You're trolling, or at least I hope you are.

The intelligence community even admitted their isn', at this point, any evidence that the Russians were involved in any way. The FBI commented on evidence and facts that it has, the CIA/Intel Community is making assertions and conspiracy theories with, as they have admitted already, no evidence to prove them. In fact, I think it can by theorized that the CIA is now acting to discredit and devalue the 2016 election and, as such, is doing the work that they assert the Russians are doing. Kind of funny, Obama, Reid and the rest are the ones carrying Putin's water.

More interesting is that this "story"( ) is being deployed in unison by all of the key players, all at the same time, with the same narrative tropes and selective information peddling. They are, quite literally, reading off the same script. Same language, same implied understanding, same anonymous sources and the same non-truths.... Example: Andrea Mitchell ststing in an article that the CIA "confirmed" that the Russians are behind Trump being elected. None of that is true, nor does the leaked "story" prove Mitchell's assertion. But it's printed anyways.

Also, no one has even stated what they think the Russians actually did....just that they "influenced" the election in some way....I think, maybe. No one knows, but trust the CIA and current admin. Even though they already admitted they have zero evidence or proof or facts at this time and the whole "story" is a leak from an anonymous source. The Washington Post is already taking a step back as well, especially about the phony fake PropOrNot hoax.

Common sense and critical thinking is being used here, just not by Nas.

Your post is totally false. Not providing the public with the intelligence they have isn't the same as not having any intelligence that links Russia. Every step of the way Trump has blown kisses at Putin and the Russians have hacked and leaked valid information that ONLY hurt Democrats and pushed fake news that ONLY hurt Hillary and Democrats. Trump is about to nominate a Russian approved Secretary of State after Putin publicly criticized his other options.

The CIA has concluded that Russia mounted a covert intelligence operation to influence the U.S. election in an effort to help Donald Trump win, a congressional official knowledgeable on the matter told NBC News.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper briefed senators on the latest intelligence in a closed-door meeting last week, and he described the latest findings on the intentions of the Russian government with regard to the hacks and other interference in the U.S. presidential election, according to the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the intelligence.

Separately, another source briefed in the intelligence told NBC News that the U.S. government has identified specific Russian actors it believes were involved in the hacks, based on intercepted communications, human source tips and computer forensics.

I have one question. Why is the CIA doing domestic investigations?I thought their charter prohibited them from doing that sort of thing? Why isn't anyone in the media bringing this up?

You may not have noticed this but Russia is a foreign country.

Okay, bud, take a breather. "Putin approved SoS...." You're venturing into conspiracy, tinfoil hat territory here.

BE.CAREFUL

That's it?

Oh no, he "knows" Putin! He's a Commie, he will sell us all out and pave the way for a Russian invasion. Wolverines!

You should be concerned my friend. Putin spoke and Trump listened to him. Russia First appointments.

You should be concerned my friend. Putin spoke and Trump listened to him. Russia First appointments.

Come on, SomeGuy. I realize some of what you do is a bit, but much is true. You are way too smart to continually defend this guy. Some of what he represents certainly has merit - distrust of the establishment, skepticism of shady governments, populist rhetoric, etc... But it's nothing more than coincidence. Most of us would like someone to make waves, but deep down, you know this ain't the fuckin' guy. He's a lifelong Democrat/Clinton lover with no principles and no intellectual curiosity. Anything he does that is "good" is simply because everyone gets something right occasionally.

He's basically Brian Scalabrine when Scal would come in and miraculously hit a tough shot... It looks good, sounds good, and makes you feel good, but it's not a strategy to use consistently in the future. In fact, it's almost frightening.

Come on, SomeGuy. I realize some of what you do is a bit, but much is true. You are way too smart to continually defend this guy. Some of what he represents certainly has merit - distrust of the establishment, skepticism of shady governments, populist rhetoric, etc... But it's nothing more than coincidence. Most of us would like someone to make waves, but deep down, you know this ain't the fuckin' guy. He's a lifelong Democrat/Clinton lover with no principles and no intellectual curiosity. Anything he does that is "good" is simply because everyone gets something right occasionally.

He's basically Brian Scalabrine when Scal would come in and miraculously hit a tough shot... It looks good, sounds good, and makes you feel good, but it's not a strategy to use consistently in the future. In fact, it's almost frightening.

"How can you be so obtuse." This is the fuckin' guy. Only Trump coulda beat Evita. Only Trump can put the brakes on the runaway Leftist Fascist train. Only Trump can try and drain the swamp.
Clean out State, CIA, EPA, Cub Fans, etc.

#oneEyedMan
#peterFinch