasonable occasionally).

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The same could be set of David Duke and his ilk, and they largely just helped Trump become President here.


Right, but nobody is leaping to defend David Duke or those who share his views.

I'm defending him in this thread only to the extent that I don't see his views as being incompatible with living in the United States, although I obviously find them deplorable. It's almost laughable to suggest that considering who we just elected President.


I didn't really think you were defending him at all. My point is that everyone is entitled to their viewpoints, even if they are reprehensible. I don't think there's any room in society for thought police and litmus tests of beliefs. But that shouldn't prevent us from being able to criticize bad beliefs.

I have no problem with you criticizing bad beliefs, including Muslim beliefs. I only start to take issue with it when it goes further than that and you or others start talking about "incompatible" with living here, which is not only false, but also sounds a bit too close to Trump's "ban them all until we figure this out" rhetoric.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You're either purposely misunderstanding or trying to paint me as a bigot and I don't appreciate either one. I've never said every Muslim is a terrorist or that every Muslim is a criminal or anything even close to that. But every Muslim does share a particular set of beliefs and ideologies. And there is no majority Muslim country where I believe you would be comfortable living.

Do you think David Duke's beliefs are incompatible with Western values? I don't know if he's committed any crimes or terrorist acts. It's his beliefs that are incompatible with our values. That's enough that you would never defend him. It's enough for me too.

Neither of those is true.

Your argument style on this topic makes it to where you can't be persuaded by facts, as you just dismiss them. You say Islamic belief is incompatible with living in the West. I point out the tens of millions who have already integrated just fine, and you counter with saying those aren't real Muslims.

As for your last paragraph, I'm not sure about that either. There is a very large contingent of the United States who believes almost exactly what David Duke does. It's tough to make the argument that his beliefs are incompatible with Western values when we just elected a President who largely ran on those same beliefs.

So are we going to say that over half the country is incompatible with Western values? We have all current Muslims and all racists already(despite Elmhurst Steve and veganfan doing just fine, presumably). That's gotta come close to half. I'm sure we can add more groups too.

I'm not misunderstanding you and I'm not calling you a bigot. I'm simply saying that you are wrong here, and I've shown why.


Muslims in the U.S. are a very small fraction of the population. They don't have the power in numbers to make any real demands on American society.

Religion by its very nature is supremacist. Especially a religion that hasn't had hundreds of years of secularism and enlightenment to polish down its rough edges. And Islam makes claims that no other religion makes, A) that it is the final Word of God, and B) that there is an imperative to conquer the earth in its name. It's a political ideology as much as it is a religion. It isn't designed to be a live and let live ideology. I couldn't give a shit if a guy prays five times a day and eats halal. To tell you the truth, I don't give a shit if he thinks gays should be thrown off buildings and women are second class people. But when enough of his fellow believers begin acting on those things, I see it as a problem.

If you look at the polling numbers on subjects like apostasy, homosexuality, the role of women, etc. it becomes clear that vast numbers of Muslims have views that we would consider incompatible with our society.


You lose credibility with that statement.

Do you really see it as a problem when "enough" of his fellow believers do it?


Why are Muslims the only group that isn't judged on their associations and the bad actions of their fellows? That seems pretty odd when Trump voters are all being lumped together. They share at least one thing in common- they voted for Donald Trump. Clinton's "deplorable" statement was ill-advised, but it wasn't all that wrong, you know.


What I meant was it should be a problem when one believer acts, not just when many do.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18498
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
I am a liberal :) I see a conservative being like Big Fan

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83000
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
define them however you want. JORR and I thought the bored was liberal. NAS said no, it is conservative and he had the numbers to back it up but declined.


When you put forth conservative ideas, you tend to feel the heat from left leaning folks. Nas is getting it from the other side because he has been highly critical of all things Trump. So he is getting the heat from opposing views.

I always felt the board had a liberal bent, but it is probably better to state that the board in general is more liberal than me. Meaning plenty of right of center guys, but they're still largely left of me.


lots of suburban white males who never set foot in urban areas on this board. That is not a liberal demographic


Sauganash Tough


it's not a matter of tough


I know.

It's not very "urban" either.


You don't know.

Of course it is urban. A city is supposed to have a city center and neighborhoods. It is no different a neighborhood than Beverly, Norwood Park, etc. There are plenty of working class people in the neighborhood. I live between a custodial engineer at Loyola U and a police officer. Also, of course, it is within the city.

Again, if you define liberal as Dem and conservative as Repub, Sauganash is voting in a manner very similar to that of other neighborhoods within the city borders

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
What does the type of employees in a neighborhood have to do with it being urban?

You live in an area far more similar to Downers Grove or Naperville. The places you like to make fun of here.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't think we should derail this thread for yet another Muslim argument.

However, I would like to derail it by asking JORR more about his stance that he doesn't believe in property rights. I do find that somewhat contradictory from someone who has said that he is a nationalist who believes in an "us vs. them" mentality. You do realize that the original Declaration of Independence was going to say "Life, Liberty, and the Ownership of Property" rather than "the pursuit of happiness," right?


:lol: When have I ever said that I was a nationalist or that I have an "us vs. them" mentality? That's the nature of the world I was born into 53 years ago. It's not the way I would have set it up. The same thing goes for the ownership of property. Yes, I have owned land. But I think if we look at it from a standpoint of if we were gods and we were setting up a worldwide society, would some people having the right/ability to own the actual ground be something we see as moral and right?


I didn't mean it as a slight, so calm down before me and my buddy Seacrest take you to the wood shed.

Based on your posts, I just surmised that you believe in American exceptionalism and that we are a good force in the world because we are "in charge." If I surmised wrong, I apologize (not really, but I have to maintain the appearance of being reasonable occasionally).


I do believe in American exceptionalism but I would prefer that we did not need to be "in charge". The problem is that if we fail to take charge, a nation that is less exceptional will do so. Withdrawal and isolationism is simply an abdication of leadership to Moscow or Beijing.

My belief in American exceptionalism is based on who we are as a people. I think it's definitely fraying at the edges right now. And this is my problem with the entire philosophy of "multiculturalism". There is no American ethnic identity. Germans can always fall back on their shared German ethnicity. The Japanese can do the same. They have this ethnic core that holds them together. It's also the thing that breeds nationalism, particularly the ugly brand that is often seen in Europe or the xenophobia that helped cause the downfall of a Japan that appeared poised for world domination. The fact that we lack this shared ethnic identity is a strength. However, without it Americans have to have some basic shared beliefs and values to hold us together. If we don't, we have no country.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[ The fact that we lack this shared ethnic identity is a strength. However, without it Americans have to have some basic shared beliefs and values to hold us together. If we don't, we have no country.


If we all believe in nothing, does that count?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10261
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Seacrest wrote:
What does the type of employees in a neighborhood have to do with it being urban?

You live in an area far more similar to Downers Grove or Naperville. The places you like to make fun of here.

So "urban" = "gritty and poorish?" Then just say rich and poor.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The same could be set of David Duke and his ilk, and they largely just helped Trump become President here.


Right, but nobody is leaping to defend David Duke or those who share his views.

I'm defending him in this thread only to the extent that I don't see his views as being incompatible with living in the United States, although I obviously find them deplorable. It's almost laughable to suggest that considering who we just elected President.


I didn't really think you were defending him at all. My point is that everyone is entitled to their viewpoints, even if they are reprehensible. I don't think there's any room in society for thought police and litmus tests of beliefs. But that shouldn't prevent us from being able to criticize bad beliefs.

I have no problem with you criticizing bad beliefs, including Muslim beliefs. I only start to take issue with it when it goes further than that and you or others start talking about "incompatible" with living here, which is not only false, but also sounds a bit too close to Trump's "ban them all until we figure this out" rhetoric.


Well, I don't think immigrants have any special right to demand entry into the U.S. There have always been restrictions and limits on immigration. I don't think it's immoral or evil to suggest taking great care in people who we welcome, especially those who we might have good reason to believe don't share our basic values. That's a far cry from kicking out citizens.

But as far as Donald Trump is concerned, he changes his mind so much and spews out any crazy thought that pops into his head so often, I have no idea if his position is something most Americans would consider reasonable or if it's something obviously outright un-American.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80544
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[ The fact that we lack this shared ethnic identity is a strength. However, without it Americans have to have some basic shared beliefs and values to hold us together. If we don't, we have no country.


If we all believe in nothing, does that count?


This man is a nihilist, FavreFan. There's nothing to be afraid of.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
What does the type of employees in a neighborhood have to do with it being urban?

You live in an area far more similar to Downers Grove or Naperville. The places you like to make fun of here.

So "urban" = "gritty and poorish?" Then just say rich and poor.


:lol:

I don't think someone from Sauganash would like to be called gritty, and I'm sure they don't want to be called poor.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83000
Seacrest wrote:
What does the type of employees in a neighborhood have to do with it being urban?

You live in an area far more similar to Downers Grove or Naperville. The places you like to make fun of here.


Well, let's define what urban is to you so I don't infer anything.

I'll start with the basics, Sauganash is located in Chicago and therefore is urban by definition.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83000
Seacrest wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
What does the type of employees in a neighborhood have to do with it being urban?

You live in an area far more similar to Downers Grove or Naperville. The places you like to make fun of here.

So "urban" = "gritty and poorish?" Then just say rich and poor.


:lol:

I don't think someone from Sauganash would like to be called gritty, and I'm sure they don't want to be called poor.


Can you name a person who wanted to be called poor, other than Mitt Romney for about 9 months in his life?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I don't know what sauganash has to do with anything...a place for rich people who have to live in the city for whatever reason.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
What does the type of employees in a neighborhood have to do with it being urban?

You live in an area far more similar to Downers Grove or Naperville. The places you like to make fun of here.

So "urban" = "gritty and poorish?" Then just say rich and poor.


:lol:

I don't think someone from Sauganash would like to be called gritty, and I'm sure they don't want to be called poor.


Can you name a person who wanted to be called poor, other than Mitt Romney for about 9 months in his life?

Hillary wanted people to think she was dead broke. Does that count?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 293 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group